Refresh your driving skills with the AARP Smart Driver online course! Use promo code THANKS to save 25 percent.

Reply
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
201
Views

Re: Explaining The Animal Frenzy

201 Views
Message 31 of 110

@alferdpackerwrote:

@Centristsin2010wrote:

@williamb39198wrote:

@Centristsin2010

Perhaps we can refer to the posts of trump supporters as avoidance or avoiding engagement. Both can be considered as picking a fight but then running away from it. How many times do they answer a question by asking a question. How many times do they ask for factual proof but when asked, they never provide any proof, and just ask for more proof. I wonder if they were in some sort of weird debate club where only asking questions and providing no proof won the debate?

 

Frosty debates


An astute observation, William.  Additionally, no less than a half a dozen times just yesterday, one would ask a question, receive an answer, and never respond to the response indicating they had no interest in the question in the first place.  Even when there is agreement there is no acknowledgement.  It may be the result of "Fox Viewer" syndrome where they're used to listening to Fox spew their bigoted propaganda and when confronted with actual facts, they ignore it and go onto something else.  It's a lack of credibility and accountability; just like those you reference.


Those who support trump and his words and actions have taken the (learned from Roy Cohn) "accuse and "run" - then make another not necessarily related accusation" strategy that the coward and liar "cadet bonespurs" habitually uses - and have turned it into an "ask a question of dubious import - don't answer responses - then ask another similarly dubious question - and don't answer responses" strategy...

 

It's a political adaptation of Bob Millet's "lying for the lord" -  Bob Millet, Lying for the Lord (iPhone & iPod).m4v - YouTube 

 

So it is seen that the coward and liar "cadet bonespurs" is suffering from deteriorating credibility in both the nation and the world, and that - not at all coincidentally - his followers and supporters subsequently only retain credibility within the ranks of the trump klan that includes crooks, liars, bigots, racists, haters, and creatures that have placed party and "leader" before country - much as some people did in a country in Europe about three quarters of a century ago...

 

Any thoughts, William? 


 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
201
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
186
Views

Re: Explaining The Animal Frenzy

186 Views
Message 32 of 110

@Centristsin2010wrote:

@williamb39198wrote:

@Centristsin2010

Perhaps we can refer to the posts of trump supporters as avoidance or avoiding engagement. Both can be considered as picking a fight but then running away from it. How many times do they answer a question by asking a question. How many times do they ask for factual proof but when asked, they never provide any proof, and just ask for more proof. I wonder if they were in some sort of weird debate club where only asking questions and providing no proof won the debate?

 

Frosty debates


An astute observation, William.  Additionally, no less than a half a dozen times just yesterday, one would ask a question, receive an answer, and never respond to the response indicating they had no interest in the question in the first place.  Even when there is agreement there is no acknowledgement.  It may be the result of "Fox Viewer" syndrome where they're used to listening to Fox spew their bigoted propaganda and when confronted with actual facts, they ignore it and go onto something else.  It's a lack of credibility and accountability; just like those you reference.


William - notice in the above that there is no reference to the topic but Fox news somehow or other got in there.

 

Would "the question" be inappropriate?

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
186
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
177
Views

Re: Explaining The Animal Frenzy

177 Views
Message 33 of 110

@rk9152wrote:

@Centristsin2010wrote:

@rk9152wrote:


What rabbit hole are you ranting about?  Your "it's about the President"; "it's not about the President, it's about MS-13"; "it's not about MS-13, it's about "immigrants"; "it's not about immigrants it's about what the President said."  Quite the "rabbit hole".  But thanks for asking....

No "rabbit hole" - that is all made up. Hardly.  I wonder why some think posters can't read.

 

Bottom line - the President was referring to MS-13, Agreed, as said before by several and which you ignored.  Some in....the MSM and some posters went bonkers claiming it as about all immigrants. Again, agreed as stated previously.  So why continue your whine directed to someone who agree's?

 

But enough with the rabbit holes, eh?  You "win" nothing playing those games.


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in Washington DC, January 21, 2017.
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
177
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
175
Views

Re: Explaining The Animal Frenzy

175 Views
Message 34 of 110

@nctarheelwrote:

@williamb39198wrote:

 

I wonder if they were in some sort of weird debate club where only asking questions and providing no proof won the debate?

Trump taught his minions well.

 

He learned this kind of debating in the college classes he DID NOT ATTEND immediately after evading the draft with the BONE SPURS he didn't have.

 

It is clear that he can't speak or write on anywhere near college level, too many spelling and grammatical errors.

 

It is also clear that he is a coward, as evidenced by his continued lashing out at his opponents with babyish type tantrum tweets.

 

Put those two flaws together and you have a PEE WEE HERMAN type debater......... you know........ he answers everything with............. well, you'll see.

 

The video also shows Trump's "art of the deal".

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOGWbzUM-y8

 

 

 

 William - the topic is the President's words about MS-13. I see nothing in the post above related to that. Were I to ask, "What do you think about the President's words about MS-13?" would that be one of those questions you criticized?


 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
175
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
178
Views

Re: Explaining The Animal Frenzy

178 Views
Message 35 of 110

@williamb39198wrote:

@Centristsin2010

Perhaps we can refer to the posts of trump supporters as avoidance or avoiding engagement. Both can be considered as picking a fight but then running away from it. How many times do they answer a question by asking a question. How many times do they ask for factual proof but when asked, they never provide any proof, and just ask for more proof. I wonder if they were in some sort of weird debate club where only asking questions and providing no proof won the debate?

