It’s Brain Health Awareness Month! Check out Staying Sharp and its new features designed to support brain health.

Reply
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
50
Views

Re: MSNBC host crying because they was no smoking gun in Mueller report.

50 Views
Message 1 of 55

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:


You seem to have forgotten that Mueller was brought in as the result of a supposed national security issue involving "Russian collusion".

Actually, it was Mueller's investigation into "Russian interference" in the 2016 election.

How do you relate the 2016 elections to sex with a porn star years ago?

Why do you ask questions on statements that posters never made?

Just another one of your usual straw man arguments rk!

 

As to "nothing happened"  - what was in there about that in your eyes.

Ten (10) incidents of obstruction of justice by Trump wherein he tried to stop or interfere with Mueller's investigation.

Not one proven only potentials listed.

Actually, ALL ten (10) obstruction of justice incidents detailed in Mueller's report were served up for Congressional action (i.e. IMPEACHMENT).


I said "not proven" - "served up" is not proven.


 


 


 


"Not proven" has no relevance.

The actions supporting obstruction of justice, in ten (10) instances, are the relevant issues you want to evade with your misleading responses.


Again, "served up" is proof of nothing.


Again, "evidence" is proof ..... and there was plenty of "evidence served up" to Congress identifying ten (10) instances of obstruction of justice by Trump and his minions!


Well then I guess that's the end of the story - tic-toc.


Hardly, Congress now needs to act on the Trump's obstruction of justice  ......  IMPEACHMENT!

DUMP TRUMP AND MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
50
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
61
Views

Re: MSNBC host crying because they was no smoking gun in Mueller report.

61 Views
Message 2 of 55

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:


You seem to have forgotten that Mueller was brought in as the result of a supposed national security issue involving "Russian collusion".

Actually, it was Mueller's investigation into "Russian interference" in the 2016 election.

How do you relate the 2016 elections to sex with a porn star years ago?

Why do you ask questions on statements that posters never made?

Just another one of your usual straw man arguments rk!

 

As to "nothing happened"  - what was in there about that in your eyes.

Ten (10) incidents of obstruction of justice by Trump wherein he tried to stop or interfere with Mueller's investigation.

Not one proven only potentials listed.

Actually, ALL ten (10) obstruction of justice incidents detailed in Mueller's report were served up for Congressional action (i.e. IMPEACHMENT).


I said "not proven" - "served up" is not proven.


 


 


 


"Not proven" has no relevance.

The actions supporting obstruction of justice, in ten (10) instances, are the relevant issues you want to evade with your misleading responses.


Again, "served up" is proof of nothing.


Again, "evidence" is proof ..... and there was plenty of "evidence served up" to Congress identifying ten (10) instances of obstruction of justice by Trump and his minions!


Well then I guess that's the end of the story - tic-toc.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
61
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
87
Views

Re: MSNBC host crying because they was no smoking gun in Mueller report.

87 Views
Message 3 of 55

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:


You seem to have forgotten that Mueller was brought in as the result of a supposed national security issue involving "Russian collusion".

Actually, it was Mueller's investigation into "Russian interference" in the 2016 election.

How do you relate the 2016 elections to sex with a porn star years ago?

Why do you ask questions on statements that posters never made?

Just another one of your usual straw man arguments rk!

 

As to "nothing happened"  - what was in there about that in your eyes.

Ten (10) incidents of obstruction of justice by Trump wherein he tried to stop or interfere with Mueller's investigation.

Not one proven only potentials listed.

Actually, ALL ten (10) obstruction of justice incidents detailed in Mueller's report were served up for Congressional action (i.e. IMPEACHMENT).


I said "not proven" - "served up" is not proven.


 


 


 


"Not proven" has no relevance.

The actions supporting obstruction of justice, in ten (10) instances, are the relevant issues you want to evade with your misleading responses.


Again, "served up" is proof of nothing.


Again, "evidence" is proof ..... and there was plenty of "evidence served up" to Congress identifying ten (10) instances of obstruction of justice by Trump and his minions!

DUMP TRUMP AND MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
87
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
102
Views

Re: MSNBC host crying because they was no smoking gun in Mueller report.

102 Views
Message 4 of 55

@ChasKy53 wrote:

Perhaps if trump supporters would listen to real news and think for themselves instead of having their heads stuck on FOX News, Breitbart, trump speeches (lies), and those who are hired to lie for trump (Barr, etc), they would understand the ramifications in the Mueller Report.  Trump is as guilty as sin and so are the ones he surrounds himself with, including some of his own family members.


No rational person needs Fox or the rest of your list to understand what Mueller sent to the Congress. It was a disappointment to them and to the tic-tocs here. 

 

The ramifications were quite clearly that no laws were broken but it was tons of pages of interviews and other material that the Dems can use to continue the failed Mueller fishing expedition.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
102
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
113
Views

Re: MSNBC host crying because they was no smoking gun in Mueller report.

