Reply
Honored Social Butterfly

Ignoring Warnings, Mich. AG Sued to RAISE Lake Level Ahead of Dam Break—to Protect Mussels

Ignoring Warnings, Mich. AG Sued to RAISE Lake Level Ahead of Dam Break—to Protect Mussels

 

BY:  David Foresmark

 

In her ongoing audition to be Joe Biden’s veep pick, Michigan Governess Gretchen Whitmer all but convicted a private dam owner for the disastrous floods that struck the middle of the state last Wednesday.

 

However, it wasn’t the dam company that was trying to save a few clams—it was Whitmer’s radical attorney general, Dana Nessel.

 

Nessel was suing the dam company to raise the lake level three feet in order to save mussels—both endangered and common—and in their response, the dam company cited safety as a reason for not doing so.

 

But to Dana Nessel, who is also suing to keep Michigan’s chilly Upper Peninsula from having a reliable source of propane, citing an imaginary concern over a pipeline across the Straits of Mackinac, people come second. A distant second.

As Michigan-based Bridge Magazine reports:

 

For decades, federal regulators demanded changes to the design of the Edenville Dam to make it more likely to withstand heavy rains and avoid flooding.

So when Michigan regulators assumed oversight of the dam in late 2018 after its owners lost their federal license to generate energy, they took action.

To protect mussels.

 

Three weeks before the 96-year-old dam failed this week amid heavy rains and caused the worst flood in Midland history, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel sued its owner, alleging it illegally lowered Wixom Lake in 2018 and 2019, killing “thousands if not millions, of freshwater mussels.”

 

“Defendants wrongfully exerted dominion over the freshwater mussels and caused their death which denies and is inconsistent with the state’s right to them,” state lawyers wrote in an April lawsuit.

 

“Exerted dominion”? Who are they suing, Adam? Eve? Wrong Eden, Dana.

Well, now they might need to enlist Noah.

 

The genesis of this dispute is complex, going back to the 1920s when private utilities were more common and the dams along the four manmade lakes in the Tittabawassee River were used as a primary power-generation source for the community.  Friends with property there tell me there has been plenty of tension between the dam owner and residents since at least the 1990s.

But there is no denying certain basic facts—and another example of the priorities of environmentalists when it comes to human life.

Again from Bridge Magazine’s excellent report:

 

The dam’s owner, Boyce Hydro Power LLC, claims Michigan pressured it to raise lake levels before the flood and the company took steps to lower them because “mis-operation could pose a significant risk to the Village of Sanford, Northwood University, the City of Midland, and other downstream areas,” according to a lawsuit last month.

Of course, none of this made the Governess’s press conference, in which she solely damned the owners. At her briefing near a school where evacuated residents were sheltering, she declared she would take “every legal recourse we have” to “hold people responsible.”

The dam owners were singled out; her Attorney General was not.

 

And not letting this crisis go to waste, the governor, known for having perhaps the least respect for private property of any in the country, added this agenda item: “We can talk about the merits of whether or not private companies should own critical infrastructure or not — I don’t think that they should — but that’s what we’re dealing with here.”

 

This is not the first time that Attorney General Dana Nessel’s priorities—and propriety—have come into question.  At the height of Michigan’s COVID-19 lockdown, she treated the state to this insightful tweet:

 

Screen Shot 2020-05-24 at 10.00.41 AM.png

 

 

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
0 Kudos
293 Views
4
Report
Recognized Social Butterfly

JimC,

 

I am not sure what "source" you pulled this article from since the byline is misspelled.  While David Forsmark was the actual author, where did you get this copy of the story?  As usual there seems to be several misrepresentations in the article.

 

If you are interested, here is a link to another article from the Detroit News (a more conservative publication).

 

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2020/05/21/state-says-didnt-pressure-boyce-hyd...

Honored Social Butterfly

So, just to get some facts out there because, well, you know how the regressive news sources  hate facts.  The owner of the dam, which had failed all safety audits, raised the water levels just before it collapsed.  His reason? "The attorney general threatened me with a lawsuit if I did not do this".  

 

So, we have a company who has disregarded the health and safety of its citizens for decades and is now terrified of a lawsuit about mussels from the Michigan A.G. it has been ignoring for the same dacades?  

 

Oh yeah..............I believe THIS excuse.   Another Trump Snowflake trying to blame other people. 

Honored Social Butterfly

Richva:  

 

Oh yeah..............I believe THIS excuse.   Another Trump Snowflake trying to blame other people. 

 

 

Par for the course. Trump must know that he can't win Michigan so the all-clear is out to trash the state.

0 Kudos
269 Views
1
Report
Honored Social Butterfly

And then there is this from the original post:

 

Nessel was suing the dam company to raisethe lake level three feet in order to save mussels—both endangered and common—and in their response, the dam company cited safety as a reason for not doing so.

 

But to Dana Nessel, who is also suing to keep Michigan’s chilly Upper Peninsula from having a reliable source of propane, citing an imaginary concern over a pipeline across the Straits of Mackinac, people come second. A distant second.

 

 

++++++++

Hmm... Nothing in there about Trump however I must remember the Trump is living rent free in the minds of the folks inflicted with TDS...

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
0 Kudos
266 Views
0
Report
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Does AARP donate to political parties or endorse candidates?

AARP is strictly non-partisan and always has been. We never endorse or donate to candidates, political parties or political action committees.

Learn more.

AARP Members Only Games

Play members only games, like FIll Ins, Lumeno, 2048 and a collaborative, multiplayer Let's Crossword.

Play Now
AARP Members Only Games Logos
AARP Rewards

Solve Crosswords. Earn Rewards. Activate AARP Rewards to earn points for games, quizzes and videos. Redeem for deals and discounts.

Get started with AARP Rewards now!
/html/assets/Rewards-program-badge-355x224.png