AARP Eye Center
https://www.aarp.org/money/scams-fraud/info-2024/victims-pay-taxes-on-stolen-money.html
I believe that the biggest reason why it was changed is because it got to be a BIG headache for the IRS. People who were โscammedโ didnโt have to prove that they had taken any steps in recovery - they just went from the scam directly to the deduction -
In fact, it got to be kind of ridiculous - letโs take a simple situation as an example. A person buys a product, they are disappointed in its performance and [they] determined they were scammed by buying this product. They take no action to try to remedy the situation - they donโt contact the seller, they donโt try to get their money back on the product, some or all, they donโt report it to their local law enforcement. They didnโt take out protective insurance on the product, they didnโt retain legal council to try to recoup any of the money.
They just went from the so-called scam (or loss) directly to their income tax form as a deduction.
To me, that isnโt right. I am sorry that people lose money to scammers but is it up to each of us to pay MORE in taxes just because they had an unfortunate happening or did nothing to try to correct it or protect themselves from it.
Some people are just too trusting, too gullible, some are native, some just donโt seek guidance - why should other taxpayers suffer the consequences for their actions?
If they are successful by some means in recovering some of their scammed losses, should they pay taxes on these recovered monies?
What about gambling losses ? Should we all be able to deduct our gambling losses be that on some sports event, or horse/dog racing or even scratch offs and playing lottery games?
I guess we all have different ways at looking at things perhaps based on our own situation. This one is to me, really out in left field. Where is the logic?
"I downloaded AARP Perks to assist in staying connected and never missing out on a discount!" -LeeshaD341679