Are you a caregiver? Tell us how you plan your getaway with loved ones for a chance to enter a weekly prize drawing.

Reply
Treasured Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
285
Views

Re: DHS seeking to charge leaders of sanctuary cities

285 Views
Message 21 of 61

john258 wrote:


You are posting for the sake of yourself not the topic. The world is not against you.


Perhaps you should stick to posting about the topic instead of telling others how and what to post.  Unless you are way over three-quarters of a century old, I would think that you need to stop talking down to others.  

 

You have completely ignored the topic to make your personal comments. 

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
285
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
260
Views

Re: DHS seeking to charge leaders of sanctuary cities

260 Views
Message 22 of 61
phyllisc6781 posted..

yup, anything to distract from the real issue. Makes no difference at all of this is water under the bridge, that Hillary is it running, no fault was founded Benghazi, Obama was an excellent president, what matters is what the propaganda sites tell these fools who have no ability to think for themselves, and apparently, in addition, have absolutely no common sense whatsoever.

=======================

Ever heard of aiding and abetting?

Aiding and abetting

Criminal[edit]
Aiding and abetting is an additional provision in United States criminal law, for situations where it cannot be shown the party personally carried out the criminal offense, but where another person may have carried out the illegal act(s) as an agent of the charged, working together with or under the direction of the charged, who is an accessory to the crime. It is comparable to laws in some other countries governing the actions of accessories, including the similar provision in England and Wales under the Accessories and Abettors Act 1861.

It is derived from the United States Code (U.S.C.), section two of title 18:

(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.
(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.

===========================

Leaders of sanctuary cities or states like California are aiding and abetting and should be charged.

Why would any law abiding citizen of our country condone the hiding of illegals?

Gee, I miss people on this board that believe in law and order.
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
260
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
254
Views

Re: DHS seeking to charge leaders of sanctuary cities

254 Views
Message 23 of 61

TxGrandpa2 wrote:

john258 wrote:




What a sad answer. They were right to stand up as they are Americans. Lets deport everyone who was not born here would be another approach. Would you support that. The far right will stop at nothing no matter how vile it is. Get rid of the far right is the answer.


Apparently you are not aware that our country has immigration laws and procedures to become American citizens.  I support our immigration and naturalization laws.  My wife was a LEGAL immigrant and went through the process to enter the country and through the naturalization procedures as required by law.  I support that.

 

Naturalization to obtain citizenship is not a new idea.  Even in the scriptures the Apostle Paul claimed Roman citizenship as a birthright while the Centurion said he had to pay money to become one.  Acts 22:22-23:11.  It is similar today, if a person is not born a citizen they have to pay the required fees to become one.

 

It is apparent that according to you illegal residents have the same right to DEMAND of our lawmakers that they pass favorable laws all the while not obeying those that are on the books.  They and all immigrants are here at the pleasure of our government.

 

No doubt you'd also be happy if the borders was open for anyone to cross and enjoy even the right to vote... Suggest you go to Mexico and flout their laws and see what happens.  You would have no rights except for whatever they chose to give you...no matter if you live there all your life.


You are posting for the sake of yourself not the topic. The world is not against you.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
254
Views
Respected Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
249
Views

Re: DHS seeking to charge leaders of sanctuary cities

249 Views
Message 24 of 61

alferdpacker wrote:

KidBoy2 wrote:
Panjandrom posted..

That's odd....I can't find any articles about this except in conservative media.
============================

This is from Newsweek...if you Google you will find the news was in most major papers...most of they are not conservative!

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-administration-wants-arrest-mayors-sanctuary-cities-783010

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WANTS TO
ARREST MAYORS OF 'SANCTUARY CITIES'

The Department of Justice is considering subjecting state and local officials to criminal charges if they implement or enforce so-called sanctuary policies that bar jurisdictions from cooperating with immigration authorities. Immigration advocates argue such a move would be illegal.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen made the disclosure Tuesday during a Senate committee hearing on the department’s operations.

“The Department of Justice is reviewing what avenues might be available,” Nielsen said. “The context of this is of course not only putting my [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] officers at risk, but also finding an efficient and effective way to enforce our immigration laws.”

As has been seen with the majority of bleephole mouth's unconstitutional executive orders - there's frequently been a considerable difference between what Putin's "useful idiot" wants - and what SCOTUS and other well-educated intelligent and perspicacious judges in high courts find to be constitutionally lawful and constitutionally permissible...

 

Liddle donnie has more often than not been wanting in one hand and pooping in the other hand - with predictable results...

 


Yes.   He can't do this.  It is unconstitutional.   It speaks volumes about their ignorance, or their counting on the ignorance of their followers.  Sad!

