Reply
Honored Social Butterfly

image of a black man

https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/9/8/16270040/trump-clinton-supporters-racist

 

Study: Trump fans are much angrier about housing assistance when they see an image of a black man

 

In contrast, Clinton supporters seemed relatively unmoved by racial cues.

 

All it takes to reduce support for housing assistance among Donald Trump supporters is exposure to an image of a black man.

 

That’s the takeaway from a new study by researchers Matthew Luttig, Christopher Federico, and Howard Lavine, set to be published in Research & Politics. In a randomized survey experiment, the trio of researchers exposed respondents to images of either a white or black man. They found that when exposed to the image of a black man, white Trump supporters were less likely to back a federal mortgage aid program. Favorability toward Trump was a key measure for how strong this effect was.

 

 

Exploiting ingrained racism is the Republican way.

Honored Social Butterfly


@gruffstuff wrote:

https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/9/8/16270040/trump-clinton-supporters-racist

 

Study: Trump fans are much angrier about housing assistance when they see an image of a black man

 

In contrast, Clinton supporters seemed relatively unmoved by racial cues.

 

All it takes to reduce support for housing assistance among Donald Trump supporters is exposure to an image of a black man.

 

That’s the takeaway from a new study by researchers Matthew Luttig, Christopher Federico, and Howard Lavine, set to be published in Research & Politics. In a randomized survey experiment, the trio of researchers exposed respondents to images of either a white or black man. They found that when exposed to the image of a black man, white Trump supporters were less likely to back a federal mortgage aid program. Favorability toward Trump was a key measure for how strong this effect was.

 

 

Exploiting ingrained racism is the Republican way.


The mind reading ability of this poster is amazing.

 

I see people.  You seem to see Black or White people.

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
0 Kudos
548 Views
4
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@jimc91 wrote:

@gruffstuff wrote:

https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/9/8/16270040/trump-clinton-supporters-racist

 

Study: Trump fans are much angrier about housing assistance when they see an image of a black man

 

In contrast, Clinton supporters seemed relatively unmoved by racial cues.

 

All it takes to reduce support for housing assistance among Donald Trump supporters is exposure to an image of a black man.

 

That’s the takeaway from a new study by researchers Matthew Luttig, Christopher Federico, and Howard Lavine, set to be published in Research & Politics. In a randomized survey experiment, the trio of researchers exposed respondents to images of either a white or black man. They found that when exposed to the image of a black man, white Trump supporters were less likely to back a federal mortgage aid program. Favorability toward Trump was a key measure for how strong this effect was.

 

 

Exploiting ingrained racism is the Republican way.


The mind reading ability of this poster is amazing.

 

I see people.  You seem to see Black or White people.


But then seeing what is someone's race is not racism. You are welcome to try and prove differently.


Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history.
Honored Social Butterfly

jim, you are making a good point. Some of us see people and others see race. The latter is a devastating form of racism. I have a hard time thinking that intelligent people can't see that. So I'm convinced that when one takes the word "see" and acts like it is a purely visual thing and another says something along the lines of, "Yeah but you support the Kluxers" - I can't help they are playing games to cover the reality of the sort of racism we are talking about.

 

A while back I posted an example that got nothing back but insults. When you assign a student to a school because of his race under segregation, that is racism. When you assign a student to a school because of his race under integration, that is busing.

 

So, assigning based on race is either good or bad depending on what they say.

0 Kudos
490 Views
0
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@ChasKy53 wrote:

@jimc91 wrote:

@gruffstuff wrote:

https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/9/8/16270040/trump-clinton-supporters-racist

 

Study: Trump fans are much angrier about housing assistance when they see an image of a black man

 

In contrast, Clinton supporters seemed relatively unmoved by racial cues.

 

All it takes to reduce support for housing assistance among Donald Trump supporters is exposure to an image of a black man.

 

That’s the takeaway from a new study by researchers Matthew Luttig, Christopher Federico, and Howard Lavine, set to be published in Research & Politics. In a randomized survey experiment, the trio of researchers exposed respondents to images of either a white or black man. They found that when exposed to the image of a black man, white Trump supporters were less likely to back a federal mortgage aid program. Favorability toward Trump was a key measure for how strong this effect was.

 

 

Exploiting ingrained racism is the Republican way.


The mind reading ability of this poster is amazing.

 

I see people.  You seem to see Black or White people.


But then seeing what is someone's race is not racism. You are welcome to try and prove differently.


