Reply
Honored Social Butterfly

TRUMP CONFIRMS THAT WE NO LONGER HAVE A DEMOCRACY

The PLUTOCRACY, in the person of TRUMP'S Cabinet and Administration, is now securely in place. 

 

Trump confirmed this today with his "I DON'T WANT POOR PEOPLE" statement.

 

Trump's Cabinet is the wealthiest Cabinet in history. The trickster, Donald Trump, ran as a "man of the people", and yet, appointed billionaires and millionaires to the Cabinet...... wiping out our DEMOCRACY and replacing it with a PLUTOCRACY.

 

You might ask what actions do PLUTOCRACIES take that defines them as such. PLUTOCRACIES ignore their SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES. They serve their OWN PURPOSES. They INCREASE POVERTY WHILE ENRICHING THEMSELVES.

 

Trump's Administration gets a check on all three parts of the definition.

 

Trump knows that having a poor person in the Administration would violate the definition of a PLUTOCRACY.

 

LORD HELP US.

 

 

 

 

NO! IT'S CONSERVATIVES THAT ARE NUTTIER THAN SQUIRREL POOP!
Honored Social Butterfly

Easy on rk9152 , I'm sure he is secretly lobbying for ALL workers to get a Guaranteed Federal Pension with adequate COLA's and Lifetime Healthcare , like he receives ,  but Please don't call it a Socialist Program !!!

Honored Social Butterfly

Mandm, myexper-- Isn't  it funny how Republicans supporters can be so much in favor of all these bills that do so much damage to others, as long as they have no skin in the game.

As I've said before, all this garbage the Republicans are trying to put in the place is just great  if it doesn't impact the trump Rangers. 

This is definitely hypocracy in its lowest human form.

Gee, I miss having a real President!!
Honored Social Butterfly


@mandm84 wrote:

Easy on rk9152 , I'm sure he is secretly lobbying for ALL workers to get a Guaranteed Federal Pension with adequate COLA's and Lifetime Healthcare , like he receives ,  but Please don't called it a Socialist Program !!!


Nor "neoMarxism"  ....

 

DUMP TRUMP AND DITCH MITCH TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Contributor

Sorry for the misdirection nctarheel. Not quite sure how that happened. But, My post was in response to rk9152.

Keep up the good work.

0 Kudos
688 Views
0
Report
Honored Social Butterfly

Despite what Trump Lovers claim, Medicare improved under Obamacare.

Honored Social Butterfly

It's more alternate reallity stuff when Trump lovers continue to bash Obamacare with make believe accusations. Nobody said Obamcare is perfect, it has several flaws which must be fixed. But guess what? We can easily fix the flaws and turn it into a first class health care law. But the only thing the Republicans did the last 6 years was to vote for repeal.

 

People forget that Obamacare:

  • ended the prohibtion of pre-existing conditions
  • made all important Preventive Care free and accessible to the patients
  • ended the insurance practice of charging higher premiums for females
  • brought health insurance to millions who never had it before
0 Kudos
502 Views
0
Report
Honored Social Butterfly

Trump's campaign manager was a foreign agent. 

Trump's National Security Advisor was a foreign agent.

"And that is legal. So, your point is.........??"

 

Perfect example of Trump thinking, supporting everything around their hero, while failing to use logic. It is not legal to be a Foreign Agent, fail to report it on your security form, and be the National Security Advisor. Flynn LIED to the FBI, that's a felony.

 

Who would want a foreign agent as your national campaign manager?

 

More importantly, it's the conflict of interest. Let's put it in football terms so even a Trump Lover can understand the problem. Would you hire Johnny Walker to be the head football coach of the Chicago Bears if he's still the head scout of the New England Patriots? Only if you're a complete idiot. 

 

Would you appoint someone to one of the most security conscious positions in our government when they are being paid to work for a foreign country? I'm LOL!  Are you kidding? Only a Trump Lover, living in an alternate reality, can't see how serious this is.

Honored Social Butterfly


@CriticalThinking wrote:

Trump's campaign manager was a foreign agent. 

Trump's National Security Advisor was a foreign agent.

"And that is legal. So, your point is.........??"

