The Only 2016 Campaign That Deliberately Colluded With Russians Was Hillary Clinton’s

Reply
Highlighted
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
296
Views

Re: The Only 2016 Campaign That Deliberately Colluded With Russians Was Hillary Clinton’s

296 Views
Message 41 of 55

@TxGrandpa2 wrote:

@Soosie wrote:

Sure would be good if posters debated the post rather than always bringing up the fact they don't like the source.  Somehow seems to defeat the pupose of a forum that is for debating political views.  I bet the ratings here would improve if the guidelines were followed more closely.


Criticizing the source instead of the content would be like criticizing the poster instead of what they post.  .......


So Tex ...... how would you value a "source" that attempts to rationalize child molestation????

DUMP TRUMP AND DITCH MITCH TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
296
Views
Highlighted
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
297
Views

Re: The Only 2016 Campaign That Deliberately Colluded With Russians Was Hillary Clinton’s

297 Views
Message 42 of 55

@jimc91 wrote:

There was Russian collusion during the 2016 presidential campaign, but it didn't come from Donald Trump.

 

 

Not true jimc91 ......

 

The collusion came from Trump's son and son-in-law when they met with Russian agents and spies ..... and also provided requested polling data to the Russians.

 

Please recall that Trump also requested the Russians to hack into our cyber systems to obtain dirt on Hillary Clinton. And on the same day of that request, 12 Russian intelligence officers attempted to hack into Hillary's server.

 

I prefer to believe the findings of our country's 17 intelligence agencies instead of a biased rag publication that attempts to rationalize child molestation!

DUMP TRUMP AND DITCH MITCH TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
297
Views
Highlighted
Valued Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
331
Views

Re: The Only 2016 Campaign That Deliberately Colluded With Russians Was Hillary Clinton’s

331 Views
Message 43 of 55

@TxGrandpa2 wrote:

@Panjandrum wrote:

 

If a post is going to be treated seriously, then it needs to contain factual information. When it orginates from the likes of The Federalist, it's little more than whackadoodle speculation aimed at riling the base. That's a given, and not worth respect.


Perhaps you or the other poster could come up with a source more suited to your liking in rebuttal?  Instead of going after the source instead of the content?  Should a source be submitted to you or that other poster before using it? 


The entire support story is not true per all of our Intel agencies. They have been  telling us that for a year now.

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
331
Views
Highlighted
Valued Social Butterfly
4
Kudos
337
Views

Re: The Only 2016 Campaign That Deliberately Colluded With Russians Was Hillary Clinton’s

337 Views
Message 44 of 55

Soosie , debating these kind of "stories" serves no useful purpose , unless you enjoy the ridiculous. I guess some people even believe the National Inquirer.

Report Inappropriate Content
4
Kudos
337
Views
Highlighted
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
342
Views

Re: The Only 2016 Campaign That Deliberately Colluded With Russians Was Hillary Clinton’s

342 Views
Message 45 of 55

I agree with Schiff on collusion....

 

Schiff doubles down on collusion.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
342
Views
Highlighted
Trusted Social Butterfly
5
Kudos
367
Views

Re: The Only 2016 Campaign That Deliberately Colluded With Russians Was Hillary Clinton’s

367 Views
Message 46 of 55

Soosie:   Perhaps you or the other poster could come up with a source more suited to your liking in rebuttal? 

 

 

Why bother? That's like claiming the earth is flat and asking for a rebuttal to the claim. As I said, not worthy of respect or time.

Report Inappropriate Content
5
Kudos
367
Views
Highlighted
Treasured Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
384
Views

Re: The Only 2016 Campaign That Deliberately Colluded With Russians Was Hillary Clinton’s

384 Views
Message 47 of 55
If a post is going to be treated seriously, then it needs to contain factual information. When it orginates from the likes of The Federalist, it's little more than whackadoodle speculation aimed at riling the base. That's a given, and not worth respect. @Panjandrum...........So why don't you post what you consider the factual information. That might wipe out the whackadoodle speculation.
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
384
Views
Highlighted
Treasured Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
364
Views

Re: The Only 2016 Campaign That Deliberately Colluded With Russians Was Hillary Clinton’s

364 Views
Message 48 of 55

@Panjandrum wrote:

 

If a post is going to be treated seriously, then it needs to contain factual information. When it orginates from the likes of The Federalist, it's little more than whackadoodle speculation aimed at riling the base. That's a given, and not worth respect.


Perhaps you or the other poster could come up with a source more suited to your liking in rebuttal?  Instead of going after the source instead of the content?  Should a source be submitted to you or that other poster before using it? 


“Only Thing We Have to Fear Is Fear Itself”. . . FDR
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
364
Views
Highlighted
Treasured Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
364
Views

Re: The Only 2016 Campaign That Deliberately Colluded With Russians Was Hillary Clinton’s

364 Views
Message 49 of 55

@Soosie wrote:

Sure would be good if posters debated the post rather than always bringing up the fact they don't like the source.  Somehow seems to defeat the pupose of a forum that is for debating political views.  I bet the ratings here would improve if the guidelines were followed more closely.


Criticizing the source instead of the content would be like criticizing the poster instead of what they post.  One poster consistently attacks the source instead of the content.  That is the same as censorship.  I've noted that this poster has never offered a source with an opposing view.


“Only Thing We Have to Fear Is Fear Itself”. . . FDR
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
364
Views
Highlighted
Trusted Social Butterfly
7
Kudos
370
Views

Re: The Only 2016 Campaign That Deliberately Colluded With Russians Was Hillary Clinton’s

370 Views
Message 50 of 55

Soosie:  Sure would be good if posters debated the post rather than always bringing up the fact they don't like the source. 

 

 

If a post is going to be treated seriously, then it needs to contain factual information. When it orginates from the likes of The Federalist, it's little more than whackadoodle speculation aimed at riling the base. That's a given, and not worth respect.

Report Inappropriate Content
7
Kudos
370
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

AARP Call-in Event: Coronavirus: Maintaining Your Well-Being

Ask experts about the coronavirus, learn how to protect yourself, stay connected and cope with stress and anxiety brought on by the pandemic. Join AARP for a special call-in event April 9, at 1:00 pm (EDT).

You can participate by calling toll-free 1-855-274-9507.

Learn more about the event on our Tele-Town Hall page.

Top Authors