Reply
Honored Social Butterfly

FBI chief McCabe faces three separate federal inquiries into his behavior

Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, a central player in the Russia election case, is the focus of three separate federal administrative inquiries into allegations about his behavior as a senior bureau executive, according to documents and interviews.

 

The allegations being reviewed range from sexual discrimination to improper political activity, the documents show

The inquiries remain open but so far there have not been any adverse findings against the senior FBI executive, who soared though the ranks the last few years to become deputy director and acting director since James Comey was fired.

 

FBI officials and McCabe declined comment.

 

Circa reported Monday that former supervisory special agent Robyn Gritz, a decorated counterterrorism agent, has filed a sexual discrimination and retaliation complaint that names McCabe and other top FBI officials. 

That is working its way through the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and is awaiting a review by an administrative law judge in the Office of Federal Operations.

 

Gritz also filed a complaint against McCabe with the main federal whistleblower agency in April, alleging social media photos she found show he campaigned for his wife’s Virginia state senate race in violation of the Hatch Act.

FBI employees are held to a higher standard than other federal workers under the Hatch Act and may not “endorse or oppose a candidate for partisan political office or a candidate for political party office in a political advertisement, broadcast, campaign literature, or similar material if such endorsement or opposition is done in concert with a candidate, political party, or partisan political group.”

The OSC told Circa  that complaint is still being actively investigated. 

In addition, the Justice Department Inspector General is investigating allegations from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, that McCabe may not have properly disclosed campaign payments to his wife on his ethics report and should have recused himself from Hillary Clinton's email case.

 

http://circa.com/politics/fbi-chief-andrew-mccabe-faces-three-separate-federal-inquiries-into-his-be...

VIMTSTL
0 Kudos
406 Views
26
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@nctarheel wrote:

@jimc91 wrote:

@nctarheel, you are OFF TOPIC.

 


Oh contrare, @jimc91,

 

Disputing the validity of information based on its origin is absolutely on topic.

 

Are you saying once you post something, everyone should take the resource(from which you composed your post) as the gospel?

 

Do you not believe in freedom of speech?

 

or

 

Do you not believe in freedom of the press?

 

Which one is it?


Thank you @TxGrandpa2 for the kudo on this posting.

 

I am glad you agree that disputing validity of information in a post based on the post's resource origin is a viable method of disputing information.

 

If a resource has repeatedly been disreputable, discredited, and a purveyour of false news...... readers need to know that.

 

Many readers will see that posts from resources like Brietbart, The Washington Times, Circa.com, and Lifezette are not always what they say they are.

 

Again, thanks for the kudo.

 

NO! IT'S CONSERVATIVES THAT ARE NUTTIER THAN SQUIRREL POOP!
0 Kudos
618 Views
3
Report
Honored Social Butterfly

@nctarheel

 

Thank you @TxGrandpa2 for the kudo on this posting.


And thanks for pointing it out that I gave a kudo in error.   Kudo has been revoked.

 
 
Honored Social Butterfly


@TxGrandpa2 wrote:

@nctarheel

 

Thank you @TxGrandpa2 for the kudo on this posting.


And thanks for pointing it out that I gave a kudo in error.   Kudo has been revoked.

 
 

It was probably a FREUDIAN SLIP.

NO! IT'S CONSERVATIVES THAT ARE NUTTIER THAN SQUIRREL POOP!
Honored Social Butterfly

nctarheel wrote:

 

It was probably a FREUDIAN SLIP.


No, just a distraction.  Now can we get back to the discussion instead of taking it off-topic with personalities?

 
 
Honored Social Butterfly

@nctarheel You are off topic, again.

 

Read the subject line.

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
0 Kudos
411 Views
1
Report
Honored Social Butterfly


@jimc91 wrote:

@nctarheel You are off topic, again.

 

Read the subject line.

 

 

 


I did read the subject line and the subject of your post was an article written by the former head of a newspaper owned and operated by a cult.

 

If you want people to believe what is written, then resources with more validity and legitimacy need to be used; not an article written by a guy that led a newspaper owned and operated by a cult.

NO! IT'S CONSERVATIVES THAT ARE NUTTIER THAN SQUIRREL POOP!
0 Kudos
414 Views
0
Report
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Does AARP donate to political parties or endorse candidates?

AARP is strictly non-partisan and always has been. We never endorse or donate to candidates, political parties or political action committees.

Learn more.

AARP Members Only Games

Play members only games, like FIll Ins, Lumeno, 2048 and a collaborative, multiplayer Let's Crossword.

Play Now
AARP Members Only Games Logos
AARP Rewards

Solve Crosswords. Earn Rewards. Activate AARP Rewards to earn points for games, quizzes and videos. Redeem for deals and discounts.

Get started with AARP Rewards now!
/html/assets/Rewards-program-badge-355x224.png