Reply
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: James Baker Has Flipped and There’s a Mole Inside the FBI

542 Views
Message 1 of 7

   hilarious - the RW is recycling their defunct CT....I can only hypothesize that they have not read either of the books that would answer those questions.   Anonymous and Crime in Progress.     Some here remain in the RW bubble.  

PRO-LIFE is Affordable Healthcare for ALL .
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: James Baker Has Flipped and There’s a Mole Inside the FBI

558 Views
Message 2 of 7

sp362:   As usual, as soon as you hear a rumor that MIGHT support your position, you are taking it as a fact, when it is anything but.  This MIGHT be news later on, or not.

 

 

Bingo.

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Recognized Social Butterfly

Re: James Baker Has Flipped and There’s a Mole Inside the FBI

566 Views
Message 3 of 7

What makes this a conspiracy theory is that they are already labeling gossip and innuendo as fact.

 

DiGenova told Carr there is now a mole inside the FBI “who is leaking to the press about the current conduct of FBI Director Christopher Wray and his general counsel, Dana Boente.

 

“What’s very clear is according to two stories, one in The Federalist and one in The Daily Caller, diGenova said, “is someone inside the FBI is now whistleblowing by leaking to the press about what’s going on and boy, it is just fascinating to watch the claim that Chris Wray and Dana Boente did everything they could to prevent the stuff from the Missouri U.S. attorney from being given to Flynn’s attorney. That is the beginning of a very ugly story. Jeff Sessions was talked into recusing himself from the Trump/Russia collusion case by Dana Boente who was then-Acting Deputy Attorney General.”

 

DiGenova has been saying the same crap for years with zero proof.  He is also the same moron who was calling Trump to pardon Scooter Libby for exposing a CIA spy. 

I don't see any "facts" in this all, just somebody trying to read their own agenda into what may or may not be going on since neither the The Federalist or the Daily Caller are known for being factually accurate.

 

As usual, as soon as you hear a rumor that MIGHT support your position, you are taking it as a fact, when it is anything but.  This MIGHT be news later on, or not.

 

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: James Baker Has Flipped and There’s a Mole Inside the FBI

593 Views
Message 4 of 7

Conspiracy Theory?  How so?  Do you dispute this is happening?

 

But, here’s the thing. We now know that Durham is investigating the leak of that conversation between Flynn and Kislyak, and we now know that – I don’t think he’s interviewed David Ignatius, the little twit from The Washington Post, who wrote the story – but the person who leaked the information about the Kislyak phone call because he had legal access to the unmasking of Flynn was a guy who ran what’s called the Office of Net Assessment in the Department of Defense, a guy named James Baker, not the James Baker who was the FBI Director [sic] [James Baker was the FBI’s General Counsel].

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: James Baker Has Flipped and There’s a Mole Inside the FBI

595 Views
Message 5 of 7

Keeping up with the conspiracies on the right is impossible. It's like Lucy and Ethel at the chocolate factory.:)

 

 

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Social Butterfly

Re: James Baker Has Flipped and There’s a Mole Inside the FBI

602 Views
Message 6 of 7

Second conspiracy theory today! Fox News is on a roll!

This one is just as credible as the last 247 Fox conspiracy theories.

 

 

(ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzz)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

James Baker Has Flipped and There’s a Mole Inside the FBI

620 Views
Message 7 of 7

Joe diGenova: Former FBI General Counsel James Baker Has Flipped and There’s a Mole Inside the FBI

 

Washington attorney Joe diGenova, a former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, spoke to radio show host Howie Carr on Wednesday. Though the interview took place before Thursday night’s release of FBI documents pertaining to Gen. Michael Flynn, he reported some fascinating new information about the Durham investigation.

 

DiGenova told Carr there is now a mole inside the FBI “who is leaking to the press about the current conduct of FBI Director Christopher Wray and his general counsel, Dana Boente.

 

“What’s very clear is according to two stories, one in The Federalist and one in The Daily Caller, diGenova said, “is someone inside the FBI is now whistleblowing by leaking to the press about what’s going on and boy, it is just fascinating to watch the claim that Chris Wray and Dana Boente did everything they could to prevent the stuff from the Missouri U.S. attorney from being given to Flynn’s attorney. That is the beginning of a very ugly story. Jeff Sessions was talked into recusing himself from the Trump/Russia collusion case by Dana Boente who was then-Acting Deputy Attorney General.”

 

“This story is like a Russian novel. I mean, this is Dostoyevsky, it’s even better than Dostoyevsky.”

 

But, here’s the thing. We now know that Durham is investigating the leak of that conversation between Flynn and Kislyak, and we now know that – I don’t think he’s interviewed David Ignatius, the little twit from The Washington Post, who wrote the story – but the person who leaked the information about the Kislyak phone call because he had legal access to the unmasking of Flynn was a guy who ran what’s called the Office of Net Assessment in the Department of Defense, a guy named James Baker, not the James Baker who was the FBI Director [sic] [James Baker was the FBI’s General Counsel].

 

The bottom line is this, it’s unfolding and what’s happening is, what Durham is actually doing is he’s painting a picture and not everyone of these acts is going to be a specific separate crime. But they are going to be, what’s called “overt acts in a conspiracy.” One to defraud the United States government. One to deny the civil rights of Trump and Flynn and Page and a bunch of other people.

 

And I’ve been told within the last few days that they are also looking at obstruction of justice for anybody (inaudible) providing false information to the FISA Court, false information to the FBI. For example, it’s known that Brennan was desperately trying to get information to the bureau to open a counterintelligence investigation against the President while he was a candidate, while he was in the internecine period, and then while he was President. All of those are being looked at for obstruction of justice. So, that’s a pretty heavy plate.

 

Later in their discussion, diGenova asked Carr, “You know Baker is now cooperating with Durham?”

 

Carr replied, “He’s flipped?”

 

And diGenova responded, “He was a target, is now understandably cooperating because he was looking at a boatload of criminal charges. Once these notes were discovered, and by the way, these were the notes that [FBI Director] Chris Wray and Dana Boente did not want turned over to General Flynn.”

 

The bottom line is this, it’s unfolding and what’s happening is, what Durham is actually doing is he’s painting a picture and not everyone of these acts is going to be a specific separate crime. But they are going to be, what’s called overt acts in a conspiracy. One to defraud the United States government. One to deny the civil rights of Trump and Flynn and Page and a bunch of other people.

 

I have no idea what’s in the mind of Judge Emmet Sullivan who used to seem like he was a really disinterested kind of noble guy. He proved that right in the Ted Stevens case. But his comments during the final status hearing before he set a sentencing date for General Flynn were so awful and so fundamentally stupid and we found out, we did an analysis, my Victoria and I did an analysis of the statements he made on the record. We got the transcript.

 

Remember when he came out and he accused the General of committing treason and started asking him a series of questions that the prosecutors, who were fumbling, they didn’t know how to answer him? He said in a series of statements, the judge did, exact words, line for line that Rachel Maddow had said the night before on her show when commenting on the upcoming Flynn hearing. It’s scary and if that’s what this guy is looking at before he comes out on the bench, he came out after a break and apologized for using the word treason, but his conduct since then has been bizarre. I don’t know whether the guy’s sick, old or not ready for prime time anymore. It seems to be a disease that’s prominent in Washington DC. Biden can’t talk. Pelosi can’t talk. The judge in the Flynn case can’t talk. It’s amazing.

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Pen Pal Safety

Take pen pal safety precautions.
Learn more.

Top Authors