Why would any person want or need to?  The sooner we as people focus on our similarities rather than the differences like skin color, the better our world becomes.  Someone had a tag line here talking about learning from history...  Sound advice don't you think?  We don't need to repeat history, just learn from it.  We (people of the planet) are all created in the image of GOD.  I see that as a really good thing.

 

Food for thought moving in the direction of a better world for our kids and grandkids...

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
0 Kudos
529 Views
1
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@jimc91 wrote:

@ChasKy53 wrote:

@jimc91 wrote:

@gruffstuff wrote:

https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/9/8/16270040/trump-clinton-supporters-racist

 

Study: Trump fans are much angrier about housing assistance when they see an image of a black man

 

In contrast, Clinton supporters seemed relatively unmoved by racial cues.

 

All it takes to reduce support for housing assistance among Donald Trump supporters is exposure to an image of a black man.

 

That’s the takeaway from a new study by researchers Matthew Luttig, Christopher Federico, and Howard Lavine, set to be published in Research & Politics. In a randomized survey experiment, the trio of researchers exposed respondents to images of either a white or black man. They found that when exposed to the image of a black man, white Trump supporters were less likely to back a federal mortgage aid program. Favorability toward Trump was a key measure for how strong this effect was.

 

 

Exploiting ingrained racism is the Republican way.


The mind reading ability of this poster is amazing.

 

I see people.  You seem to see Black or White people.


But then seeing what is someone's race is not racism. You are welcome to try and prove differently.


Why would any person want or need to?  The sooner we as people focus on our similarities rather than the differences like skin color, the better our world becomes.  Someone had a tag line here talking about learning from history...  Sound advice don't you think?  We don't need to repeat history, just learn from it.  We (people of the planet) are all created in the image of GOD.  I see that as a really good thing.

 

Food for thought moving in the direction of a better world for our kids and grandkids...

 

 

 


In a sense Jim you are correct. But you dont support the groups that really mean it because they will turn things upside down. real equality in justice, econimics, education, and opportunity are items the right will fight to PREVENT. The question is, for being supposedly color blind, why?

 

So it begins.
Honored Social Butterfly

Simply studying the history of our country shows the rich white men oppressing the poor and anyone of a different skin color than them, facts that cannot be denied.

 

Studying labor history in this country shows the same. Heck the rich whites imported the Chinese to build the railroad and the sit down strike (protest) by the Chines and others was one of the first 'strikes'.

 

Even the Constitution was written with rich (white) land owners being the only ones who could vote. 'rich white land owners' back then were 'rich white males'.

 

Sure, the slaves were freed. Women and blacks gained the right to vote. We even have the equal rights laws passed in the early sixties. We wouldn't have to have laws against discrimination/oppression if there weren't so many willing to do the discriminating/oppressing.

 

Unions were formed to stop oppression and discrimination.  Unions fought for equal rights for all. It was working, so the grand ole' Republicans started pumping dollars into getting RTW laws passed on the state level to weaken and destroy unions.

 

Just studying the long history of labor in America is an eye opener about the roots of racism and sexism and it's long history in America.

 

Many deny history for different reasons, some because they see nothing wrong with how it was and yearn for it to return.


Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history.
Honored Social Butterfly


@ChasKy53 wrote:

Simply studying the history of our country shows the rich white men oppressing the poor and anyone of a different skin color than them, facts that cannot be denied.

 

Studying labor history in this country shows the same. Heck the rich whites imported the Chinese to build the railroad and the sit down strike (protest) by the Chines and others was one of the first 'strikes'.

 

Even the Constitution was written with rich (white) land owners being the only ones who could vote. 'rich white land owners' back then were 'rich white males'.

 

Sure, the slaves were freed. Women and blacks gained the right to vote. We even have the equal rights laws passed in the early sixties. We wouldn't have to have laws against discrimination/oppression if there weren't so many willing to do the discriminating/oppressing.

 

Unions were formed to stop oppression and discrimination.  Unions fought for equal rights for all. It was working, so the grand ole' Republicans started pumping dollars into getting RTW laws passed on the state level to weaken and destroy unions.

 

Just studying the long history of labor in America is an eye opener about the roots of racism and sexism and it's long history in America.

 

Many deny history for different reasons, some because they see nothing wrong with how it was and yearn for it to return.


Our history does show us to be imperfect. The question arises, what do we do - trash the whole thing and start over?? If not, our government and our laws will continue to be the product of those "rich white men".

 

Since you brought up RTW again - how can one demand the right to organize while denying the right to not organize and call that "fair"?

0 Kudos
458 Views
7
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@rk9152 wrote:

@ChasKy53 wrote:

Simply studying the history of our country shows the rich white men oppressing the poor and anyone of a different skin color than them, facts that cannot be denied.

