Refresh your driving skills and you could save on your auto insurance! Sign up for the AARP Smart Driver course.

 

Reply
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
192
Views

Re: ‘Uranium One’ Informant to Speak to Congress

192 Views
Message 1 of 46

The only people that need to be brought into the light are trump and sessions. And for donnie that light is getting a whole lot brighter. sessions is a really poor excuse for AG. 

 

You just keep beating the same old bushes, try looking inward

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
192
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
237
Views

Re: ‘Uranium One’ Informant to Speak to Congress

237 Views
Message 2 of 46

@CriticalThinking wrote:

 

The deal required multiple approvals by the U.S., starting with the Committee on Foreign Investments in the U.S. Under federal law, the committee reviews foreign investments that raise potential national security concerns.

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

AG Sessions is very interested in the process and the details.

 

Justice is on the way...

 

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
237
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
249
Views

‘Uranium One’ Informant to Speak to Congress

249 Views
Message 3 of 46

How many scams will members of the Trump Cult blindly fall for? Will they ever question or challenge any conspiracy theory which mentions Hillary or Obama, even when they're 9 or 10 years old? The answer is no. 

 

Trump Lovers will never look at the facts when Hillary or President Obama is involved. They do NOT want the truth, they want to believe every word of any conspiracy theory Fox repeats all day long, 7 days a week

 

There are too many facts for one post, but let's start with the following:

 

The deal required multiple approvals by the U.S., starting with the Committee on Foreign Investments in the U.S. Under federal law, the committee reviews foreign investments that raise potential national security concerns.

 

The Committee on Foreign Investments has nine members, including the secretaries of the treasury, state, defense, homeland security, commerce and energy; the attorney general; and representatives from two White House offices (the United States Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy).

 

As you can see above, even if Hillary was involved, she had a minuscule role in the decision. But don't tell that to members of Trump's Cult because they don't want the truth. 

 

There's a lot more, but this is enough for now.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
249
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
255
Views

Re: ‘Uranium One’ Informant to Speak to Congress

255 Views
Message 4 of 46

@Richva, Justice IS on the way... Tic tock.

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
255
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
258
Views

Re: ‘Uranium One’ Informant to Speak to Congress

258 Views
Message 5 of 46

@jimc91wrote:

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has ordered Justice Department prosecutors to interview FBI agents about the evidence uncovered in their criminal investigation into the 2010 Uranium One deal, multiple law enforcement officials told NBC News. A senior DOJ official said the questions stem from an assistant attorney general's promise to determine whether a special counsel is warranted.

 

Background: Trump brought the deal back into light in October when he singled out Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration for their involvement in the deal, calling it "the biggest story that Fake Media doesn't want to follow." Since then, some Republicans have questioned whether the Obama administration knew that the FBI had evidence that Russia had engaged in criminal activity, as well as if Clinton Foundation donors had any influence in the deal's approval.

 

https://www.axios.com/justice-department-ordered-to-re-examine-uranium-one-probe-1515110761-044ee489...

 

Justice is on the way...

 

 

 

 

 


Just to be clear, continuously revisiting pretend topics which have already been proved false is not "justice". It is the political equivalent of bullying.  Somebody should notify Melania. 

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
258
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
264
Views

Re: ‘Uranium One’ Informant to Speak to Congress

264 Views
Message 6 of 46

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has ordered Justice Department prosecutors to interview FBI agents about the evidence uncovered in their criminal investigation into the 2010 Uranium One deal, multiple law enforcement officials told NBC News. A senior DOJ official said the questions stem from an assistant attorney general's promise to determine whether a special counsel is warranted.

 

Background: Trump brought the deal back into light in October when he singled out Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration for their involvement in the deal, calling it "the biggest story that Fake Media doesn't want to follow." Since then, some Republicans have questioned whether the Obama administration knew that the FBI had evidence that Russia had engaged in criminal activity, as well as if Clinton Foundation donors had any influence in the deal's approval.

 

https://www.axios.com/justice-department-ordered-to-re-examine-uranium-one-probe-1515110761-044ee489...

 

Justice is on the way...

 

 

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
264
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
275
Views

Re: ‘Uranium One’ Informant to Speak to Congress

275 Views
Message 7 of 46

@jimc91wrote:

FBI Interviewed Uranium One Informant in Clinton Foundation Investigation William D. Campbell fights back against The Hill and Democratic accusations

 

former FBI informant who spent more than six years undercover gathering information on the Russian energy and uranium market was recently interviewed by FBI agents from the Little Rock, Arkansas field office as part of an ongoing bureau investigation into the Clinton Foundation, according to Victoria Toensing, the attorney representing the informant.

 

Toensing disclosed the information in a letter asking for a retraction to The Hill’s article published Thursday, which was based solely on a Democrat memorandum attacking the credibility of William Douglas Campbell, the former informant. Democrats stated that Campbell provided no evidence to the congressional committees of “quid pro quo” regarding the Clinton Foundation and the Russians.

