Is your 'stuff' stressing you out? TV personality Matt Paxton has tips for downsizing and decluttering in our free, two-part webinar! Register now.

Reply
Treasured Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
212
Views

Re: Mueller’s ‘witch hunt’

212 Views
Message 11 of 92

@easyed598 wrote:

.Critical wrote- Someone please advise Ed that a single person had over a $5 million exemption from the estate tax, while a married couple had almost an $11 million exemption. Therefore, there was no need to eliminate the Estate Tax because you could pass almost $11 million to your family TAX FREE.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In this day and age 5 million and 11 million is not a large amount for a family business and  a 50 million dollar business could cause the business to go out of business after the inheritance tax is applied.


Off topic

 

 

44>dolt45
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
212
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
219
Views

Re: Mueller’s ‘witch hunt’

219 Views
Message 12 of 92

.Critical wrote- Someone please advise Ed that a single person had over a $5 million exemption from the estate tax, while a married couple had almost an $11 million exemption. Therefore, there was no need to eliminate the Estate Tax because you could pass almost $11 million to your family TAX FREE.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In this day and age 5 million and 11 million is not a large amount for a family business and  a 50 million dollar business could cause the business to go out of business after the inheritance tax is applied.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
219
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
197
Views

Mueller’s ‘witch hunt’

197 Views
Message 13 of 92

Easy Ed incredibly asked about the new GOP tax plan and his hero in the White House, "You got proof he is benefiting from the tax cut ,all things consider? Anyways-Do you think billionaire Trump did the tax cut for his personal benefit and not for the millions of people who have higher paychecks???

 

I don't have to waste any time answering that off the wall set of questions, which have very obvious answers.

 

"Ed also claimed that elminating the inheritance tax would help farmers in his part of the world. I'm sorry Ed, but that was another false economic statement. Ed answered, "This was in reference to family farms and all family businesses who want to pass on the business to other family members ---nice try twisting that  argument but it fail."

 

Why does Ed continually prove he has no clue when it comes to economics? I realize Trump Cult members are allergic to FACTS, but this one is truly absurd. Someone please advise Ed that a single person had over a $5 million exemption from the estate tax, while a married couple had almost an $11 million exemption. Therefore, there was no need to eliminate the Estate Tax because you could pass almost $11 million to your family TAX FREE.

 

Please advise Ed that the only people who benefitted from doing away with the Estate Tax were very rich people like his leader and hero in the White House

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
197
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
193
Views

Re: Mueller’s ‘witch hunt’

193 Views
Message 14 of 92

Critical wrote-Several months ago, Ed told us Donald Trump will NOT benefit from the new GOP tax plan. I'm sorry Ed, but that's more proof he does not understand economics. He definitely is paying higher taxes on his NY real estate. You got proof he is benefiting from the tax cut ,all things consider? Anyways-Do you think billionaire Trump did the tax cut for his personal benefit and not for the millions of people who have higher paychecks???

 

Ed also claimed that elminating the inheritance tax would help farmers in his part of the world. I'm sorry Ed, but that was another false economic statement.-\   This was in reference to family farms and all family businesses who want to pass on the business to other family members ---nice try twisting that  argument but it fail. 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
193
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
196
Views

Re: Mueller’s ‘witch hunt’

196 Views
Message 15 of 92

@rk9152 wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@CriticalThinking wrote:

RK said, "So I wonder- what is Mueller needed for?"

 

Of course you do RK. Everybody's explained it to him in detail, but he doesn't want to hear it.


Nor anything other than the fake news spewed forth by Fox and Limblah.  It'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.


Fox and Limbaugh have nothing to do with the fact that all the indictments that are being ranted about have been for past activities that are the responsibility of various law enforcement agencies. That's exactly what Fox and Limblah spew daily.  But what you and Fox and Limblah want other mental-midgets to think is that it's not part of Muellers mandate.....but though, it is. But, it is true. It's "gaslighting".  It doesn't matter who investigates it.  Did it matter to you that the Special Council investigated White Water?  How about sexual harrassment?  A consensual sex act? So, what does it matter who says it? What matters is the mandate says from Rosenstein....Once again, since there are and have been agencies responsible for those supposed offenses, why do we need Mueller. (sic)  The Justice Department determined one was necessary. Actually, the accuracy of the response quited you down.  "You're right" would have sufficed.

 

So, again, what is Mueller needed for?  Ahhh.....more of the "rk" gaslighting.... Is truth now called "gaslighting? Maybe you need to look up ANOTHER word.....Well, if you are going to take truth and call it gaslighting, that would indicate it is your definion of the word  Again, maybe you should post your definition of the word.

 

As to, "he doesn't want to hear it" - trust me he does. So, lay it on me (or him).  Enjoy your journey into your rabbithole.... Again, no logical response so trot out the "rabbithole".  It's what occurs when you rely on twisted facts and rhetoric from Fox and Limblah....you usually end up in your own "rabbit hole".....it could be worse.

And now from the "rabbit hole" to your other favotite (sic) Fox ans (sic) Limbaugh. Yes, your "rabbit holes" are quite the hoot.

 

"In appointing Mueller, however, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein gave him broad authority not only to investigate "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated" with Trump's campaign, but also to examine "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation."

