Looking for work? The U.S. Census Bureau is hiring more than 500,000 people nationwide. Learn more.

Reply
Highlighted
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
316
Views

Re: LAWMAKER BELIEVES GLENN SIMPSON FACES ‘REAL LEGAL JEOPARDY

316 Views
Message 1 of 10

@rk9152 wrote:

@Panjandrum wrote:

ChasKy53:    Ahhh ....... The Daily Caller.  LOOK OVER HERE !   LOOK OVER HERE !   LOOK OVER HERE !

 

 

Exactly. The problem with that tactic is that the OVER HERE can't compete with Trump's ongoing circus act. It distracts those who live and breathe the Fox soap opera far more than the vast majority who pay little attention to it.


FOX?????

 

Any thoughts on what Real Clear Politics had to say? As a matter of fact - Do you know the Caller was in error?

 

I sometimes think that the thinking of the left is the Party line - period. Anything else is "OVER THERE".


Time will tell. Till then this is a waste of time.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
316
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
329
Views

Re: LAWMAKER BELIEVES GLENN SIMPSON FACES ‘REAL LEGAL JEOPARDY

329 Views
Message 2 of 10

@Panjandrum wrote:

ChasKy53:    Ahhh ....... The Daily Caller.  LOOK OVER HERE !   LOOK OVER HERE !   LOOK OVER HERE !

 

 

Exactly. The problem with that tactic is that the OVER HERE can't compete with Trump's ongoing circus act. It distracts those who live and breathe the Fox soap opera far more than the vast majority who pay little attention to it.


FOX?????

 

Any thoughts on what Real Clear Politics had to say? As a matter of fact - Do you know the Caller was in error?

 

I sometimes think that the thinking of the left is the Party line - period. Anything else is "OVER THERE".

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
329
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
335
Views

Re: LAWMAKER BELIEVES GLENN SIMPSON FACES ‘REAL LEGAL JEOPARDY

335 Views
Message 3 of 10

@williamb39198 wrote:

Their opinion doesn’t matter, and I’m not logging into the site. This is just another regurgitated attempt to try to discredit the Steele Dossier. No thanks.

Perhaps they will write something which discusses what trump has been doing to destroy our Country. 

 

How bout those financials donnie


Got it. Daily Caller reports - no validity there. Fox - no way we could even consider that. Then there is Real Clear Politics - not even worth looking at.

 

So, how do you determine the validity or lack there of of the issue?

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
335
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
353
Views

Re: LAWMAKER BELIEVES GLENN SIMPSON FACES ‘REAL LEGAL JEOPARDY

353 Views
Message 4 of 10

ChasKy53:    Ahhh ....... The Daily Caller.  LOOK OVER HERE !   LOOK OVER HERE !   LOOK OVER HERE !

 

 

Exactly. The problem with that tactic is that the OVER HERE can't compete with Trump's ongoing circus act. It distracts those who live and breathe the Fox soap opera far more than the vast majority who pay little attention to it.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
353
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
377
Views

Re: LAWMAKER BELIEVES GLENN SIMPSON FACES ‘REAL LEGAL JEOPARDY

377 Views
Message 5 of 10

Their opinion doesn’t matter, and I’m not logging into the site. This is just another regurgitated attempt to try to discredit the Steele Dossier. No thanks.

Perhaps they will write something which discusses what trump has been doing to destroy our Country. 

 

How bout those financials donnie

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
377
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
389
Views

Re: LAWMAKER BELIEVES GLENN SIMPSON FACES ‘REAL LEGAL JEOPARDY

389 Views
Message 6 of 10

@williamb39198 wrote:

So are you claiming that the daily caller has journalistic integrity like fox news has? Does integrity include trying to put marginal new spins on old marginal news stories?

 

Never Forget


So, what did you think of the real clear politics item?

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
389
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
402
Views

Re: LAWMAKER BELIEVES GLENN SIMPSON FACES ‘REAL LEGAL JEOPARDY

402 Views
Message 7 of 10

So are you claiming that the daily caller has journalistic integrity like fox news has? Does integrity include trying to put marginal new spins on old marginal news stories?