 

Toensing was never contacted prior to publication by The Hill for fair comment in the story. The Hill’s article has now been followed up in The Washington Post, The Washington Examiner, CNN, Reuters, Yahoo,  and other numerous outlets, none of which contacted Toensing for fair comment.  On Friday, The Hill updated the story, only after receiving a call from Toensing asking for a retraction.

 

In a formal letter, Toensing condemned the Democratic memo and The Hill for making false allegations against her client and not contacting her for comment. The Hill did not retract the story but updated it instead.

 

“The reporter told me they were leaving in the accusations because she said, that’s what the Democrats told her,” said Toensing. “This is a new journalistic standard.”

 

A spokesperson for The Hill defended the news organization’s work, stating it has written extensively on the issue of the Uranium One sale and Campbell.

 

“The Hill has reported more extensively on Uranium One than any other publication brought this issue to the attention of the public, reporting accurately what members on both sides of the aisle have said about the issue,” The Hill spokesperson said in an email.

 

Friday’s edition of the story was updated to include Toensing’s statements from the letter she sent asking for a retraction of the story. The Hill also included a statement from a spokesperson for the Republican chairman of the House Oversight committee, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., on Friday.

“We did in fact ask multiple Republican lawmakers for comment and they declined to make any statement,” The Hill spokesperson said.

 

However, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., who were both actively involved in calling for an investigation into the Uranium One matter never received a call, they said.

“The information Campbell posseses and his previous knowledge of Russian operations to enter the U.S. energy market was significant enough to the bureau that they interviewed him in December…”

Victoria Toensing

Toensing said the information Campbell delivered to the FBI and his previous knowledge of Russian operations to enter the U.S. energy market was significant enough to the bureau that they interviewed him in December regarding the Clinton Foundation investigation.

 

“FBI agents from Little Rock, Arkansas interviewed Mr. Campbell about the Clinton Foundation,” she revealed. “Would they have done so if he had “serious credibility concerns?”

 

The article was written by The Hill staffer Katie Bo Williams. It was based on the Democratic memorandum of the briefing Campbell gave to both Republican and Democratic staffers from three Congressional Committees in February. Campbell provided the congressional staff members with years of in-depth and valuable information on the Russian nuclear energy industry and relayed thousands of briefs he put together for the FBI on his conversations with the Russians.

 

The Democratic memorandum “falsely accuses Mr. Campbell of criminal conduct, alleging that he had taken “kickbacks from [the Russian] firm before he was authorized to do so,” Toensing stated.

 

READ MUCH MORE:  https://saraacarter.com/fbi-interviewed-uranium-one-informant-in-clinton-foundation-investigation/

 

 

 


Here we go again the far right followers post the nonsense from their leaders to keep us from the real news of the day. We should all treat these nonsense subjects for what they are material for the trash can.

Here is the big news tonight.

Well we all now own a 250 billion boat . It was seized by the FBI in the latest scandal. We also own a Piacso Painting which was seized by the FBI from Leonardo the actor. What is the scandal which involves billions of $. Here is a short Summary.

The PM of Malaysia came into some like 750 billion in his bank accounts. He and a business man were laundering the money around the world. Our FBI has become involved since this has ties to the US. The business man is missing. I have a feeling for good.

With all this going on Trump had the PM make a state visit to the WH some time ago. The PM and his full crew stayed at the trump Hotel in DC so Trump made money on that. They had a dinner for the PM, and the FBI was afraid they might have to seize some of the Jewelery being worn by the PM wife as it was part of the case. They did not.

Trump had to know all this was going on when he invited the PM to visit.

There are a few of the people involved in the Trump world who are part of this. One of Trumps main donors is working with the PM as an business adv,, and being paid millions. That person is also a working with the Reb. National Committee as a Dep. Finance Director. He was part of the Trump campaign, and still is at the WH a lot of the time. He has a record in NY State where he paid a few million to people working with the NY State Pension fund for business. The State people went to jail, he was a cooperating witness (he got them sent up by telling what happened.) He got off with no jail time. There was an offer made through him that for something like 75 Million the our JD, FBI investigation into this scam would be dropped.

In the money laundering they formed a film production co. and paid for something like 4 films. Dum and Dumer 2 was one, and there was one about wall street in which Leo starred (that's how we now own the art).

This is so bad and involves so much I can not even remember it ail. I will tell you where to go and watch it. MSNBC (Rachel Maddow show Friday) has it all in detail, and the WP paper broke it. I think the NY Times is also involved. So instead of having a back and forth on the silly stuff the far right wants you to have go watch this full story as it will be breaking over the next days and months. I am sure we will see in time how deep Trump is mixed up in it.

As I have said to all. Go see the film RED SPARROWS. That is the world these (Trump) people live in.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
275
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
282
Views

Re: ‘Uranium One’ Informant to Speak to Congress

282 Views
Message 8 of 46

FBI Interviewed Uranium One Informant in Clinton Foundation Investigation William D. Campbell fights back against The Hill and Democratic accusations

 

former FBI informant who spent more than six years undercover gathering information on the Russian energy and uranium market was recently interviewed by FBI agents from the Little Rock, Arkansas field office as part of an ongoing bureau investigation into the Clinton Foundation, according to Victoria Toensing, the attorney representing the informant.