 

Frosty debates


I would suggest that others going off the deep end with "brownskin", Nazis, rabbit holes, etc. when the topic is clear, throws your theory about "Trump supporters" out the window.

 

Often a question is used in an attempt to get the conversation back to the topic. For example, "What do you think about (the topic)?".

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
178
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
174
Views

Re: Explaining The Animal Frenzy

174 Views
Message 36 of 110

@Centristsin2010wrote:


So since that is your thought, you'll have to answer it yourself. Or post something about Nazis or rabbit holes or whatever floats your boat.


Avoiding the question is quite telling.  I'm not surprised.  But thanks for the "reveal".


Yes, it is telling - I did not bring up "brownskin" yet you are making an issue about demanding I explain it. What it "tells" is that you have no interest in any topic except cop hating and are just looking for a fight.

 

And there is a "reveal" for you to live with.

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
174
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
176
Views

Re: Explaining The Animal Frenzy

176 Views
Message 37 of 110

@Centristsin2010wrote:

@rk9152wrote:


What rabbit hole are you ranting about?  Your "it's about the President"; "it's not about the President, it's about MS-13"; "it's not about MS-13, it's about "immigrants"; "it's not about immigrants it's about what the President said."  Quite the "rabbit hole".  But thanks for asking....

No "rabbit hole" - that is all made up.

 

Bottom line - the President was referring to MS-13, the MSM and some posters went bonkers claiming it as about all immigrants. It is a simple as that.


 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
176
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
180
Views

Re: Explaining The Animal Frenzy

180 Views
Message 38 of 110

@Centristsin2010wrote:

@williamb39198wrote:

@Centristsin2010

Perhaps we can refer to the posts of trump supporters as avoidance or avoiding engagement. Both can be considered as picking a fight but then running away from it. How many times do they answer a question by asking a question. How many times do they ask for factual proof but when asked, they never provide any proof, and just ask for more proof. I wonder if they were in some sort of weird debate club where only asking questions and providing no proof won the debate?

 

Frosty debates


An astute observation, William.  Additionally, no less than a half a dozen times just yesterday, one would ask a question, receive an answer, and never respond to the response indicating they had no interest in the question in the first place.  Even when there is agreement there is no acknowledgement.  It may be the result of "Fox Viewer" syndrome where they're used to listening to Fox spew their bigoted propaganda and when confronted with actual facts, they ignore it and go onto something else.  It's a lack of credibility and accountability; just like those you reference.


Those who support trump and his words and actions have taken the (learned from Roy Cohn) "accuse and "run" - then make another not necessarily related accusation" strategy that the coward and liar "cadet bonespurs" habitually uses - and have turned it into an "ask a question of dubious import - don't answer responses - then ask another similarly dubious question - and don't answer responses" strategy...

 

It's a political adaptation of Bob Millet's "lying for the lord" -  Bob Millet, Lying for the Lord (iPhone & iPod).m4v - YouTube 

 

So it is seen that the coward and liar "cadet bonespurs" is suffering from deteriorating credibility in both the nation and the world, and that - not at all coincidentally - his followers and supporters subsequently only retain credibility within the ranks of the trump klan that includes crooks, liars, bigots, racists, haters, and creatures that have placed party and "leader" before country - much as some people did in a country in Europe about three quarters of a century ago...

 

 

44>dolt45
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
180
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
189
Views

Re: Explaining The Animal Frenzy

189 Views
Message 39 of 110

@williamb39198wrote:

@Centristsin2010

Perhaps we can refer to the posts of trump supporters as avoidance or avoiding engagement. Both can be considered as picking a fight but then running away from it. How many times do they answer a question by asking a question. How many times do they ask for factual proof but when asked, they never provide any proof, and just ask for more proof. I wonder if they were in some sort of weird debate club where only asking questions and providing no proof won the debate?

 

Frosty debates


An astute observation, William.  Additionally, no less than a half a dozen times just yesterday, one would ask a question, receive an answer, and never respond to the response indicating they had no interest in the question in the first place.  Even when there is agreement there is no acknowledgement.  It may be the result of "Fox Viewer" syndrome where they're used to listening to Fox spew their bigoted propaganda and when confronted with actual facts, they ignore it and go onto something else.  It's a lack of credibility and accountability; just like those you reference.


"FAKE 45 #illegitimate" read a sign at the Woman's March in Washington DC, January 21, 2017.
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
189
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
201
Views

Re: Explaining The Animal Frenzy

201 Views
Message 40 of 110

@williamb39198wrote:

 

I wonder if they were in some sort of weird debate club where only asking questions and providing no proof won the debate?

Trump taught his minions well.

 

He learned this kind of debating in the college classes he DID NOT ATTEND immediately after evading the draft with the BONE SPURS he didn't have.

 

It is clear that he can't speak or write on anywhere near college level, too many spelling and grammatical errors.

 

It is also clear that he is a coward, as evidenced by his continued lashing out at his opponents with babyish type tantrum tweets.

 

Put those two flaws together and you have a PEE WEE HERMAN type debater......... you know........ he answers everything with............. well, you'll see.

 

The video also shows Trump's "art of the deal".

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOGWbzUM-y8

 

 

 

 

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
201
Views