Reply
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
243
Views

243 Views
Message 61 of 72

@rk9152 wrote:

Wrong question (as usual) - it is who is being driven nuts? I have seen nothing posted about any Evangelist that would seem to be 
"driven nuts".


You need to talk to someone at any Starbuck's.  The RW Christians (That should probably be in quotes) are all trying to find ways to belittle the Buttigeg. Since he keeps pointing out that God made him what he is, it becomes difficult but they are definitely trying. I find Starbucks to be a great place to learn how people are really reacting. 

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
243
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
245
Views

245 Views
Message 62 of 72

@rk9152 wrote:

@Roxanna35 wrote:


Wrong question (as usual) - it is who is being driven nuts? I have seen nothing posted about any Evangelist that would seem to be 
"driven nuts".


  No comment, (as usual) trying to divert, confuse and  infer the incorrect questions. whenever you are willing to discuss the issues. please come back and let us know.

no name
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
245
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
247
Views

247 Views
Message 63 of 72

@Roxanna35 wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

@ChasKy53 wrote:

@Richva wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

A previous poster thought that somebody was driving Evangelists nuts. now, you think that someone is driving Evangelits (whoever they are) nuts.

 

And I still await some specifics of who was driven nuts - Evangelists or Evangelits - I can go either way.


Oddly, 90% of the people who read this will understand the word evangelist, know exactly what is meant, and roll their eyes upward.


Sometimes a cheap shot over a misspell is all a trump-supporting conservative has.  Sad but true. 

 

Since you seem to enjoy the use of (sic) welcome to the world of Trump-supporting conservatives.


And getting back to the basics that keep getting dodged - who has been driven nuts.


Actually, this thread was speaking about the hypocrisy of the men in any religion. and the discomfort that that hypocrisy can bring to many of us.

About who is driving the Evangelists. nuts  I guess that as I have said before, I don't do sects. and the Evangelists are a sect. and not a religion. so I don't think that we should waste our time in dealing with in the differences of any religion and including them in the discussion.


Wrong question (as usual) - it is who is being driven nuts? I have seen nothing posted about any Evangelist that would seem to be 
"driven nuts".

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
247
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
246
Views

246 Views
Message 64 of 72

@rk9152 wrote:

@ChasKy53 wrote:

@Richva wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

A previous poster thought that somebody was driving Evangelists nuts. now, you think that someone is driving Evangelits (whoever they are) nuts.

 

And I still await some specifics of who was driven nuts - Evangelists or Evangelits - I can go either way.


Oddly, 90% of the people who read this will understand the word evangelist, know exactly what is meant, and roll their eyes upward.


Sometimes a cheap shot over a misspell is all a trump-supporting conservative has.  Sad but true. 

 

Since you seem to enjoy the use of (sic) welcome to the world of Trump-supporting conservatives.


And getting back to the basics that keep getting dodged - who has been driven nuts.


Actually, this thread was speaking about the hypocrisy of the men in any religion. and the discomfort that that hypocrisy can bring to many of us.

About who is driving the Evangelists. nuts  I guess that as I have said before, I don't do sects. and the Evangelists are a sect. and not a religion. so I don't think that we should waste our time in dealing with in the differences of any religion and including them in the discussion.

no name
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
246
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
241
Views

241 Views
Message 65 of 72

@ChasKy53 wrote:

@Richva wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

A previous poster thought that somebody was driving Evangelists nuts. now, you think that someone is driving Evangelits (whoever they are) nuts.

 

And I still await some specifics of who was driven nuts - Evangelists or Evangelits - I can go either way.


Oddly, 90% of the people who read this will understand the word evangelist, know exactly what is meant, and roll their eyes upward.


Sometimes a cheap shot over a misspell is all a trump-supporting conservative has.  Sad but true. 

 

Since you seem to enjoy the use of (sic) welcome to the world of Trump-supporting conservatives.


And getting back to the basics that keep getting dodged - who has been driven nuts.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
241
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
239
Views

239 Views
Message 66 of 72

@Richva wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

A previous poster thought that somebody was driving Evangelists nuts. now, you think that someone is driving Evangelits (whoever they are) nuts.

 

And I still await some specifics of who was driven nuts - Evangelists or Evangelits - I can go either way.


Oddly, 90% of the people who read this will understand the word evangelist, know exactly what is meant, and roll their eyes upward.


And they may even translate what a Crhisitian is too but no one seems to know who was driven nuts.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
239
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
254
Views

254 Views
Message 67 of 72

@Richva wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

A previous poster thought that somebody was driving Evangelists nuts. now, you think that someone is driving Evangelits (whoever they are) nuts.

 

And I still await some specifics of who was driven nuts - Evangelists or Evangelits - I can go either way.


Oddly, 90% of the people who read this will understand the word evangelist, know exactly what is meant, and roll their eyes upward.


Sometimes a cheap shot over a misspell is all a trump-supporting conservative has.  Sad but true.


Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history.
Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
254
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
4
Kudos
252
Views

252 Views
Message 68 of 72

@rk9152 wrote:

A previous poster thought that somebody was driving Evangelists nuts. now, you think that someone is driving Evangelits (whoever they are) nuts.

 

And I still await some specifics of who was driven nuts - Evangelists or Evangelits - I can go either way.


Oddly, 90% of the people who read this will understand the word evangelist, know exactly what is meant, and roll their eyes upward.

Report Inappropriate Content
4
Kudos
252
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
263
Views

263 Views
Message 69 of 72

A previous poster thought that somebody was driving Evangelists nuts. now, you think that someone is driving Evangelits (whoever they are) nuts.

 

And I still await some specifics of who was driven nuts - Evangelists or Evangelits - I can go either way.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
263
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
260
Views

260 Views
Message 70 of 72

I believe it is more the arc of history which is giving some Christians heartburn. A few year's ago being outted as gay was a career killer and could get you shunned from your own family.  Now, we have a gay man as a viable candidate for president. Part of that is the loss of moral authority and respect Christianity used to control. Nobody likes to see their influence diminish. 

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
260
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

September is Emergency Preparedness month.

Do you have an emergency plan in place?

Share or ask questions today.

Emergency preparedness kit

Top Authors