 

Studying labor history in this country shows the same. Heck the rich whites imported the Chinese to build the railroad and the sit down strike (protest) by the Chines and others was one of the first 'strikes'.

 

Even the Constitution was written with rich (white) land owners being the only ones who could vote. 'rich white land owners' back then were 'rich white males'.

 

Sure, the slaves were freed. Women and blacks gained the right to vote. We even have the equal rights laws passed in the early sixties. We wouldn't have to have laws against discrimination/oppression if there weren't so many willing to do the discriminating/oppressing.

 

Unions were formed to stop oppression and discrimination.  Unions fought for equal rights for all. It was working, so the grand ole' Republicans started pumping dollars into getting RTW laws passed on the state level to weaken and destroy unions.

 

Just studying the long history of labor in America is an eye opener about the roots of racism and sexism and it's long history in America.

 

Many deny history for different reasons, some because they see nothing wrong with how it was and yearn for it to return.


Our history does show us to be imperfect. The question arises, what do we do - trash the whole thing and start over?? If not, our government and our laws will continue to be the product of those "rich white men".

 

Since you brought up RTW again - how can one demand the right to organize while denying the right to not organize and call that "fair"?


Over time, when our Congress represented 'The people', passed amendments giving all the right to vote, equal rights, and to organize into labor unions, our country prospered and a larger amount of the whole shared in it. That wasn't "trashing the whole thing".  As the 1% and the Corporations took over our POLs with their billions in campaign finance and lobbying, things started progressing backwards towards serfdom again. Their campaign to weaken unions through RTW laws disassembled a united labor force in America which gave working citizens a large voice in Washington.

 

Workers always had the right to organize or "the right not to organize" through a majority vote of the workforce, based on pure democratic principles. Going back to that would 'make America great again'.


Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history.
Honored Social Butterfly

Chas the magazine In These Times has an article about the wagner act. It says FDR got it wrong establishing it under the 14th amendment, the commerce clause...because courts will rule in favor of not hurting commerce. the AFL CIO wanted it under the 13th amendment..anti slavery. food for thought is all.
So it begins.
Honored Social Butterfly


@ChasKy53 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@ChasKy53 wrote:

Simply studying the history of our country shows the rich white men oppressing the poor and anyone of a different skin color than them, facts that cannot be denied.

 

Studying labor history in this country shows the same. Heck the rich whites imported the Chinese to build the railroad and the sit down strike (protest) by the Chines and others was one of the first 'strikes'.

 

Even the Constitution was written with rich (white) land owners being the only ones who could vote. 'rich white land owners' back then were 'rich white males'.

 

Sure, the slaves were freed. Women and blacks gained the right to vote. We even have the equal rights laws passed in the early sixties. We wouldn't have to have laws against discrimination/oppression if there weren't so many willing to do the discriminating/oppressing.

 

Unions were formed to stop oppression and discrimination.  Unions fought for equal rights for all. It was working, so the grand ole' Republicans started pumping dollars into getting RTW laws passed on the state level to weaken and destroy unions.

 

Just studying the long history of labor in America is an eye opener about the roots of racism and sexism and it's long history in America.

 

Many deny history for different reasons, some because they see nothing wrong with how it was and yearn for it to return.


Our history does show us to be imperfect. The question arises, what do we do - trash the whole thing and start over?? If not, our government and our laws will continue to be the product of those "rich white men".

 

Since you brought up RTW again - how can one demand the right to organize while denying the right to not organize and call that "fair"?


Over time, when our Congress represented 'The people', passed amendments giving all the right to vote, equal rights, and to organize into labor unions, our country prospered and a larger amount of the whole shared in it. That wasn't "trashing the whole thing".  As the 1% and the Corporations took over our POLs with their billions in campaign finance and lobbying, things started progressing backwards towards serfdom again. Their campaign to weaken unions through RTW laws disassembled a united labor force in America which gave working citizens a large voice in Washington.
Yet they are acting under the Constitution written by those "rich white men". So, besides complaining, if not totally trashed, what??

 

Workers always had the right to organize or "the right not to organize" through a majority vote of the workforce, based on pure democratic principles. Going back to that would 'make America great again'.

And that is why we are a Republic, we also respect the rights of the minority. 


