Refresh your driving skills and you could save on your auto insurance! Sign up for the AARP Smart Driver course.

 

Reply
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
369
Views

Re: You Ain't Seen Nuthin' Yet

369 Views
Message 21 of 52

@gruffstuff wrote:

 

The world you describe seems to have very few people being productive and supporting everyone else.

 

I wouldn't characterize it as people being productive, people will own machines and machines will do the work. Not sure how people will buy the stuff the machines make without income.

 

What's the alternative if machines displace 50% of the workforce in the next few decades?

 

People can adapt or try to, learn new skills, new professions, but they have to pay the bills while they do.

 

The drive to reduce the cost of labor and automation is not going to stop.

 

Another possibility is machines greatly reduce the cost of goods and services.

 

What do that do to the value of what human labor is still around?

 

What will labor be worth if 50% of the workforce doesn't have a job?

 

Still people have to pay the bills.

 

Get rid of the people ?

 

On a scale of 1 to 10 most people are around 5, they're average, what will average people do? Not smart enough to design robots, they don't own land to farm, no new world to get on a ship and sail to, and machines can do most of the jobs they used to do, faster, cheaper, better, forever. 

 

Family planning or just keep trying to bring back coal and man made climate change will get rid of a lot of the surplus population.

 

 

 

 


It does appear the Republican Path Forward is a form of genocide by neglect. Neglect pollution control, kill more people. Neglect climate change, kill more people. Neglect health care, kill more people. They even have come up with a new victim - instead of basing their genocide on race, they base it on INCOME, so only the poor will die. This seems to be okay with the GOPerBase, mostly because they haven't noticed the plan also calls for moving the middle class down to "poor" as rapidly as possible.

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
369
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
343
Views

Re: You Ain't Seen Nuthin' Yet

343 Views
Message 22 of 52

It is not a case of manufacturing jobs going away. It is a case of jobs going away.

 

Better way to phrase that is it is not a case of manufacturing going away, it's a case of manufacturing jobs going away.

 

Look at what has already happened in the US, manufacturing jobs are way down, but manufacturing output is way up.

 

However it's not just going to be manufacturing, one of the next things to go will be drivers, truck drivers, bus drivers, cab drivers, Uber drivers.

 

Every society is three meals away from anarchy, or nine meals from chaos, or four meals from revolution. 

 

Take your pick.

 

What's better, a minimum income scheme or a revolution, or anarchy, or chaos?

 

Cheaper to just feed people and keep a roof over their heads then it is to lock them up or wage war on them.

 

At least I think it is.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
343
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
4
Kudos
342
Views

Re: You Ain't Seen Nuthin' Yet

342 Views
Message 23 of 52

 

The world you describe seems to have very few people being productive and supporting everyone else.

 

I wouldn't characterize it as people being productive, people will own machines and machines will do the work. Not sure how people will buy the stuff the machines make without income.

 

What's the alternative if machines displace 50% of the workforce in the next few decades?

 

People can adapt or try to, learn new skills, new professions, but they have to pay the bills while they do.

 

The drive to reduce the cost of labor and automation is not going to stop.

 

Another possibility is machines greatly reduce the cost of goods and services.

 

What do that do to the value of what human labor is still around?

 

What will labor be worth if 50% of the workforce doesn't have a job?

 

Still people have to pay the bills.

 

Get rid of the people ?

 

On a scale of 1 to 10 most people are around 5, they're average, what will average people do? Not smart enough to design robots, they don't own land to farm, no new world to get on a ship and sail to, and machines can do most of the jobs they used to do, faster, cheaper, better, forever. 

 

Family planning or just keep trying to bring back coal and man made climate change will get rid of a lot of the surplus population.

 

 

 

 

Report Inappropriate Content
4
Kudos
342
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
330
Views

Re: You Ain't Seen Nuthin' Yet

330 Views
Message 24 of 52

If taxes aren't the answer, the opposite is also true, and tax breaks aren't the answer either. Someone should have clued Trump and Pence in before looking like fools when they gave away the castle to Carrier, and then Carrier made its move to eliminate all the jobs their tax incentives were supposed to retain.

 

https://www.cheatsheet.com/money-career/these-companies-started-firing-employees-right-after-getting...

 

 

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/ (11 pages of lies and growing)
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
330
Views
Highlighted
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
333
Views

Re: You Ain't Seen Nuthin' Yet

333 Views
Message 25 of 52

@john258 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@john258 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@john258 wrote:

What you have here are two different problems. 1. Manufacturing jobs of to day going away just like they always do. This has been going on for at least 200 years. 2. Income inequality. Every time this happens the middle class on down is hurt.

