Join AARP panelists live Nov. 18 for a free webinar on ride-sharing. Register now to learn more about apps like Uber and Lyft.

Reply
Trusted Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
185
Views

IF COLLUSION EVIDENCE EXISTED, ADAM SCHIFF WOULD HAVE LEAKED IT

185 Views
Message 61 of 126

Since cult members are convinced the Mueller investigation is, to use Trump's words, a "witch hunt", why are they so worried about it? One reason, is they don't think for themselves. Because they're cult members, they do what all cult members do. They give 100%, blind support to their leader and take any criticsm of their leader personally. They will do anything to protect Trump, even from a perfectly legal investigation.

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
185
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
196
Views

Re: IF COLLUSION EVIDENCE EXISTED, ADAM SCHIFF WOULD HAVE LEAKED IT

196 Views
Message 62 of 126

@Richva wrote:

Problem solved. Trump just announced collusion is not a crime so he will stop pretending he did not direct  his campaign to collude with the Russians.  He is so smart. First he stops Kim from making anymore ICBMs with a one page agreement and now he solves the collusion problem. Can a cure for cancer be coming from his next taxpayer funded vacation at Mar-a-Lago? 

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/31/trump-collusion-not-a-crime-751332


Anti-Trump posters have been saying that collusion is not a crime from the get go in defense of Mueller's fishing expedition.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
196
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
189
Views

Re: IF COLLUSION EVIDENCE EXISTED, ADAM SCHIFF WOULD HAVE LEAKED IT

189 Views
Message 63 of 126

@oceanedge2 wrote:

rk - HAVE any OF those Charges named the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES as a co-conspirator?

     NOT YET.

But - is the President not the real target?

 

One year and nearly two months ago Mueller was given his Order # 3915-2017.  How is it rk that you continue failing to comprehend a straight forward, double spaced,  simple one page document?

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

 


Does that mean that you do not think that the President is the actual target as opposed to Playboy models, porn stars, and old tax issues? 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
189
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
210
Views

Re: IF COLLUSION EVIDENCE EXISTED, ADAM SCHIFF WOULD HAVE LEAKED IT

210 Views
Message 64 of 126

Richva

Thank you for the updates and the laughter.  You Rock.. Nancy 

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
210
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
202
Views

Re: IF COLLUSION EVIDENCE EXISTED, ADAM SCHIFF WOULD HAVE LEAKED IT

202 Views
Message 65 of 126

Problem solved. Trump just announced collusion is not a crime so he will stop pretending he did not direct  his campaign to collude with the Russians.  He is so smart. First he stops Kim from making anymore ICBMs with a one page agreement and now he solves the collusion problem. Can a cure for cancer be coming from his next taxpayer funded vacation at Mar-a-Lago? 

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/31/trump-collusion-not-a-crime-751332

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
202
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
198
Views

Re: IF COLLUSION EVIDENCE EXISTED, ADAM SCHIFF WOULD HAVE LEAKED IT

198 Views
Message 66 of 126

rk - HAVE any OF those Charges named the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES as a co-conspirator?

     NOT YET.

But - is the President not the real target?

 

One year and nearly two months ago Mueller was given his Order # 3915-2017.  How is it rk that you continue failing to comprehend a straight forward, double spaced,  simple one page document?

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

 

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
198
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
200
Views

Re: IF COLLUSION EVIDENCE EXISTED, ADAM SCHIFF WOULD HAVE LEAKED IT

200 Views
Message 67 of 126

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:


@rk9152 wrote:

 


Russia has been conducting cyber warfare on us for many years - are we in agreement?


An evasion from the FACT that on the same day Trump asked Russia to hack into his opponent's server, Russian Intelligence Officers tried for the first time to hack into the server of Hillary's personal office" .....

No evasion, Russia and others have been conducting cyber warfare against us for many years. That is a fact that really needs addressing.

But Russia nor any other country was specifically asked to conduct cyber warfare .... as Trump did with Russia.

"THAT is a fact that REALLY needs addressing" instead of the evasion you perform!

 

As to the President's joke -

Yet the Russian Intelligence Officers didn't see it as a "joke" and attempted to hack into Hillary's server .... as directed by Trump!

 

let us not forget that he was making a comment on over 30,000 emails under subpoena that Clinton was refusing to give up.

Trump was not making a "comment" rk.  Trump made a request and it was granted by Russian Intelligence Officers!

 

Now, which is worse illegally ignoring a subpoena or bringing it up?

A straw man argument evading the fact that Trump had no right to ask Russia to hack into our country's cyber systems. In doing so, he committed an act of treason.

