Trump now claims DOJ put a spy in his campaign to frame him.......

[john258]

---

@rk9152 wrote:

---

@john258 wrote:

---

@rk9152 wrote:

---

@john258 wrote:

---

@rk9152 wrote:

---

---

  Obama said that didn't happen. Are you calling him a liar? If so, that would make you a racist to some.

---

You said bye bye to me and told me would would not post to me. Yet you are. You are asking me questions again but will not answer mine. Stick to your bye bye, and you are calling me names which is against the TOS.

---

Yep, I thought you might have a problem with that Obama statement.

As to "name calling" - read it again with specific reference to the words "to some".

---

You just can not resist. You said bye bye, but keep trying. It reminds me of our cat she just can not resist climbing in the closet when to door is open, but she knows she should not.

---

Sorry, I just can't see the connection between you thinking Obama lied and being in or out of the closet.

---

You said bye bye now you must follow what you said.

---

I suspected you would have to dodge rather than deal with your words. Suspicion confirmed!!!!

---

You said bye bye so why are you posting to me? Far right proving again the the experts tell us about them.

---

Interesting!! Who are the experts that tell "us" that Conservatives are capable of discussing issues on an intellectual level while those to the left have to resort yo double-talk, games, and dodging.

---

You said bye bye but now you seem to say you did not tell the truth when you said that. Our far right just can not stand to be ignored. Well it is easy for us thinking people to do that as we do not spend all our time trying to make our selves look good by talking, we make our selves look good by what we do. We do not steal children from mothers at the border and move them across the country. The far right SS (Ice) does.

[rk9152]

---

@CriticalThinking wrote:

"Does that mean you think the Obama Administration did place a "source" in the Trump campaign but that's O.K. because...."

How silly can the questions become? Obviously he watches Fox because that's the kind of trash Fox promotes. For those who are thinking, the Obama Administration can't place anything inside the Trump campaign. In addition, they would have to be pretty stupid and/or desperate to even try something so dumb.

But let's examine what's realistically possible. The FBI may have developed a "confidential source" inside the campaign. This is SOP in law enforcement and perfectly legal/proper. Let me emphasize the word "may".

---

Actually it is the sort of "trash" reported on MSNBC and CNN. Not really that dumb - he had the small politicized elements of the bureaucracy to work with and knew he would have the Dems and MSM to come up with various defenses. 

As to you last para, it seems to indicate  you think the Obama Administration did place a "source" in the Trump campaign but that's O.K. because.... well.....something about Fox.

[CriticalThinking]

"Does that mean you think the Obama Administration did place a "source" in the Trump campaign but that's O.K. because...."

How silly can the questions become? Obviously he watches Fox because that's the kind of trash Fox promotes. For those who are thinking, the Obama Administration can't place anything inside the Trump campaign. In addition, they would have to be pretty stupid and/or desperate to even try something so dumb.

But let's examine what's realistically possible. The FBI may have developed a "confidential source" inside the campaign. This is SOP in law enforcement and perfectly legal and proper.

We don't know if that happened, so let me emphasize the word "may".

[rk9152]

---

@CriticalThinking wrote:

Trump loyalists believe every bit of propaganda coming out of the White House and then repeated endlessly on Fox. It must be true because Fox keeps repeating the story 24/7. 

And of course everybody knows we can trust the "Liar In Chief". After all, who would you believe, the FBI or a pathological liar?

---

Does that mean you think the Obama Administration did place a "source" in the Trump campaign but that's O.K. because ..... well..... because something about Fox.

Or does that mena that you think they didn't?

[CriticalThinking]

Trump loyalists believe every bit of propaganda coming out of the White House and then repeated endlessly on Fox. It must be true because Fox keeps repeating the story 24/7. 

And of course everybody knows we can trust the "Liar In Chief". After all, who would you believe, the FBI or a pathological liar?

[rk9152]

---

@john258 wrote:

---

@rk9152 wrote:

---

@john258 wrote:

---

@rk9152 wrote:

---

---

  Obama said that didn't happen. Are you calling him a liar? If so, that would make you a racist to some.

---

You said bye bye to me and told me would would not post to me. Yet you are. You are asking me questions again but will not answer mine. Stick to your bye bye, and you are calling me names which is against the TOS.

---

Yep, I thought you might have a problem with that Obama statement.

As to "name calling" - read it again with specific reference to the words "to some".

---

You just can not resist. You said bye bye, but keep trying. It reminds me of our cat she just can not resist climbing in the closet when to door is open, but she knows she should not.

---

Sorry, I just can't see the connection between you thinking Obama lied and being in or out of the closet.

---

You said bye bye now you must follow what you said.

---

I suspected you would have to dodge rather than deal with your words. Suspicion confirmed!!!!

---

You said bye bye so why are you posting to me? Far right proving again the the experts tell us about them.

