Honored Social Butterfly

Conservatives New Social Media App - Which Is Banning Liberal Users

Conservatives flock to a free speech social media app — which has started banning liberal users
Many of Parler's users have voiced their disapproval of how mainstream platforms such as Facebook and Twitter moderate content.
July 2, 2020, 11:13 PM CDT
By James Wellemeyer


Last week, Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas, both announced on Twitter that they were moving to a new social media platform.

"I'm proud to join @parler_app -- a platform gets what free speech is all about -- and I'm excited to be a part of it," Cruz tweeted.


Many others followed suit. Parler, founded in August 2018, touts itself as an "unbiased" social media platform focused on "real user experiences and engagement." In recent weeks, it has become a destination for conservatives who have voiced their disapproval of how mainstream platforms such as Facebook and Twitter moderate content.


But as with every other platform on the internet, Parler's free speech stance goes only so far. The platform has been banning many people who joined and trolled conservatives.

"Pretty much all of my leftist friends joined Parler to screw with MAGA folks, and every last one of them was banned in less than 24 hours because conservatives truly love free speech," a user wrote on Twitter.


Writer and comedian Tony Posnanski also received a ban from the app. "Free speech my a--! I literally said less than here and I got banned," he tweeted.

John Matze, the founder and CEO of Parler, said Thursday in an interview with CNBC that the company remains firm in its promise that it supports free speech.

"Our general premise is that we believe in the good of the American people as a whole and that people should be able to have these discussions," he said. "People don't want to be told what to think. People don't want to be told what to say anymore."

Parler did not respond to a request for comment.


The move to Parler by conservatives comes as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other social media platforms remain under pressure from Republicans over how they decide to remove content posted by users. Conservatives for years have claimed that they are unfairly silenced on the platforms, although many Republican politicians and pundits enjoy large audiences on them.

The pressure has increased in recent weeks since Twitter labeled multiple tweets from President Donald Trump as misleading and Snap, the owner of Snapchat, announced that it will stop promoting Trump's content. Facebook, which did not take similar action, has faced both a major advertiser boycott over how it handles hate speech and unrest from employees over how it handled Trump's statements.


Republicans have countered by pushing legislation to curtail the tech industry's legal protections, coupled with an executive order from Trump.

Parler is not the first alternative platform to try to capitalize on displeasure with the major platforms. Its user experience is similar to that of Twitter and other microblogging websites. Users can make posts on the platform and receive likes, comments and shares.


Some people who joined the platform described it as a conservative version of Twitter. Rees Paz, who calls himself a left-leaning centrist in his Twitter bio, tweeted that all of the users recommended for him on the app were conservative figures, from Trump's son Eric to Laura Loomer, a conservative activist who was previously banned from Twitter.


But even some conservatives find fault with the platform, which, in addition to stating that it is a free speech haven, promises to "never [share] your personal data."

Its privacy policy says it "may collect ... information such as your name, email address, username, and profile photo."


For people who choose to join the app's "influencer network," the company may ask for information "such as your Social Security number (SSN) or your tax identification number."

Some users have been dissatisfied with the company's efforts to protect their privacy.

Mindy Robinson, a conservative political commentator, criticized Cruz for endorsing the app.

"The minute it asked for a copy of my driver's license to access normal features Twitter already has ... I knew something was seriously wrong with Parler," Robinson wrote.

She then clarified that she was not able to send a direct message on the app without providing a photo of her driver's license.


Another user wrote: "I signed up prior to it requiring a phone number. It hasn't asked me to provide it yet. The moment it does I'm out."

In his CNBC interview, Matze defended Parler's policy on phone numbers and identification, saying people say "nasty things" online because they can stay anonymous.

"On Parler, people get verified, people have phone numbers related to their accounts. People know they're acting and behaving as they would in a town square," he said.

"We are a town square, not a publication," Matze added. "I think people will come around to this idea more and more — society can solve these problems without regulation of the social media platforms."

Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history.
Honored Social Butterfly

Olderscout is correct, the only free speech that that the far right wants is their lies and misconceptions. They can't stand being called out on their lies and can't stand fact checking. Twitter and Facebook have both started marking comments that are false. Funny, that only chases away lying right wingers.


They need their own little group where they can ban anyone that calls out their lies and misinformation.

Man learns from history that man learns nothing from history.
0 Kudos
Honored Social Butterfly

The only speech Republicans want to be free is their lies, and we have been paying the considerable "hidden" costs since 1968.

Systemic racism

Income redistribution from middle to top

  - Real wages unchanged since 1964

  - Middle Class savings rate dropped from 10% to 2%

  - No limits on credit interest or fees

  - 8 MILLION Americans driven from their homes by predatory lenders

  - 40% tax cut for incomes over $1M. 60% increase for AVERAGE income

Outsourcing of millions of good jobs to Commie slaves in Asia

Crumbling Infrastructure:

  - Failing k-12 Public Schools

  - UN-Affordable higher education

  - Unsafe roads and bridges

  - Unreliable electric grid

  - UN-Affordable medical care

Two totally unnecessary but never ending wars

Worst Pandemic since 1919

  - NO action from the ToadPOTUS

  - States set AGAINST each other to maximize profits for medical equip providers

  - Denial of Science to make mask wearing POLITICAL


All this was brought to us by REPUBLICAN LEGISLATION.


Do we REALLY need more of this just so somebody is doing great harm to poor brown people and forcing religious dogma on our health care system? Just asking because THAT is all today's Republican Party is doing.


0 Kudos
Honored Social Butterfly

@Olderscout66 Tell me what that tirade has to do with liberals being banned at Parler? 



Libs are nuttier than squirrel poop
0 Kudos
Honored Social Butterfly

So?  Turn about is fair play... right?


Read the rules...  

Libs are nuttier than squirrel poop
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Does AARP donate to political parties or endorse candidates?

AARP is strictly non-partisan and always has been. We never endorse or donate to candidates, political parties or political action committees.

Learn more.

AARP Members Only Games

Play members only games, like FIll Ins, Lumeno, 2048 and a collaborative, multiplayer Let's Crossword.

Play Now
AARP Members Only Games Logos
AARP Rewards

Solve Crosswords. Earn Rewards. Activate AARP Rewards to earn points for games, quizzes and videos. Redeem for deals and discounts.

Get started with AARP Rewards now!