Reply
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
552
Views

Re: The Trump Cover-Up is Revealed

552 Views
Message 1 of 24

@rk9152 wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:


 


 


 


Image result for kettle black


Sorry, you lost me - how is that related to a poster complaining about long posts but only addressing one of the posters?

 

Or was it intended as just one more meaningless insult?


Must not have been "meaningless', after all you replied to it.


"The only thing that man learns from history is that man learns nothing from history."
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
552
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
590
Views

Re: The Trump Cover-Up is Revealed

590 Views
Message 2 of 24

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@Roxanna35 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:


Only to the biased. You are overlooking the left over people "close to the WH" who could well be part of the "by any means necessary" crowd.


Is there a way to convince you to please delete all previous posts that you are not answering? again, they are unreadable.
Now for your post.
Yes, there are many in the WH that have been there for many Administrations. and there will always be people like that in every Administration.

But, they are not privy to Trump or his meetings or anything that can actually hurt or help Trump.
So, in order to be specific. His crowd. Jared, Ivanka. his aids, Spicer, Bannon, Kelly Ann and perhaps others. and his National Security Advisor. Sessions.  and Prebious. probably that is about it. The left over people, I bet they don't even see Trump. and that includes Melania. lOL


Is there any way to convince you that were you to address all involved, not just one, your request would seem more sincere and less personal and biased.


Image result for kettle black


Sorry, you lost me - how is that related to a poster complaining about long posts but only addressing one of the posters?

 

Or was it intended as just one more meaningless insult?

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
590
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
597
Views

Re: The Trump Cover-Up is Revealed

597 Views
Message 3 of 24

@rk9152 wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote: 

Rosenstein threatened to resign after the narrative emerging from the White House on Tuesday evening cast him as a prime mover of the decision to fire Comey and that the president acted only on his recommendation, said the person close to the White House, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.


Speaks volumes!  So the Washington Post said so and the person who said it is anonymous.

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/mattbarber/2016/08/07/why-the-washington-post-has-no-credibility-n22...


I'll take the multiple Pulitzer Prize winning Washington Post over the TownHall website anyday of the week.  One does actual journalistic reporting.


Actually, history has shown that you will "take" any source that agrees with you and disregard any one that does not.


Of course that's coming from one who argues the fringes and has never posted sourced information.  Why?  There's no reason to when one posts only to twist others words, complain about word choice and post straw arguments.


You are getting repetitious - have a blessed day.


And you STILL don't get it.....


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in DC, 1/27/2017
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
597
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
600
Views

Re: The Trump Cover-Up is Revealed

600 Views
Message 4 of 24

@rk9152 wrote:

@Roxanna35 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:


Only to the biased. You are overlooking the left over people "close to the WH" who could well be part of the "by any means necessary" crowd.


Is there a way to convince you to please delete all previous posts that you are not answering? again, they are unreadable.
Now for your post.
Yes, there are many in the WH that have been there for many Administrations. and there will always be people like that in every Administration.

But, they are not privy to Trump or his meetings or anything that can actually hurt or help Trump.
So, in order to be specific. His crowd. Jared, Ivanka. his aids, Spicer, Bannon, Kelly Ann and perhaps others. and his National Security Advisor. Sessions.  and Prebious. probably that is about it. The left over people, I bet they don't even see Trump. and that includes Melania. lOL


Is there any way to convince you that were you to address all involved, not just one, your request would seem more sincere and less personal and biased.


Image result for kettle black


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in DC, 1/27/2017
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
600
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
608
Views

Re: The Trump Cover-Up is Revealed

608 Views
Message 5 of 24

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote: 

Rosenstein threatened to resign after the narrative emerging from the White House on Tuesday evening cast him as a prime mover of the decision to fire Comey and that the president acted only on his recommendation, said the person close to the White House, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.


Speaks volumes!  So the Washington Post said so and the person who said it is anonymous.

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/mattbarber/2016/08/07/why-the-washington-post-has-no-credibility-n22...


I'll take the multiple Pulitzer Prize winning Washington Post over the TownHall website anyday of the week.  One does actual journalistic reporting.


Actually, history has shown that you will "take" any source that agrees with you and disregard any one that does not.


Of course that's coming from one who argues the fringes and has never posted sourced information.  Why?  There's no reason to when one posts only to twist others words, complain about word choice and post straw arguments.


You are getting repetitious - have a blessed day.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
608
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
609
Views

Re: The Trump Cover-Up is Revealed

609 Views
Message 6 of 24

@Roxanna35 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:


Only to the biased. You are overlooking the left over people "close to the WH" who could well be part of the "by any means necessary" crowd.


Is there a way to convince you to please delete all previous posts that you are not answering? again, they are unreadable.
Now for your post.
Yes, there are many in the WH that have been there for many Administrations. and there will always be people like that in every Administration.

But, they are not privy to Trump or his meetings or anything that can actually hurt or help Trump.
So, in order to be specific. His crowd. Jared, Ivanka. his aids, Spicer, Bannon, Kelly Ann and perhaps others. and his National Security Advisor. Sessions.  and Prebious. probably that is about it. The left over people, I bet they don't even see Trump. and that includes Melania. lOL


Is there any way to convince you that were you to address all involved, not just one, your request would seem more sincere and less personal and biased.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
609
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
627
Views

Re: The Trump Cover-Up is Revealed

627 Views
Message 7 of 24

@rk9152 wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote: 

Rosenstein threatened to resign after the narrative emerging from the White House on Tuesday evening cast him as a prime mover of the decision to fire Comey and that the president acted only on his recommendation, said the person close to the White House, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.


