Reply
Trusted Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
189
Views

Re: Why "Racist" is Fake News

189 Views
Message 71 of 99

@sp362wrote:

@aruzinskywrote:

@Centristsin2010wrote:

@aruzinskywrote:

 

But, just to make this constructive criticism, instead of saying, "racist," liberals should substitute the relevant parts of the definitions or "racism" and "race" into their speech, i.e., one of the 55 different combinations given above.  Fat chance, but  I fulfilled my moral obligation to make my criticism constructive. 

 

Au contraire.....you fulfilled your obligation to let others know that like many Conservatives posting here, the term "racist" confuses you.  Yes, it's very telling that YOU need to know which definition applies.


 


It's very telling that you don't need to know what you are talking about. 


What's very telling is that you are taking broad generalizations and assuming you are correct.  In another thread you talked about the large number of Mexican beggars (among other things).  Did you ever stop and ask them what their nationality was or whether or not they were actually Citizens?  How wold you know what they were?

 

Two thoughts come to my mind "There are none so blind as those who will not see"  and another one from Forest Gump that I can't post here.


Acute schizophrenics see things that aren't there.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
189
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
194
Views

Re: Why "Racist" is Fake News

194 Views
Message 72 of 99

@aruzinskywrote:

 


I choose to believe that you were projecting when you said, "Excessive volubility has often been used as a smokescreen to hide deliberately calculated mendacity," because it is you, not I, who used excessive volubility, i.e., were too verbose.  Notice that "used excessive volubility" is more vebose than "were too verbose" which proves my point.


Vaya Con Huevos

 

 

44>dolt45
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
194
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
199
Views

Re: Why "Racist" is Fake News

199 Views
Message 73 of 99

@aruzinskywrote:

@Centristsin2010wrote:

@aruzinskywrote:

 

But, just to make this constructive criticism, instead of saying, "racist," liberals should substitute the relevant parts of the definitions or "racism" and "race" into their speech, i.e., one of the 55 different combinations given above.  Fat chance, but  I fulfilled my moral obligation to make my criticism constructive. 

 

Au contraire.....you fulfilled your obligation to let others know that like many Conservatives posting here, the term "racist" confuses you.  Yes, it's very telling that YOU need to know which definition applies.


 


It's very telling that you don't need to know what you are talking about. 


What's very telling is that you are taking broad generalizations and assuming you are correct.  In another thread you talked about the large number of Mexican beggars (among other things).  Did you ever stop and ask them what their nationality was or whether or not they were actually Citizens?  How wold you know what they were?

 

Two thoughts come to my mind "There are none so blind as those who will not see"  and another one from Forest Gump that I can't post here.

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
199
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
201
Views

Re: Why "Racist" is Fake News

201 Views
Message 74 of 99

@Centristsin2010wrote:

@aruzinskywrote:

 

But, just to make this constructive criticism, instead of saying, "racist," liberals should substitute the relevant parts of the definitions or "racism" and "race" into their speech, i.e., one of the 55 different combinations given above.  Fat chance, but  I fulfilled my moral obligation to make my criticism constructive. 

 

Au contraire.....you fulfilled your obligation to let others know that like many Conservatives posting here, the term "racist" confuses you.  Yes, it's very telling that YOU need to know which definition applies.


 


It's very telling that you don't need to know what you are talking about. 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
201
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
201
Views

Re: Why "Racist" is Fake News

201 Views
Message 75 of 99

@aruzinskywrote:

 

But, just to make this constructive criticism, instead of saying, "racist," liberals should substitute the relevant parts of the definitions or "racism" and "race" into their speech, i.e., one of the 55 different combinations given above.  Fat chance, but  I fulfilled my moral obligation to make my criticism constructive. 

 

Au contraire.....you fulfilled your obligation to let others know that like many Conservatives posting here, the term "racist" confuses you.  Yes, it's very telling that YOU need to know which definition applies.


 


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in Washington DC, January 21, 2017.
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
201
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
207
Views

Re: Why "Racist" is Fake News

207 Views
Message 76 of 99

@alferdpackerwrote:

 


@aruzinskywrote:

@alferdpackerwrote:

 


@aruzinskywrote:

@alferdpackerwrote:

 


@aruzinskywrote:

@alferdpackerwrote:

 


@aruzinskywrote:

@aruzinskywrote:

The word "racist" has, at least, 22 different meanings: 

 

rac·ist

noun

1.
A. a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races.
B. a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another.

 

adjective

noun: racist; plural noun: racists; adjective: racist

1.
A. showing or feeling discrimination or prejudice against people of other races.
B. believing that a particular race is superior to another.

