Take the AARP Smart Driver course and you could save on auto insurance! Sign up today.

Reply
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
175
Views

Re: POOF!!! another fallacy exposed. CLinton testified under oath.

175 Views
Message 71 of 161

@williamb39198–I noticed that after the format change. 

 

Gee, I miss having a real president!

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
175
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
164
Views

Re: POOF!!! another fallacy exposed. CLinton testified under oath.

164 Views
Message 72 of 161

I'm not on a phone so it might be different for me, but some of the posts look faint when there are a bunch of quotes. Could be built in... I don't know.

TRE45ON
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
164
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
174
Views

Re: POOF!!! another fallacy exposed. CLinton testified under oath.

174 Views
Message 73 of 161

That worked but the type is so faint

that it’s hard to read. Oh well, thanks. 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
174
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
170
Views

Re: POOF!!! another fallacy exposed. CLinton testified under oath.

170 Views
Message 74 of 161

@williamb39198–Happens all the time, turn your phone. I usually have to turn mine horizontally.

 

Gee, I miss having a real president!

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
170
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
171
Views

Re: POOF!!! another fallacy exposed. CLinton testified under oath.

171 Views
Message 75 of 161

Does someone’s computer have a bug, and this not the first time that I have seen this. The messages are getting spagettified like they are entering the event horizon of a black hole!

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
171
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
181
Views

Re: POOF!!! another fallacy exposed. CLinton testified under oath.

181 Views
Message 76 of 161

@rk9152 wrote:

@john258 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@john258 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@john258 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@Cirice wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

Another nonsensical statement - approved by your kudo stalker.


Are you her "kudo stalker"?  Because you seem to be stalking her kudos.


Sounds fair - was Hillary asked questions under oath about the emails under subpoena that were destroyed?

 

How about her campaign joining with the FBI to acquire the Fusion GPS dossier which was then used by the Administration to get FISA approval for the spying on the opposition.

 

And then, Administration insiders unmasking members of the opposition campaign.

 

Any thoughts on that??


Gee I was listening to Shawn today and heard the same things from him just about word for word. Fox news has been pushing the same thing also. Here is a message to all. Go listen to Shawn for about 15 min., watch FOX New for the same amount of time. I have never heard such nonsense. Shawn was blaming all that is going on in US on Hillary and Obama. Did you know Obama and Hillary made a deal when he first ran for Pres. that Hillary would drop out if Obama made her Sec. of State? That is what Shawn told all today. He said this was the start. Did you know Hillary had her really cheap unsecured server set up in her garage. That is what Shawn said today. She did not want to use the secure State Dept. Server per Shawn. (Note Hillary's server was never hacked, the State Depts was.). Russia started working with Hillary to defeat Trump. Yes Shawn said that to. The Clinton Foundation had to be paid by any one, and country, etc. that wanted to have access to the State Dept.  Yes Shawn said that today. I could go on but you can see the nonsense and lies that were coming from Shawn. No person with any idea of reality could think what he said was true. It was like a comedy hour. What makes it worse is there are people who believe what Shawn says. We see it posed in here. The far right followers just do as they are told post everywhere they can, and the leaders fill in the blank posting spots using BOTS just as the Russians have taught them.

Never in my lifetime have I seen such a group of people as the current far right Reb. supporters of Trump. They are destroying the US. Time to end this. How? By voting out of office everyone one with an R at all levels of government. That will make the Reb. Party get rid of the far right nuts and become the party it used to be. It will mean Trump will be gone by Congress. The the US can function again. Lastly. Go listen to some of the nonsense being put out by the far right.


I am delighted to here that Shawn reads my posts to inspire him.

 

Now, can we get beyond Shawn, bot, Fox, and Trump? Any thoughts on the post you were theoretically responding to?


No we can not get past Shawn and the far right rep. who create this type of nonsense and have their followers spread it around to keep us from thinking about the big problems. Nice try to cover up who the masters and followers are. Only a member of the far right rep. would think it is true. We need to end all of these far right rep. lies by never voting for anyone with an R behind their name at any level until the party cleans house of the far right and returns to what it once was. A real part of the American System.


Well now, john, that is a shame because Shawn, bot, Fox, and Trump are not here, it's only us guys (generic). So, if you'd like to discuss areas in which we do not agree, you are going to have to settle for me.


No you are incorrect. They are here. Want me to tell you who they are?


Sure, what handle does Shawn use, what handle does bot use. what handle does Fox use, and what handle does Trump use here?


you

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
181
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
188
Views

Re: POOF!!! another fallacy exposed. CLinton testified under oath.

188 Views
Message 77 of 161

@rk9152 wrote:

 


@Olderscout66 wrote:

Today's GOPerLords are the ideolgical decendants of the scum who ranted that Eisenhower was a Commie spy, probably because he sent in the 101st Airbourne to escort black students into Little Rock High.

 

No real change in their ideology or ignorance over the last half century, but now they've got their own Network and major political party to help spread their viral lies and visceral hate.

 

They cannot stand the fact their actual criminal members keep getting arrested and jailed, but the imaginary criminality they concocted for Hillary cannot survive in the light, so they must pretend the FBI has been corrupted to only arrest right wing nutjobs.

 

Now they've enlisted the Russians to help make sure the tinfoil hat brigaide makes it to the polls - What's next?


