DOES AARP CARE MORE FOR ANIMALS THAN OUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS?
Judging from past AARP articles such as:
"6 WAYS TO KEEP YOUR PET SAFE WHILE DRIVING"
"HOW TO KEEP YOUR PET HEALTHY FOR LESS MONEY"
"TO THE RESCUE: SAVING ANIMALS FROM DISASTER ZONES"
It becomes clear that AARP cares more for animals than it does for our fellow human beings.
Why do I say this, you might ask?
Because AARP seems to have restricted discussion of the caged human beings in the bug infested, tropical heat of Florida. Humans that are exposed to walking through their own and fellow caged individual's sewage. The ASPCA would not put up with those conditions for canines or felines.
Judging from AARP'S defense of humane actions toward animals noted above VERSUS their restricted conversation of "man's inhumanity to man" in Florida can only lead one to conclude they care more for animals then our fellow human beings.
This comment is not political in any way, shape, or form.
It is the expression that no human being, regardless of who they are or what they have done, should be exposed to these conditions.