 

Definition of race

1 : a breeding stock of animals

2 a : (i) a family, (ii) tribe, (iii) people, or (iv) nation belonging to the same stock

b : a class or kind of people unified by (i) shared interests, (ii) habits, or (iii) characteristics

3 a : (i) an actually or potentially interbreeding group within a species; (ii) a taxonomic category (such as a subspecies) representing such a group

b : breed

c : a category of humankind that shares certain distinctive physical traits

4 obsolete : inherited temperament or disposition

5 : distinctive flavor, taste, or strength

 

Liberals not only pretend to know what was on the accused's mind but, also pretend that the audience's interpretation of race coincides with the accused, which may or not be 1.A. or 1.B. in combination with 2. a.(i)(ii)(iii)(iv), 2. b.(i)(ii)(iii), 3. a.(i)(ii), 3. b., or 3. c.. (22 different combinations) Thus, every liberal, who uses the word "racist" as a catch phrase and fails to disambiguate the word, is producing fake news.

 

But, just to make this constructive criticism, instead of saying, "racist," liberals should substitute the relevant parts of the definitions or "racism" and "race" into their speech, i.e., one of the 22 different combinations given above.  Fat chance, but  I fulfilled my moral obligation to make my criticism constructive. 

 


Correction:

 

he word "racist" has, at least, 33 different meanings: 

 

rac·ist

noun

1.
A. a person who shows or feels (i) discrimination or (ii) prejudice against people of other races.
B. a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another.

 

adjective

noun: racist; plural noun: racists; adjective: racist

1.
A. showing or feeling discrimination or prejudice against people of other races.
B. believing that a particular race is superior to another.

 

Definition of race

1 : a breeding stock of animals

2 a : (i) a family, (ii) tribe, (iii) people, or (iv) nation belonging to the same stock

b : a class or kind of people unified by (i) shared interests, (ii) habits, or (iii) characteristics

3 a : (i) an actually or potentially interbreeding group within a species; (ii) a taxonomic category (such as a subspecies) representing such a group

b : breed

c : a category of humankind that shares certain distinctive physical traits

4 obsolete : inherited temperament or disposition

5 : distinctive flavor, taste, or strength

 

Liberals not only pretend to know what was on the accused's mind but, also pretend that the audience's interpretation of race coincides with the accused, which may or not be 1.A.(i)(ii) or 1.B. in combination with 2. a.(i)(ii)(iii)(iv), 2. b.(i)(ii)(iii), 3. a.(i)(ii), 3. b., or 3. c.. (33 different combinations) Thus, every liberal, who uses the word "racist" as a catch phrase and fails to disambiguate the word, is producing fake news.

 

But, just to make this constructive criticism, instead of saying, "racist," liberals should substitute the relevant parts of the definitions or "racism" and "race" into their speech, i.e., one of the 33 different combinations given above.  Fat chance, but  I fulfilled my moral obligation to make my criticism constructive. 


The content of the post is clearly overcompensation in support of an extreme fringe variant of political bias...

 

 


The content of your post is clearly undercompensation in support of a common variant of political bias, liberalism.  

 

What do you know about, Plato's Allegory of the Cave?


What valid and empirically proved evidence can you post links to that irrefutably proves that Plato's Allegory of the Cave is valid and applicable here and now?

 

Excessive volubility has often been used as a smokescreen to hide deliberately calculated mendacity, and is recognized by both law enforcement and the mental health profession as a red warning flag of the possibility of mendacity being employed.      

In the vernacular, the expression "baffle with bullbleep" has a similar meaning.

 


Too verbose.


Translation - can't answer the question without exposing deliberately calculated mendacity and republican/conservative/trump-sucking bullbleep for all to see.

 


You are projecting.

 


You have a degree in mental health?   I thought electron molesting and related perversions was your thing - I know a little about that - having done some of that while serving in a nuclear powered ballistic missile submarine in the late sixties and early seventies...

 

Believe whatever you wish - it won't have the slightest effect upon reality.

 


I choose to believe that you were projecting when you said, "Excessive volubility has often been used as a smokescreen to hide deliberately calculated mendacity," because it is you, not I, who used excessive volubility, i.e., were too verbose.  Notice that "used excessive volubility" is more vebose than "were too verbose" which proves my point.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
207
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
218
Views

Re: Why "Racist" is Fake News

218 Views
Message 77 of 99

 


@aruzinskywrote:

@alferdpackerwrote:

 


@aruzinskywrote:

@alferdpackerwrote:

 


@aruzinskywrote:

@alferdpackerwrote:

 


@aruzinskywrote:

@aruzinskywrote:

The word "racist" has, at least, 22 different meanings: 

 

rac·ist

noun

1.
A. a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races.
B. a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another.

