Take control of your brain health with Staying Sharp! Try it today.

Reply
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
110
Views

Re: Democrats Lose To Trump Again On Emoluments

110 Views
Message 1 of 3

@CriticalThinking wrote:

“Today’s pair of decisions by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals is a complete victory,” Jay Sekulow, a lawyer for Trump, said in a statement. 

 

Jay Sekulow appears to be wrong! The case wasn't dismissed because it lacked merit, it was dismissed on a legal techniicality. The two AG's who filed the case didn't have legal standing. If that was the reason, then I don't understand why Sekulow said it was dismissed with prejudice. That means the court made a final ruling and nobody can bring the case before the court again. 

 

In other words, those rulings appear to contract each other. Did the judges say "with prejudice", or did that come from Sekulow?

 

 

 

 


SIMPLE SOLUTION

 

Have The US House Start a Impeachment Inquiry

 

the US House Certainly - HAS STANDING

 

You know - like do their Job as the Constitution Envisioned it

 

Not the Way Extreme Partisans like Pelosi Interpret it

 

Oversight of Emoluments Violations is a US House Responsiblity

 

 

( " China if You're Listening - Get Trumps Tax Returns " )

" )
" - Anonymous

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
110
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
146
Views

Democrats Lose To Trump Again On Emoluments

146 Views
Message 2 of 3

“Today’s pair of decisions by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals is a complete victory,” Jay Sekulow, a lawyer for Trump, said in a statement. 

 

Jay Sekulow appears to be wrong! The case wasn't dismissed because it lacked merit, it was dismissed on a legal techniicality. The two AG's who filed the case didn't have legal standing. If that was the reason, then I don't understand why Sekulow said it was dismissed with prejudice. That means the court made a final ruling and nobody can bring the case before the court again. 

 

In other words, those rulings appear to contract each other. Did the judges say "with prejudice", or did that come from Sekulow?

 

 

 

 

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
146
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
150
Views
2
Replies

Democrats Lose To Trump Again On Emoluments

150 Views
Message 3 of 3

U.S. Appeals Court Hands Win To Trump In Hotel ‘Emoluments’ Case

 

A Democratic-backed lawsuit accuses Trump of violating anti-corruption provisions of the U.S. Constitution with his Washington hotel.

 

So lets Just Leave Him in Office

 

Don't Start Impeachement - this Court Rules The AG's in the 2 States Did Not Have Jurisdiction

 

A Impeachment Hearing by the House Would Have Standing

 

July 10 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday scored a crucial victory in a Democratic-backed lawsuit that accuses him of violating anti-corruption provisions of the U.S. Constitution with his Washington hotel.

 

The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a set of decisions instructing a lower court judge to dismiss the lawsuit filed against the Republican president in June 2017 by the Democratic attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia.

 

The court said the attorneys general lacked legal standing to bring the case.

A spokesman for D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

“Today’s pair of decisions by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals is a complete victory,” Jay Sekulow, a lawyer for Trump, said in a statement. “This latest effort at presidential harassment has been dismissed with prejudice.”

 

Source - https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-emoluments-lawsuit_n_5d25fc9de4b0583e482a75cd

 

 

( " China if You're Listening - Get Trumps Tax Returns " )

" )
" - Anonymous

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
150
Views
2
Replies