 

Perfect example of Trump thinking, supporting everything around their hero, while failing to use logic. It is not legal to be a Foreign Agent, fail to report it on your security form, and be the National Security Advisor. Flynn LIED to the FBI, that's a felony.

 

Who would want a foreign agent as your national campaign manager?

 

More importantly, it's the conflict of interest. Let's put it in football terms so even a Trump Lover can understand the problem. Would you hire Johnny Walker to be the head football coach of the Chicago Bears if he's still the head scout of the New England Patriots? Only if you're a complete idiot. 

 

Would you appoint someone to one of the most security conscious positions in our government when they are being paid to work for a foreign country? I'm LOL!  Are you kidding? Only a Trump Lover, living in an alternate reality, can't see how serious this is.


Yes, he did screw up but then signed the paper. However, there is nothing wrong with being a "Foreign Agent" nor is there anything wrong with bringing a former "Foreign Agent" into the government.

 

The above is a factual and dispassionate summation of the situation.

 

And then we have "Trump Lover", "LOL", their hero" - indicating an inability to rationally look at the distinction between "foreign agent" and "former foreign agent" but instead clinging to childish comments.

0 Kudos
371 Views
0
Report
Honored Social Butterfly

"how about you define "FOREIGN AGENT" as it applies in this situation."

 

A Foreign Agent is someone who's working for a foreign government. I thought that was a no brainer, but since a forum member asked, I had to state the obvious. If they are employed in the U.S. Goverment, by definition, they have a conflict of interest.

 

Trump's campaign manager was a foreign agent. 

Trump's National Security Advisor was a foreign agent.

0 Kudos
415 Views
1
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@CriticalThinking wrote:

"how about you define "FOREIGN AGENT" as it applies in this situation."

 

A Foreign Agent is someone who's working for a foreign government. I thought that was a no brainer, but since a forum member asked, I had to state the obvious. If they are employed in the U.S. Goverment, by definition, they have a conflict of interest.

 

Trump's campaign manager was a foreign agent. 

Trump's National Security Advisor was a foreign agent.


And that is legal. So, your point is.........??

 

You are overlooking the tense involved - "was" a foreign agent; "is" a part of the Administration. I agree that the two should not coincide.

0 Kudos
398 Views
0
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@nctarheel wrote:

The PLUTOCRACY, in the person of TRUMP'S Cabinet and Administration, is now securely in place. 

 

Trump confirmed this today with his "I DON'T WANT POOR PEOPLE" statement.

 

Trump's Cabinet is the wealthiest Cabinet in history. The trickster, Donald Trump, ran as a "man of the people", and yet, appointed billionaires and millionaires to the Cabinet...... wiping out our DEMOCRACY and replacing it with a PLUTOCRACY.

 

You might ask what actions do PLUTOCRACIES take that defines them as such. PLUTOCRACIES ignore their SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES. They serve their OWN PURPOSES. They INCREASE POVERTY WHILE ENRICHING THEMSELVES.

 

Trump's Administration gets a check on all three parts of the definition.

 

Trump knows that having a poor person in the Administration would violate the definition of a PLUTOCRACY.

 

LORD HELP US.

 

 

 

 


 

Screen Shot 2017-06-23 at 8.31.07 AM.png

 

Compare and Contrast Republic vs Plutocracy Definition

The easiest way to know the meaning of a word is to get its dictionary meaning. Though the meaning of any particular word can be framed in numerous ways in different dictionaries, its underlying principle remains same. The same is true in case of Republic and Plutocracy definitions. You can compare and contrast Republic vs Plutocracy definitions based on the meaning given by different dictionaries. Dictionary definitions give appropriate meanings for these government types. Republic can be described as, Political system governed by elected representatives and Plutocracy as Government by the wealthy. You can get a further insight about the difference between its meanings by comparing Republic vs Plutocracy definitions from Oxford, Cambridge and Merriam Webster dictionaries as follows,

  • Oxford Dictionary Republic vs Plutocracy Definitions:
    Republic: A type of government where the people and their elected representatives have the supreme power and there is an elected or nominated president is called as a Republic
    Plutocracy: A state or society governed by the wealthy
  • Republic definiton and Plutocracy definition from Cambrige Dictionary:
    Republic: A country or type of government usually governed by elected representatives of people and a president, without a king or a queen is called as Republic
    Plutocracy: Someone who becomes powerful because they are rich
  • Merriam-Webster Dictionary Republic vs Plutocracy Definitions:
    Republic: Government type where the body of citizens who are entitled to vote have the supreme powers and this power is exercised, governing according to law, by the elected officers ans representatives responsible to them
    Plutocracy: Government by the richest people.