How is that rant related to the fact that Hillary lied to the FBI, the Congress and us about her emails? - and had her illegalities covered up by the corrupt DOJ. I frankly do not see any Russians or pointy hats in that scenario.


Valued Social Butterfly
rk9152
 
Re: Denialism
76 Views
Message 89 of 110
@williamb39198 wrote:

@MIseker

@Centristsin2010

@ChasKy53

@phyllisc6781

@rk9152

First to rk, I’m really glad that we have Obama people in the DOJ!

At least they can help fight trump from trying to destroy our legal system. Some of his appointees for federal judge positions cannot even get approval from a judicial council. We deserve better. 

Secondly, I am going agree with rk on something I think he said in the topic of Roy Moore...partial agreement! He said that the allegations are alleged. I agree. I say with that in mind they have not been proven as fact and have not been investigated. Although they are many and may be true, they cannot be said to be fact yet in a court of law. There is a process to pursue that, and what we must guard against is trying people in the court of public opinion. No matter what we feel or think about a person, we need the process to determine if guilty. But, I certainly would say that we need to investigate both moore and trump

on the allegations against them, which are many. Only fair to do. 

With the court of public opinion in mind let’s take a look at trump taking denials and weaponizing lies

towards Hilliary. Let’s look at the campaign. “She’s a criminal, lock her up”. She was investigated for Benghazi, emails, and there have calls for investigations into the Clinton foundation and Uranium sales. trump proclaimed that she was guilty...because he says so?

His denial is of the fact that there has been no court ruling or conviction of guilt, and no sentence or jail time. Criminal? Fabrication?

With that he proceeds weaponizing a lie. “She’s a criminal, lock her up”.

Because he says so!? He took his denial, fabricated a lie, weaponized it because of his fear of her, and then carried out his trial in the court of public opinion, also know as his base. So wrong. And unfortunate that so many fell into his web of fear and lies.

We are better than that. 

Focusing on the emails. You do know that she lied, do you not. You do know that she was not indicted over the lies to the FBI because she (as opposed to Flynn) was given special treatment and not put under oath and the same privilege was given to her top aides. And, finally, the findings were reworded so as to eliminate her culpability for her actions.

 

That is the corruption in the DOJ that you are defending.

 

it goes back to the topic..all this, and here we are days later..and you didnt delete the post where you said CLINTON WAS NOT PUT UNDER OATH. 

 

If i was going to change my view and cover it up. id sure delete the post i was accused of making. 

 

No, I wont Smiley Happy

So it begins.
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
188
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
191
Views

Re: POOF!!! another fallacy exposed. CLinton testified under oath.

191 Views
Message 78 of 161

@rk9152

 

One question... how does "sold us out to the Russians" become "the Russians effected the outcome of the elections" in your mind?

TRE45ON
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
191
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
195
Views

Re: POOF!!! another fallacy exposed. CLinton testified under oath.

195 Views
Message 79 of 161

@rk9152 wrote:

 


@Olderscout66 wrote:

Today's GOPerLords are the ideolgical decendants of the scum who ranted that Eisenhower was a Commie spy, probably because he sent in the 101st Airbourne to escort black students into Little Rock High.

 

No real change in their ideology or ignorance over the last half century, but now they've got their own Network and major political party to help spread their viral lies and visceral hate.

 

They cannot stand the fact their actual criminal members keep getting arrested and jailed, but the imaginary criminality they concocted for Hillary cannot survive in the light, so they must pretend the FBI has been corrupted to only arrest right wing nutjobs.

 

Now they've enlisted the Russians to help make sure the tinfoil hat brigaide makes it to the polls - What's next?


How is that rant related to the fact that Hillary lied to the FBI, the Congress and us about her emails? - and had her illegalities covered up by the corrupt DOJ. I frankly do not see any Russians or pointy hats in that scenario.


I dont believe your charges and insinuations. Do you have legal proof of those false allegations?

So it begins.
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
195
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
200
Views

Re: POOF!!! another fallacy exposed. CLinton testified under oath.

200 Views
Message 80 of 161

@rk9152 wrote:

@MIseker wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@phyllisc6781 wrote:

Not sure I responded to this or not because everyone knows Hillary testified under oath. Just another bare faced lie or twisting of the truth by a wanna be journalist.  

 

Stupid to spread hate and corruption.  Stupid to present this as truth, see where it got Moore and soon Bannon?

 

Gee, I miss having a real president!

 

 


I suppose "everyone" knows that if "everyone" did not read the posted information on the subject.

 

And then the discussion is moved forward with pc stuff like "stupid", "Moore", and "Bannon". 


Nice dodge. 

When you were posting that Clinton never testified under oath..

was it an error? you thought she didnt?

was it more of your usual distraction from a topic? that topic wasnt about clinton.

did you just plain old lie?

 

Ive barked the wrong tree before..but i admit it when i do.

Is that part of your personality profile?


Right, she testified under oath in a very tightly controlled area - the reason for having a private server - period. On other occasions she and her staffers testified not under oath.

 

Now do you have some cutsey way to deal with that?


yes indeed. thats not what you said on another topic Smiley Happy

 

So it begins.
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
200
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Have you taken a memorable trip to a destination others should know about? Post a Trip Report


city skyline captured on tablet

Top Authors