 

0 Kudos
530 Views
2
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@rk9152 wrote:

@ChasKy53 wrote:

 


Over time, when our Congress represented 'The people', passed amendments giving all the right to vote, equal rights, and to organize into labor unions, our country prospered and a larger amount of the whole shared in it. That wasn't "trashing the whole thing".  As the 1% and the Corporations took over our POLs with their billions in campaign finance and lobbying, things started progressing backwards towards serfdom again. Their campaign to weaken unions through RTW laws disassembled a united labor force in America which gave working citizens a large voice in Washington.
Yet they are acting under the Constitution written by those "rich white men". So, besides complaining, if not totally trashed, what??

 

The Constitution has been amended many times since the "rich white men" wrote it. 'amended to better reflect the needs of society' rather than just "rich white men". You should have read closer and you would have noticed this.

 

Workers always had the right to organize or "the right not to organize" through a majority vote of the workforce, based on pure democratic principles. Going back to that would 'make America great again'.

And that is why we are a Republic, we also respect the rights of the minority. 

 

The minority in any democratic vote, even in a 'Republic',  accepts the outcome and ruling of that vote. I guess you would like to "totally trash that"?


 


 


Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history.
0 Kudos
536 Views
1
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@ChasKy53 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@ChasKy53 wrote:

 


Over time, when our Congress represented 'The people', passed amendments giving all the right to vote, equal rights, and to organize into labor unions, our country prospered and a larger amount of the whole shared in it. That wasn't "trashing the whole thing".  As the 1% and the Corporations took over our POLs with their billions in campaign finance and lobbying, things started progressing backwards towards serfdom again. Their campaign to weaken unions through RTW laws disassembled a united labor force in America which gave working citizens a large voice in Washington.
Yet they are acting under the Constitution written by those "rich white men". So, besides complaining, if not totally trashed, what??

 

The Constitution has been amended many times since the "rich white men" wrote it. 'amended to better reflect the needs of society' rather than just "rich white men". You should have read closer and you would have noticed this.

 

Workers always had the right to organize or "the right not to organize" through a majority vote of the workforce, based on pure democratic principles. Going back to that would 'make America great again'.

And that is why we are a Republic, we also respect the rights of the minority. 

 

The minority in any democratic vote, even in a 'Republic',  accepts the outcome and ruling of that vote. I guess you would like to "totally trash that"?


 Yes, in our form of government the workers accept the fact that now we have a union in this factory. To join or not to join is the right of the individual.

 

But, getting back to your history of the faults with our nation - what is your solution for that document written by those "rich old white men"??


 

0 Kudos
548 Views
0
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@rk9152 wrote:

@ChasKy53 wrote:

Simply studying the history of our country shows the rich white men oppressing the poor and anyone of a different skin color than them, facts that cannot be denied.

 

Studying labor history in this country shows the same. Heck the rich whites imported the Chinese to build the railroad and the sit down strike (protest) by the Chines and others was one of the first 'strikes'.

 

Even the Constitution was written with rich (white) land owners being the only ones who could vote. 'rich white land owners' back then were 'rich white males'.

 

Sure, the slaves were freed. Women and blacks gained the right to vote. We even have the equal rights laws passed in the early sixties. We wouldn't have to have laws against discrimination/oppression if there weren't so many willing to do the discriminating/oppressing.

 

Unions were formed to stop oppression and discrimination.  Unions fought for equal rights for all. It was working, so the grand ole' Republicans started pumping dollars into getting RTW laws passed on the state level to weaken and destroy unions.

 

Just studying the long history of labor in America is an eye opener about the roots of racism and sexism and it's long history in America.

 

Many deny history for different reasons, some because they see nothing wrong with how it was and yearn for it to return.


Our history does show us to be imperfect. The question arises, what do we do - trash the whole thing and start over?? If not, our government and our laws will continue to be the product of those "rich white men".

 

Since you brought up RTW again - how can one demand the right to organize while denying the right to not organize and call that "fair"?


Good idea - Alt Right, BLM, KKK, antifa and everyone else are all entitled - some formally organized, and some not - that under the law have absolutely equal rights to organize, demonstrate and speak freely and publicly about their perceptions regarding their opposition...

Freedom of speech doesn't include drowning out or shouting down a speaker - but it does permit heckling, use of vile epithets, and does include the constitutionally permitted free speech display of the middle finger in opposition to a speaker. 

 

Isn't it a shame the incredibly stupid trump ran his rallys as he did?

 

Anyone who attacks a person who is lawfully and constitutionally displaying a middle finger in opposition to a speaker is guilty of criminal breach of law - and should spend some time in jail considering their criminal conduct...

 

Equality under the law...

 

Remember - there have been more than just a couple of instances in which the ACLU argued in favor of - and won - court decisions granting the KKK and other racist groups to demonstrate...

That sword cuts in both directions, you know...

