From ‘liquid biopsies’ to precision medicine, these five developments will change cancer care in the next decade. Learn more.

Reply
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
201
Views

Re: Warren: America Was "Very Prosperous" When The Top Tax Rate Was Well Above 50 Percent

201 Views
Message 21 of 24

That is a true statement. The point, however, is not that a high tax rate on the people who actually  have 80% of the wealth in this country would stimulate the economy.  It is that the idea we cannot tax these extremely wealthy people is preposterous. It seems pretty simple to me. If you have 80% of the wealth, you should pay 80% of the cost of running the country which made that wealth possible. 

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
201
Views
Highlighted
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
205
Views

Re: Warren: America Was "Very Prosperous" When The Top Tax Rate Was Well Above 50 Percent

205 Views
Message 22 of 24

Too FUNNY!

 

Elizabeth Warren, the Progressive, pointing to the past as a model instead of the future.

 

The dems sure have their work cut out for them.  Did they learn nothing from the 2016 election?

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
205
Views
Frequent Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
185
Views

Re: Warren: America Was "Very Prosperous" When The Top Tax Rate Was Well Above 50 Percent

185 Views
Message 23 of 24

@jimc91 wrote:

CNBC: Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., sat down with CNBC's John Harwood to discuss an array of issues, from President Donald Trump to the economy. Here, she talks about wanting to roll back the GOP tax cuts.

Q: If Democrats take the Congress, if you're in the White House, or both, would you like to see these corporate tax cuts repealed?

A: Yeah, I really want to see them rolled back.

 

 

Q: Back to 35 percent?

A: Well, it's not about the number. Here's how I look at budgets and taxes are at the heart of this. A lot of people think they're just numbers; they're not. They are the expression of our values. The values of the Republican Party that passed those tax cuts are to give $1.5 trillion away to the richest Americans and the biggest corporations, and let everybody else pick up the crumbs.

I think the right way to think about this is that we need a budget, we need a tax bill that works for all of us. So what I'd like to see is I'd like to see us strengthen America's middle class.

 

Q: What's too high for the top personal rate?

A: It's not about a number. That's what negotiations are all about.

Q: Is 50 percent obviously too high?

A: That's why you sit down and you negotiate over the numbers.

Q: When George W. Bush was president, his team articulated the view that it was a matter of right and wrong that you shouldn't have more than a third of your income taken. Do you feel similarly that it's wrong for more than half of somebody's marginal income to be taken?

A: Look, there was a time in a very prosperous America — an America that was growing a middle class, an America in which working families were doing better generation after generation after generation — where the top marginal rate was well above 50 percent.

Q: Ninety percent.

A: That's exactly right. But for me, the heart of the question is that you've got to ask, "What constitutes a fair share in this economy?" It depends in part on what the economy is.

Q: It doesn't strike you as obviously, "no, 90 percent, that's ridiculous. Can't be that"?

A: Ninety percent, yes; 90 percent sounds pretty shockingly high. But what I’m trying to get at is this is not about negotiating over specific numbers. It's not about negotiating before you go into the negotiations.

The Republicans wrote this tax bill behind closed doors. They didn't want any Democrats in the room. They sat down with their donors and with the lobbyists, and they decided on the rates by themselves.

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/07/24/warren_america_was_very_prosperous_when_the_top_t...

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

I suppose this is part of the new democrat platform.  

 

Have you ever seen a balloon made out of lead? 


This is hilarious. Sen. Warren cites historical facts about the long-ago time before the American middle class was mostly destroyed, noting that going back to that in some form or other might be a good idea, and you think there's something wrong with it.

 

Can I have some of what you're smoking?

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
185
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
188
Views
23
Replies

Warren: America Was "Very Prosperous" When The Top Tax Rate Was Well Above 50 Percent

188 Views
Message 24 of 24

CNBC: Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., sat down with CNBC's John Harwood to discuss an array of issues, from President Donald Trump to the economy. Here, she talks about wanting to roll back the GOP tax cuts.

Q: If Democrats take the Congress, if you're in the White House, or both, would you like to see these corporate tax cuts repealed?

A: Yeah, I really want to see them rolled back.

 

 

Q: Back to 35 percent?

A: Well, it's not about the number. Here's how I look at budgets and taxes are at the heart of this. A lot of people think they're just numbers; they're not. They are the expression of our values. The values of the Republican Party that passed those tax cuts are to give $1.5 trillion away to the richest Americans and the biggest corporations, and let everybody else pick up the crumbs.

I think the right way to think about this is that we need a budget, we need a tax bill that works for all of us. So what I'd like to see is I'd like to see us strengthen America's middle class.

 

Q: What's too high for the top personal rate?

A: It's not about a number. That's what negotiations are all about.

Q: Is 50 percent obviously too high?

A: That's why you sit down and you negotiate over the numbers.

Q: When George W. Bush was president, his team articulated the view that it was a matter of right and wrong that you shouldn't have more than a third of your income taken. Do you feel similarly that it's wrong for more than half of somebody's marginal income to be taken?

A: Look, there was a time in a very prosperous America — an America that was growing a middle class, an America in which working families were doing better generation after generation after generation — where the top marginal rate was well above 50 percent.

Q: Ninety percent.

A: That's exactly right. But for me, the heart of the question is that you've got to ask, "What constitutes a fair share in this economy?" It depends in part on what the economy is.

Q: It doesn't strike you as obviously, "no, 90 percent, that's ridiculous. Can't be that"?

A: Ninety percent, yes; 90 percent sounds pretty shockingly high. But what I’m trying to get at is this is not about negotiating over specific numbers. It's not about negotiating before you go into the negotiations.

The Republicans wrote this tax bill behind closed doors. They didn't want any Democrats in the room. They sat down with their donors and with the lobbyists, and they decided on the rates by themselves.

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/07/24/warren_america_was_very_prosperous_when_the_top_t...

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

I suppose this is part of the new democrat platform.  

 

Have you ever seen a balloon made out of lead? 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
188
Views
23
Replies
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Open Enrollment: Oct 15-Dec 7, 2019 Find resources to help you decide on the best healthcare insurance plans for you during Open Enrollment season

Top Authors