 

adjective

noun: racist; plural noun: racists; adjective: racist

1.
A. showing or feeling discrimination or prejudice against people of other races.
B. believing that a particular race is superior to another.

 

Definition of race

1 : a breeding stock of animals

2 a : (i) a family, (ii) tribe, (iii) people, or (iv) nation belonging to the same stock

b : a class or kind of people unified by (i) shared interests, (ii) habits, or (iii) characteristics

3 a : (i) an actually or potentially interbreeding group within a species; (ii) a taxonomic category (such as a subspecies) representing such a group

b : breed

c : a category of humankind that shares certain distinctive physical traits

4 obsolete : inherited temperament or disposition

5 : distinctive flavor, taste, or strength

 

Liberals not only pretend to know what was on the accused's mind but, also pretend that the audience's interpretation of race coincides with the accused, which may or not be 1.A. or 1.B. in combination with 2. a.(i)(ii)(iii)(iv), 2. b.(i)(ii)(iii), 3. a.(i)(ii), 3. b., or 3. c.. (22 different combinations) Thus, every liberal, who uses the word "racist" as a catch phrase and fails to disambiguate the word, is producing fake news.

 

But, just to make this constructive criticism, instead of saying, "racist," liberals should substitute the relevant parts of the definitions or "racism" and "race" into their speech, i.e., one of the 22 different combinations given above.  Fat chance, but  I fulfilled my moral obligation to make my criticism constructive. 

 


Correction:

 

he word "racist" has, at least, 33 different meanings: 

 

rac·ist

noun

1.
A. a person who shows or feels (i) discrimination or (ii) prejudice against people of other races.
B. a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another.

 

adjective

noun: racist; plural noun: racists; adjective: racist

1.
A. showing or feeling discrimination or prejudice against people of other races.
B. believing that a particular race is superior to another.

 

Definition of race

1 : a breeding stock of animals

2 a : (i) a family, (ii) tribe, (iii) people, or (iv) nation belonging to the same stock

b : a class or kind of people unified by (i) shared interests, (ii) habits, or (iii) characteristics

3 a : (i) an actually or potentially interbreeding group within a species; (ii) a taxonomic category (such as a subspecies) representing such a group

b : breed

c : a category of humankind that shares certain distinctive physical traits

4 obsolete : inherited temperament or disposition

5 : distinctive flavor, taste, or strength

 

Liberals not only pretend to know what was on the accused's mind but, also pretend that the audience's interpretation of race coincides with the accused, which may or not be 1.A.(i)(ii) or 1.B. in combination with 2. a.(i)(ii)(iii)(iv), 2. b.(i)(ii)(iii), 3. a.(i)(ii), 3. b., or 3. c.. (33 different combinations) Thus, every liberal, who uses the word "racist" as a catch phrase and fails to disambiguate the word, is producing fake news.

 

But, just to make this constructive criticism, instead of saying, "racist," liberals should substitute the relevant parts of the definitions or "racism" and "race" into their speech, i.e., one of the 33 different combinations given above.  Fat chance, but  I fulfilled my moral obligation to make my criticism constructive. 


The content of the post is clearly overcompensation in support of an extreme fringe variant of political bias...

 

 


The content of your post is clearly undercompensation in support of a common variant of political bias, liberalism.  

 

What do you know about, Plato's Allegory of the Cave?


What valid and empirically proved evidence can you post links to that irrefutably proves that Plato's Allegory of the Cave is valid and applicable here and now?

 

Excessive volubility has often been used as a smokescreen to hide deliberately calculated mendacity, and is recognized by both law enforcement and the mental health profession as a red warning flag of the possibility of mendacity being employed.      

In the vernacular, the expression "baffle with bullbleep" has a similar meaning.

 


Too verbose.


Translation - can't answer the question without exposing deliberately calculated mendacity and republican/conservative/trump-sucking bullbleep for all to see.

 


You are projecting.

 


You have a degree in mental health?   I thought electron molesting and related perversions was your thing - I know a little about that - having done some of that while serving in a nuclear powered ballistic missile submarine in the late sixties and early seventies...

 

Believe whatever you wish - it won't have the slightest effect upon reality.

 

44>dolt45
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
218
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
209
Views

Re: Why "Racist" is Fake News

209 Views
Message 78 of 99

@aruzinskywrote:

@sp362wrote:

@aruzinskywrote:

@sp362wrote:

@aruzinskywrote:

@sp362wrote:



Race is different than racist.  You do not not need a definition of race to be considered a racist.  The more people pigeonhole and demean smaller groups in the HUMAN RACE is what makes tham a racist.

 

In another thread you posted this comment (along with other more blatant ones):

aruzinsky wrote: 

This is your evil  strategy:

 

1. Pretend that all cultures are magically equally good.

 

2. Attack anyone who doesn't agree with your delusion by calling them "racists" and "bigots" in a purely connotative sense.   

