Eye scans and gene editing are among the new frontiers in Alzheimer’s research! Learn more in AARP’s report on medical breakthroughs.

Reply
Trusted Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
177
Views

Re: Why Climatology is Junk Science

177 Views
Message 11 of 82

@alotofgrey wrote:

@aruzinsky wrote

Wrong and the proof is a counterexample.  Mathematics is within a discipline but not science.

 


Sky,

Science requires measuremnent. Mathamatics does not. Math in any form is an art, not a science.

Careful, your ignorance of what things are is showing.


Irrelevant.  You said, "That study is science if and only if it is done within the dicipline or the scientific method."  And, you misspelled "measurement" and "discipline" which shows your ignorance.

 

Furthermore, if a mathematician finds a mathematical error made by a climatologist, the mathematician's criticism of the climatologist is valid.

 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
177
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
178
Views

Re: Why Climatology is Junk Science

178 Views
Message 12 of 82

@aruzinsky wrote

Wrong and the proof is a counterexample.  Mathematics is within a discipline but not science.

 


Sky,

Science requires measuremnent. Mathamatics does not. Math in any form is an art, not a science.

Careful, your ignorance of what things are is showing.

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
178
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
170
Views

Re: Why Climatology is Junk Science

170 Views
Message 13 of 82

Perhaps deniers might want a practical approach to study....interview polar bears! Due to global warming, they are losing their ice flow platforms to hunt off of, and are wandering beaches in search of food including into towns and garbage pits. But just a warning! Might want to be careful, they’re really hungry, and they might eat ya!

 

deny all you want, it’s still happening

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
170
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
183
Views

Re: Why Climatology is Junk Science

183 Views
Message 14 of 82

@alotofgrey wrote:

"Ology" is Latin for study.

Climat "ology" (Climatology) is the study of  climate.

That study is science if and only if it is done within the dicipline or the scientific method.

 

Your opinion is outside of that dicipline so that means it is not science. That makes it bogus bs. Of course your know that.

 

 

 


Wrong and the proof is a counterexample.  Mathematics is within a discipline but is not science nor BS.  Of course, you don't know that.

 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
183
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
182
Views

Re: Why Climatology is Junk Science

182 Views
Message 15 of 82

"Ology" is Latin for study.

Climate "ology" (Climatology) is the study of  climate.

That study is science if and only if it is done within the discipline of the scientific method.

 

 

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
182
Views
Highlighted
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
181
Views

Re: Why Climatology is Junk Science

181 Views
Message 16 of 82

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

So, don't let the facts confuse you. Instead, follow the lead of AOC!


Ah. facts.  The bread and butter of the liberal and the play dough of the Conservative. The facts are that America is falling behind in renewable energy as well as economic opportunity for anyone but the aristocracy. I find it interesting that the same people who claim there is no way to model the impacts of climate change are all over the cost models of renewable energy.  

 

Here in Southern New Mexico, we are seeing proposals to convert our entire energy production from natural gas and coal to renewable in 10 years and with lower total costs.  That includes mothballing the existing plants. 

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
181
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
186
Views

Re: Why Climatology is Junk Science

186 Views
Message 17 of 82

@Richva wrote:

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@Richva wrote:

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@williamb39198 wrote:

@Richva 

You are making some very good points to those who do not wish to admit what is going on in the climate, as opposed to what we can see with our own eyes is going on with climate change. Yet their best defense is to say: you fix the climate, and we’ll just do whatever we want to mess it up! Plus, the right shows no concern for future generations. Once again, that is the right’s sense of compromise, we’ll do whatever we want whether you agree or not...hardly common ground. Plus, there is no sense of teamwork, is there?

But, why should we think differently of the right, when they support a lying wanna be dictator who doesn’t give a crap about anything or anyone...except himself. He doesn’t care about the climate, does he?

 

Never Forget


Trump cares about the climate but always walks away from a "bad deal". The left wants a program that will add another tax to each person costing an additional $27K per person ($9+ trillion per year to implement the new green deal) and that program doesn't guarantee any results more than Obama's Solyndra deal. Bankruptcy for the U.S. will not solve the climate change.


I would very much like to see the link to your source.  BTW, it appears Trump walks away from any deal.  He is getting quite the collection of participation trophies,


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-25/group-sees-ocasio-cortez-s-green-new-deal-costing...

 

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/green-new-deal-93-trillion-alexandria-ocasio-cortez/

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/center-right-think-tank-projects-green-new-deal-cou...

 

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/31567-green-new-deal-will-cost-93-trillion-says...

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6747001/Green-New-Deal-cost-93-trillion-decade-employment-h...