 

http://www.governmentvs.com/en/republic-vs-plutocracy-definition/comparison-20-49-11

 

Screen Shot 2017-06-23 at 8.38.22 AM.png

 

Compare and Contrast Republic vs Democracy Definition

The easiest way to know the meaning of a word is to get its dictionary meaning. Though the meaning of any particular word can be framed in numerous ways in different dictionaries, its underlying principle remains same. The same is true in case of Republic and Democracy definitions. You can compare and contrast Republic vs Democracy definitions based on the meaning given by different dictionaries. Dictionary definitions give appropriate meanings for these government types. Republic can be described as, Political system governed by elected representatives and Democracy as Government for the people, by the people, of the people. You can get a further insight about the difference between its meanings by comparing Republic vs Democracy definitions from Oxford, Cambridge and Merriam Webster dictionaries as follows,

  • Oxford Dictionary Republic vs Democracy Definitions:
    Republic: A type of government where the people and their elected representatives have the supreme power and there is an elected or nominated president is called as a Republic
    Democracy: A system of government that is formed by whole population/eligible members, through elected representatives.
  • Republic definiton and Democracy definition from Cambrige Dictionary:
    Republic: A country or type of government usually governed by elected representatives of people and a president, without a king or a queen is called as Republic
    Democracy: The belief in freedom and equality between people, or a system of government based on this belief, in which power is either held by elected representatives or directly by the people themselves:
  • Merriam-Webster Dictionary Republic vs Democracy Definitions:
    Republic: Government type where the body of citizens who are entitled to vote have the supreme powers and this power is exercised, governing according to law, by the elected officers ans representatives responsible to them
    Democracy: The type of government in which people choose their leaders by voting is called as Democracy.

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The Founders gave us a Republic...  If we can keep it.

 

Benjamin Franklin




Quotes by This Author

  
 The deliberations of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 were held in strict secrecy. Consequently, anxious citizens gathered outside Independence Hall when the proceedings ended in order to learn what had been produced behind closed doors. The answer was provided immediately. A Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.” (Benjamin Franklin)

 

 

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
0 Kudos
502 Views
6
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@jimc91 wrote:

 

Screen Shot 2017-06-23 at 8.31.07 AM.png

 

 

 


Thanks for re-iterating my thesis. Your definitions confirm that there is a PLUTOCRACY in Washington, D.C. with the TRUMP ADMINISTRATION in place.

 

Name one Cabinet member that is not rich.

 

Do you really believe that TRUMP himself would be where he is if he weren't rich???? 

 

Rather than being President; he'd probably be in jail as a huckster.

 

TRUMP, himself, confirmed that a Plutocracy is in place as he has said he doesn't want POOR PEOPLE in his Cabinet.

NO! IT'S CONSERVATIVES THAT ARE NUTTIER THAN SQUIRREL POOP!
Honored Social Butterfly


@nctarheel wrote:

@jimc91 wrote:

 

Screen Shot 2017-06-23 at 8.31.07 AM.png

 

 

 


Thanks for re-iterating my thesis. Your definitions confirm that there is a PLUTOCRACY in Washington, D.C. with the TRUMP ADMINISTRATION in place.

 

Name one Cabinet member that is not rich.

 

Do you really believe that TRUMP himself would be where he is if he weren't rich???? 

 

Rather than being President; he'd probably be in jail as a huckster.

 

TRUMP, himself, confirmed that a Plutocracy is in place as he has said he doesn't want POOR PEOPLE in his Cabinet.


I have often said that The Secretary of Transportation should have been a bus driver, Secretary of Commerce a Fuller Brush Salesman, and Secretary of the Treasury should have been  bank clerk.