 

Compare your #1 point to 1B and you will see why I called this out as racist comment.


"The more people pigeonhole and demean smaller groups in the HUMAN RACE is what makes tham a racist."

 

I am a smaller group (of 1) in the human race therefore, by your definition, you often calling me a "racist" is racist. 


Since I did not define you as part of a smaller group, you need to look back at your definitions.  Again compare the comment you posted to your own definitions and you tell me how what you posted does not qualify as a racist statement.




Regardless of whether you defined me as part of a smaller group, in fact, I am part of a smaller group.  

 

"Again compare the comment you posted to your own definitions and you tell me how what you posted does not qualify as a racist statement."

 

I am innocent until proven guilty.


Another use of illogical logic.

How about these statements:

Just some racist comments:

"I see many Mexican beggars."

"Begging, criminal activity and social services (referring to Mexicans)."

"people of Mexican ancestry have a cultural propensity to have large, extended families living in relatively small homes."

" Litter on my street is worse than ever.  And, there is more garbage in the alleys than ever."  (attributed to illegal immigrants only)

"And, if the illegals disappeared, other nationalities wouldn't replace them in Home Depot parking lots, because it is culturally beneath them. "

If you can't see how bigoted those statements are, I feel sorry for you and your neighbors.


What part of 

 

"But, just to make this constructive criticism, instead of saying, "racist," liberals should substitute the relevant parts of the definitions or "racism" and "race" into their speech, i.e., one of the 55 different combinations given above."

 

didn't you understand?  And, you confuse "racist" with "bigot."

 

big·ot

noun

noun: bigot; plural noun: bigots

a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.


What you posted is nonsense.  Since you seem to have an intolerance towards others, I am sorry you consider yourself a bigot.  We can always agree to disagree, but your generalizations are racist, despite your claims.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
209
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
201
Views

Re: Why "Racist" is Fake News

201 Views
Message 79 of 99

@gruffstuffwrote:

Why "Racist" is Fake News

 

I was raised to be racist, I know what it means, we all do.  Nothing " fake news "  about it. 

 

 


Speak for yourself because you haven't taken a poll of "we."

 

 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
201
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
209
Views

Re: Why "Racist" is Fake News

209 Views
Message 80 of 99

@sp362wrote:

@aruzinskywrote:

@sp362wrote:

@aruzinskywrote:

@sp362wrote:



Race is different than racist.  You do not not need a definition of race to be considered a racist.  The more people pigeonhole and demean smaller groups in the HUMAN RACE is what makes tham a racist.

 

In another thread you posted this comment (along with other more blatant ones):

aruzinsky wrote: 

This is your evil  strategy:

 

1. Pretend that all cultures are magically equally good.

 

2. Attack anyone who doesn't agree with your delusion by calling them "racists" and "bigots" in a purely connotative sense.   

 

Compare your #1 point to 1B and you will see why I called this out as racist comment.


"The more people pigeonhole and demean smaller groups in the HUMAN RACE is what makes tham a racist."

 

I am a smaller group (of 1) in the human race therefore, by your definition, you often calling me a "racist" is racist. 


Since I did not define you as part of a smaller group, you need to look back at your definitions.  Again compare the comment you posted to your own definitions and you tell me how what you posted does not qualify as a racist statement.




Regardless of whether you defined me as part of a smaller group, in fact, I am part of a smaller group.  

 

"Again compare the comment you posted to your own definitions and you tell me how what you posted does not qualify as a racist statement."

 

I am innocent until proven guilty.


Another use of illogical logic.

How about these statements:

Just some racist comments:

"I see many Mexican beggars."

"Begging, criminal activity and social services (referring to Mexicans)."

"people of Mexican ancestry have a cultural propensity to have large, extended families living in relatively small homes."

" Litter on my street is worse than ever.  And, there is more garbage in the alleys than ever."  (attributed to illegal immigrants only)

"And, if the illegals disappeared, other nationalities wouldn't replace them in Home Depot parking lots, because it is culturally beneath them. "

If you can't see how bigoted those statements are, I feel sorry for you and your neighbors.


What part of 

 

"But, just to make this constructive criticism, instead of saying, "racist," liberals should substitute the relevant parts of the definitions or "racism" and "race" into their speech, i.e., one of the 55 different combinations given above."

 

didn't you understand?  And, you confuse "racist" with "bigot."

 

big·ot

noun

noun: bigot; plural noun: bigots

a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
209
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Open Enrollment: Oct 15-Dec 7, 2019 Find resources to help you decide on the best healthcare insurance plans for you during Open Enrollment season

Top Authors