Reply
Highlighted
Trusted Social Butterfly

Re: WH Proposed Releasing Immigrants To Sanctuary Cities As Retaliation

417 Views
Message 41 of 51

@Richva wrote:

@KidBoy2 wrote:
RK posted..

They have to go somewhere - why not Sanctuary States?

======================================================

Why not? It's the liberals that are protecting illegals in sanctuary cities.

Right MsStretch?

 

Because it is childish, petty, and vindictive. 



How funny.  Right after I hit Post, I saw your reply.  I basically echoed you.  Well, you know what they say about great minds.  Woman Wink

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Trusted Social Butterfly

Re: WH Proposed Releasing Immigrants To Sanctuary Cities As Retaliation

419 Views
Message 42 of 51

@KidBoy2 wrote:
RK posted..

They have to go somewhere - why not Sanctuary States?

======================================================

Why not? It's the liberals that are protecting illegals in sanctuary cities.

Right MsStretch?

If you are looking to be vindictive and retaliate against the Democrats.

 

Perhaps you should read the entire article.  Even ICE was alarmed by the proposal and did not take it seriously.  It is not a viable solution, evident on many levels.  Simply a childish, petty ploy IMO.

 

The sanctuary city proposal ran contrary to ICE policy guidelines, as well as legal counsel. ICE officials balked at the notion of moving migrants to detention facilities in different areas, insisting that Congress only authorizes the agency to deport immigrants, not relocate them internally, according to DHS officials.

 

The plan to retaliate against sanctuary cities came just after Trump agreed to reopen the government in late January, following a five-week shutdown over wall funding. The president gave lawmakers three weeks to come up with a plan to secure the border before a second fiscal deadline in mid-February.

It was during that mid-February standoff that one whistleblower went to Congress alleging that the White House was considering a plan to punish Democrats if they did not relent on ICE funding for beds. A second official independently came forward after that.

According to both, there were at least two versions of the plan being considered. One was to move migrants who were already in ICE detention to the districts of Democratic opponents. The second option was to bus migrants apprehended at the border to sanctuary cities, such as New York, Chicago and San Francisco.
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: WH Proposed Releasing Immigrants To Sanctuary Cities As Retaliation

411 Views
Message 43 of 51

@KidBoy2 wrote:
RK posted..

They have to go somewhere - why not Sanctuary States?

======================================================

Why not? It's the liberals that are protecting illegals in sanctuary cities.

Right MsStretch?

 

Because it is childish, petty, and vindictive. All the hallmarks of a Trump policy. Cities may refuse to help the government round up immigrants just as they refused to help round up escaped slaves.  Trump's problem is he does not like the Constitution one bit. 


Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: WH Proposed Releasing Immigrants To Sanctuary Cities As Retaliation

430 Views
Message 44 of 51
RK posted..

They have to go somewhere - why not Sanctuary States?

======================================================

Why not? It's the liberals that are protecting illegals in sanctuary cities.

Right MsStretch?
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: WH Proposed Releasing Immigrants To Sanctuary Cities As Retaliation

427 Views
Message 45 of 51

ManicProgressive: 

“Using human beings — including little children — as pawns....”

 

Yup. Beyond sick. Proof they don’t see immigrants as human beings.

 

Exactly. Trump wants to treat people like unwanted dogs that gets dumped from the car out in the country somewhere, and neither he nor his followers get how morally bankrupt that is.

As always, when people show you who they are, believe them.

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Trusted Social Butterfly

Re: WH Proposed Releasing Immigrants To Sanctuary Cities As Retaliation

430 Views
Message 46 of 51

@rk9152 wrote:

Such bouncing off the walls pettiness - candyland, Bonespurs, your boss is taking your money, and the usual racism about those poor brown (no - "illegal") people.

 

They have to go somewhere - why not Sanctuary States?


Pettiness?  Absolutely.  I learned it from the best at being petty -- Donald J. Trump.

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: WH Proposed Releasing Immigrants To Sanctuary Cities As Retaliation

441 Views
Message 47 of 51

That's actually a pretty good idea...  I like it!

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: WH Proposed Releasing Immigrants To Sanctuary Cities As Retaliation

438 Views
Message 48 of 51

Such bouncing off the walls pettiness - candyland, Bonespurs, your boss is taking your money, and the usual racism about those poor brown (no - "illegal") people.

 

They have to go somewhere - why not Sanctuary States?

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: WH Proposed Releasing Immigrants To Sanctuary Cities As Retaliation

458 Views
Message 49 of 51

lil donny Bonespurs keeps finding new ways to rip apart families so they will never reunite. His supporters CHEER! because after all, those are the same color of people who took all the good jobs and are invading our country, going to transform our culture. The racism of Regressives is so intense it overwhelms every trace of logical thought they may have once possessed.

 

Wakie wakie little GOPers - the reason YOU haven't gotten any meaningful raise is because YOUR BOSS kept all the profits for him/herself. The people seeking asylum had NOTHING to do with it.

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: WH Proposed Releasing Immigrants To Sanctuary Cities As Retaliation

462 Views
Message 50 of 51

“Using human beings — including little children — as pawns....”

 

Yup.  Beyond sick. Proof they don’t see immigrants as human beings.

Report Inappropriate Content
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Have a health tip to share or a health question to ask?

Check out the Health Tips discussion board today!

Top Authors