 

People who have succeeded in their field and have risen to the top are, obviously, undeserving of their money and have no knowledge in their field.

 

Do I have that right in neoMarxist thinking??

Honored Social Butterfly


@rk9152 wrote:

 

I have often said that The Secretary of Transportation should have been a bus driver, Secretary of Commerce a Fuller Brush Salesman, and Secretary of the Treasury should have been  bank clerk.

 

People who have succeeded in their field and have risen to the top are, obviously, undeserving of their money and have no knowledge in their field.

 

Do I have that right in neoMarxist thinking??


You do have an excellent point.... except for the neoMarxist comment.

 

Using a real TRUMP appointee as an example; you will see that a BUS DRIVER or A BANK CLERK or a FULLER BRUSH SALESPERSON might have been a better choice than the actual TRUMP appointee.

 

Let's look at Betsy DeVos as our example.

 

What a wonderful appointee to head the Department of Education!!!!

 

Let's see her qualifications.

(1) She never attended public school.

(2) Her children never attended public school.

(3) She attended CHRISTIAN BASED schools throughout her educational career.

(4) She has been in opposition to the Public School systems in the United States.

(5) She is an advocate of Charter Schools.

(6) She is a billionaire.

(7) She is connected to the Pyramid company AMWAY.

(8) Her position in her company, Neurocare, is basically that of a "snake oil salesperson".

(9) She called for guns in schools to battle grizzly bears.

 

and best of all, with her showing what a true grasp she has on the HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES......................

 

(10) She called historically BLACK Colleges "Real Pioneers Of School Choice".

 

What an idiot she is.

 

Everyone, except her, knows that the rise of BLACK Colleges was due to BLACKS being excluded from other(WHITE) colleges at the time.

 

So while you thought you were being funny....... THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION WOULD PROBABLY DO BETTER WITH A BUS DRIVER, FULLER BRUSH SALESPERSON OR A BANK CLERK.

NO! IT'S CONSERVATIVES THAT ARE NUTTIER THAN SQUIRREL POOP!
0 Kudos
403 Views
3
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@nctarheel wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

 

I have often said that The Secretary of Transportation should have been a bus driver, Secretary of Commerce a Fuller Brush Salesman, and Secretary of the Treasury should have been  bank clerk.

 

People who have succeeded in their field and have risen to the top are, obviously, undeserving of their money and have no knowledge in their field.

 

Do I have that right in neoMarxist thinking??


You do have an excellent point.... except for the neoMarxist comment.

 

Using a real TRUMP appointee as an example; you will see that a BUS DRIVER or A BANK CLERK or a FULLER BRUSH SALESPERSON might have been a better choice than the actual TRUMP appointee.

 

Let's look at Betsy DeVos as our example.

 

What a wonderful appointee to head the Department of Education!!!!

 

Let's see her qualifications.

(1) She never attended public school.

(2) Her children never attended public school.

(3) She attended CHRISTIAN BASED schools throughout her educational career.

(4) She has been in opposition to the Public School systems in the United States.

(5) She is an advocate of Charter Schools.

(6) She is a billionaire.

(7) She is connected to the Pyramid company AMWAY.

(8) Her position in her company, Neurocare, is basically that of a "snake oil salesperson".

(9) She called for guns in schools to battle grizzly bears.

 

and best of all, with her showing what a true grasp she has on the HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES......................

 

(10) She called historically BLACK Colleges "Real Pioneers Of School Choice".

 

What an idiot she is.

 

Everyone, except her, knows that the rise of BLACK Colleges was due to BLACKS being excluded from other(WHITE) colleges at the time.

 

So while you thought you were being funny....... THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION WOULD PROBABLY DO BETTER WITH A BUS DRIVER, FULLER BRUSH SALESPERSON OR A BANK CLERK.


Did you not notice the references I actually made about the bus driver, the salesman (sorry not PC) and the bank clerk? Hint - not DofEd.

0 Kudos
427 Views
2
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@rk9152 wrote:

 

Did you not notice the references I actually made about the bus driver, the salesman (sorry not PC) and the bank clerk? Hint - not DofEd.


