Skip to main content
GailL1
Community Champion ⭐⭐⭐
September 29, 2018

Possible Solution to the Social Security WEP and GPO - Your Thoughts ???

  • September 29, 2018
  • 8 replies
  • 3821 views

First off, I am very sorry that many people seem surprised and shocked over the WEP or GPO if they are affected by either of these when they retire.  On the other hand, I understand why this formula reduction is there and the concept seems fair. 

 

Is the current WEP or GPO reduction formula correct for those whose benefits are being recalculated because of them - I don't know.  I do know that the previous method of calculating benefits for these folks was not right -  so going back to the previous method is really out of the question.  So there either has to be a new formula which will still not give a full benefit or a totally new concept.

 

I have come up with a possible solution and wanted to run it by the folks here to see what you think?

 

Why not give these government  / civil employees, on an individual selection basis,  the option of staying within the Social Security system by allowing the person to pay their own payroll withholding SS tax on their government / civil wages - both parts, employee and employer, the same way a self-employed does it.  Currently this would be 12.4% up to the (2018) taxable wage cap of $128,400 - the cap changes yearly.

 

We cannot ask the government entity (employer) to pay any part of this since they would still be running and contributing to the current pension plan which they have opted to sponsor instead of being within the SS program and I am sure most don't want to give that up.  So it would be up to the government/civil employee to pay both (employee and employer) parts of this tax in order to build their SS benefit but yet not affect their civil servant pension benefit.

 

As an example a government /civil employee who works for a government entity that does NOT participate in the SS system who earns an annual salary of $ 50,000 per year would be paying a Social Security payroll tax of $ 6200 into the system but ALL those wages would also count toward the Social Security benefit when they retire, computed without a WEP formula.

 

As with any retirement system, this would take some thought and planning for not only ones self but any dependent or spouse that could be left as survivors.

 

Perhaps there maybe a way for an involved government / civil employee to go back and pay this tax according to the tax year and receive added benefits - but it would require paying these back payroll taxes which might add up to be a pretty penny depending upon the government/civil salary through the years.

 

Just a thought - what do you think?

 

 

 

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    8 replies

    Contributor ⭐
    August 21, 2024

    The Government Pension Offset is supposed to take away benefits from spouses who have a pension from work from which they did not contribute to FICA. The GPO ignores any time that they were actually dependent on their spouse.  The penalty is only based on the amount of the pension.  This penalizes parents who have stayed out of the workplace to raise their kids. It discriminates agains traditional families. 

    GailL1
    GailL1Author
    Community Champion ⭐⭐⭐
    August 22, 2024

    @bonnced 

    You have lost me -   The GPO is based on the pension amount NOT time worked.

     

    SSA.gov - Government Pension Offset

    IT‘S ALWAYS SOMETHING . . . . .. . . . Roseanne Roseannadanna
    roachme
    Contributor ⭐⭐⭐
    September 22, 2024

    @GailL1 That is an interesting solution that is similar to the federal governments method for including military time as part of the federal retirement system.  Civil service employees can get their military time added to their federal service time by doing a backpay to the federal pension system.  For 4 years military, my wife had to pay over $4000 over time to add her military to her fed service time.  Hers was expensive because she waited until late in her fed career to add the years and that caused the payment to have compounded interest for all the years she waited.  If she'd added the years as soon as she went to work for the Fed, it would've been about $1200.  But the return on investment of paying for the 4 years was an additional 8% of pension income.

     

    For your plan to work, the worker would have to start paying the SS taxes as soon as they started non-SS taxed work or the compounded interest for coming to the party late would be astronomical, as in several hundred thousand dollars by retirement time.  In my wife's case, if she paid the SS taxes at retirement to receive SS, her half alone would've cost $110,000 plus the 35 years interest to receive a SS check for $2900 starting this year.  Not a real good return on investment with a compounded interest cost.  If her teenage years had been admissible for SS her age 62 SS after WEP would've been about $300/mo for a grand total of about $3500 in FICA taxes paid.  She would've gotten it all back in the first year.  Like you said, WEP and GPO are justified, but I think in some cases they are implemented similar to doing surgery with a chainsaw instead of a scalpel. 

    GailL1
    GailL1Author
    Community Champion ⭐⭐⭐
    September 22, 2024

    @roachme  One of my really old post (2018) - had to read it again to remember what scheme I was cooking up.  OH, IF I Were only King.  🤓

     

    It would work IF they were given this choice at the beginning of their government employment where Social Security wasn’t covered.  Yes, a later decision would probably cost them a lot maybe too much for the benefit.  

     

     

    IT‘S ALWAYS SOMETHING . . . . .. . . . Roseanne Roseannadanna
    roachme
    Contributor ⭐⭐⭐
    September 23, 2024

    @GailL1   I thought it was a novel, outside the box, idea that should be acknowledged.  Unfortunately, I don't think a lot of people would buy into it because it would cost them 12.4% for a payout 40-50 years later.  Like for my wife that would've been over $220K total out of her checks for SS on top of her 7% share paid out for the pension.

    roachme
    Contributor ⭐⭐⭐
    January 20, 2025

    Well, now that WEP and GPO are no longer in effect, the SS Trust is going to run dry just that much sooner unless enough people go back to work to make up the new outlay.  It should have been tweaked but never revoked.  My wife was not eligible to receive any SS spousal or survivor benefits as long as the GPO was in place.  Now she is eligible to receive over $1900/mo in spousal benefits from SS.  They say WEP/GPO only affected about 3 million people.  I think that number is grossly underestimated because those are the number receiving reduced SS now.  There are probably several million more, like my wife, who couldn't receive benefits because the GPO eliminated any benefit, both spousal and survivor.  And I believe the SS payout will be much larger than anticipated because the GPO keeps people with pensions over $36K from collecting a SS spousal benefit from spouses with a monthly benefit under $4000.

    I'm actually torn between applying for her spousal and not.  If we do apply, I'll use it to reduce my out of pocket taxes.  It may push me up a tax bracket and 20%-27% of it will go back to the SS and Medicare Trust funds.  I'm eager to see what this year's SS Trustee Report is going to say about when the Trust will run dry and how much the law change is going to cost.

    document.addEventListener('click', function() { setTimeout(function() { var links = document.querySelectorAll('a[href="/member/register"]'); links.forEach(function(link) { link.href = 'https://secure.aarp.org/applications/user/register?promo=GSCOMM'; }); }, 500); }, true);