Reply
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: Good On You - Kamala Harris!

734 Views
Message 1 of 48

   Poor Jeff, he is just an ignorant good ol boy from the deep South that suffers interminably when confronted by a woman who dares to ask questions and doesn't allow him to weasel out by mumbo-jumbo.    

 

      Per Jeff:    Gee, I don't know if there is an actual policy - I never bothered to inquire.   Donald and the Republicans rely on this sort of stupidity...and Jeff personifies it as do some here.   

PRO-LIFE is Affordable Healthcare for ALL .
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: Good On You - Kamala Harris!

735 Views
Message 2 of 48

@rk9152 wrote:

@alferdpacker wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@afisher wrote:

   Apparently some of the donald supporters are playing pretend lawyers and don't seem to comprehend that asking a question and then clarifying that it should be answered with a Yes or No is beyond their understanding.   

 

    DAG was hoping to kill time and run-out the clock.    And why that may be great if there was not a time constraint, but there is and Senator Harris was (OMG) doing her job and pressing for a KISS answer that DAG wanted to avoid.   

 

     She did her job and donald supporters are really afraid of that sort of behavior.


Hey, af, have you stopped beating your neighbor's dog?

 

Just answer "yes" or "no".


You get your answer after trump has gone a month without telling a lie...


Pointless, off-topic, and offensive. Would you care to redeem yourself with some specific lie you think I told? You did have to go back five days to find that post so you must have something solid in mind to make the effort worthwhile. Surely it wasn't just a "throw-out" insult.


Too Bad The GOP Chairmen of all the Committees looking into Trump Inc's Collusion with the Russians - don;t have the same - Solid Frame of Mind - that AP seems to be displaying..................they aren;t even aware of what their own Constitutional duties & functions are

 

 

 

 

( " China if You're Listening - Get Trumps Tax Returns " )

" )
" - Anonymous

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: Good On You - Kamala Harris!

741 Views
Message 3 of 48

@alferdpacker wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@afisher wrote:

   Apparently some of the donald supporters are playing pretend lawyers and don't seem to comprehend that asking a question and then clarifying that it should be answered with a Yes or No is beyond their understanding.   

 

    DAG was hoping to kill time and run-out the clock.    And why that may be great if there was not a time constraint, but there is and Senator Harris was (OMG) doing her job and pressing for a KISS answer that DAG wanted to avoid.   

 

     She did her job and donald supporters are really afraid of that sort of behavior.


Hey, af, have you stopped beating your neighbor's dog?

 

Just answer "yes" or "no".


You get your answer after trump has gone a month without telling a lie...


Pointless, off-topic, and offensive. Would you care to redeem yourself with some specific lie you think I told? You did have to go back five days to find that post so you must have something solid in mind to make the effort worthwhile. Surely it wasn't just a "throw-out" insult.

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: Good On You - Kamala Harris!

755 Views
Message 4 of 48

Seems Republicans are afraid of the truth coming out, doesn't it? 

Gee, I miss having a real President!!
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: Good On You - Kamala Harris!

760 Views
Message 5 of 48

Good On You - Again - Kamala Harris!

 

Whats with all these White Republican Males and their intimidation by Kamela Harris 

 

(CNN)For the second time in a week, Sen. Kamala Harris was cut off by her Republican colleagues while posing questions at a Senate intelligence committee hearing -- drawing the spotlight to the potential 2020 contender.

 
While asking Attorney General Jeff Sessions about his refusal to answer questions Tuesday concerning conversations he may have had with President Donald Trump, the California Democrat was interrupted by Sen. John McCain of Arizona.
 
Senate intelligence chairman Richard Burr then stepped in and said: "Senators, we'll allow the chair to control the hearing. Sen. Harris, let him answer the question."
 
Hey Burr - he did answer Kamela Harris' question - the same way he answered almost every other - I can't answer that question........................
 
And whats with McCain - he isn;t even a permanent member of this Committee - he's just invited as Ex Officio 
 
 

( " China if You're Listening - Get Trumps Tax Returns " )

" )
" - Anonymous

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: Good On You - Kamala Harris!

