Skip to main content
Contributor ⭐
January 2, 2025

Promise to Eliminate Income Tax on Social Security

  • January 2, 2025
  • 18 replies
  • 8571 views

I'm reaching out to encourage everyone to contact their representatives and support President Trump's proposal to eliminate income taxes on Social Security benefits.

Here's why this matters:
Key Points to Consider
Currently, up to 85% of Social Security benefits can be subject to federal income tax1
About 67 million U.S. households receive monthly Social Security benefit checks3
The proposal would primarily help middle-income seniors who currently pay taxes on their benefits
Action Steps
Contact your local congressional representatives
Emphasize support for Trump's plan to remove Social Security benefit taxation
Highlight how this would provide financial relief for seniors
Important Caution
While the proposal sounds appealing, financial experts warn it could potentially harm the long-term sustainability of Social Security. The Congressional Budget Office estimates this tax cut could reduce Social Security revenue by approximately $950 billion between 2026-20353.
Recommended Communication Points
Express support for tax relief for seniors
Request careful consideration of long-term program funding
Ask for transparent analysis of the proposal's financial impact
Let's work together to ensure our voices are heard and our financial security is protected!

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    18 replies

    Conversationalist ⭐⭐
    January 2, 2025

    Here's an idea: Eliminate taxes on SS benefits and tax 100% of the beneficiary's assets (e.g., home, life insurance, savings) upon death. This will recoup the cost of the lost taxes and increase the likelihood that the SS Trust Fund will have enough money to continue to pay living retirees. 

     

    This wouldn't be much different than the federal estate recovery rule, which requires states to put a lien on Medicaid recipients' assets (e.g., home, life insurance, vehicle) to recoup the cost of providing care so taxpayers don't have to shoulder that burden. 

    GailL1
    Community Champion ⭐⭐⭐
    January 2, 2025

    @BalbonisMoleskine 

    I will have to think about that one a bit before replying BUT at least your thinking is moving in the right direction.  

    👍

    IT‘S ALWAYS SOMETHING . . . . .. . . . Roseanne Roseannadanna
    GailL1
    Community Champion ⭐⭐⭐
    January 2, 2025

    @d196684e 

    Would eliminating this tax on benefits be ok with you IF we reduced the benefits that everybody is receiving to make up for this loss in income to the Trust Fund - that is exactly what will happen come around 2030 or so.  OR maybe that reduction in the benefit amount would be built into the Elimination of the Tax on Benefits legislation. 

     

    By all means let’s get rid of the tax on benefits - we would just be losing even MORE money in the Trust Fund causing the time of insolvency to even come much earlier- maybe it will be a 25% reduction instead of closer to 20% - but we can plan ahead - RIGHT?

     

    In 2023, taxes on benefits added $ 50.7 BILLION to the Social Security Trust Fund.  The reason that this was added was to help out with the Trust Fund since we are no  longer taking in enough in FICA taxes to cover benefits thus since 2021 we have been having to pull more and more money out of the Trust Fund reserve to pay benefits.  The number of workers paying into the system has been greatly reduced with the advent of technology.  

    SSA.gov- Trust Fund DATA 

    See table 2 - Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance Trust Funds Income

     

    Would you also support increasing the contribution rate for everybody who is working?  The younger generations might think you are only looking out of yourself.

     

    You could just think of these taxes as paying for a benefit you got while working - mainly the matched contributions paid by your employer for you.

     

    If you say, just remove the tax max cap - I will scream because just doing this isn’t solving the insolvency problem because the tax max cap relates directly to capping the maximum benefit.

    SSA.gov- Contribution and Benefit Base 

     

    Congress  just repealed the Windfall Elimination and Government Pension Offset - Per the CBO this adjustment in benefits for those involved will COST the Trust Fund  $200 BILLION over 10 years - now you want to even do more harm to the Trust Fund by elimination this tax on benefits.

     

    I think I also read that more beneficiary’s DON’T pay taxes on their benefits than those that DO - so I don’t think those that DON’T pay taxes on their benefits will be supportive of pulling an income source from the Trust Fund.

     

    Keep working on reducing the income going into the Trust Fund and we will all have to be tightening our belts.  

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    IT‘S ALWAYS SOMETHING . . . . .. . . . Roseanne Roseannadanna
    Contributor ⭐⭐
    January 12, 2025

    Please post a link to the source of your claim, pertaining to how the income tax we currently are forced to pay on our social security income, that we've earned, will, if that payment is done away with, shrink the fund. 

     

    I submit that we do away with that forced payment, which is an insult to those of us who worked hard all of our lives, AND had the good sense to invest and save so that we have a good income from our investments, to this day.  I strongly suggest that we do away with that tax on our senior incomes, AND do away with the BILLIONS OF DOLLARS we currently dole out to countries that we have no business supporting, monetarily. That saved money will be more than enough to keep the SSA sitting pretty in the years to come. 

    GailL1
    Community Champion ⭐⭐⭐
    January 15, 2025

    @Tonster521 - you are right - what were they thinking?  

    There were even other proposals to fix the formula reviewed at the same time as the Social Security Fairness Act -they rejected it.

    SSA.gov - Equal Treatment of Public Servants Act of 2023  

    They fought this out and dusted it off, and it did the rounds of being discussed in the House in Nob. 2024 - but then decided t just to go ahead and give the benefits going back to 01/2024.

     

    The one teacher that I am working with, already gets a pension of over $ 5500 a month and now she will get her late husband’s Survivors Benefits - even though she has since remarried - but she married AFTER she was over 60 - so she still gets her former husbands Survivors benefits.  

     

    GPO is different than WEP but the newly passed legislation didn’t create any difference in them - they were both REPEALED. - we can only hope that as the rules and processes are written that some smart person working on this aspect of the legislation will say, Whoa - somebody is really getting a bonus.

     

    And if we now repeal the taxation on benefits - something is gonna have to give - We may see the letter addressed to all of the Social Security Beneficiaries saying - We regret to inform you of a serious shortfall, please tighten your belt.

     

     

    IT‘S ALWAYS SOMETHING . . . . .. . . . Roseanne Roseannadanna
    WebWiseWoman
    Community Champion ⭐⭐⭐
    January 28, 2025

    Neil deGrasse Tyson said it best “How sad it must be — believing that scientists, scholars, historians, economists, and journalists have devoted their entire lives to deceive you, while a reality tv star with decades of fraud and exhaustively documented lying is your only beacon of truth and honesty.”

    GailL1
    Community Champion ⭐⭐⭐
    February 9, 2025

    @d196684e 

    You will be happy to know that (2) RepublicanSenators introduced SB 358 last week that changes the limits for taxes on Social Security Benefits.

     

    https://www.marshall.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/senators-marshall-blackburn-introduce-bill-to-reduce-excessive-taxation-on-social-security-benefits/ 

     

    IT‘S ALWAYS SOMETHING . . . . .. . . . Roseanne Roseannadanna