113 Views
Message 5 of 55

Perhaps if trump supporters would listen to real news and think for themselves instead of having their heads stuck on FOX News, Breitbart, trump speeches (lies), and those who are hired to lie for trump (Barr, etc), they would understand the ramifications in the Mueller Report.  Trump is as guilty as sin and so are the ones he surrounds himself with, including some of his own family members.


"The only thing man learns from history is man learns nothing from history"
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
113
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
117
Views

Re: MSNBC host crying because they was no smoking gun in Mueller report.

117 Views
Message 6 of 55

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:


You seem to have forgotten that Mueller was brought in as the result of a supposed national security issue involving "Russian collusion".

Actually, it was Mueller's investigation into "Russian interference" in the 2016 election.

How do you relate the 2016 elections to sex with a porn star years ago?

Why do you ask questions on statements that posters never made?

Just another one of your usual straw man arguments rk!

 

As to "nothing happened"  - what was in there about that in your eyes.

Ten (10) incidents of obstruction of justice by Trump wherein he tried to stop or interfere with Mueller's investigation.

Not one proven only potentials listed.

Actually, ALL ten (10) obstruction of justice incidents detailed in Mueller's report were served up for Congressional action (i.e. IMPEACHMENT).


I said "not proven" - "served up" is not proven.


 


 


 


"Not proven" has no relevance.

The actions supporting obstruction of justice, in ten (10) instances, are the relevant issues you want to evade with your misleading responses.


Again, "served up" is proof of nothing.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
117
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
138
Views

Re: MSNBC host crying because they was no smoking gun in Mueller report.

138 Views
Message 7 of 55

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

Actually, ALL ten (10) obstruction of justice incidents detailed in Mueller's report were served up for Congressional action (i.e. IMPEACHMENT).
"Served up" is not proof nor evidence..

"Evidence" is proof ..... and there was plenty of "evidence served up" to Congress identifying ten (10) instances of obstruction of justice by Trump and his minions!

DUMP TRUMP AND MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
138
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
151
Views

Re: MSNBC host crying because they was no smoking gun in Mueller report.

151 Views
Message 8 of 55

@myexper wrote:

Actually, ALL ten (10) obstruction of justice incidents detailed in Mueller's report were served up for Congressional action (i.e. IMPEACHMENT).
"Served up" is not proof nor evidence..
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
151
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
165
Views

Re: MSNBC host crying because they was no smoking gun in Mueller report.

165 Views
Message 9 of 55

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:


You seem to have forgotten that Mueller was brought in as the result of a supposed national security issue involving "Russian collusion".

Actually, it was Mueller's investigation into "Russian interference" in the 2016 election.

How do you relate the 2016 elections to sex with a porn star years ago?

Why do you ask questions on statements that posters never made?

Just another one of your usual straw man arguments rk!

 

As to "nothing happened"  - what was in there about that in your eyes.

Ten (10) incidents of obstruction of justice by Trump wherein he tried to stop or interfere with Mueller's investigation.

Not one proven only potentials listed.

Actually, ALL ten (10) obstruction of justice incidents detailed in Mueller's report were served up for Congressional action (i.e. IMPEACHMENT).


I said "not proven" - "served up" is not proven.


 


 


 


"Not proven" has no relevance.

The actions supporting obstruction of justice, in ten (10) instances, are the relevant issues you want to evade with your misleading responses.


Claims from those  attempting to "get" the President is what has "no relevence".


Far more than just  "claims" rk .........

And detailed "evidence" defining ten (10) instances of obstruction of justice by Trump is "most relevant" rk!


If you have proof, come up with something better than "served up".


Already done ....... "evidence" ...... "evidence" defining ten (10) instances of obstruction of justice!

DUMP TRUMP AND MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
165
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
182
Views

Re: MSNBC host crying because they was no smoking gun in Mueller report.

182 Views
Message 10 of 55

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:


You seem to have forgotten that Mueller was brought in as the result of a supposed national security issue involving "Russian collusion".

Actually, it was Mueller's investigation into "Russian interference" in the 2016 election.

How do you relate the 2016 elections to sex with a porn star years ago?

Why do you ask questions on statements that posters never made?

Just another one of your usual straw man arguments rk!

 

As to "nothing happened"  - what was in there about that in your eyes.

Ten (10) incidents of obstruction of justice by Trump wherein he tried to stop or interfere with Mueller's investigation.

Not one proven only potentials listed.

Actually, ALL ten (10) obstruction of justice incidents detailed in Mueller's report were served up for Congressional action (i.e. IMPEACHMENT).


I said "not proven" - "served up" is not proven.


 


 


 


"Not proven" has no relevance.

The actions supporting obstruction of justice, in ten (10) instances, are the relevant issues you want to evade with your misleading responses.


Claims from those  attempting to "get" the President is what has "no relevence".


Far more than just  "claims" rk .........

And detailed "evidence" defining ten (10) instances of obstruction of justice by Trump is "most relevant" rk!


If you have proof, come up with something better than "served up".

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
182
Views