Honored Social Butterfly

Trump overexposed himself long ago — and has no new tricks to offer

Trump overexposed himself long ago — and has no new tricks to offer


The once-careful decorum of presidential news conferences is gone — shattered into a thousand tiny pieces as the president and the press interrupt, talk over, insult and ignore each other.


It is a mesmerizing show to watch. And it’s the predictable result of two colliding fault lines: Donald Trump’s decades of media overexposure and the emergence of a young crop of White House correspondents born into — and unintimidated by — that same environment of sensory overload.


For them, Trump doesn’t embody the majesty and mystery of his office. He’s just another guy on social media, like 2,000 of their closest friends. He’s a reality-show celebrity, sure — but in a modern world where everyone gets 15 minutes of fame. And he’s the guy who, for years, went on shock-jock Howard Stern’s radio show to rollick through anything and everything in his personal life.


Among the most forceful new members of the White House Press Corps are CNN’s Jeremy Diamond and Kaitlin Collins, both 28. They were in middle school when Trump’s TV show, “The Apprentice,” debuted in 2004. For PBS’s Yamiche Alcindor, age 32, the real estate mogul’s show was, if anything, background noise as she prepped for the SAT.


Studies indicate “The Apprentice” left a strong impression on some older voters, who kept that larger-than-life image of Trump in mind when they cast ballots for him in 2016. But younger people grew up on “unscripted” reality TV and know it’s about as real as a mirage. The tightly choreographed board-room scenes of Trump triumphant may have dazzled their parents, but the kids — raised on a steady diet of faux reality on MTV, VH1 and more — simply rolled their eyes and played along with the pretend.


Just one month after “The Apprentice” started its run on NBC, Facebook debuted, and the era of social media began. Young users like Diamond, Collins and Alcindor were early adopters, moving from Facebook to Twitter (2006), then over to Instagram (2010). Researchers label people now in their late 20s and early 30s as “social media natives” because it’s a language they  grew up speaking. Trump’s social media fluency may impress older voters, but not a generation that honestly can’t remember a world without it.


That same generation is often criticized for living their private lives publicly, posting every embarrassing moment — a habit, they’re told, that could haunt them later. But they can’t begin to compete with Trump’s Howard Stern radio time — 15 hours over several years, spent discussing in stark terms his various wives, their detailed prenups, and the models he dated in between.


All of this leads to a special case of “familiarity breeds contempt” among younger people regarding the president, perhaps especially among those in the White House press corps. Reality TV and social media overexposure can “flatten” a person — and to younger generations, these are now very humdrum, banal forms of communication, making everyone involved actually seem less exceptional.


For Trump, that means the invisible barrier which normally exists between a president and the press corps has disappeared. And the more he makes himself available to the media, the worse it gets, as we’re seeing with his daily coronavirus news conferences. Too often he doesn’t seem “presidential” but, instead, displays the same personality ticks and flaws he has exhibited over many years — and what used to be entertaining is now mostly frustrating for reporters. The news-conference Trump is just like the Trump on Twitter, barking in all capital letters ... and just like the Trump on reality TV shouting, “You’re fired!”


Younger press corps members literally grew up watching that guy, out there in the media bloodstream, overexposed every step of the way, with his extreme hunger for media attention.

It’s no wonder they treat him like someone they know all too well. 


At least for time being, Trump seems to have gotten the message — he's dialed back on his time at the news conferences, and didn't hold one at all Saturday.


But that shift — assuming it lasts — probably comes years too late.


Trump overexposed himself long ago — and has no new tricks to offer 


This article is from The Hill, considered one of the LEAST biased media sources.....


The Hill - Least Biased - Credible - Reliable - Not Left - Not right BiasFactual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Mostly Credible and Reliable

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

  • Overall, we rate The Hill Least Biased based on editorial positions that are currently balanced and news reporting that is low biased. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to previous opinion columns promoting unproven claims.

Detailed Report


Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180




The Hill is an American political journalism newspaper and website published in Washington, D.C. since 1994. The Hill focuses on politics, policy, business, and international relations. Their coverage includes the U.S. Congress, the presidency, and election campaigns. The current editor is Bob Cusack, who has been reporting on policy and politics in the nation’s capital since 1995.

Read our profile on United States government and media.


Funded by / Ownership


The Hill is published by Capitol Hill Publishing, which is owned by News Communications, Inc. Jimmy Finkelstein is the current CEO of New Communications who is described as a “Republican and longtime friend who served as a fundraiser for Giuliani’s failed 2008 presidential run.” The paper and website are funded through a subscription and advertising model.


Analysis / Bias


In review, The Hill covers both sides on the political spectrum and generally sources information properly, however they sometimes rush stories and have to change them after the fact.  The Hill rarely uses loaded words in their headlines and articles such as this: Trump says he won’t sign GOP’s compromise immigration bill. All news stories are sourced to either journalists in the field or credible media sources.


The Hill features editorial commentaries that provide a reasonably balanced group of columnist that consists of the following:


The Hill also features other outside opinion contributors such as Newt Gingrich among other prominent figures. The general overall tone of all op-ed’s taken together is currently balanced after dominant right-leaning voice John Solomon left the paper in October 2019.


The Hill has faced criticism for the hiring of John Solomon, who is described as a strong supporter of President Trump and a conspiracy theorist, with his previous opinion columns under review for false content. Further, it has been reported that owner Jimmy Finkelstein “kept a watchful eye on the newspaper’s coverage to ensure it is not too critical of the President.”


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in DC, 1/27/2017
0 Kudos
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Does AARP donate to political parties or endorse candidates?

AARP is strictly non-partisan and always has been. We never endorse or donate to candidates, political parties or political action committees.

Learn more.

AARP Members Only Games

Play members only games, like FIll Ins, Lumeno, 2048 and a collaborative, multiplayer Let's Crossword.

Play Now
AARP Members Only Games Logos
AARP Rewards

Solve Crosswords. Earn Rewards. Activate AARP Rewards to earn points for games, quizzes and videos. Redeem for deals and discounts.

Get started with AARP Rewards now!