@rk9152,

 

I fully understand that your references were about other posts in the Cabinet. But I believe that Trump's vetting of one candidate for his Cabinet was no better or no worse than the vetting for any of the other positions in his Cabinet.

 

The DeVos appointment(being such an idiotic choice for Department of Education) calls into question all of his appointments.

 

But the main question that arises based on your last post is..........since you avoided the subject of Betsy DeVos, does that mean that you agree with my point about Betsy DeVos?

NO! IT'S CONSERVATIVES THAT ARE NUTTIER THAN SQUIRREL POOP!
0 Kudos
412 Views
1
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@nctarheel wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

 

Did you not notice the references I actually made about the bus driver, the salesman (sorry not PC) and the bank clerk? Hint - not DofEd.


@rk9152,

 

I fully understand that your references were about other posts in the Cabinet. But I believe that Trump's vetting of one candidate for his Cabinet was no better or no worse than the vetting for any of the other positions in his Cabinet.

 

The DeVos appointment(being such an idiotic choice for Department of Education) calls into question all of his appointments.

 

But the main question that arises based on your last post is..........since you avoided the subject of Betsy DeVos, does that mean that you agree with my point about Betsy DeVos?


The issue was about Cabinet Members in general. If you want to focus on DeVos we can, but if I respond to you, another poster will probably criticize me for going off topic. Hey, I can deal with it, so here goes.

 

As has been noted on various boards, there is a problem in our education system. So, to continue down the same path does not make sense. Possibly, Ms. DeVos will take us in different directions that will be better. I don't know what she will propose nor what she will be able to do. And I suggest that neither do you. But, I believe that we can agree that her efforts will not be samo-samo.

0 Kudos
404 Views
0
Report
Honored Social Butterfly

It's impossible to get a Trump Lover to acknowledge facts and use logic when it comes to their hero, Donald Trump. They blindly defend everything their idol does. Using logical arguments with them is a complete waste of time.

 

For the rest of us, we understand that a Foreign Agent is someone who's getting paid do work in the interest of that foreign government. Assigning a person in that position as our National Security Advisor is a version of insanity. Most of us understand the stark conflict of interest involved. 

 

If the above isn't enough, failing to disclose that you're a foreign agent on your security form, which I believe Flynn did, is a felony. 

Honored Social Butterfly


@CriticalThinking wrote:

It's impossible to get a Trump Lover to acknowledge facts and use logic when it comes to their hero, Donald Trump. They blindly defend everything their idol does. Using logical arguments with them is a complete waste of time.

 

For the rest of us, we understand that a Foreign Agent is someone who's getting paid do work in the interest of that foreign government. Making a person in that position the National Security Advisor is a version of insanity. Most of us understand the stark conflict of interest involved. 

 

If the above isn't enough, failing to disclose that you're a foreign agent on your security form, which I believe Flynn did, is a felony. 


He has accepted payments.


Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history.
0 Kudos
530 Views
3
Report
Esteemed Social Butterfly

And now today, Trump said "we'll have to see" if Mueller should continue in role as special prosecutor in the Russia investigation. Guess what, Mr. President, you don't get to make that decision.

 

More obstructionism and intimidation on Trump's part. Doesn't sound much like democracy to me.

 

 

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/ (13 pages of lies and growing)
Honored Social Butterfly


@BigLib wrote:

And now today, Trump said "we'll have to see" if Mueller should continue in role as special prosecutor in the Russia investigation. Guess what, Mr. President, you don't get to make that decision.

 

More obstructionism and intimidation on Trump's part. Doesn't sound much like democracy to me.

 

 


Oh, but donald voters think it does.


Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history.
0 Kudos
499 Views
1
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@ChasKy53 wrote:

@BigLib wrote:

And now today, Trump said "we'll have to see" if Mueller should continue in role as special prosecutor in the Russia investigation. Guess what, Mr. President, you don't get to make that decision.

 

More obstructionism and intimidation on Trump's part. Doesn't sound much like democracy to me.

 

 


Oh, but donald voters think it does.


I can't speak for "donald voters" but I believe that a President operating within the confines of his office is just fine. Do you find fault with that on "democracy" grounds??

