Reply
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
279
Views

279 Views
Message 1 of 64

trump porn star.jpg

 

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
279
Views
Highlighted
Esteemed Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
287
Views

287 Views
Message 2 of 64

When Clinton’s affair with a young naive intern was exposed, there was public outcry.

Why is there no indignation that trump was involved with a porn star shortly after his new wife had a child??

HYPOCRISY??!!

 

Gee, I miss having a real president!

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
287
Views
Highlighted
Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
300
Views

300 Views
Message 3 of 64


@easyed598 wrote:

 

Bill Clinton having sex with  intern decades younger than him is fact. 



You think Stormy Daniels isn't decades younger than Trump? Smiley Tongue

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
300
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
318
Views

318 Views
Message 4 of 64

@rk9152 wrote:
I don't know about those "ignobles" but I did, in error, make reference to legalized prostitution. I understand that the woman involved was not a prostitute, she was a porn star who extorted Trump.

Because sleeping with porn stars is such a reasonable idea on so many levels how could you expect anything negative to happen?  Your Moron (Thanks Rex) at work!

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
318
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
325
Views

325 Views
Message 5 of 64

There is no negative fact or revelation about Trump which would result in a member of the Cult saying anything negative about their hero and idol in the White House. If they were objective and cared about the truth, they wouldn't be a member of the Trump Cult.

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
325
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
341
Views

341 Views
Message 6 of 64

   So off topic, but I couldn't resist.    My parents always told me when I asked what did a word mean:   The dictionary is paid for.    Now, some are on-line and some here are pleading stupidity ( i don't know what that means).   oh my.    Sort of proves my point about the ignobles.

   Paying for silence - I wonder when people don't understand words, if they also fail to understand why the issue of Donald doesn't hesitate to " pay for silence' via NDA  is a bfd. 

 

   Gee whiz, even the US Olympic committee who paid a girl that was sexually abused by a physician has backed down on their holding her to her  to here NDA.  

 

PRO-LIFE is Affordable Healthcare for ALL .
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
341
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
354
Views

354 Views
Message 7 of 64

@afisher wrote:

   Oh My, the GOP  ignobles have spent a lot of time attempting to a) make a point that the woman involved was a prostitute, now why is that?   Is that the start of a smear campaign....sorry it was an epic FAIL.    b)  this woman was paid quite well to not talk about this - again that doesn't make her a prostitute.   c)  the magic of media:   a national magazine has a 5500 word interview with this woman and that interview is over a decade old...so the NDA of the woman has ZERO bearing on the issue when the interview hits the streets.  Hilariously, the magazine is taking a play straight from Donald.  

 

Donald will tweet, his whine will be about libel - because he can makes up distractions for his ignoble followers who may not comprehend that Donald doesn't know or care about the law and neither do they....but they will try it here, again, soon.    


I don't know about those "ignobles" but I did, in error, make reference to legalized prostitution. I understand that the woman involved was not a prostitute, she was a porn star who extorted Trump.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
354
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
361
Views

361 Views
Message 8 of 64

   Oh My, the GOP  ignobles have spent a lot of time attempting to a) make a point that the woman involved was a prostitute, now why is that?   Is that the start of a smear campaign....sorry it was an epic FAIL.    b)  this woman was paid quite well to not talk about this - again that doesn't make her a prostitute.   c)  the magic of media:   a national magazine has a 5500 word interview with this woman and that interview is over a decade old...so the NDA of the woman has ZERO bearing on the issue when the interview hits the streets.  Hilariously, the magazine is taking a play straight from Donald.  

 

Donald will tweet, his whine will be about libel - because he can makes up distractions for his ignoble followers who may not comprehend that Donald doesn't know or care about the law and neither do they....but they will try it here, again, soon.    

PRO-LIFE is Affordable Healthcare for ALL .
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
361
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
370
Views

370 Views
Message 9 of 64

@rk9152 wrote:

@ChasKy53 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@ChasKy53 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@oceanedge2 wrote:

 

rk - Was it a Trump supporter who brought it up?

 

That would be Michael Cohen, Attorney at Law and a Big dt supporter, bringing it up when he made payment to this woman's supporter, her attorney.  But because dt is a buck-stops-here kind of guy, we have to agree he brought it up himself and can't really blame Mr. Cohen for following orders.  Besides, dt is doing a terrible job of keeping his toxic self well hidden and that's a bit tricky when R.Mueller is very good at any job HE undertakes.  If there is a Russian pee party tape, I'm certain he has filed it correctly and will bring it up when necessary.


It was brought up here by oceanedge2 - a big Trump supporter???


Michael Cohen, a trump supporter. brought it up. Fifth grade reading comprehension makes that very clear. That pesky reality thing bites you again.


Is that the reading level where you learn the meaning of, "It was brought up here by oceanedge2..."?


Oceanedge didn't "bring it up".  Oceanedge pointed out that Michael Cohen brought it up and yes he's a trump supporter. Ain't reality tough for you?


ocean is posting here, Cohen is not. Why do you obsess over such meaningless stuff?


Why do you obsess over Putin's useful idiot?    It's firmly established that he lies more often than he tells the truth...

 

44>dolt45
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
370
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
374
Views

374 Views
Message 10 of 64

@ChasKy53 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@ChasKy53 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@oceanedge2 wrote:

 

rk - Was it a Trump supporter who brought it up?

 

That would be Michael Cohen, Attorney at Law and a Big dt supporter, bringing it up when he made payment to this woman's supporter, her attorney.  But because dt is a buck-stops-here kind of guy, we have to agree he brought it up himself and can't really blame Mr. Cohen for following orders.  Besides, dt is doing a terrible job of keeping his toxic self well hidden and that's a bit tricky when R.Mueller is very good at any job HE undertakes.  If there is a Russian pee party tape, I'm certain he has filed it correctly and will bring it up when necessary.


It was brought up here by oceanedge2 - a big Trump supporter???


Michael Cohen, a trump supporter. brought it up. Fifth grade reading comprehension makes that very clear. That pesky reality thing bites you again.


Is that the reading level where you learn the meaning of, "It was brought up here by oceanedge2..."?


Oceanedge didn't "bring it up".  Oceanedge pointed out that Michael Cohen brought it up and yes he's a trump supporter. Ain't reality tough for you?


ocean is posting here, Cohen is not. Why do you obsess over such meaningless stuff?

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
374
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

September is Emergency Preparedness month.

Do you have an emergency plan in place?

Share or ask questions today.

Emergency preparedness kit

Top Authors