Reply
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
604
Views

Re: You Say You Want a Revolution, Well, You Know...

604 Views
Message 1 of 6

@gruffstuff wrote:

Do that, problem solved. Fail, democracy ended. Simple.

 

I agree, time for some new public servants.


Hopefully Progressives - - - like many of the new Prosecuting Attorneys elected by The People who are now pushing for change in the Criminal Justice System.


"The only thing that man learns from history is that man learns nothing from history."
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
604
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
617
Views

Re: You Say You Want a Revolution, Well, You Know...

617 Views
Message 2 of 6

Do that, problem solved. Fail, democracy ended. Simple.

 

I agree, time for some new public servants.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
617
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
639
Views

Re: You Say You Want a Revolution, Well, You Know...

639 Views
Message 3 of 6

1,000 former DOJ empolyees condemnation would be difficult to ignore, unless you're a gutless draftdodging preppytwit with an inflated sense of adequacy and mental and emotional development arrested on your fifth birthday.

 

But that is what Putin put in the White House , so do not expect the ToadPOTUS to give any more consideration to this damning letter than he has to his over-justified impeachment.

 

The solution is not more letters condemning his behavior, its removing him and his Senate flunkies next November.

 

Do that, problem solved. Fail, democracy ended. Simple.

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
639
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
696
Views

Re: You Say You Want a Revolution, Well, You Know...

696 Views
Message 4 of 6

It is unfortunately that many think that any of this  will get cured by the up coming elections. but it will be ups to us to deal with that.

no name
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
696
Views
Highlighted
Recognized Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
703
Views

Re: You Say You Want a Revolution, Well, You Know...

703 Views
Message 5 of 6
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
703
Views
Highlighted
Social Butterfly
6
Kudos
720
Views
5
Replies

You Say You Want a Revolution, Well, You Know...

720 Views
Message 6 of 6
DOJ Alumni Statement on the Events Surrounding the Sentencing of Roger Stone
 
 

We, the undersigned, are alumni of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) who have collectively served both Republican and Democratic administrations. Each of us strongly condemns President Trump’s and Attorney General Barr’s interference in the fair administration of justice.

 

As former DOJ officials, we each proudly took an oath to support and defend our Constitution and faithfully execute the duties of our offices. The very first of these duties is to apply the law equally to all Americans. This obligation flows directly from the Constitution, and it is embedded in countless rules and laws governing the conduct of DOJ lawyers. The Justice Manual — the DOJ’s rulebook for its lawyers — states that “the rule of law depends on the evenhanded administration of justice”; that the Department’s legal decisions “must be impartial and insulated from political influence”; and that the Department’s prosecutorial powers, in particular, must be “exercised free from partisan consideration.”

 

All DOJ lawyers are well-versed in these rules, regulations, and constitutional commands. They stand for the proposition that political interference in the conduct of a criminal prosecution is anathema to the Department’s core mission and to its sacred obligation to ensure equal justice under the law.

 

And yet, President Trump and Attorney General Barr have openly and repeatedly flouted this fundamental principle, most recently in connection with the sentencing of President Trump’s close associate, Roger Stone, who was convicted of serious crimes. The Department has a long-standing practice in which political appointees set broad policies that line prosecutors apply to individual cases. That practice exists to animate the constitutional principles regarding the even-handed application of the law. Although there are times when political leadership appropriately weighs in on individual prosecutions, it is unheard of for the Department’s top leaders to overrule line prosecutors, who are following established policies, in order to give preferential treatment to a close associate of the President, as Attorney General Barr did in the Stone case. It is even more outrageous for the Attorney General to intervene as he did here — after the President publicly condemned the sentencing recommendation that line prosecutors had already filed in court.

 

Such behavior is a grave threat to the fair administration of justice. In this nation, we are all equal before the law. A person should not be given special treatment in a criminal prosecution because they are a close political ally of the President. Governments that use the enormous power of law enforcement to punish their enemies and reward their allies are not constitutional republics; they are autocracies.

 

We welcome Attorney General Barr’s belated acknowledgment that the DOJ’s law enforcement decisions must be independent of politics; that it is wrong for the President to interfere in specific enforcement matters, either to punish his opponents or to help his friends; and that the President’s public comments on DOJ matters have gravely damaged the Department’s credibility. But Mr. Barr’s actions in doing the President’s personal bidding unfortunately speak louder than his words. Those actions, and the damage they have done to the Department of Justice’s reputation for integrity and the rule of law, require Mr. Barr to resign. But because we have little expectation he will do so, it falls to the Department’s career officials to take appropriate action to uphold their oaths of office and defend nonpartisan, apolitical justice.

 

For these reasons, we support and commend the four career prosecutors who upheld their oaths and stood up for the Department’s independence by withdrawing from the Stone case and/or resigning from the Department. Our simple message to them is that we — and millions of other Americans — stand with them. And we call on every DOJ employee to follow their heroic example and be prepared to report future abuses to the Inspector General, the Office of Professional Responsibility, and Congress; to refuse to carry out directives that are inconsistent with their oaths of office; to withdraw from cases that involve such directives or other misconduct; and, if necessary, to resign and report publicly — in a manner consistent with professional ethics — to the American people the reasons for their resignation.

 

We likewise call on the other branches of government to protect from retaliation those employees who uphold their oaths in the face of unlawful directives. The rule of law and the survival of our Republic demand nothing less.

 

If you are a former DOJ employee and would like to add your name below, click here. Protect Democracy will update this list daily with new signatories.

 

Click link to see signatories 

 
Report Inappropriate Content
6
Kudos
720
Views
5
Replies
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Top Authors