 

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/lifestyle/lifestylefood/green-new-deal-could-cost-up-to-dollar93-trillion-...

 

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/431460-center-right-group-says-ocasio-cortezs-green-ne...

 

Need I go on?


Nope. I stopped every time I ran into the words "a Republican aligned think tank".  It made them all short reads. 


So, don't let the facts confuse you. Instead, follow the lead of AOC!

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
186
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
198
Views

Re: Why Climatology is Junk Science

198 Views
Message 18 of 82

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@Richva wrote:

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@williamb39198 wrote:

@Richva 

You are making some very good points to those who do not wish to admit what is going on in the climate, as opposed to what we can see with our own eyes is going on with climate change. Yet their best defense is to say: you fix the climate, and we’ll just do whatever we want to mess it up! Plus, the right shows no concern for future generations. Once again, that is the right’s sense of compromise, we’ll do whatever we want whether you agree or not...hardly common ground. Plus, there is no sense of teamwork, is there?

But, why should we think differently of the right, when they support a lying wanna be dictator who doesn’t give a crap about anything or anyone...except himself. He doesn’t care about the climate, does he?

 

Never Forget


Trump cares about the climate but always walks away from a "bad deal". The left wants a program that will add another tax to each person costing an additional $27K per person ($9+ trillion per year to implement the new green deal) and that program doesn't guarantee any results more than Obama's Solyndra deal. Bankruptcy for the U.S. will not solve the climate change.


I would very much like to see the link to your source.  BTW, it appears Trump walks away from any deal.  He is getting quite the collection of participation trophies,


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-25/group-sees-ocasio-cortez-s-green-new-deal-costing...

 

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/green-new-deal-93-trillion-alexandria-ocasio-cortez/

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/center-right-think-tank-projects-green-new-deal-cou...

 

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/31567-green-new-deal-will-cost-93-trillion-says...

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6747001/Green-New-Deal-cost-93-trillion-decade-employment-h...

 

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/lifestyle/lifestylefood/green-new-deal-could-cost-up-to-dollar93-trillion-...

 

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/431460-center-right-group-says-ocasio-cortezs-green-ne...

 

Need I go on?


Nope. I stopped every time I ran into the words "a Republican aligned think tank".  It made them all short reads. 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
198
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
196
Views

Re: Why Climatology is Junk Science

196 Views
Message 19 of 82

@Richva wrote:

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@williamb39198 wrote:

@Richva 

You are making some very good points to those who do not wish to admit what is going on in the climate, as opposed to what we can see with our own eyes is going on with climate change. Yet their best defense is to say: you fix the climate, and we’ll just do whatever we want to mess it up! Plus, the right shows no concern for future generations. Once again, that is the right’s sense of compromise, we’ll do whatever we want whether you agree or not...hardly common ground. Plus, there is no sense of teamwork, is there?

But, why should we think differently of the right, when they support a lying wanna be dictator who doesn’t give a crap about anything or anyone...except himself. He doesn’t care about the climate, does he?

 

Never Forget


Trump cares about the climate but always walks away from a "bad deal". The left wants a program that will add another tax to each person costing an additional $27K per person ($9+ trillion per year to implement the new green deal) and that program doesn't guarantee any results more than Obama's Solyndra deal. Bankruptcy for the U.S. will not solve the climate change.


I would very much like to see the link to your source.  BTW, it appears Trump walks away from any deal.  He is getting quite the collection of participation trophies,


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-25/group-sees-ocasio-cortez-s-green-new-deal-costing...

 

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/green-new-deal-93-trillion-alexandria-ocasio-cortez/

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/center-right-think-tank-projects-green-new-deal-cou...

 

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/31567-green-new-deal-will-cost-93-trillion-says...

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6747001/Green-New-Deal-cost-93-trillion-decade-employment-h...

 

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/lifestyle/lifestylefood/green-new-deal-could-cost-up-to-dollar93-trillion-...

 

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/431460-center-right-group-says-ocasio-cortezs-green-ne...

 

Need I go on?

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
196
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
218
Views

Re: Why Climatology is Junk Science

218 Views
Message 20 of 82

So trump cares? That’s proven to be the exact opposite. 

Appoints coal lobbyist to head the epa, and pulls out of the Paris accord! And pulls regulations regarding air and water. 

And where are your figures coming from. There’s no program, and some of the aspects have just been proposed. Where is the study and cost analysis for your figures?

 

Never Forget

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
218
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Roundtable Discussion:
Ask questions and get advice from fellow entrepreneurs
Now through Nov. 22

Top Authors