 

Rosenstein also gave Mueller the power to investigate "any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)" — including perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, and intimidation of witnesses."


 


 


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in Washington DC, January 21, 2017.
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
196
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
201
Views

Re: Mueller’s ‘witch hunt’

201 Views
Message 16 of 92

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@CriticalThinking wrote:

RK said, "So I wonder- what is Mueller needed for?"

 

Of course you do RK. Everybody's explained it to him in detail, but he doesn't want to hear it.


Nor anything other than the fake news spewed forth by Fox and Limblah.  It'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.


Fox and Limbaugh have nothing to do with the fact that all the indictments that are being ranted about have been for past activities that are the responsibility of various law enforcement agencies. That's exactly what Fox and Limblah spew daily.  But what you and Fox and Limblah want other mental-midgets to think is that it's not part of Muellers mandate.....but though, it is. But, it is true. It's "gaslighting".  It doesn't matter who investigates it.  Did it matter to you that the Special Council investigated White Water?  How about sexual harrassment?  A consensual sex act? So, what does it matter who says it? What matters is the mandate says from Rosenstein....Once again, since there are and have been agencies responsible for those supposed offenses, why do we need Mueller. (sic)  The Justice Department determined one was necessary.

 

So, again, what is Mueller needed for?  Ahhh.....more of the "rk" gaslighting.... Is truth now called "gaslighting? Maybe you need to look up ANOTHER word.....Well, if you are going to take truth and call it gaslighting, that would indicate it is your definion of the word

 

As to, "he doesn't want to hear it" - trust me he does. So, lay it on me (or him).  Enjoy your journey into your rabbithole.... Again, no logical response so trot out the "rabbithole".  It's what occurs when you rely on twisted facts and rhetoric from Fox and Limblah....you usually end up in your own "rabbit hole".....it could be worse.

And now from the "rabbit hole" to your other favotite Fox and Limbaugh.

 

"In appointing Mueller, however, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein gave him broad authority not only to investigate "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated" with Trump's campaign, but also to examine "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation."

 

Rosenstein also gave Mueller the power to investigate "any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)" — including perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, and intimidation of witnesses."


 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
201
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
215
Views

Re: Mueller’s ‘witch hunt’

215 Views
Message 17 of 92

@easyed598 wrote:

Critical wrote -Ed, as Trump Cult member, I don't expect him to understand economics. But why is making it so obvious? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------When I identified as a cult member  it was a tongue and cheek remark   you didn't need to identify yourself, it was obvious in your posts, just like here with tarriffs.....and also seems what the fake news media has now picked up on. "Picked-ip on"....LOL.....it's because GOP Corker made the claim, as a few other Repubs.... Prefer that over being called a Democrat swamp dweller. <roll eyes here>.....maybe another Judge Judy gif......Funny how the Dems like pick  up 4 letter words and  that really aren`t true but reflects on their limited imagination. <roll eyes here>.....maybe another Judge Judy gif...Guess we have to learn to live with them using Cult,C**t,f**k  etc. Well, clearly they've learned from your cult leader.....

 

 

As far as the economy ,I do pretty good for someone who  don`t (sic) know economics.How about you?  

 

Image result for judge judy rolling eyes


 


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in Washington DC, January 21, 2017.
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
215
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
217
Views

Mueller’s ‘witch hunt’

217 Views
Message 18 of 92

Ed, please stop. You just proved you have no understanding of the devastating effects of a trade war on the economy.

 

Several months ago, Ed told us Donald Trump will NOT benefit from the new GOP tax plan. I'm sorry Ed, but that's more proof he does not understand economics. 

 

Ed also claimed that elminating the inheritance tax would help farmers in his part of the world. I'm sorry Ed, but that was another false economic statement.

 

Where is Ed getting this bogus economic information?

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
217
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
217
Views

Re: Mueller’s ‘witch hunt’

217 Views
Message 19 of 92

@easyed598 wrote:

Critical wrote -Ed, as Trump Cult member, I don't expect him to understand economics. But why is making it so obvious? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------When I identified as a cult member  it was a tongue and cheek remark and also seems what the fake news media has now picked up on. Prefer that over being called a Democrat swamp dweller. Funny how the Dems like pick  up 4 letter words and  that really aren`t true but reflects on their limited imagination. Guess we have to learn to live with them using Cult,C**t,f**k  etc. As far as the economy ,I do pretty good for someone who  don`t know economics.How about you?


Obama/Hillary cult members will never agree that Trump has a good economy or that Trump did anything good.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
217
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
220
Views

Re: Mueller’s ‘witch hunt’

220 Views
Message 20 of 92

Critical wrote -Ed, as Trump Cult member, I don't expect him to understand economics. But why is making it so obvious? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------When I identified as a cult member  it was a tongue and cheek remark and also seems what the fake news media has now picked up on. Prefer that over being called a Democrat swamp dweller. Funny how the Dems like pick  up 4 letter words and  that really aren`t true but reflects on their limited imagination. Guess we have to learn to live with them using Cult,C**t,f**k  etc. As far as the economy ,I do pretty good for someone who  don`t know economics.How about you?

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
220
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Have a question about AARP membership or benefits? Ask it in the AARP Help Membership forum, Benefits & Discounts forum, or General forum.


multiple white question marks with center red question mark

Top Authors