780 Views
Message 6 of 48

@rk9152 wrote:

@afisher wrote:

   Apparently some of the donald supporters are playing pretend lawyers and don't seem to comprehend that asking a question and then clarifying that it should be answered with a Yes or No is beyond their understanding.   

 

    DAG was hoping to kill time and run-out the clock.    And why that may be great if there was not a time constraint, but there is and Senator Harris was (OMG) doing her job and pressing for a KISS answer that DAG wanted to avoid.   

 

     She did her job and donald supporters are really afraid of that sort of behavior.


Hey, af, have you stopped beating your neighbor's dog?

 

Just answer "yes" or "no".


You get your answer after trump has gone a month without telling a lie...

44>dolt45
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: Good On You - Kamala Harris!

784 Views
Message 7 of 48

@afisher wrote:

   Apparently some of the donald supporters are playing pretend lawyers and don't seem to comprehend that asking a question and then clarifying that it should be answered with a Yes or No is beyond their understanding.   

 

    DAG was hoping to kill time and run-out the clock.    And why that may be great if there was not a time constraint, but there is and Senator Harris was (OMG) doing her job and pressing for a KISS answer that DAG wanted to avoid.   

 

     She did her job and donald supporters are really afraid of that sort of behavior.


Hey, af, have you stopped beating your neighbor's dog?

 

Just answer "yes" or "no".

Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: Good On You - Kamala Harris!

793 Views
Message 8 of 48

   Apparently some of the donald supporters are playing pretend lawyers and don't seem to comprehend that asking a question and then clarifying that it should be answered with a Yes or No is beyond their understanding.   

 

    DAG was hoping to kill time and run-out the clock.    And why that may be great if there was not a time constraint, but there is and Senator Harris was (OMG) doing her job and pressing for a KISS answer that DAG wanted to avoid.   

 

     She did her job and donald supporters are really afraid of that sort of behavior.

PRO-LIFE is Affordable Healthcare for ALL .
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly

Re: Good On You - Kamala Harris!

813 Views
Message 9 of 48

Good on you, Kamala Harris!!!

 

 

 

 

44>dolt45
Report Inappropriate Content
Highlighted
Gold Conversationalist

Re: Good On You - Kamala Harris!

817 Views
Message 10 of 48

@mickstuder wrote:

(CNN)Senate intelligence committee Chairman Richard Burr shut down a line of questioning from California Sen. Kamala Harris at Wednesday's high-profile hearing, admonishing her and other Democrats to stop cutting off witnesses.

......

 

The move rankled some on Twitter who argued the North Carolina Republican was singling out Harris, one of three women on the intelligence panel, during Wednesday's contentious hearing.
 
Harris was pressing Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein over whether he would sign a letter to give Special Counsel Robert Mueller full independence from the Justice Department in his probe, which would have the same effect as a letter issued for then-Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald in the investigation into the 2003 leaking of then-covert CIA officer Valerie Plame's identity.
 

 

 


What an odd place to bury this comment, in 38th place on a month-old typical AARP name-calling rant about another subject. As to what happened on June 7, do not believe CNN . The rude woman from California was not in any way shouted down... not because she was a woman... but for being rude. The situation was just the opposite. The rude woman from California was the person shouting down a witness

 

  1. She was questioning but rudely interrupting the Deputy Attorney General (DAG), not giving him any time to answer her obtuse 3-minute-long multiple-prepositional-phrase question about the 20-year-old special prosecutor law.
  2. The question had nothing to do with Russians, classified information, the Trump administration or anything else mentioned in the long rambling preamble to the CNN screenscrape above
  3. When the committee chairman gaveled down the rude woman and gave the DAG the time to answer, the Deputy Attorney General clearly explained how the Plame situation vis a vis that Special Prosecutor (Fitzgerald) differed from the current situation under Special Prosecutor Mueller.
  4. In addition, among other parts of his answer, the DAG made it clear that this had all been explained to this rude woman already when he briefed all 100 senators on his Mueller appointment a few weeks ago.

 

She is just a publicity hound. She probably had these this fake news story from the fake news journalists at CNN all set up before she even spoke (that's how Stalinist propagandists work)

 

Report Inappropriate Content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Thursday, July 9 – Coronavirus Event

1 p.m. ET - Answering Your Frequently Asked Questions

Call: 1-855-274-9507

Top Authors