@Epsterwrote:
Meanwhile, it does not surprise me to see such careless use of language.
I was on the receiving end of unsettling Unibomber surface mail. I was on the receiving end of death threats from Unibomber wannabes. I was a frequent visitor to an office building in which a Unibomber package exploded, causing death and mayhem. My friend was killed by this bomb.
Unless your incoming mail was routinely inspected by the FBI; unless you had clients hire a bodyguard so you could perform your work; unless your vehicle was routinely swept for bombs, all courtesy of the Unibomber and his mimics, you might not find the use of the term here to be grossly inappropriate.
And yet it is exactly that: insensitive, crude, incendiary and inappropriate. Also typical of these boards.
Epster, the frequent thread unsubber, going now to engage that feature because there is nothing you can say now that I intend to read. Period.
The blitzkrieg manner in which you attack another's post without one iota of ON TOPIC discourse is really getting long in the tooth. This isn't the first time you are guilty of this.
@Epster, your experiences have nothing to do with the subject matter of this post.
That I used the name given to "Ted" Kaczynski, THE UNABOMBER, is because many, from The Washington Post to Fox News, are drawing parallels of these latest incidents to the incidents he perpetrated so many years ago.
Where you got the term UNIBOMBER from, I do not know.
Frankly, you make it sound like my post was personal when you weren't even a participant in the thread.
Once your complete your attack by using words such as insensitive, crude, and inappropriate; you then state you won't be reading any responses.
In other words, the only purpose of your post was NOT discourse but WAS TO ATTACK ANOTHER.