You have to solve both problems and you can not combine them. Problem one has always had a starter as new things and ways are invented to make things. That is already happening we just have to encourage it not try and stop it. The Reb. have always tried the latter and it never worked. You want the cost of manufacturing to be about the same all over the world. Unions for all helps as then it is harder to take advantage of the people who become the workers. Problem 2 has been with us for years now. You can not have the difference between top and bottom in earnings and have a healthy economy. Teddy Roosevelt new this and was a trust buster as this was one of the first attempts to control it. Unions once again serve a really useful purpose as they give the workers a voice in what the difference is. The Reb. have always been for what is happening today by their policies. The Ben and Jerry rule would help a lot if it were put into law, and minimum wage helps.


You have missed the point. The problem isn't fair treatment of workers, it is the lack of need for workers. And Rebs. are not a factor - only reality is.


No I am on point. When you understand economics you know these are 2 different problems with 2 different answers. When both get the correct answer you solve them, when you try to solve both together using the same answer you solve nothing, and our current situation proves that. The far right have never done anything to solve either of these problems. As I have said before the far right have never helped the average person with anything.


If there are very few workers needed due to an advancing technology, the treatment of the few workers is not a factor for the vast majority of people.

 

This is not a political issue, it is a technology one so the usual "far right" comments are pointless.


I have given you the approach to solve these 2 problems, but the far right do not understand any of this and just post different words wich are meaningless. With that in mind we have now reached that point. You know the drill.


Again - This is not a political issue, it is a technology one so the usual "far right" comments are pointless.

 

It is not a case of manufacturing jobs going away. It is a case of jobs going away.

 

It is not a case of income inequality. It is a case of income nonexistence.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
333
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
366
Views

Re: You Ain't Seen Nuthin' Yet

366 Views
Message 26 of 52

@rk9152 wrote:

@john258 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@john258 wrote:

What you have here are two different problems. 1. Manufacturing jobs of to day going away just like they always do. This has been going on for at least 200 years. 2. Income inequality. Every time this happens the middle class on down is hurt.

You have to solve both problems and you can not combine them. Problem one has always had a starter as new things and ways are invented to make things. That is already happening we just have to encourage it not try and stop it. The Reb. have always tried the latter and it never worked. You want the cost of manufacturing to be about the same all over the world. Unions for all helps as then it is harder to take advantage of the people who become the workers. Problem 2 has been with us for years now. You can not have the difference between top and bottom in earnings and have a healthy economy. Teddy Roosevelt new this and was a trust buster as this was one of the first attempts to control it. Unions once again serve a really useful purpose as they give the workers a voice in what the difference is. The Reb. have always been for what is happening today by their policies. The Ben and Jerry rule would help a lot if it were put into law, and minimum wage helps.


You have missed the point. The problem isn't fair treatment of workers, it is the lack of need for workers. And Rebs. are not a factor - only reality is.


No I am on point. When you understand economics you know these are 2 different problems with 2 different answers. When both get the correct answer you solve them, when you try to solve both together using the same answer you solve nothing, and our current situation proves that. The far right have never done anything to solve either of these problems. As I have said before the far right have never helped the average person with anything.


If there are very few workers needed due to an advancing technology, the treatment of the few workers is not a factor for the vast majority of people.

 

This is not a political issue, it is a technology one so the usual "far right" comments are pointless.


I have given you the approach to solve these 2 problems, but the far right do not understand any of this and just post different words wich are meaningless. With that in mind we have now reached that point. You know the drill.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
366
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
380
Views

Re: You Ain't Seen Nuthin' Yet

380 Views
Message 27 of 52

I've seen this coming since 30 years ago. Automation and technology will, I thought, kill jobs. I'm surprised it has taken this long. Computers also have made it possible for corporations to transfer work to workers in other countries. 

To keep the economy flowing nicely, we need consumers. Consumers need money. 

Right now consumer debt is growing. Unless we do something to change this trend, the house of cards will collapse.

 

jobs robots.jpg

 

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
380
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
381
Views

Re: You Ain't Seen Nuthin' Yet

381 Views
Message 28 of 52

@Richva wrote:

@gruffstuff wrote:

For those that see all the problems of workers solvable by merely taxing the accomplished, better think  again - it's a new world out there continually evolving and the plants of the '50s are not coming back.

 

Being a plumber I made an observation about thirty five years ago, a recession wasn't considered a recession until white collar workers lost jobs.

 

A spin off of that observation is automation, off shoring, and AI aren't a problem until white collar types starting losing jobs.