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
249
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
246
Views

Re: DHS seeking to charge leaders of sanctuary cities

246 Views
Message 25 of 61

ChasKy53 wrote:

Benghazi !!  Benghazi !!  Benghazi !!    Hillary !!  Hillary !!  Hillary !!   Obama !!  Obama !! Obama !!   Illegals !!  Illegals !!  Illegals !!  (Mexicans)

 

Anything to distract from Trump !!  Trump !!  Trump !!

 

And the surveillance and investigations rightly continue (now they will interview Bannon)   tic toc closer to tump, tic toc closer to trump, tic toc closer to trump ..................


Definitely the sound made by a really kookie, Cuckoo Clock.

Hillary in 2020 by a landslide!

Gee, I miss having a real fortune teller

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
246
Views
Super Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
257
Views

Re: DHS seeking to charge leaders of sanctuary cities

257 Views
Message 26 of 61
  • @ChasKy53— yup, anything to distract from the real issue. Makes no difference that all of this is water under the bridge, that Hillary isn’t running, no fault was found in Benghazi,  Obama was an excellent president, what matters is what the propaganda sites tell these fools who have no ability to think for themselves, and apparently, in addition, have absolutely no common sense whatsoever. 

 

Gee, I miss having a real president!

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
257
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
256
Views

Re: DHS seeking to charge leaders of sanctuary cities

256 Views
Message 27 of 61

He is right. This is not appearing in the legitimate press anywhere.  No referenes in the whack-a-doodle press either. More fake news?

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
256
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
243
Views

Re: DHS seeking to charge leaders of sanctuary cities

243 Views
Message 28 of 61

Benghazi !!  Benghazi !!  Benghazi !!    Hillary !!  Hillary !!  Hillary !!   Obama !!  Obama !! Obama !!   Illegals !!  Illegals !!  Illegals !!  (Mexicans)

 

Anything to distract from Trump !!  Trump !!  Trump !!

 

And the surveillance and investigations rightly continue (now they will interview Bannon)   tic toc closer to tump, tic toc closer to trump, tic toc closer to trump ..................


"The only thing man learns from history is man learns nothing from history"
Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
243
Views
Super Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
205
Views

Re: DHS seeking to charge leaders of sanctuary cities

205 Views
Message 29 of 61

@williamb39198


williamb39198 wrote:

As usual, what is wrong with this picture!

The dhs secretary only proved that she can lie for trump, just like other repub senators sitting right next to trump. Perhaps they need to get hearing tests, and have their heads checked too.

Their ice agents are proving that they can “cherry pick”. Let’s deport people who have been following the law, they are easiest to get to. Kinda like the old Vietnam body count.,.good to pump up numbers. What happened to the pursuit of bad guys?

The justice department issued a report on terrorism, but did not include domestic terrorism...what about the white guy that shot 500 in Las Vegas, and the other white guy who shot 30+ in the church. Sounds like they are making up their facts to fit their story of banning Muslims. 

What happened to: “threats, both foreign and domestic”?

trumps and repubs are still using the DACA young people as bargaining chips. 

Sanctuary cities...trump policy, let’s punish cities for having humane and

moral policies towards people! He has no clue or compassion. 

 

It’s tough to find the words...


I agree, but here are some words:

 

 Untruthful

 

Cruel

 

Vicious

 

Lacking in compassion

 

Unlawful

 

Deceptive

 

Disgusting

 

Inhumane

 

Gee, I miss having a real president!

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
205
Views
Highlighted
Super Social Butterfly
4
Kudos
208
Views

Re: DHS seeking to charge leaders of sanctuary cities

208 Views
Message 30 of 61

As usual, what is wrong with this picture!

The dhs secretary only proved that she can lie for trump, just like other repub senators sitting right next to trump. Perhaps they need to get hearing tests, and have their heads checked too.

Their ice agents are proving that they can “cherry pick”. Let’s deport people who have been following the law, they are easiest to get to. Kinda like the old Vietnam body count.,.good to pump up numbers. What happened to the pursuit of bad guys?

The justice department issued a report on terrorism, but did not include domestic terrorism...what about the white guy that shot 500 in Las Vegas, and the other white guy who shot 30+ in the church. Sounds like they are making up their facts to fit their story of banning Muslims. 

What happened to: “threats, both foreign and domestic”?

trumps and repubs are still using the DACA young people as bargaining chips. 

Sanctuary cities...trump policy, let’s punish cities for having humane and

moral policies towards people! He has no clue or compassion. 

 

It’s tough to find the words...

Report Inappropriate Content
4
Kudos
208
Views