@NancyV227386
Have no idea of your needs or your health - both will have a bearing on what the premium turns out to be. Term is always the cheapest in premium cost.
I had a 40-year level term policy in place until I reached the age of 73 - then I took a look at my needs at that time - no dependents, no mortgage, no debt, financially OK but don't want to spend on something unnecessary. Insurance as an investment vehicle isn't for me.
So now I have none and that is just fine -
You must figure out what you need -
If a couple has a mortgage and the surviving spouse can't handle it on their own - that's an amount you need to consider. Any other (larger) debt that cannot be liquidated to pretty much satisfy it might also be a consideration depending upon which part of the couple ( or how their estate) is held liable.
But ya gotta be able to afford the premiums or get rid of these debts before retirement. Nobody should really retire with a mortgage.
The need for life insurance is only one part of a financial picture. You don't want to be worth more dead than alive.
So what would be the "need" aspect of the life insurance?
It's Always Something . . . . Roseanna Roseannadanna