Sen. Graham: 'I Want to Know How Far Up the Chain' the Trump-Russia Investigation Went

Reply
Highlighted
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
530
Views

Re: Sen. Graham: 'I Want to Know How Far Up the Chain' the Trump-Russia Investigation Went

530 Views
Message 11 of 34
what needs fixing is the Senate and the White House Jim, both esp. the White House full of not caring about the law and DISorder, LOL!!!
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
530
Views
Highlighted
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
509
Views

Re: Sen. Graham: 'I Want to Know How Far Up the Chain' the Trump-Russia Investigation Went

509 Views
Message 12 of 34

@MsStretch wrote:

Sen. Graham:  Up for re-election in 2020.

 

'Nuff said.


Don't forget, Graham is the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.  He is very interested in seeing the FBI and DOJ get fixed for the American people.  What American could be against that?  You know, Law and Order...

 

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
509
Views
Highlighted
Respected Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
513
Views

Re: Sen. Graham: 'I Want to Know How Far Up the Chain' the Trump-Russia Investigation Went

513 Views
Message 13 of 34

Sen. Graham:  Up for re-election in 2020.

 

'Nuff said.



    

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
513
Views
Highlighted
Trusted Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
529
Views

Sen. Graham: 'I Want to Know How Far Up the Chain' the Trump-Russia Investigation Went

529 Views
Message 14 of 34

This is part of a plan to turn America into a Trump dictatorship where the rule of law is no longer respected. 

 

Real Americans know and understand the FBI is an elite organization, but just like any other beauracracy, they make mistakes. Correct those mistakes and move on, ignore the calls for a dictatorship orchestrated by Comrade Trump, Vladimir Putin's puppet.

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
529
Views
Highlighted
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
533
Views

Re: Sen. Graham: 'I Want to Know How Far Up the Chain' the Trump-Russia Investigation Went

533 Views
Message 15 of 34

 

 

Looks like it may be time to get rid of the FISA court since we can't trust the people in charge of it to use it solely for its intended purpose.  

 

What's that saying about "Power and Corruption" ?  

 

Indeed it went to some bad actors and was used in an inappropriate way.

 

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
533
Views
Highlighted
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
557
Views

Re: Sen. Graham: 'I Want to Know How Far Up the Chain' the Trump-Russia Investigation Went

557 Views
Message 16 of 34

One thing to say about the trump ad concerning trump supporters...

the "cult" has now evolved to "devil worship"...the photo certainly looks

"demonic"!

Appropriate photo of trump...just another round of lies, fear, and divisive behavior. 

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
557
Views
Highlighted
Trusted Social Butterfly
4
Kudos
566
Views

Sen. Graham: 'I Want to Know How Far Up the Chain' the Trump-Russia Investigation Went

566 Views
Message 17 of 34

Seantor Graham called Donald Trump a "race-baiting xenophobic bigot" in 2015, but in 2018 claimed that he "never heard him make a single racist statement."

 

And we're supposed to give this man a level of credibility? I'm LOL again.

Report Inappropriate Content
4
Kudos
566
Views
Highlighted
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
572
Views

Re: Sen. Graham: 'I Want to Know How Far Up the Chain' the Trump-Russia Investigation Went

572 Views
Message 18 of 34

And why does anyone pays attention to anything the the most disgusting individual in this country has to say?
This man who, will attach himself to whomever he thinks is going to provide him with what he needs. a man that attaches himself to people to see if whatever he thinks they have, rubs off on him?
This man does not have what it takes to even say one word that is credible. therefore he has become irrelevant and immaterial

no name
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
572
Views
Highlighted
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
573
Views

Re: Sen. Graham: 'I Want to Know How Far Up the Chain' the Trump-Russia Investigation Went

573 Views
Message 19 of 34

@jimc91 wrote:

Donald Trump’s ‘they’re after you’ tweet says it all:

 

Screen Shot 2019-12-26 at 5.30.03 AM.png

BY:  Michael Goodwin

 

On its face, a tweet President Trump sent last weekis fairly benign. It doesn’t mock anyone, isn’t personally nasty and hasn’t caused any hair-on-fire controversy.

