Reply
Regular Contributor

GET RID OF THE VULTURES

Medicare for all sounds good to me.  We need to get rid of the health insurance and drug company vultures that prey upon the lower and middle class people of this country and line the pockets of the rich.  I know the rich and their henchmen in our government like to use labels like Socialism to convince people that this kind of stuff is evil.  How about lets start useing labels that really matter.  If something is Right or Good for the vast majority then that is what we need to do rather then worry about meaningless labels like Socialist or Democrat that Trump supporters like to flood the airways with.  Lets worry about what is right and whats good for the vast majority of US citizens.  Vote for candidates that work for the people and not just the rich no matter what party they belong to.  Baby boomers, like myself, need to come out strong while there are still enough of us around to make a difference.  Get smart people!!  Don't let the rich tell you what to do. 

Regular Contributor

I do know something about healthcare in countries that have universal coverage.  My wife was born in Malta and has relatives there who have a universal healthcare system.  I am in constant comunication with some of them through Facebook.  In their case they tell me there are long waits for non lifethreatening conditions but life threatening conditions are treated quickly.  They dot pay anything other then taxes for their healthcare.  My wife's sister waited five years for a knee operation.  I know this is only one example and I don't claim universal healthcare would be the same in this country.  I think medacare for all would involve a lot of changes to medicare as there are still a lot of cost to me with medicare now.  I have been a type one diabetic for forty years and I believe I wouldn't be covered under a Republican health plan.  Just my opinion.

0
Kudos
4157
Views
0 Kudos
5,100 Views
0
Report
Contributor

I am almost 73 and I count. Cardiac high risk.
0 Kudos
5,122 Views
0
Report
Contributor

Amen!

0 Kudos
5,126 Views
0
Report
Conversationalist

Do you think it would be fair to the people who have contributed to Medicare all their lives, while also paying for their other health insurance they had while working, to now pay more in taxes so everybody still working can have the same level of healthcare without paying a comparative share of the burden?

 

When the monthly cost of each person’s premiums for MFA is calculated, will those that have paid all their lives into the system be exempt, until the premiums exceed what they and their employers have previously paid in? Who will pay the premiums for all in the beginning? Starting with new high school grads only, until the people that graduated one year before start paying their share?

 

Don't forget that the contributions to Medicare during our working lives were just for the hospitalization costs.  We continue to pay for Part B, and supplemental insurance to pay for everything else. Now you want us to either pay for your entry into the plan, or risk getting less than we bargained for because the system cannot handle the increase in demand.

 

The only way you can provide health insurance for all is to make it a parallel program based on Medicare, that would allow those who are now retired and dependent on the current system to stay in that system.  Those that are starting out in the new system wouldn’t have anything to do with Medicare as it is. Everyone in between would be in both systems with varying percentages of coverage based on how old they are.  I don’t see any other way it could be implemented in a fair way.  In 40 some years, Medicare would be gone and replaced by the new system, covering everybody.  

0 Kudos
5,746 Views
0
Report
Newbie

I don't really know what can help you, you can try to find something here

0 Kudos
6,166 Views
0
Report
Honored Social Butterfly

Please allow me to ask a very basic question -

 

How do you think we should go from a captalistic / profit motive medical industry - doctors, hospitals, pharma, DME, therapist, transport, institutionalize care, etc., etc. - to one that is based on cost controls and still think that we will not feel any consequences or repercussions????

 

Here is the latest Canada Health Act Annual Report for 2017 - 2018 done by the Minister of Health.

I am just gonna quote (1) of the problems that was revealed in this report -

 

Yes, they have problems - kind of the reverse of ours - people want, what they want, when they want it especially when their health is involved.  So just don't think the grass is always greener.

 

https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/health-system-services/canada-health-ac...

 

Minister's Message:

When I was appointed as federal Minister of Health, the Prime Minister made it clear that I was expected to promote and defend the Canada Health Act, and specifically to eliminate patient charges for services that should be publicly insured. The Canada Health Act, and the values that it represents, form the foundation of our health care system, and much like the foundation of a house, if we allow cracks to form, there is a risk that this building will start to crumble.

 

This is why the Government of Canada has joined the Government of British Columbia in court to defend against a Charter challenge which seeks to dismantle our publicly funded health care system and allow physicians and private clinics to charge patients whatever the market will bear for medically necessary services. This is also why, over the past year, I have been engaging with my provincial and territorial colleagues on ways we can work together to protect Canadians' access to publicly insured services.

 

The Problem  (Medicare is what the Canadian system is called)

For the most part, Medicare works well and patients receive the care they need without having to pay out of pocket. However, in many parts of the country, patients are being charged for diagnostic services, such as MRI or CT scans, at private clinics. If a patient goes to a hospital for the exact same service, they would not be charged. The federal position has always been that patients should not face charges for medically necessary hospital and physician services – this includes diagnostic services – regardless of where the service is provided. Paying to skip the queue for diagnostic services also allows these individuals to be fast-tracked for any follow up care in the public system. This goes against the fundamental principle of access based on need, not on the ability to pay.

 

 

It's Always Something . . . . Roseanna Roseannadanna
0 Kudos
6,428 Views
0
Report
Honored Social Butterfly

Absolutely correct, @bizman1951 !!!!

 

Americans need to wake up to the propaganda being fed us on a daily basis.  And I agree, if something is really advantageous and in the best interest of the majority of Americans, we should move toward that.

 

The old McCarthyism/commie/socialism type stance many politicians are taking right now does NOTHING for the good of the people and only benefits the rich who make their money off of the backs of all of the rest of us!

0 Kudos
6,437 Views
0
Report
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Need to Know

"I downloaded AARP Perks to assist in staying connected and never missing out on a discount!" -LeeshaD341679

AARP Perks

More From AARP