 

Guess what is happening, and will continue to happen?

 

Buy books, go to school, get good grades, do OK on a SAT, get though college, do everything right, and there still might not be a good job for you, a job working in a bookstore maybe, if anyone buys books anymore.

 

It is a new world out there, and the old one is not coming back, we're not bringing back coal.

 

One thing will still be true though, the drive to reduce the cost of labor.

 

Time to think about universal healthcare and a guaranteed minimum income IMO.

 

If machines are going to do all the work, the people who own those machines must pay more in taxes.

 

Start thinking about opening more family planning clinics, not closing them.

 

Put climate change problems on top of world wide automation and AI and people are going to need a strong social safety net.

 

I'ts good you're finally starting to see the light, keep working on it, you might get there some day.

 

 

 

 


The guaranteed minimum income has always been an idea with fascination for me.  The ultimate safety net with none of the overhead our current welfare systems generate.  If you want to go to school or work on your art or whatever, you simply must reduce your standard of living to the point you can support yourself until your investment in the future pays off (or doesn't). If you are lazy enough not to aspire to more than the guaranteed minimum, it takes the laziest people out of the job market making America more competitive.  

 

Frankly, I would rather some other country show it can be successful first as they have with government run health care, retirements, day care, elder care, and so on. 


Minimum wage is pointless when there are no jobs.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
381
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
382
Views

Re: You Ain't Seen Nuthin' Yet

382 Views
Message 29 of 52

@gruffstuff wrote:

For those that see all the problems of workers solvable by merely taxing the accomplished, better think  again - it's a new world out there continually evolving and the plants of the '50s are not coming back.

 

Being a plumber I made an observation about thirty five years ago, a recession wasn't considered a recession until white collar workers lost jobs.

 

A spin off of that observation is automation, off shoring, and AI aren't a problem until white collar types starting losing jobs.

 

Guess what is happening, and will continue to happen?

 

Buy books, go to school, get good grades, do OK on a SAT, get though college, do everything right, and there still might not be a good job for you, a job working in a bookstore maybe, if anyone buys books anymore.

 

It is a new world out there, and the old one is not coming back, we're not bringing back coal.

 

One thing will still be true though, the drive to reduce the cost of labor.

 

Time to think about universal healthcare and a guaranteed minimum income IMO.

 

If machines are going to do all the work, the people who own those machines must pay more in taxes.

 

Start thinking about opening more family planning clinics, not closing them.

 

Put climate change problems on top of world wide automation and AI and people are going to need a strong social safety net.

 

I'ts good you're finally starting to see the light, keep working on it, you might get there some day.

 

 

The world you describe seems to have very few people being productive and supporting everyone else. You may be right but it does seem unfair to the working few.

 

I do not understand your last comment. 


Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
382
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
381
Views

Re: You Ain't Seen Nuthin' Yet

381 Views
Message 30 of 52

@john258 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@john258 wrote:

What you have here are two different problems. 1. Manufacturing jobs of to day going away just like they always do. This has been going on for at least 200 years. 2. Income inequality. Every time this happens the middle class on down is hurt.

You have to solve both problems and you can not combine them. Problem one has always had a starter as new things and ways are invented to make things. That is already happening we just have to encourage it not try and stop it. The Reb. have always tried the latter and it never worked. You want the cost of manufacturing to be about the same all over the world. Unions for all helps as then it is harder to take advantage of the people who become the workers. Problem 2 has been with us for years now. You can not have the difference between top and bottom in earnings and have a healthy economy. Teddy Roosevelt new this and was a trust buster as this was one of the first attempts to control it. Unions once again serve a really useful purpose as they give the workers a voice in what the difference is. The Reb. have always been for what is happening today by their policies. The Ben and Jerry rule would help a lot if it were put into law, and minimum wage helps.


You have missed the point. The problem isn't fair treatment of workers, it is the lack of need for workers. And Rebs. are not a factor - only reality is.


No I am on point. When you understand economics you know these are 2 different problems with 2 different answers. When both get the correct answer you solve them, when you try to solve both together using the same answer you solve nothing, and our current situation proves that. The far right have never done anything to solve either of these problems. As I have said before the far right have never helped the average person with anything.


If there are very few workers needed due to an advancing technology, the treatment of the few workers is not a factor for the vast majority of people.

 

This is not a political issue, it is a technology one so the usual "far right" comments are pointless.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
381
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Have a question about AARP membership or benefits? Ask it in the AARP Help Membership forum, Benefits & Discounts forum, or General forum.


multiple white question marks with center red question mark

Top Authors