44>dolt45
Honored Social Butterfly


@alferdpacker wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@ChasKy53 wrote:

Simply studying the history of our country shows the rich white men oppressing the poor and anyone of a different skin color than them, facts that cannot be denied.

 

Studying labor history in this country shows the same. Heck the rich whites imported the Chinese to build the railroad and the sit down strike (protest) by the Chines and others was one of the first 'strikes'.

 

Even the Constitution was written with rich (white) land owners being the only ones who could vote. 'rich white land owners' back then were 'rich white males'.

 

Sure, the slaves were freed. Women and blacks gained the right to vote. We even have the equal rights laws passed in the early sixties. We wouldn't have to have laws against discrimination/oppression if there weren't so many willing to do the discriminating/oppressing.

 

Unions were formed to stop oppression and discrimination.  Unions fought for equal rights for all. It was working, so the grand ole' Republicans started pumping dollars into getting RTW laws passed on the state level to weaken and destroy unions.

 

Just studying the long history of labor in America is an eye opener about the roots of racism and sexism and it's long history in America.

 

Many deny history for different reasons, some because they see nothing wrong with how it was and yearn for it to return.


Our history does show us to be imperfect. The question arises, what do we do - trash the whole thing and start over?? If not, our government and our laws will continue to be the product of those "rich white men".

 

Since you brought up RTW again - how can one demand the right to organize while denying the right to not organize and call that "fair"?


Good idea - Alt Right, BLM, KKK, antifa and everyone else are all entitled - some formally organized, and some not - that under the law have absolutely equal rights to organize, demonstrate and speak freely and publicly about their perceptions regarding their opposition...

Freedom of speech doesn't include drowning out or shouting down a speaker - but it does permit heckling, use of vile epithets, and does include the constitutionally permitted free speech display of the middle finger in opposition to a speaker. 

 

Isn't it a shame the incredibly stupid trump ran his rallys as he did?

 

Anyone who attacks a person who is lawfully and constitutionally displaying a middle finger in opposition to a speaker is guilty of criminal breach of law - and should spend some time in jail considering their criminal conduct...

 

Equality under the law...

 

Remember - there have been more than just a couple of instances in which the ACLU argued in favor of - and won - court decisions granting the KKK and other racist groups to demonstrate...

That sword cuts in both directions, you know...


By golly, that was one big bulletin. Gotta put the reading glasses to see all that stuff below the thumb tack.

0 Kudos
412 Views
0
Report
Honored Social Butterfly

I'd like to learn more about imagery, Mlseker, so if you (or anyone else) have any resources, I'd love to read them.

 

 

Honored Social Butterfly


@NerdyMom wrote:

I'd like to learn more about imagery, Mlseker, so if you (or anyone else) have any resources, I'd love to read them.

 

 


Early labor history is FASCINATING. racist unions, non racist unions, strikers being murdered by the feds to force them to work..

 

Interesting the least racist, most gender equal union was put down by the feds.. the IWW.

 Eugene Debs

 PBS has a doc on MINERS..dont remember the name. Its a gret portrait of Mother Jones as an organizer. It features the Blair Mountain War, one of the few out and out gun battles to get a lot of film. 

There is good stuff on the strike at Carnagie Steel.

Felts-baldwin and Pinkerton were usually the hired thugs that killed strikers

Brothers in Arms ( netflix or amazon worth the money) the story of the Reuther Brothers and the UAW until Nixon had Reuther killed in 72.

look on you tube for  documentry called Wobblies, its on amazon for pay but the wobs usually mnage to keep it up on you tube.

Almost anything on WWI. that was the defineing moment for todays world, imperialism and cpitalism. Blood for oil is on netflix i think, is kind of shoddy but the info stands.

 

Read Howard Zinn before his books are all banned..that process has stepped up since his death. I hd to settle down a while after i read his first part of the History of the US..from the losers side..losers being us. It has extensive detail on the beginning of racism on North America, fostered by Law, Big Money, and the Church.

 

The howard Zinn was an eye opener. once you read it, you will see why its getting banned. it should be taught in grade school. 

So it begins.
Honored Social Butterfly

@MIseker thanks for the sources! I'll check them out.

Honored Social Butterfly

I tried to get into imagery on another thread but I think someones brains were too small to relate.

But yes, thats how it works. Show 14 black looters repeatedly nationwide and white michiganders in suburban Detroit will stay with Trump. It really is that simple, and the simple minded dont get it. they never worry about who is ( imagery : pschyodelic animation) opening the top of their head and pumping a truckload of manure in, top line of it showing thru their eyes ( that sparkle, watching dancing looters carrying tvs and white women) , BIG BROTHER logo in the corner of their tv as they drool on their remote...Keep on truckin
So it begins.
Honored Social Butterfly


@MIseker wrote:
I tried to get into imagery on another thread but I think someones brains were too small to relate.