 

And your evasive post continues to STILL evade the FACT that on the same day Trump asked Russia to hack into his opponent's server, Russian Intelligence Officers tried for the first time to hack into the server of Hillary's personal office" .....


I believe he had every right to a "throw out" joke.

Trump's request to the Russians was no joke rk.

 Again ..... On the same day Trump asked Russia to hack into his opponent's server, Russian Intelligence Officers tried for the first time to hack into the server of Hillary's personal office.

 

Do you believe she had the right to ignore the subpoena?

The same straw man argument evading the fact that Trump had no right to ask Russia to hack into our country's cyber systems. In doing so, he committed an act of treason.


 He really didn't.

 

But, on the other hand, how could attempting to assist in the fulfillment of the requirements of a subpoena be considered treason?


 


No "other hand" rk ..... just the same old straw man argument.

Nope - that's real. How could attempting to assist in the fulfillment of the requirements of a subpoena be considered treason?

 

So once AGAIN ..... Trump had no right to ask Russia to hack into our country's cyber systems. In doing so, he committed an act of treason.


No problemo - he didn't.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
200
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
202
Views

Re: IF COLLUSION EVIDENCE EXISTED, ADAM SCHIFF WOULD HAVE LEAKED IT

202 Views
Message 68 of 126

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@myexper wrote:


@rk9152 wrote:

 


Russia has been conducting cyber warfare on us for many years - are we in agreement?


An evasion from the FACT that on the same day Trump asked Russia to hack into his opponent's server, Russian Intelligence Officers tried for the first time to hack into the server of Hillary's personal office" .....

No evasion, Russia and others have been conducting cyber warfare against us for many years. That is a fact that really needs addressing.

But Russia nor any other country was specifically asked to conduct cyber warfare .... as Trump did with Russia.

"THAT is a fact that REALLY needs addressing" instead of the evasion you perform!

 

As to the President's joke -

Yet the Russian Intelligence Officers didn't see it as a "joke" and attempted to hack into Hillary's server .... as directed by Trump!

 

let us not forget that he was making a comment on over 30,000 emails under subpoena that Clinton was refusing to give up.

Trump was not making a "comment" rk.  Trump made a request and it was granted by Russian Intelligence Officers!

 

Now, which is worse illegally ignoring a subpoena or bringing it up?

A straw man argument evading the fact that Trump had no right to ask Russia to hack into our country's cyber systems. In doing so, he committed an act of treason.

 

And your evasive post continues to STILL evade the FACT that on the same day Trump asked Russia to hack into his opponent's server, Russian Intelligence Officers tried for the first time to hack into the server of Hillary's personal office" .....


I believe he had every right to a "throw out" joke.

Trump's request to the Russians was no joke rk.

 Again ..... On the same day Trump asked Russia to hack into his opponent's server, Russian Intelligence Officers tried for the first time to hack into the server of Hillary's personal office.

 

Do you believe she had the right to ignore the subpoena?

The same straw man argument evading the fact that Trump had no right to ask Russia to hack into our country's cyber systems. In doing so, he committed an act of treason.


 He really didn't.

 

But, on the other hand, how could attempting to assist in the fulfillment of the requirements of a subpoena be considered treason?


 


No "other hand" rk ..... just the same old straw man argument.

 

So once AGAIN ..... Trump had no right to ask Russia to hack into our country's cyber systems. In doing so, he committed an act of treason.

DUMP TRUMP AND DITCH MITCH TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
202
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
211
Views

Re: IF COLLUSION EVIDENCE EXISTED, ADAM SCHIFF WOULD HAVE LEAKED IT

211 Views
Message 69 of 126

@oceanedge2 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

Have ANY of THOSE been charged with CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE UNITED STATES????
Citizens Manafort & Gates have both been charged with conspiracy against the United States.
Rick Gates, a former top official in President Trump’s campaign, pleaded guilty Friday afternoon to conspiracy and lying to the FBI, 
 he’s pleaded not guilty to 18 charges of tax evasion, bank fraud and conspiracy
By your standards, anything is CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.

HAVE any OF those Charges named the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES as a co-conspirator?

     NOT YET.

But - is the President not the real target?

 



 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
211
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
225
Views

Re: IF COLLUSION EVIDENCE EXISTED, ADAM SCHIFF WOULD HAVE LEAKED IT

225 Views
Message 70 of 126

@rk9152 wrote:

Have ANY of THOSE been charged with CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE UNITED STATES????
Citizens Manafort & Gates have both been charged with conspiracy against the United States.

HAVE any OF those Charges named the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES as a co-conspirator?

 

     NOT YET.

 

 

 


 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
225
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Roundtable Discussion:
Ask questions and get advice from fellow entrepreneurs
Now through Nov. 22

Top Authors