WATCH VIDEO: Friday's Iowa presidential candidate forum. Appearing are Beto O'Rourke, Elizabeth Warren, Marianne Williamson and Andrew Yang.

Reply
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
264
Views

Re: FREE SPEECH

264 Views
Message 11 of 95

 


@TxGrandpa2 wrote:

@alferdpacker wrote:


"pedator" - a pedo-predator like Roy Moore's "pedating" upon minor teen girls - and liddle donnie when he deliberately went into dressing rooms knowing full well that there would be unclothed minor girls the vast majority of whom would not have willingly allowed him to see them in various states of undress.


 

 


Many sources from former contestants has said that this was impossible.  Especially since they have said that the contestants were in separate cubicles that was open and that there was a crowd of make-up people around plus pagent employees.

 

So of course if you have some valid sources (but none on Tarheel's censored list) why don't you post links to them?  None of the 'cute' remarks nor 'LOLs' please.


Identify by name who "they" were...

Your allegation that was said is insufficient to be accepted as proof.

 

trump's own words good enough for you?

trump has been quoted as saying that he liked to see those young girls and women changing - therefore obviously NOT fully clothed and/or partially unclothed. Trump has beem quoted as saying that when you're rich you can gey away with that.

 

Look up and post links for trump supporters?

Nope - trump supporters nave never been worthy of my expending that kind of effort...

 

I do post links for the benefit of people who would never ever consider supporting trump...

 

 

44>dolt45
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
264
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
254
Views

Re: FREE SPEECH

254 Views
Message 12 of 95

@Centristsin2010 wrote:


LOL...A.P. appears someone thinks, "they have said" is a "valid source".  Just can't make this stuff up....


LOL back at you.  I didn't claim it was a 'valid' source, but 'what was said'.  Perhaps "A.P." has a valid source for his comments?  Can we be assured that "A.P." isn't making his comments up?

 

That works both ways "C.2"

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
254
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
236
Views

Re: FREE SPEECH

236 Views
Message 13 of 95

@TxGrandpa2 wrote:

@alferdpacker wrote:


"pedator" - a pedo-predator like Roy Moore's "pedating" upon minor teen girls - and liddle donnie when he deliberately went into dressing rooms knowing full well that there would be unclothed minor girls the vast majority of whom would not have willingly allowed him to see them in various states of undress.


 

 


Many sources from former contestants has said that this was impossible.  Especially since they have said that the contestants were in separate cubicles that was open and that there was a crowd of make-up people around plus pagent employees.

 

So of course if you have some valid sources (but none on Tarheel's censored list) why don't you post links to them?  None of the 'cute' remarks nor 'LOLs' please.


LOL...A.P. appears someone thinks, "they have said" is a "valid source".  Just can't make this stuff up....


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in Washington DC, January 21, 2017.
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
236
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
230
Views

Re: FREE SPEECH

230 Views
Message 14 of 95

@alferdpacker wrote:


"pedator" - a pedo-predator like Roy Moore's "pedating" upon minor teen girls - and liddle donnie when he deliberately went into dressing rooms knowing full well that there would be unclothed minor girls the vast majority of whom would not have willingly allowed him to see them in various states of undress.


 

 


Many sources from former contestants has said that this was impossible.  Especially since they have said that the contestants were in separate cubicles that was open and that there was a crowd of make-up people around plus pagent employees.

 

So of course if you have some valid sources (but none on Tarheel's censored list) why don't you post links to them?  None of the 'cute' remarks nor 'LOLs' please.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
230
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
223
Views

Re: FREE SPEECH

223 Views
Message 15 of 95

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

 

Over 70% of workers are unaware that the First Amendment doesn't protect them from getting fired ove...

 No freedom of speech while at work!  Is that what you're advocating?

It's not what I'm advocating but just the facts of life - take it or leave it!


You're still mistaken....though I don't expect you to read the link to understand how or why you're wrong.  It's not what those who are obstinately devoted to their view or predjudices are interested in.


You are always welcome to your biased opinion.


You must not understand the words, "obstinately devoted to one's biases and predjudices" actually mean.  "Take it or leave it", fits. "No freedom of speech while at work!" fits; "You are quite wrong again" fits.


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in Washington DC, January 21, 2017.
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
223
Views
Highlighted
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
222
Views

Re: FREE SPEECH

222 Views
Message 16 of 95

@TxGrandpa2 wrote:

@alferdpacker wrote:

BTW - you forgot serial adulterer like liddle donnie, and sexual predator -


Don't forget Slick Willie who was a poster boy for a pedator and adulter.(sic)


"pedator" - a pedo-predator like Roy Moore's "pedating" upon minor teen girls - and liddle donnie when he deliberately went into dressing rooms knowing full well that there would be unclothed minor girls the vast majority of whom would not have willingly allowed him to see them in various states of undress.

 

Yeah - those perverts and their actions are well known...

 

 

44>dolt45
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
222
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
223
Views

Re: FREE SPEECH

223 Views
Message 17 of 95

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

 

Over 70% of workers are unaware that the First Amendment doesn't protect them from getting fired ove...

 No freedom of speech while at work!  Is that what you're advocating?

It's not what I'm advocating but just the facts of life - take it or leave it!


You're still mistaken....though I don't expect you to read the link to understand how or why you're wrong.  It's not what those who are obstinately devoted to their view or predjudices are interested in.


You are always welcome to your biased opinion.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
223
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
236
Views

Re: FREE SPEECH

236 Views
Message 18 of 95

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@Centristsin2010 wrote:

 

Over 70% of workers are unaware that the First Amendment doesn't protect them from getting fired ove...

 No freedom of speech while at work!  Is that what you're advocating?

It's not what I'm advocating but just the facts of life - take it or leave it!


You're still mistaken....though I don't expect you to read the link to understand how or why you're wrong.  It's not what those who are obstinately devoted to their view or predjudices are interested in.


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in Washington DC, January 21, 2017.
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
236
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
229
Views

Re: FREE SPEECH

229 Views
Message 19 of 95

@john258 wrote:


Typical answer from the far right enablers. When caught try and deflect. No one in here would know anything about what you did unless you told told them so we night say there is nothing worse that a person who put out information and then when asked about is says they have a nosy neighbor. The fact is the poster is the problem not the neighbor.


Have a good day John.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
229
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
232
Views

Re: FREE SPEECH

232 Views
Message 20 of 95

@TxGrandpa2 wrote:

@john258 wrote:


You were the one who told everyone in here what you did.


Quote where I posted who I voted for.  But the question is why should it concern you or anyone here? 

 

Posters here are worse than our nosy neighbor who sits at her dining room window watching our house all the time.  So much so that we finally had a wood fence installed to block her view.


Typical answer from the far right enablers. When caught try and deflect. No one in here would know anything about what you did unless you told told them so we night say there is nothing worse that a person who put out information and then when asked about is says they have a nosy neighbor. The fact is the poster is the problem not the neighbor.

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
232
Views