But yes, thats how it works. Show 14 black looters repeatedly nationwide and white michiganders in suburban Detroit will stay with Trump. It really is that simple, and the simple minded dont get it. they never worry about who is ( imagery : pschyodelic animation) opening the top of their head and pumping a truckload of manure in, top line of it showing thru their eyes ( that sparkle, watching dancing looters carrying tvs and white women) , BIG BROTHER logo in the corner of their tv as they drool on their remote...Keep on truckin

Again, the racist prism of the left raises it's ugly head. If you mean the Carlson report, was it shown repeatedly in Michigan? Or is that a "vision" that supports your "racist" preconception?

 

And then more of the imagined imagery - TVs and white women.

 

With all these thoughts running through your brain I guess it is understandable that you think others are equally racist. That allows you to say, "Yes, but I have white guilt, so I am more noble". When in reality, those are your visions, not everyone's.

0 Kudos
456 Views
10
Report
Honored Social Butterfly

rk, you need to be honest with yourself and everybody else. Fox has become a never-ending Willie Horton ad, constantly implying Black=Bad and feeding the Republican dogma of racism.

 

Black people get tired of being shot dead by police, suddenly that discontent is RACIST.

 

Rioting happens in many neighborhoods, but only the black ones get air time.

 

More air time for Birthers than moderate Republicans during the entire Obama Administration.

 

Republicans accept support from Nazi's, the KKK and the POTUS puts the biggest media supporter of the Alt-Right in the Whitehouse as his top advisor, and Fox says NOTHING.

 

Polling places in black communities get closed by the hundreds, but the only stories about vote suppression feature pictures of a single group calling itself the New Black Panthers.

 

So show the negative - Fox reporting uplifting stories about blacks who aren't neo-Republicans who sound more than a little racist themselves.

 

 

Honored Social Butterfly


@Olderscout66 wrote:

rk, you need to be honest with yourself and everybody else. Fox has become a never-ending Willie Horton ad, constantly implying Black=Bad and feeding the Republican dogma of racism.

While that is not true, I can see why you might see it that way through your racism prism. Since the marching orders of the radical left is, "Any one who disagrees with us is a racist" it is only natural. Your Republican comment above is a perfect example.

 

Black people get tired of being shot dead by police, suddenly that discontent is RACIST.

Do they not get tired of being shot dead by their neighbors? 7 dead , 35 shot Labor Day weekend in Chicago.

 

Rioting happens in many neighborhoods, but only the black ones get air time.

Possibly you have stats, not just biases to offer.

 

More air time for Birthers than moderate Republicans during the entire Obama Administration.

You will, no doubt be offering proof. Surely not just another on of "those" facts.

 

Republicans accept support from Nazi's, the KKK and the POTUS puts the biggest media supporter of the Alt-Right in the Whitehouse as his top advisor, and Fox says NOTHING.

Would you like Fox news in charge of White House staffing??

 

Polling places in black communities get closed by the hundreds, but the only stories about vote suppression feature pictures of a single group calling itself the New Black Panthers.

Again - proof of the closings? Actually, wherever I have lived, polling place schedules are constantly changing their schedules based on past demand. But, naturally, if the normal course of events occurs in  a black neighborhood, that becomes "racism" through the racist's prism.

 

So show the negative - Fox reporting uplifting stories about blacks who aren't neo-Republicans who sound more than a little racist themselves.

Again - that pesky prism.

 

 


 

0 Kudos
509 Views
1
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@rk9152 wrote:

@Olderscout66 wrote:

rk, you need to be honest with yourself and everybody else. Fox has become a never-ending Willie Horton ad, constantly implying Black=Bad and feeding the Republican dogma of racism.

While that is not true, I can see why you might see it that way through your racism prism. Since the marching orders of the radical left is, "Any one who disagrees with us is a racist" it is only natural. Your Republican comment above is a perfect example.

 

Black people get tired of being shot dead by police, suddenly that discontent is RACIST.

Do they not get tired of being shot dead by their neighbors? 7 dead , 35 shot Labor Day weekend in Chicago.

 

Rioting happens in many neighborhoods, but only the black ones get air time.

Possibly you have stats, not just biases to offer.

 

More air time for Birthers than moderate Republicans during the entire Obama Administration.

You will, no doubt be offering proof. Surely not just another on of "those" facts.