Speaks volumes!  So the Washington Post said so and the person who said it is anonymous.

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/mattbarber/2016/08/07/why-the-washington-post-has-no-credibility-n22...


I'll take the multiple Pulitzer Prize winning Washington Post over the TownHall website anyday of the week.  One does actual journalistic reporting.


Actually, history has shown that you will "take" any source that agrees with you and disregard any one that does not.


Of course that's coming from one who argues the fringes and has never posted sourced information.  Why?  There's no reason to when one posts only to twist others words, complain about word choice and post straw arguments.


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in DC, 1/27/2017
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
627
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
632
Views

Re: The Trump Cover-Up is Revealed

632 Views
Message 8 of 24

@rk9152 wrote:


Only to the biased. You are overlooking the left over people "close to the WH" who could well be part of the "by any means necessary" crowd.


Is there a way to convince you to please delete all previous posts that you are not answering? again, they are unreadable.
Now for your post.
Yes, there are many in the WH that have been there for many Administrations. and there will always be people like that in every Administration.

But, they are not privy to Trump or his meetings or anything that can actually hurt or help Trump.
So, in order to be specific. His crowd. Jared, Ivanka. his aids, Spicer, Bannon, Kelly Ann and perhaps others. and his National Security Advisor. Sessions.  and Prebious. probably that is about it. The left over people, I bet they don't even see Trump. and that includes Melania. lOL

no name
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
632
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
650
Views

Re: The Trump Cover-Up is Revealed

650 Views
Message 9 of 24

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:
 
Accounts from more than 30 officials at the White House, Justice Department and on Capitol Hill indicate that President Trump was angry that FBI Director James B. Comey would not support his baseless claim that President Obama had his campaign offices wiretapped. Trump also fumed that Comey was giving too much attention to the Russia probe and not enough to investigating leaks to journalists.
 
 
Inside Trump’s anger and impatience — and his sudden decision to fire Comey
 

Every time FBI Director James B. Comey appeared in public, an ever-watchful President Trump grew increasingly agitated that the topic was the one that he was most desperate to avoid: Russia.

Trump had long questioned Comey’s loyalty and judgment, and was infuriated by what he viewed as the director’s lack of action in recent weeks on leaks from within the federal government. By last weekend, he had made up his mind: Comey had to go.

 

At his golf course in Bedminster, N.J., Trump groused over Comey’s latest congressional testimony, which he thought was “strange,” and grew impatient with what he viewed as his sanctimony, according to White House officials. Comey, Trump figured, was using the Russia probe to become a martyr.

 

Back at work Monday morning in Washington, Trump told Vice President Pence and several senior aides — Reince Priebus, Stephen K. Bannon and Donald McGahn, among others — that he was ready to move on Comey. First, though, he wanted to talk with Attorney General Jeff Sessions, his trusted confidant, and Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, to whom Comey reported directly. Trump summoned the two of them to the White House for a meeting, according to a person close to the White House.

 

The president already had decided to fire Comey, according to this person. But in the meeting, several White House officials said Trump gave Sessions and Rosenstein a directive: to explain in writing the case against Comey.

 

The pair quickly fulfilled the boss’s orders, and the next day Trump fired Comey — a breathtaking move that thrust a White House already accustomed to chaos into a new level of tumult, one that has legal as well as political consequences.

Rosenstein threatened to resign after the narrative emerging from the White House on Tuesday evening cast him as a prime mover of the decision to fire Comey and that the president acted only on his recommendation, said the person close to the White House, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

 

Justice Department officials declined to comment.

 

The stated rationale for Comey’s firing delivered Wednesday by principal deputy White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was that he had committed “atrocities” in overseeing the FBI’s probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state, hurting morale in the bureau and compromising public trust.

 

“He wasn’t doing a good job,” Trump told reporters Wednesday. “Very simple. He wasn’t doing a good job.”

 

much much more at:  Inside Trump’s anger and impatience — and his sudden decision to fire Comey


From the article, "said the person close to the White House", "according to a person close to the White House", "officials said", "these people said", "according to several people familiar with the dynamic" - might it not be wise to await the words of the people themselves?

 

ANY "person close to the white house" instantly has more credibilility than trump. 


Only to the biased. You are overlooking the left over people "close to the WH" who could well be part of the "by any means necessary" crowd.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
650
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
658
Views

Re: The Trump Cover-Up is Revealed

658 Views
Message 10 of 24

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote: 

Rosenstein threatened to resign after the narrative emerging from the White House on Tuesday evening cast him as a prime mover of the decision to fire Comey and that the president acted only on his recommendation, said the person close to the White House, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.


Speaks volumes!  So the Washington Post said so and the person who said it is anonymous.

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/mattbarber/2016/08/07/why-the-washington-post-has-no-credibility-n22...


I'll take the multiple Pulitzer Prize winning Washington Post over the TownHall website anyday of the week.  One does actual journalistic reporting.


Actually, history has shown that you will "take" any source that agrees with you and disregard any one that does not.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
658
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Introducing jen43, one of our featured ACEs! Check out their profile and fill yours out, today!

Meet an ACE

Top Authors