 

Yet it is powerful in its own way, for it artfully sums up the Trump era from the perspective of the president and his supporters. With a likeness to the Uncle Sam “I want you” poster, the disrupter-in-chief reaffirms in 14 words the belief of Trump Nation that the political establishment, the media, the permanent bureaucracy and yes, the deep state are trying to crush him and them.

 

The president tweeted the image the day House Democrats voted to impeach him, and hours after his raucous rally in Michigan that evening.

 

The tweet included no added comment because none was needed. The message is clear: I am all that stands between you and the barbarians at the gate. If I fall, you are next.

 

Critics regard it as fear-mongering, and there is no denying that the president wanted to rally his base, lest it be discouraged by the day’s events.

 

Yet Trump’s oblique reference to a weaponized and powerful adversary is hardly ­unfounded, with a partisan, flimsy impeachment the latest example. The tweet’s siren call to believers is a shorthand way of saying that impeachment is just a continuation of the endless attacks against us.

Indeed, his presidency effectively begins with a prophecy of those attacks, one that came 17 days before Trump took the oath.

 

“Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you,” Sen. Chuck Schumer said on MSNBC.

 

It was an incredible thing to say in a nation where the people are supposedly sovereign, but soon it would become clear that Schumer knew what he was talking about, which still raises questions.

 

How did he know the FBI, CIA and others were going after Trump?

 

Did he warn them against meddling in politics? Did he alert prosecutors?

 

If so, nobody did anything because it was quickly obvious that law enforcement and intelligence officials in the Obama administration were leaking secrets designed to embarrass the new president — and kill his administration in its infancy.

 

The effort never stopped, with impeachment launched when a man identified by the media as CIA officer Eric Ciaramella filed a complaint about Trump’s July 25 call with the president of Ukraine.

 

Most of the period between Schumer’s warning and the Ukraine complaint was dominated by the two-year slog of special counsel Robert Mueller. It, too, made lots of noise and the Democrat/media frenzy created the clear implication that Trump would be formally charged with helping Russia tip the 2016 election.

 

Of course, Mueller found no such evidence, but he still hurt the president.

 

The probe was a black cloud hanging over the White House during the 2018 midterm campaign, and thus likely played a role in Dems winning the House majority — the majority they would use to impeach the president.

 

Thus, Mueller’s team struck out legally, but helped Dems score big politically. So much for its integrity.

 

More recently, added confirmation that Schumer was right has come in spades. Thanks to reports from the Justice Department’s inspector general, we know there was rampant misconduct and political bias at Jim Comey’s FBI.

 

We learned through texts that top agent Peter Strzok, who said he could “smell” Trump voters in a Walmart, had exchanges with his office paramour about stopping Trump, including references to an “insurance policy” in case Trump won. J. Edgar Hoover would blush at the audacity.

 

A second probe scorched the FBI’s handling of the FISA applications to spy on Trump campaign associate Carter Page. Although the probe found no direct evidence that anti-Trump bias was a factor, it did reveal that all the omissions, failures and mistakes worked against Trump, with even exculpatory evidence against Page intentionally withheld.

 

Thankfully and finally, the fallout from those findings is picking up speed, with the top FISA judge questioning the FBI’s “candor” and saying the flawed submissions “calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable.”

 

Even bigger fish could be on the grill in a separate probe. Other top officials in the Obama administration, CIA head John Brennan and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper are reportedly under scrutiny by US Attorney John Durham, who is conducting a criminal investigation of the spying effort against Trump.

 

The New York Times reported that Durham is gathering Brennan’s emails and documents in a focus on his congressional testimony about the use of the Hillary Clinton-financed Steele dossier in the government finding that Russia tried to help Trump in 2016.

 

To understand the import of the investigation, it pays to recall that Brennan, Clapper, Comey and his former top deputy, Andrew McCabe, have for years appeared on hate-Trump TV to accuse him of treason and other crimes, as has Clinton.

 

None of those charges was true, but the endless attacks on Trump from former insiders are unprecedented, and reflect badly on the institutions they led and the government as a whole. All these false charges were amplified by a media that ignored basic fairness.