 

Republicans accept support from Nazi's, the KKK and the POTUS puts the biggest media supporter of the Alt-Right in the Whitehouse as his top advisor, and Fox says NOTHING.

Would you like Fox news in charge of White House staffing??

 

Polling places in black communities get closed by the hundreds, but the only stories about vote suppression feature pictures of a single group calling itself the New Black Panthers.

Again - proof of the closings? Actually, wherever I have lived, polling place schedules are constantly changing their schedules based on past demand. But, naturally, if the normal course of events occurs in  a black neighborhood, that becomes "racism" through the racist's prism.

 

So show the negative - Fox reporting uplifting stories about blacks who aren't neo-Republicans who sound more than a little racist themselves.

Again - that pesky prism.

 

 


Again - that bogus opinion - completely devoid of any factual basis - the same kind of disingenuously fabricated mendacity as that ludicrous neo-marxist offal...
Still the same classic projection as ever - enthusiastically swallowed hook line and sinker by RWNJs from sea to shining sea...
44>dolt45
Honored Social Butterfly


@rk9152 wrote:

@MIseker wrote:
I tried to get into imagery on another thread but I think someones brains were too small to relate.

But yes, thats how it works. Show 14 black looters repeatedly nationwide and white michiganders in suburban Detroit will stay with Trump. It really is that simple, and the simple minded dont get it. they never worry about who is ( imagery : pschyodelic animation) opening the top of their head and pumping a truckload of manure in, top line of it showing thru their eyes ( that sparkle, watching dancing looters carrying tvs and white women) , BIG BROTHER logo in the corner of their tv as they drool on their remote...Keep on truckin

Again, the racist prism of the left raises it's ugly head. If you mean the Carlson report, was it shown repeatedly in Michigan? Or is that a "vision" that supports your "racist" preconception?

 

And then more of the imagined imagery - TVs and white women.

 

With all these thoughts running through your brain I guess it is understandable that you think others are equally racist. That allows you to say, "Yes, but I have white guilt, so I am more noble". When in reality, those are your visions, not everyone's.


sorry I dont have white guilt.  Nice try. go back nd look at the link i posted about fox and the looters again. with all these hurricanes i suspect your wires may be down.

So it begins.
Honored Social Butterfly


@MIseker wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@MIseker wrote:
I tried to get into imagery on another thread but I think someones brains were too small to relate.

But yes, thats how it works. Show 14 black looters repeatedly nationwide and white michiganders in suburban Detroit will stay with Trump. It really is that simple, and the simple minded dont get it. they never worry about who is ( imagery : pschyodelic animation) opening the top of their head and pumping a truckload of manure in, top line of it showing thru their eyes ( that sparkle, watching dancing looters carrying tvs and white women) , BIG BROTHER logo in the corner of their tv as they drool on their remote...Keep on truckin

Again, the racist prism of the left raises it's ugly head. If you mean the Carlson report, was it shown repeatedly in Michigan? Or is that a "vision" that supports your "racist" preconception?

 

And then more of the imagined imagery - TVs and white women.

 

With all these thoughts running through your brain I guess it is understandable that you think others are equally racist. That allows you to say, "Yes, but I have white guilt, so I am more noble". When in reality, those are your visions, not everyone's.


sorry I dont have white guilt.  Nice try. go back nd look at the link i posted about fox and the looters again. with all these hurricanes i suspect your wires may be down.


Forget links you posted, it's just between us guys (generic).

 

There were looters. A person being interviewed was incenses that people (note: "people") would take advantage of the tragedy to steal from another person (note: "person"). That person expressed his disgust with such people (note: "people").

 

And, naturally, the "I'm better than others because I attack my race"" crowd peered through their racism prism and saw something that wasn't there.

 

YOUR views, not that of a link you found?

0 Kudos
482 Views
5
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@rk9152 wrote:

@MIseker wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@MIseker wrote:
I tried to get into imagery on another thread but I think someones brains were too small to relate.

But yes, thats how it works. Show 14 black looters repeatedly nationwide and white michiganders in suburban Detroit will stay with Trump. It really is that simple, and the simple minded dont get it. they never worry about who is ( imagery : pschyodelic animation) opening the top of their head and pumping a truckload of manure in, top line of it showing thru their eyes ( that sparkle, watching dancing looters carrying tvs and white women) , BIG BROTHER logo in the corner of their tv as they drool on their remote...Keep on truckin

Again, the racist prism of the left raises it's ugly head. If you mean the Carlson report, was it shown repeatedly in Michigan? Or is that a "vision" that supports your "racist" preconception?