---

Interesting!! Who are the experts that tell "us" that Conservatives are capable of discussing issues on an intellectual level while those to the left have to resort yo double-talk, games, and dodging.

[john258]

---

@rk9152 wrote:

---

@john258 wrote:

---

@rk9152 wrote:

---

---

  Obama said that didn't happen. Are you calling him a liar? If so, that would make you a racist to some.

---

You said bye bye to me and told me would would not post to me. Yet you are. You are asking me questions again but will not answer mine. Stick to your bye bye, and you are calling me names which is against the TOS.

---

Yep, I thought you might have a problem with that Obama statement.

As to "name calling" - read it again with specific reference to the words "to some".

---

You just can not resist. You said bye bye, but keep trying. It reminds me of our cat she just can not resist climbing in the closet when to door is open, but she knows she should not.

---

Sorry, I just can't see the connection between you thinking Obama lied and being in or out of the closet.

---

You said bye bye now you must follow what you said.

---

I suspected you would have to dodge rather than deal with your words. Suspicion confirmed!!!!

---

You said bye bye so why are you posting to me? Far right proving again the the experts tell us about them.

[rk9152]

---

@CriticalThinking wrote:

Chasky said, " the whining and howling at the moon from the Right when their cult leader or anyone connected to him is subjected to criticism and/or investigation.

So it was OK for the "supposed investigations" on Hillary to be played out in the media for over a decade, yet trump and the Mueller investigations shouldn't be mentioned in the media? The double standards of the Right are astounding. In this case, those double standards are fear driven; fear that the Mueller investigations will find trump guilty of breaking the law."

---

Yes he/she/it did. Please take note of my response.

[rk9152]

---

@ChasKy53 wrote:

---

@rk9152 wrote:

---

@Snoopy48 wrote:

---

@rk9152 wrote:

---

@oceanedge2 wrote:

rk - And - are any of those indictments related to Russian collusion?

Sounds like a "no".

You've misunderstood.  The answer to your question is "YES", per Mueller.

So maybe posters can stop the rants about the indictments, etc.

With more coming???  Afraid not.  I'm taking bets with relatives on those.  It's quite sticky if Manafort really will insist on his day(s) in court(s).

---

Did Mueller really say, for example, that being extorted by a porn star is "Russian collusion". Is "lying to the FBI" really "Russian collusion".

---

Can you provide verifiable proof that Mueller is even looking at anything to do with Trump's payout to Stormy Daniels? 

---

Can you provide verifiable proof that he isn't?

But, you do have a point - much of this supposed investigation is playing out in the biased media and other places. Look at all the Stormy posts here as if they were part of the investigation.

On the other hand, the officials did raid the lawyer's homes and offices. Seems like they might be "looking".

---

Oh, the whining and howling at the moon from the Right when their cult leader or anyone connected to him is subjected to criticism and/or investigation.

So it was OK for the "supposed investigations" on Hillary to be played out in the media for over a decade, yet trump and the Mueller investigations shouldn't be mentioned in the media? The double standards of the Right are astounding. In this case, those double standards are fear driven; fear that the Mueller investigations will find trump guilty of breaking the law.

---

---

@ChasKy53 wrote:

---

@rk9152 wrote:

---

@Snoopy48 wrote:

---

@rk9152 wrote:

---

@oceanedge2 wrote:

rk - And - are any of those indictments related to Russian collusion?

Sounds like a "no".

You've misunderstood.  The answer to your question is "YES", per Mueller.

So maybe posters can stop the rants about the indictments, etc.

With more coming???  Afraid not.  I'm taking bets with relatives on those.  It's quite sticky if Manafort really will insist on his day(s) in court(s).

---

Did Mueller really say, for example, that being extorted by a porn star is "Russian collusion". Is "lying to the FBI" really "Russian collusion".

---

Can you provide verifiable proof that Mueller is even looking at anything to do with Trump's payout to Stormy Daniels? 

---

Can you provide verifiable proof that he isn't?

But, you do have a point - much of this supposed investigation is playing out in the biased media and other places. Look at all the Stormy posts here as if they were part of the investigation.

On the other hand, the officials did raid the lawyer's homes and offices. Seems like they might be "looking".

---

Oh, the whining and howling at the moon from the Right when their cult leader or anyone connected to him is subjected to criticism and/or investigation.

No whining, no howling, just responding to the words of ocean. would you care to join in.

So it was OK for the "supposed investigations" on Hillary to be played out in the media for over a decade, yet trump and the Mueller investigations shouldn't be mentioned in the media? The double standards of the Right are astounding. In this case, those double standards are fear driven; fear that the Mueller investigations will find trump guilty of breaking the law.

You missed the point. ocean pointed out that we really don'tknow what Mueller is and is not investigating. The investigations of Hillary were open.

Instead of getting all giggly over "double standards" and howling, try following the conversation you went to add your one cent to - or just say "Yeah, me too" and collect your kudoes.

---