Reply
Highlighted
Conversationalist

Re: tRump Proposal = Millions Losing Food Stamps - SNAP

422 Views
Message 31 of 40

@john258 wrote:

All should keep in mind Trump is doing things like this to every program, and every part of the Fed. Govt. He is hurting all of us and we do not even know it. It will take the next President 4 years to sort all this out and correct it, and that is why there will be no big programs started in the next 4 years. Trump must go in 2020.


Trump started the space force and now we are on track to get to Mars before 2024.

“If you’re good at something, never do it for free.”
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Conversationalist

Re: tRump Proposal = Millions Losing Food Stamps - SNAP

434 Views
Message 32 of 40

@KidBoy2 wrote:
Trump administration proposal could cause millions to lose food stamps

I hope that does not happen.

FWIW....Our local food bank is a big organization with a large paid staff. They are advertising for more people to use the food bank .. job security? The director makes 80k a year.

That said I give money every month to our state food bank, the Salvation Army, American Red Cross, and the Poverello Shelter. I also at times give to other causes.

Hopefully this motivates them to get a job.

“If you’re good at something, never do it for free.”
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: tRump Proposal = Millions Losing Food Stamps - SNAP

445 Views
Message 33 of 40
Trump administration proposal could cause millions to lose food stamps

I hope that does not happen.

FWIW....Our local food bank is a big organization with a large paid staff. They are advertising for more people to use the food bank .. job security? The director makes 80k a year.

That said I give money every month to our state food bank, the Salvation Army, American Red Cross, and the Poverello Shelter. I also at times give to other causes.
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: tRump Proposal = Millions Losing Food Stamps - SNAP

433 Views
Message 34 of 40
ManicProgressive posted..

But but but.....we have to stop helping the poor so we can help the rich.....

==============================================================

We do...says who?
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: tRump Proposal = Millions Losing Food Stamps - SNAP

425 Views
Message 35 of 40
He's trying to pay for all of his golf trips by cutting food stamps. tRump supporters should like that.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Link please!
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: tRump Proposal = Millions Losing Food Stamps - SNAP

415 Views
Message 36 of 40

All should keep in mind Trump is doing things like this to every program, and every part of the Fed. Govt. He is hurting all of us and we do not even know it. It will take the next President 4 years to sort all this out and correct it, and that is why there will be no big programs started in the next 4 years. Trump must go in 2020.

Report Inappropriate Content
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: tRump Proposal = Millions Losing Food Stamps - SNAP

436 Views
Message 37 of 40

2025 is coming fast. We'll see how they feel when their tax cuts disappear but the tax cuts for the rich and for businesses don't.

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: tRump Proposal = Millions Losing Food Stamps - SNAP

445 Views
Message 38 of 40

@ManicProgressive wrote:

But but but.....we have to stop helping the poor so we can help the rich.....

 

makes perfect sense. 🤷🏼‍♀️


He's trying to pay for all of his golf trips by cutting food stamps. tRump supporters should like that. Smiley Frustrated


"The only thing that man learns from history is that man learns nothing from history."
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: tRump Proposal = Millions Losing Food Stamps - SNAP

422 Views
Message 39 of 40

But but but.....we have to stop helping the poor so we can help the rich.....

 

makes perfect sense. 🤷🏼‍♀️

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

tRump Proposal = Millions Losing Food Stamps - SNAP

411 Views
Message 40 of 40

 

Trump administration proposal could cause millions to lose food stamps
“SNAP is related to hunger and getting people the nutrition they need,” one food bank representative said. “Food shouldn’t be a luxury.”
Image: Food bank in New York City
Food banks should help those who fall outside the safety net of food security, not replace the safety net, one advocate said.John Moore / Getty Images file
 
 
Nov. 30, 2019, 3:27 AM CST
By Phil McCausland

 

Three proposed rule changes by the Trump administration could cause millions of poor people to lose access to food stamps and decrease the size of the benefit for millions more.

Over the past year, the Department of Agriculture proposed three changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP or food stamps. The new rules create stricter work requirements for program eligibility, cap deductions for utility allowances and “reform” the way 40 states automatically enroll families into SNAP when they receive other forms of federal aid.

