Reply
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
338
Views

338 Views
Message 11 of 15

   As the original paper via the Lancet was not presented, then how should anyone know if the information distributed by Mr. Barrett.    Here is a link to his articles:  https://www.dailywire.com/author/james-barrett

   Indicate which article the author is referring to and then there may be a discussion.   Without such information, then this may be considered bumpkus.    (even Donald says he thought/ new that Covid19 was going to be terrible)    or is this just a distraction about China, which did what the US did not, which was institute containment.  

 

     https://www.ft.com/coronavirus-latest

PRO-LIFE is Affordable Healthcare for ALL .
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
338
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
333
Views

333 Views
Message 12 of 15

As noted by CNN, when Dr. Fauci presented his 2% estimation in March, he stressed that determining the true death rate requires accurate data on the number of people who have contracted the virus but are asymptomatic, or show no symptoms, a metric that has been glaringly lacking thus far. Only taking into account confirmed cases results in an incomplete data set and generally includes those with the more severe symptoms, rather than the more mild cases, which some previous studies suggest could be about half the number of COVID-19 cases.

 

The new study attempts to account for the asymptomatic or very mild cases, not just the confirmed cases. To do so, the researchers looked at infection rates of  people who returned to their home countries on flights from Wuhan, China, CNN explains.

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
333
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
329
Views

329 Views
Message 13 of 15

@jimc91 wrote:

Study: Coronavirus Death Rate Lower Than Previously Reported

By  James Barrett


 

 

 

So, once again, you are quoting a spurious source... One that works for THE DAILY WIRE.

 

Yes folks, it is the same DAILY WIRE that reports on "NEWS" without verification or takes things out of context.You know... reports like protesters digging up Confederate graves.... FALSE!!!!! Or maybe, Harvard holding segregated commencement exercises.....FALSE!!!!!

 

Yes, folks, it is the same DAILY WIRE founded by a "leftover" from BRIETBART NEWS.

 

Come on, @jimc91, is it really that hard to find legitimate news sources?

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
329
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
337
Views

337 Views
Message 14 of 15
It's still early and the data remains dynamic, but modeling is all we have. Certainly western advanced medicine will predictably produce lower death rates overall, but less developed nations will be exponentially affected.

Live long and prosper

Libs are nuttier than squirrel poop
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
337
Views
Highlighted
Honored Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
327
Views
14
Replies

Coronavirus Death Rate Lower Than Previously Reported

327 Views
Message 15 of 15

Study: Coronavirus Death Rate Lower Than Previously Reported

By  James Barrett

 

A new study published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases medical journal estimates that the death rate of coronavirus is significantly lower than previously reported.

 

In early March, World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said the estimated mortality rate of COVID-19 globally was about 3.4%, while Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said it could be anywhere from 1-2% if “you just do the math,” based on initial reports out of other countries.

“What we’re hearing right now, on a recent call from the WHO this morning is that there aren’t as many asymptotic cases as we think. Which made them elevate, I think, what their mortality is,” Fauci explained in the first week of March. “You know as well as anybody that the mortality for seasonal flu is .1% so even if it goes down to 1% it’s still 10 times more fatal.”

 

As reported by CNN Tuesday, a new study published in Lancet estimates that even the lower-end 1% fatality rate estimation is too high. A more accurate estimation of the percentage of people who will die due to complications from the virus, researchers say, is about two-thirds that, 0.66%.

“That coronavirus death rate, which is lower than earlier estimates, takes into account potentially milder cases that often go undiagnosed — but it’s still far higher than the 0.1% of people who are killed by the flu,” CNN explains. “When undetected infections aren’t taken into account, the Lancet study found that the coronavirus death rate was 1.38%, which is more consistent with earlier reports.”

 

As noted by CNN, when Dr. Fauci presented his 2% estimation in March, he stressed that determining the true death rate requires accurate data on the number of people who have contracted the virus but are asymptomatic, or show no symptoms, a metric that has been glaringly lacking thus far. Only taking into account confirmed cases results in an incomplete data set and generally includes those with the more severe symptoms, rather than the more mild cases, which some previous studies suggest could be about half the number of COVID-19 cases.

 

The new study attempts to account for the asymptomatic or very mild cases, not just the confirmed cases. To do so, the researchers looked at infection rates of  people who returned to their home countries on flights from Wuhan, China, CNN explains.

 

“According to the study, these people received PCR tests — a type of test that would be able to identify how many of those travelers were shedding the virus, even if they didn’t show symptoms,” CNN explains. “Researchers combined that data on ‘infection prevalence’ with public information on reported cases and deaths, estimating the overall death rate to be about two-thirds of 1%.”

For those younger than 40, the estimated fatality rate is even lower, just 0.16%, while those younger than 9 have only an estimated 0.00161% chance of dying from complications related to the virus. For those 80 or older, however, the fatality rate is an alarming 7.8%, researchers found.

 

“There might be outlying cases that get a lot of media attention, but our analysis very clearly shows that at aged 50 and over, hospitalisation is much more likely than in those under 50, and a greater proportion of cases are likely to be fatal,” said Imperial College London professor and study co-author Azra Ghani said, as reported by CNN.

 

While researchers found that the fatality rate is far lower than some previous estimates, they also note that the often prolonged recovery time for the virus, which can take over three weeks, threatens to overwhelm health care systems.

 

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
327
Views
14
Replies
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Thursday, October 1 – Coronavirus Tele-Town Hall Event

1 p.m. ET - Coronavirus: Vaccines & Coping During the Pandemic

Call: 1-855-274-9507

Top Authors