 

Never Forget

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
402
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
411
Views

Re: LAWMAKER BELIEVES GLENN SIMPSON FACES ‘REAL LEGAL JEOPARDY

411 Views
Message 8 of 10

Those opinions changed abruptly after Trump won, as the result of what looks increasingly like a coordinated campaign involving outgoing Obama administration officials who leaked carefully chosen bits of classified information to a credulous press corps that had become used to printing handouts from the good guys and was especially eager to #Resist Trump.

 

Slightly off topic but from an extensive report on Simpson by what I hope will be more acceptable to the experts on journalistic integrity.

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2018/01/15/did_glenn_simpson_lie_to_congress_431548.html

 

 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
411
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
443
Views

Re: LAWMAKER BELIEVES GLENN SIMPSON FACES ‘REAL LEGAL JEOPARDY

443 Views
Message 9 of 10

Ahhh ....... The Daily Caller.  LOOK OVER HERE !   LOOK OVER HERE !   LOOK OVER HERE !


"The only thing man learns from history is man learns nothing from history"
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
443
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
451
Views
9
Replies

LAWMAKER BELIEVES GLENN SIMPSON FACES ‘REAL LEGAL JEOPARDY

451 Views
Message 10 of 10
  • Bruce Ohr told Congress he met with Glenn Simpson in August 2016, a claim that directly conflicts with what the Fusion GPS founder told Congress in his own testimony. 
  • Simpson said he met Ohr only after the 2016 election. The inconsistency has led one Republican to claim that Simpson is “in real legal jeopardy” over his testimony. 
  • Ohr also testified that Simpson was the source for a heavily disputed allegation about conservative lawyer Cleta Mitchell.

 

Justice Department official Bruce Ohr’s congressional testimony undercuts testimony given by Glenn Simpson, the founder of the opposition firm that commissioned the infamous Steele dossier.

Ohr’s testimony, a transcript of which was published Friday, also confirms reports that Simpson was the source of a heavily disputed allegation about conservative attorney Cleta Mitchell.

 

Ohr told lawmakers in an Aug. 28, 2018 hearing that he met Simpson prior to the 2016 election to discuss information gathered by Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored the dossier. That conflicts with Simpson’s testimony to the House Intelligence Committee that he met Ohr only after the election and at Ohr’s request.

 

Ohr also revealed Simpson provided him during a meeting in December 2016 with a seemingly false lead about Mitchell that ended up in a news article published in 2018.

 

Both of Simpson’s inaccurate claims have been reported in the past, but they were not officially confirmed until Friday, when Georgia GOP Rep. Doug Collins released a transcript of Ohr’s testimony before the House Judiciary and House Oversight Committees.

 

In his interview, Ohr discussed his interactions with Simpson and Steele, a former MI6 officer. Ohr served as a back channel between Steele and the FBI after the 2016 election. He met twice with both Simpson and Steele to exchange information that Steele gathered as part of the dossier project.

 

Some Republican lawmakers have suggested that Simpson lied about the timeline of his interactions with Ohr, whose wife worked as a contractor for Fusion GPS. Texas GOP Rep. John Ratcliffe said on Oct. 14, 2018 that Simpson faced “real legal jeopardy” over his testimony. Simpson pleaded the Fifth two days later to avoid testifying to the House Judiciary and House Oversight Committees. 

 

The testimony that could land Simpson in hot water took place before the House Intelligence Committee on Nov. 14, 2017. In the closed-door hearing, Simpson acknowledged that he met with Ohr, but he claimed the meeting occurred after the 2016 election. He also suggested that Ohr sought the meeting.

 

Ohr’s testimony conflicts directly with both claims.

 

 

Fusion GPS Co-Founder Glenn Simpson listens as his lawyer, Joshua Levy, speaks to members of the media following a meeting with members of the House Judiciary and Oversight Committee in the Rayburn Office Building on Capitol Hill on October 16, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)

Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson at the Rayburn Office Building on Capitol Hill on Oct. 16, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)

 

Ohr said that he met twice with Simpson, on Aug. 22, 2016 and again on Dec. 10, 2016. He also testified it was Simpson who reached out to him and not the other way around. 