 

A study by the Urban Institute released this week examined the three rules in combination for the first time and found that 3.7 million fewer people would receive SNAP in an average month, 2.2 million households would see their average monthly benefits drop by $127, more than 3 million others would see an average drop of $37 per month, and 982,000 students would lose access to free or reduced lunches.

“What we found is that overall the three proposed changes would reduce the number of households participating in SNAP by about 11 percent if this was implemented in 2018," said Laura Wheaton, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute who conducted the study. "It’s about a 9.4 percent reduction in the number of people participating and about an 8 percent reduction in overall benefits.”

 

Critics and experts say that would be antithetical to the program's goals to address food insecurity in the United States.

Craig Gundersen, an agricultural and consumer economics professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who has studied the program for more than two decades, said that about a million people could become food insecure because of the change. He added that 50 percent of those 3.7 million SNAP beneficiaries were already food insecure despite the assistance.

The changes, he said, would put many Americans in a worse position, increasing hunger and health issues. Each additional adult who becomes food insecure sees an additional $2,000 in healthcare costs, Gundersen explained.

"The essential goal of the program is to mitigate hunger and its consequences in the United States,” he said. "Anything that impedes SNAP of doing that is very problematic as it leads to food insecurity in our country."

The USDA, meanwhile, estimates that the changes would reduce the SNAP budget by about $4.2 billion.

 

Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue defended the work requirements in a USA Today column, emphasizing that it would save taxpayer dollars.

“At USDA, our informal motto is ‘Do Right and Feed Everyone,’” Perdue wrote. “With these proposed improvements, we will ‘do right’ by the taxpayers and restore the dignity of work to the able-bodied who receive SNAP benefits. And, we will ‘feed everyone’ by ensuring the health and stability of SNAP for those who truly need it.”

All of the new rules have gone through a comment period with the changes to utilities currently taking feedback until Monday. Tens of thousands of people have already responded, with most providing negative responses.

 

The latest rule change proposed by the Trump administration would cause millions of people to take smaller deductions for shelter and utility costs, which are considered when a person applies for SNAP benefits. Critics say that would force people to choose between buying food and paying for housing.

It could also create a steeper financial cliff for some beneficiaries. Those in danger of losing access to SNAP might be discouraged from working because the new calculation would put them in a higher income bracket, causing them to lose access, Gundersen explained

“On the one hand they want to encourage people to work, but on the other they would be taking away that incentive,” Gundersen said.

But the main issue is that SNAP is not intended to be a work program in the first place, Gundersen said, but instead aimed to address food insecurity within the United States.

As it operates now, SNAP does not discourage people from participating in the labor market, he said.

"There are some assistance programs that do discourage people to work, but this is not one of them," Gundersen said, adding that what lawmakers should be asking is: "What makes this program work so well and why does it work well as compared to other programs?"

These new rules also have advocates in states like Nevada worried. Nevada could see up to 22 percent of recipients lose access to food stamps, which could be devastating in a place where 12.3 percent of households face food insecurity, according to the USDA.

Related

“SNAP is related to hunger and getting people the nutrition they need,” said Jocelyn Lantrip, the communications director at Food Bank of Northern Nevada. “Food shouldn’t be a luxury.”

With a tech boom raising income levels but not enough to cover rising housing costs, Lantrip said that these changes could create further food insecurity issues, which remain close to the levels that the Food Bank of Northern Nevada saw during the recession.

 

At the height of the recession, Lantrip said her food bank helped 103,000 people per month. Now, during a period of perceived economic stability, she said they are helping 91,000.

Food banks like hers wouldn’t be able to accommodate for the needs of an additional 196,000 people, which is the number in Nevada who would likely need help accessing food if these rules were to go into effect, Lantrip said.

“That’s really hard for food banks to keep up with if you have that kind of decline in benefits,” she said. “We support people if they fall outside of the safety net, but we can’t replace the safety net as a food bank. We’re spinning our wheels already, because when unemployment is low people assume hunger is low, but we’re just helping more working poor than before.”

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-administration-proposal-could-cause-millions-lose-food-st...


"The only thing that man learns from history is that man learns nothing from history."
Report Inappropriate Content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Top Authors