0 Kudos
537 Views
0
Report
Honored Social Butterfly

Some travel a tougher path , many to no fault of their own. There but for the grace of God , go I

Honored Social Butterfly

NCTARHEEL WROTE--The PLUTOCRACY, in the person of TRUMP'S Cabinet and Administration, is now securely in place. 

 

Trump confirmed this today with his "I DON'T WANT POOR PEOPLE" statement.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------iT WOULD BE NICE IF YOU PUT WHAT HE SAID IN CONTEXT-

---------WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE A POOR ,UNSUCCESSFUL,UNEDUCATED PERSON PERSON RUNNING THE ECONOMY?    TWIST AND SPIN IS WHY LIBERALS LOSE SO MUCH.

0 Kudos
398 Views
1
Report
Trusted Contributor

Well, we now have a Wedding Planner running NY/NJ HUD,  and a Neurosurgeon in charge of the whole thing.

Honored Social Butterfly

"They do not seem to understand that "Foreign Agent" does not mean James Bond. It is simply one who took a job with a foreign government and complied with the requirement to register."

 

  • I can't believe a rational person could make such a statement. 
  • I also can't believe a Presidential candidate would hire a FOREIGN AGENT as his campaign manager.
  • I can't believe a President would appoint a FOREIGN AGENT to probably the most sensitive spot in the U.S. government, National Security Advisor.
Honored Social Butterfly


@CriticalThinking wrote:

"They do not seem to understand that "Foreign Agent" does not mean James Bond. It is simply one who took a job with a foreign government and complied with the requirement to register."

 

  • I can't believe a rational person could make such a statement. 
  • I also can't believe a Presidential candidate would hire a FOREIGN AGENT as his campaign manager.
  • I can't believe a President would appoint a FOREIGN AGENT to probably the most sensitive spot in the U.S. government, National Security Advisor.

Rather than just constantly repeating the same vagueness and insults, how about you define "FOREIGN AGENT" as it applies in this situation.

0 Kudos
537 Views
2
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@rk9152 wrote:

@CriticalThinking wrote:

"They do not seem to understand that "Foreign Agent" does not mean James Bond. It is simply one who took a job with a foreign government and complied with the requirement to register."

 

  • I can't believe a rational person could make such a statement. 
  • I also can't believe a Presidential candidate would hire a FOREIGN AGENT as his campaign manager.
  • I can't believe a President would appoint a FOREIGN AGENT to probably the most sensitive spot in the U.S. government, National Security Advisor.

Rather than just constantly repeating the same vagueness and insults, how about you define "FOREIGN AGENT" as it applies in this situation.


Oh, do you mean like you keep 'defining' words like racism and police hater?


Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history.
Honored Social Butterfly


@ChasKy53 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@CriticalThinking wrote:

"They do not seem to understand that "Foreign Agent" does not mean James Bond. It is simply one who took a job with a foreign government and complied with the requirement to register."

 

  • I can't believe a rational person could make such a statement. 
  • I also can't believe a Presidential candidate would hire a FOREIGN AGENT as his campaign manager.
  • I can't believe a President would appoint a FOREIGN AGENT to probably the most sensitive spot in the U.S. government, National Security Advisor.

Rather than just constantly repeating the same vagueness and insults, how about you define "FOREIGN AGENT" as it applies in this situation.


Oh, do you mean like you keep 'defining' words like racism and police hater?


Check just below the word "Subject" for a clue as to the topic.

0 Kudos
519 Views
0
Report
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Does AARP donate to political parties or endorse candidates?

AARP is strictly non-partisan and always has been. We never endorse or donate to candidates, political parties or political action committees.

Learn more.

AARP Members Only Games

Play members only games, like FIll Ins, Lumeno, 2048 and a collaborative, multiplayer Let's Crossword.

Play Now
AARP Members Only Games Logos
AARP Rewards

Solve Crosswords. Earn Rewards. Activate AARP Rewards to earn points for games, quizzes and videos. Redeem for deals and discounts.

Get started with AARP Rewards now!
/html/assets/Rewards-program-badge-355x224.png