I'm deeply distrustful of the whole Rewards operation.
For one, I've gone through more than 400 consecutive Instant Wins and won nothing. NADA.
And why is that? Anyone explain that?
And what about finding out some general information on who's winning the rewards sweepstakes? Is there any attempt on the part of the provider/operator or AARP Rewards to give out some information that explains there are real people winning the sweeps?
AND why can't the provider of AARP Rewards provide me a running total of my cumulative entries into a sweepstake? It used to do that, provide a running total on all my entries, but now it doesn't do that.
As always, I'm deeply skeptical of the people running this thing...
I agree, there is something fishy going on if someone is lucky enough to win repeatedly 20 times in a 3-month period and then continue to win multiple times in later months. Statistically, this would be highly improbable. I haven't won any Instant Wins since the change to 7 days because the odds of winning is so much lower now. I hope AARP will investigate to ensure these repeated wins are really legitimate wins. Limiting the number of monthly daily wins would be a good start. Thanks @ BeachGirl 23 for investigating and alerting AARP admin.
400 consecutive Instant Wins? That's all? I figure I do at least four a day, every day, and I've gone over a year without winning anything. That's over 1,400 attempts! I've asked this question before without answer: When it says 100 cards, is that per eight days, per month, per year, forever,.....? I'm guessing the latter.
@ridgeviewfarm I'm pretty sure it's per week per item. There was no change in the number of instant win rewards, just leaving them up for a week to extract more points from the system and/or to make it look like there were more rewards. The winners' list shows that I'm pretty sure. You have the record for losses so far. I did win some before they changed it to give you less chance of winning....and perhaps before bots took over. I just suspect that given the info that was linked previously. I have no way of knowing except that the odds of one or more individuals winning multiple times are very small.
There has been a lot of dissatisfaction and suspicions aired on this discussion board about the Daily Instant Wins, going back over a year. There was a series of revealing posts on this topic in late Feb. 2021 which can be accessed at the following URL (beginning with the 2nd post):
I also think it is pretty much impossible to win an instant win. I would like to know how the computer generated winning times works. Does the computer pick pick around 14 wins in one day for each of the seven wins? Or does the computer pick 50 in one day for a certain win such as an Amazon card? Or, maybe the computer picks all 100 in one day. Do they spread wins throughout the 24 hours or are all the wins in an eight hour period or some other period of time? I doubt that it would help me win an instant win if I knew more about how the computer generated times actually worked, but it might give me an idea as to why I am not winning. I did win some instant wins before they changed to the seven days. And I have never won a sweepstakes and I generally enter sweepstakes everyday with the maximum entries. Unlucky, I guess.
It seems to be more difficult to win since the change of each Instant Win to last for 7 days. I agree with HokiePoq that there may be something going on if someone is lucky enough to win repeatedly. AARP tech support should investigate if these are legitimate wins and that no fraud is going on.
@Tomsowa I have not won anything since the change to make them last a week, not a day. Everyone is seven times less likely to win, i think. And then there's the issue of the same entity winning repeatedly. Someone called our attention to this a while back. I say entity because I don't think a single individual would be that lucky....a bot more likely. With email "cards" rather than cards mailed to a real address, it made fraud easier. With rewards being electronic, it's my opinion that they need to be members only. That way an address would be linked to the winners. City and state should be listed on the winners' lists like they used to be. Hello World has rolled out the welcome mat for fraud compared to the last operator.
Instant win games are based on random computer generated winning times, so my strategy has been to play at different times on different days and occasionally even spread out my daily entries (i.e. play 2 out of the 7 entries in morning, another 3 in the afternoon and the remaining 2 in the evening etc). I've had some luck doing that.
The rewards program could definitely use some improvements, but IMHO it is still relatively generous and being run with integrity.
I am also very frustrated with the system. I thought it was me. I stumbled onto this thread and now realize that I am in the same boat with everyone else. I actually stopped playing as it felt as though my account was flagged.
I hope things change going forward so everyone has a better chance of winning. If not, maybe they should go back to the way it was before.