 

Attorney General Bill Barr offers the best overview of this unholy alliance, saying, “Our nation was turned on its head for three years based on a completely bogus narrative that was largely fanned and hyped by a completely irresponsible press.”

 

Barr also says the question of whether anti-Trump bias led to FBI misconduct is still open. He also says Durham’s probe will not be limited to that agency or even to the United States.

 

So Schumer’s warning hit the bull’s-eye — but uncharacteristically, he’s been shy about taking credit.

 

Is he afraid of the intelligence agencies, or is he OK with the officials playing politics because Trump was the target? If the latter, he joins a crowd who fancy themselves liberals of integrity, but who are comfortable with abuses of power and double standards against Trump.

 

Even impeachment was not the grand, noble process the Founders envisioned, despite Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s efforts to dress up a dirty trick. Under her, impeachment proved that the House, like the FBI, CIA and the media, has corrupted itself in a bid to destroy Trump and delegitimize his presidency.

 

In his bristling letter to Pelosi, Trump cited numerous examples where Dems talked of impeachment long before Ukraine, including a Washington Post story on Inauguration Day that said, “The Campaign to Impeach President Trump Has Begun.”

 

Trump also highlighted the quote that, for my money, is the matching bookend to Schumer’s “six ways from Sunday” prophecy. This one came from Rep. Al Green from Texas, who said last May he was “concerned if we don’t impeach this president, he will get re-elected.”

 

Can’t have that. Whatever it takes, can’t have that.

 

 


You used that photo before so why again. Is the new rule all must have a picture of the dictator in their home and pay homage to it daily?

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
573
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
584
Views

Re: Sen. Graham: 'I Want to Know How Far Up the Chain' the Trump-Russia Investigation Went

584 Views
Message 20 of 34

Donald Trump’s ‘they’re after you’ tweet says it all:

 

Screen Shot 2019-12-26 at 5.30.03 AM.png

BY:  Michael Goodwin

 

On its face, a tweet President Trump sent last weekis fairly benign. It doesn’t mock anyone, isn’t personally nasty and hasn’t caused any hair-on-fire controversy.

 

Yet it is powerful in its own way, for it artfully sums up the Trump era from the perspective of the president and his supporters. With a likeness to the Uncle Sam “I want you” poster, the disrupter-in-chief reaffirms in 14 words the belief of Trump Nation that the political establishment, the media, the permanent bureaucracy and yes, the deep state are trying to crush him and them.

 

The president tweeted the image the day House Democrats voted to impeach him, and hours after his raucous rally in Michigan that evening.

 

The tweet included no added comment because none was needed. The message is clear: I am all that stands between you and the barbarians at the gate. If I fall, you are next.

 

Critics regard it as fear-mongering, and there is no denying that the president wanted to rally his base, lest it be discouraged by the day’s events.

 

Yet Trump’s oblique reference to a weaponized and powerful adversary is hardly ­unfounded, with a partisan, flimsy impeachment the latest example. The tweet’s siren call to believers is a shorthand way of saying that impeachment is just a continuation of the endless attacks against us.

Indeed, his presidency effectively begins with a prophecy of those attacks, one that came 17 days before Trump took the oath.

 

“Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you,” Sen. Chuck Schumer said on MSNBC.

 

It was an incredible thing to say in a nation where the people are supposedly sovereign, but soon it would become clear that Schumer knew what he was talking about, which still raises questions.

 

How did he know the FBI, CIA and others were going after Trump?

 

Did he warn them against meddling in politics? Did he alert prosecutors?

 

If so, nobody did anything because it was quickly obvious that law enforcement and intelligence officials in the Obama administration were leaking secrets designed to embarrass the new president — and kill his administration in its infancy.

 

The effort never stopped, with impeachment launched when a man identified by the media as CIA officer Eric Ciaramella filed a complaint about Trump’s July 25 call with the president of Ukraine.