 

And then more of the imagined imagery - TVs and white women.

 

With all these thoughts running through your brain I guess it is understandable that you think others are equally racist. That allows you to say, "Yes, but I have white guilt, so I am more noble". When in reality, those are your visions, not everyone's.


sorry I dont have white guilt.  Nice try. go back nd look at the link i posted about fox and the looters again. with all these hurricanes i suspect your wires may be down.


Forget links you posted, it's just between us guys (generic).

 

There were looters. A person being interviewed was incenses that people (note: "people") would take advantage of the tragedy to steal from another person (note: "person"). That person expressed his disgust with such people (note: "people").

 

And, naturally, the "I'm better than others because I attack my race"" crowd peered through their racism prism and saw something that wasn't there.

 

YOUR views, not that of a link you found?


no soup for you.

So it begins.
Honored Social Butterfly


@MIseker wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

 

YOUR views, not that of a link you found?


no soup for you.


You are right Mlseker.  "You can't have your pudding if you don't eat your meat"


Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history.
Honored Social Butterfly


@MIseker wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@MIseker wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@MIseker wrote:
I tried to get into imagery on another thread but I think someones brains were too small to relate.

But yes, thats how it works. Show 14 black looters repeatedly nationwide and white michiganders in suburban Detroit will stay with Trump. It really is that simple, and the simple minded dont get it. they never worry about who is ( imagery : pschyodelic animation) opening the top of their head and pumping a truckload of manure in, top line of it showing thru their eyes ( that sparkle, watching dancing looters carrying tvs and white women) , BIG BROTHER logo in the corner of their tv as they drool on their remote...Keep on truckin

Again, the racist prism of the left raises it's ugly head. If you mean the Carlson report, was it shown repeatedly in Michigan? Or is that a "vision" that supports your "racist" preconception?

 

And then more of the imagined imagery - TVs and white women.

 

With all these thoughts running through your brain I guess it is understandable that you think others are equally racist. That allows you to say, "Yes, but I have white guilt, so I am more noble". When in reality, those are your visions, not everyone's.


sorry I dont have white guilt.  Nice try. go back nd look at the link i posted about fox and the looters again. with all these hurricanes i suspect your wires may be down.


Forget links you posted, it's just between us guys (generic).

 

There were looters. A person being interviewed was incenses that people (note: "people") would take advantage of the tragedy to steal from another person (note: "person"). That person expressed his disgust with such people (note: "people").

 

And, naturally, the "I'm better than others because I attack my race"" crowd peered through their racism prism and saw something that wasn't there.

 

YOUR views, not that of a link you found?


no soup for you.


What does that mean? It sounds like you can not formulate an opinion but can only repost links someone has sent you.

0 Kudos
489 Views
2
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@rk9152 wrote:


YOUR views, not that of a link you found?


no soup for you.


What does that mean? It sounds like you can not formulate an opinion but can only repost links someone has sent you.


Here it is. >>>the "I'm better than others because I attack my race""<<<brown1.jpg

 

 

 

Being called a race traitor like this guy was says a lot more about the people doing the calling. Its an admission of defeat, and agreement they can no longer speak or act without betraying what they actually are.

So it begins.
Honored Social Butterfly


@MIseker wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:


YOUR views, not that of a link you found?


no soup for you.


What does that mean? It sounds like you can not formulate an opinion but can only repost links someone has sent you.


Here it is. >>>the "I'm better than others because I attack my race""<<<brown1.jpg

 

 

 

Being called a race traitor like this guy was says a lot more about the people doing the calling. Its an admission of defeat, and agreement they can no longer speak or act without betraying what they actually are.


I dunno. Once again it is seeing things through that prism of race. If you see people as people, is that not admirable?

 

And the above depends on circumstances. If one encounters a person berating a person specifically for his race, certainly speak up. But then there are those that call one a racist for defending the Constitution and the rights it grants citizens - not good.

 

Like I said, the circumstances are certainly a factor.

0 Kudos
455 Views
0
Report
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Does AARP donate to political parties or endorse candidates?

AARP is strictly non-partisan and always has been. We never endorse or donate to candidates, political parties or political action committees.

Learn more.

AARP Members Only Games

Play members only games, like FIll Ins, Lumeno, 2048 and a collaborative, multiplayer Let's Crossword.

Play Now
AARP Members Only Games Logos
AARP Rewards

Solve Crosswords. Earn Rewards. Activate AARP Rewards to earn points for games, quizzes and videos. Redeem for deals and discounts.

Get started with AARP Rewards now!
/html/assets/Rewards-program-badge-355x224.png