 

Toensing disclosed the information in a letter asking for a retraction to The Hill’s article published Thursday, which was based solely on a Democrat memorandum attacking the credibility of William Douglas Campbell, the former informant. Democrats stated that Campbell provided no evidence to the congressional committees of “quid pro quo” regarding the Clinton Foundation and the Russians.

 

Toensing was never contacted prior to publication by The Hill for fair comment in the story. The Hill’s article has now been followed up in The Washington Post, The Washington Examiner, CNN, Reuters, Yahoo,  and other numerous outlets, none of which contacted Toensing for fair comment.  On Friday, The Hill updated the story, only after receiving a call from Toensing asking for a retraction.

 

In a formal letter, Toensing condemned the Democratic memo and The Hill for making false allegations against her client and not contacting her for comment. The Hill did not retract the story but updated it instead.

 

“The reporter told me they were leaving in the accusations because she said, that’s what the Democrats told her,” said Toensing. “This is a new journalistic standard.”

 

A spokesperson for The Hill defended the news organization’s work, stating it has written extensively on the issue of the Uranium One sale and Campbell.

 

“The Hill has reported more extensively on Uranium One than any other publication brought this issue to the attention of the public, reporting accurately what members on both sides of the aisle have said about the issue,” The Hill spokesperson said in an email.

 

Friday’s edition of the story was updated to include Toensing’s statements from the letter she sent asking for a retraction of the story. The Hill also included a statement from a spokesperson for the Republican chairman of the House Oversight committee, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., on Friday.

“We did in fact ask multiple Republican lawmakers for comment and they declined to make any statement,” The Hill spokesperson said.

 

However, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., who were both actively involved in calling for an investigation into the Uranium One matter never received a call, they said.

“The information Campbell posseses and his previous knowledge of Russian operations to enter the U.S. energy market was significant enough to the bureau that they interviewed him in December…”

Victoria Toensing

Toensing said the information Campbell delivered to the FBI and his previous knowledge of Russian operations to enter the U.S. energy market was significant enough to the bureau that they interviewed him in December regarding the Clinton Foundation investigation.

 

“FBI agents from Little Rock, Arkansas interviewed Mr. Campbell about the Clinton Foundation,” she revealed. “Would they have done so if he had “serious credibility concerns?”

 

The article was written by The Hill staffer Katie Bo Williams. It was based on the Democratic memorandum of the briefing Campbell gave to both Republican and Democratic staffers from three Congressional Committees in February. Campbell provided the congressional staff members with years of in-depth and valuable information on the Russian nuclear energy industry and relayed thousands of briefs he put together for the FBI on his conversations with the Russians.

 

The Democratic memorandum “falsely accuses Mr. Campbell of criminal conduct, alleging that he had taken “kickbacks from [the Russian] firm before he was authorized to do so,” Toensing stated.

 

READ MUCH MORE:  https://saraacarter.com/fbi-interviewed-uranium-one-informant-in-clinton-foundation-investigation/

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
282
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
410
Views

Re: ‘Uranium One’ Informant to Speak to Congress

410 Views
Message 9 of 46

@CriticalThinking wrote:

John did an excellent job responding to the author of this thread when he wrote, "

 

Here you see how the tag team posting works. First you take a subject and post it under different names so there are a lot threads on it. Then you take the provided stories which are not true and post them at different stages in each thread. Then when one of your buddies seems to be wearing out you come in and relieve him or her with more stories that are not true. You keep this up for weeks if possible and the masters have told you all the lies will seem true. Sadly that works with the far right and some others. You also get to try and change the subject, and today the real subject is who was indited in the Russia probe.

 

Here is some real news. Did you see that the Trump Campaign Data arm offered to work with the Russians  to sort out the stolen E mails from Hillary so they could be released quicker, and used quicker by posters like I am talking about.

 

From top to bottom this is all controlled by the Russians."


I'll say one thing Critical:    I know who won't have charges filed against them or get arrested come Monday ............ Bill or Hillary !!!!


"The only thing man learns from history is man learns nothing from history"
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
410
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
422
Views

‘Uranium One’ Informant to Speak to Congress

422 Views
Message 10 of 46

John did an excellent job responding to the author of this thread when he wrote, "

 

Here you see how the tag team posting works. First you take a subject and post it under different names so there are a lot threads on it. Then you take the provided stories which are not true and post them at different stages in each thread. Then when one of your buddies seems to be wearing out you come in and relieve him or her with more stories that are not true. You keep this up for weeks if possible and the masters have told you all the lies will seem true. Sadly that works with the far right and some others. You also get to try and change the subject, and today the real subject is who was indited in the Russia probe.

 

Here is some real news. Did you see that the Trump Campaign Data arm offered to work with the Russians  to sort out the stolen E mails from Hillary so they could be released quicker, and used quicker by posters like I am talking about.

 

From top to bottom this is all controlled by the Russians."

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
422
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Have a question about AARP membership or benefits? Ask it in the AARP Help Membership forum, Benefits & Discounts forum, or General forum.


multiple white question marks with center red question mark

Top Authors