 

Most of the period between Schumer’s warning and the Ukraine complaint was dominated by the two-year slog of special counsel Robert Mueller. It, too, made lots of noise and the Democrat/media frenzy created the clear implication that Trump would be formally charged with helping Russia tip the 2016 election.

 

Of course, Mueller found no such evidence, but he still hurt the president.

 

The probe was a black cloud hanging over the White House during the 2018 midterm campaign, and thus likely played a role in Dems winning the House majority — the majority they would use to impeach the president.

 

Thus, Mueller’s team struck out legally, but helped Dems score big politically. So much for its integrity.

 

More recently, added confirmation that Schumer was right has come in spades. Thanks to reports from the Justice Department’s inspector general, we know there was rampant misconduct and political bias at Jim Comey’s FBI.

 

We learned through texts that top agent Peter Strzok, who said he could “smell” Trump voters in a Walmart, had exchanges with his office paramour about stopping Trump, including references to an “insurance policy” in case Trump won. J. Edgar Hoover would blush at the audacity.

 

A second probe scorched the FBI’s handling of the FISA applications to spy on Trump campaign associate Carter Page. Although the probe found no direct evidence that anti-Trump bias was a factor, it did reveal that all the omissions, failures and mistakes worked against Trump, with even exculpatory evidence against Page intentionally withheld.

 

Thankfully and finally, the fallout from those findings is picking up speed, with the top FISA judge questioning the FBI’s “candor” and saying the flawed submissions “calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable.”

 

Even bigger fish could be on the grill in a separate probe. Other top officials in the Obama administration, CIA head John Brennan and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper are reportedly under scrutiny by US Attorney John Durham, who is conducting a criminal investigation of the spying effort against Trump.

 

The New York Times reported that Durham is gathering Brennan’s emails and documents in a focus on his congressional testimony about the use of the Hillary Clinton-financed Steele dossier in the government finding that Russia tried to help Trump in 2016.

 

To understand the import of the investigation, it pays to recall that Brennan, Clapper, Comey and his former top deputy, Andrew McCabe, have for years appeared on hate-Trump TV to accuse him of treason and other crimes, as has Clinton.

 

None of those charges was true, but the endless attacks on Trump from former insiders are unprecedented, and reflect badly on the institutions they led and the government as a whole. All these false charges were amplified by a media that ignored basic fairness.

 

Attorney General Bill Barr offers the best overview of this unholy alliance, saying, “Our nation was turned on its head for three years based on a completely bogus narrative that was largely fanned and hyped by a completely irresponsible press.”

 

Barr also says the question of whether anti-Trump bias led to FBI misconduct is still open. He also says Durham’s probe will not be limited to that agency or even to the United States.

 

So Schumer’s warning hit the bull’s-eye — but uncharacteristically, he’s been shy about taking credit.

 

Is he afraid of the intelligence agencies, or is he OK with the officials playing politics because Trump was the target? If the latter, he joins a crowd who fancy themselves liberals of integrity, but who are comfortable with abuses of power and double standards against Trump.

 

Even impeachment was not the grand, noble process the Founders envisioned, despite Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s efforts to dress up a dirty trick. Under her, impeachment proved that the House, like the FBI, CIA and the media, has corrupted itself in a bid to destroy Trump and delegitimize his presidency.

 

In his bristling letter to Pelosi, Trump cited numerous examples where Dems talked of impeachment long before Ukraine, including a Washington Post story on Inauguration Day that said, “The Campaign to Impeach President Trump Has Begun.”

 

Trump also highlighted the quote that, for my money, is the matching bookend to Schumer’s “six ways from Sunday” prophecy. This one came from Rep. Al Green from Texas, who said last May he was “concerned if we don’t impeach this president, he will get re-elected.”

 

Can’t have that. Whatever it takes, can’t have that.

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
584
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

AARP Coronavirus Call-in Event

AARP will host a weekly, live Coronavirus Information Tele-Town Hall on Thursdays at 1 pm (ET). Learn more on AARP's Coronavirus Tele-Town Hall page and join us each week for the latest information.

Calling is toll-free. During the 90-minute live event, government experts will answer your questions and address health concerns related to COVID-19.

Top Authors