AARP Hearing Center
FROM THE ARTICLE.
Older Adults Are Looking for Jobs, but Age Discrimination Hampers the Search
In a Senate hearing, AARP pushes Congress to protect workers from bias
By Miriam Cross, AARP. Published September 04, 2025.
Age discrimination in the workplace can be as blatant as an interviewer probing for an applicantโs age or as subtle as coded terms like โdigital nativeโ in job advertisements.
Older job seekers are often told they are overqualified or have too much experience, and they worry their age will count against them, Nancy LeaMond, AARP chief advocacy and engagement officer, told U.S. Senate lawmakers Sept. 3.
USE LINK BELOW TO READ THE ARTICLE.
https://www.aarp.org/advocacy/age-discrimination-senate-hearing/
Solved! Go to Solution.
LOL She was testifying in front of a group that is largely โover the hillโ themselves and the voting public is taking note of this and some could be even voted out of office based on their age. Would we all be guilty of age discrimination if we decided to vote against them because they are so old, we feel like they are now ineffective in their representation of their constituents?
Yes, I agree with the 2009 Supreme Court decision that a person should have to prove that they were let go or not hired based purely on age discrimination.
I am for giving aptitude test - both physical, mental and tech-wise based on the qualification that are needed for a said job - that should rule out any adverse decisions. 50 is not old anymore, neither is 60 or even older IF those who older are applying for a job has excelled in those areas - physical, mental and tech-wise - and the job calls for the need of one or all of these things.
So who here would want to fly in a plane whose pilot is over the age of mid-sixties or older? I believe FAA guidelines even call for this. They may be able to still do the job just fine but there is added liability. Wouldnโt this also go for someone that say is a commercial bus driver?
Yep, the only way I see around this is to conduct test - physical, mental, knowledge based or tech-wise - depending on what the job entails to see if they can stand up to the criteria for the job against others of any age or sex.
On the other hand, if one is applying for an entry level position and even though they may have lots of relative experience - it is entry level and that is where the pay scale is assigned. Got great credentials - apply for an opening where those skills can be utilized and then receive the applicable pay scale.
I do not know of a company that would discriminate against someone purely because of age IF they can so called โcut the musterโ for the job - physically, mentally, knowledge based and/or tech-wise and they accept the pay scale or negotiate for their worth.
LOL She was testifying in front of a group that is largely โover the hillโ themselves and the voting public is taking note of this and some could be even voted out of office based on their age. Would we all be guilty of age discrimination if we decided to vote against them because they are so old, we feel like they are now ineffective in their representation of their constituents?
Yes, I agree with the 2009 Supreme Court decision that a person should have to prove that they were let go or not hired based purely on age discrimination.
I am for giving aptitude test - both physical, mental and tech-wise based on the qualification that are needed for a said job - that should rule out any adverse decisions. 50 is not old anymore, neither is 60 or even older IF those who older are applying for a job has excelled in those areas - physical, mental and tech-wise - and the job calls for the need of one or all of these things.
So who here would want to fly in a plane whose pilot is over the age of mid-sixties or older? I believe FAA guidelines even call for this. They may be able to still do the job just fine but there is added liability. Wouldnโt this also go for someone that say is a commercial bus driver?
Yep, the only way I see around this is to conduct test - physical, mental, knowledge based or tech-wise - depending on what the job entails to see if they can stand up to the criteria for the job against others of any age or sex.
On the other hand, if one is applying for an entry level position and even though they may have lots of relative experience - it is entry level and that is where the pay scale is assigned. Got great credentials - apply for an opening where those skills can be utilized and then receive the applicable pay scale.
I do not know of a company that would discriminate against someone purely because of age IF they can so called โcut the musterโ for the job - physically, mentally, knowledge based and/or tech-wise and they accept the pay scale or negotiate for their worth.