 

Simpson revealed his contacts with Ohr after being asked in the November 2017 hearing whether he had heard from anyone at the FBI or Justice Department about his and Steele’s investigation of President Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.

 

“After the election. I mean, during the election, no,” Simpson said.

 

“What did you hear after and from whom and when?” a House staffer asked.

 

“I was asked to provide some information to the Justice Department,” Simpson replied.

When asked who contacted him and when, Simpson said: “It was by a prosecutor named Bruce Ohr, who was following up. You know, I can’t remember when. It was sometime after Thanksgiving, I think.”

 

“Did Mr. Ohr reach out to you, or how did that shake out?” he was asked.

 

Simpson did not acknowledge that he reached out to Ohr. Instead, he said that Steele had been in touch with Ohr “and that Bruce wanted more information.” Steele and Ohr had met on July 30, 2016.

Simpson claimed again that his interaction with Ohr occurred only after the election.

 

“The context of this is that it was after the election,” said Simpson. “A very surprising thing had happened, which is that Donald Trump had won. There was — we were — by that time, we were enormously concerned about rapidly accumulating indications that the Russian Government had mounted a massive attack on the American election system and that, you know, Donald Trump or his associates might have been involved.”

 

Ohr suggested in his testimony that Simpson initiated the December 2016 meeting. He also said that Simpson provided him with a memory stick that he wanted given to the FBI. That would seem to conflict with Simpson’s testimony that he was asked to provide information to the Justice Department and that Ohr requested the information.

 

“So, as I think I may have mentioned earlier, Glenn Simpson wanted to meet in early December, whatever date that was in December. At that meeting, he provided me with a memory stick and provided some additional details on information about possible connections between the Russian Government and the Trump campaign,” Ohr testified.

 

Simpson has not commented on his testimony. It is unclear why Simpson would have lied about his contacts with Ohr, but some Republicans have theorized the opposition researcher did not want to acknowledge the breadth of his efforts to disseminate information from the dossier.

 

Ohr also confirmed in his testimony that Simpson provided him with information on Mitchell during their meeting on Dec. 10, 2016.

 

“I think it was Glenn Simpson mentioned to me was that Cleta Mitchell became aware of money moving through the NRA or something like that from Russia,” Ohr testified. “And I don’t remember the exact circumstances. And that she was upset about it, but the election was over. I seem to remember that from my notes.”

 

Mitchell would later pop up on the radar of California Rep. Adam Schiff. The top House Intelligence Democrat released a memo on March 13, 2018 that included Mitchell on a list of potential witnesses in the committee’s Russia investigation. Two days later, McClatchy published a story revealing why Mitchell was of interest to Schiff.

 

The McClatchy story matched closely with what Simpson told Ohr, suggesting the Fusion GPS founder was somehow the initial source of information on Mitchell. Mitchell had privately expressed concerns that Russian money flowed into the National Rifle Association, according to the article.

There was one major flaw in the story.

 

The report initially claimed that Mitchell was a member of NRA’s board of directors. But in response to the report, Mitchell said that she left the board in 2012 and had no contact with the gun rights group during the campaign.

 

“I’ve never ever expressed any concerns because I’ve never had such concerns,” Mitchell toldTalking Points Memo. “Never crossed my mind. Ever.”

 

Mitchell told The Daily Caller News Foundation that reporters from ABC News and CNN approached her weeks before Schiff’s letter inquiring about the information that ended up in the McClatchy piece.

Notably, the two reporters who wrote the Mitchell story are also behind two controversial reports alleging that former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen visited Prague in August 2016 to meet with Kremlin officials. That claim is one of the main allegations of collusion in Steele’s dossier. Cohen denied the claim in sworn congressional testimony on Feb. 27.

 

McClatchy says it stands behind all of its reporting on Mitchell and Cohen.

 

https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/09/bruce-ohr-glenn-simpson-testimony/

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
451
Views
9
Replies
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Open Enrollment: Oct 15-Dec 7, 2019 Find resources to help you decide on the best healthcare insurance plans for you during Open Enrollment season

Top Authors