Your pain isn't like anyone else's, and science is homing in on better treatments. Read about the newest ways to break pain's grip.

Reply
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
372
Views

Re: Academia may now be beyond satire

372 Views
Message 1 of 7

@jimc91 wrote:

 

 

Relax everybody...  The adults are about to take charge.

 

 


Who is this adult that Trump and the Republicans found to put in charge?

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
372
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
373
Views

Re: Academia may now be beyond satire

373 Views
Message 2 of 7

In 1996, Alan Sokal, a New York University physicist and self-described “academic leftist,” composed an essay that was a word salad of solemn academic jargon.

 

 

Too funny when you consider this is coming from folks who thought Sarah Palin was a policy wonk.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
373
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
380
Views

Re: Academia may now be beyond satire

380 Views
Message 3 of 7

@Richva wrote:

I believe this post is a good example of conflating. 


Yes - along with lots of decades old conservative scamming and con game practices... 

 

He is useless on top of the ground - he should be under it - inspiring the cabbages... Mark Twain 1894
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
380
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
400
Views

Re: Academia may now be beyond satire

400 Views
Message 4 of 7

I believe this post is a good example of conflating. 

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
400
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
411
Views

Re: Academia may now be beyond satire

411 Views
Message 5 of 7

Thing is, the liberals knew what all those big words meant and understood immediately it was satirical. Conservatives continue to be confused.

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
411
Views
Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
439
Views

Re: Academia may now be beyond satire

439 Views
Message 6 of 7

re:  Cannot compete with? . . Who can?

 

So sad; When I was in elementary school, our entire class was treated each year ; one thing I shall always remember.  So sad; all the good stuff is gone or going.

No one can take away lying on the grass on summer night with friends gazing up at the stars.  I just hope the amount of stars to be seen at lower sea level cities will not dwindle too much more in future.   We learned about the  names of planets and which light in the sky  had a form,e.g., Little and Big Dipper.  Friends always  helped because the group consisted of several different ages,

.We did not have to study for things we learned from friends, especially.  There was no television; "Hi Ho Silver."'   

 

Charlee

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
439
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
449
Views
6
Replies

Academia may now be beyond satire

449 Views
Message 7 of 7

Academia may now be beyond satire

BY: George Will

 

The Chronicle of Higher Education, which is a window on the sometimes weird world of academia, recently revisited a hilarious intellectual hoax from 20 years ago. Reading the recollections of the perpetrator and of some who swallowed his gibberish is sobering.

 

In 1996, Alan Sokal, a New York University physicist and self-described “academic leftist,” composed an essay that was a word salad of solemn academic jargon. He said he strove to be “especially egregious,” by maundering on about “the dialectical emphases” of “catastrophe theory” becoming a “concrete tool of progressive political praxis.” His essay’s gaudy title was: “Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity.”

 

He sent it to the left-leaning “cultural studies” journal Social Text, which swooned, perhaps in part because Sokal larded his nonsense with political tropes that are catnip to lettered leftists — “emancipatory mathematics,” “demystify and democratize the production of scientific knowledge,” “the crisis of late-capitalist production relations.” Soon after Social Text published his faux scholarship, Sokal revealed in another journal, Lingua Franca, that it was a parody.

 

This would have been obvious to anyone whose intelligence had not been anesthetized by the patois of “deconstructionist” and “poststructuralist” professors. They move on to Nietzsche’s assertion that there are no facts, only interpretations, which he wrote shortly before going mad at age 44. They begin with a few banalities: Science is influenced by political and social forces; literature is conditioned by the writers’ contexts. And they arrive at the doctrine that everything from science to sexuality is a “social construct” reflective of society’s power relations, and therefore everything is arbitrary and political.

 

 

Today, Bruce Robbins, a Columbia University humanities professor who was a co-editor of Social Text, tells The Chronicle of Higher Education that Sokal’s essay appealed because he seemed to be a scientist “kind of on ‘our side.’” Robbins and another Social Text editor promptly claimed victim status, saying that “the deceptive means by which Sokal chose to make his point” will injure “the openness of intellectual inquiry.”

 

Sokal’s point, however, was that intellectual inquiry in the humanities often is not open. The humanities, he today tells the Chronicle, had become a “subculture” that was “ingrained and self-referential and mostly disdained critiques from outsiders, so that an ordinary type of intellectual critique was precluded.”

 

 

Today, Robbins says Sokal was not unethical, but he should not have regarded those whom Social Text spoke for as “enemies.” Says Robbins, “I mean, there were epistemological differences, but so what?”

 

So what? Epistemology is the field of philosophy concerning the theory of knowledge, of the methods of arriving at certainty. It concerns the distinction between mere unfounded opinion and well-grounded belief. Their “epistemological differences” were not simply wholesome “diversity.” The epistemology Sokal attacked precludes serious discussion of knowable realities. What Sokal exposed was — and remains — radical relativism that asserts the impossibility of serious science and scholarship.

 

 

Today, Sokal, who seems eager to make amends for his good deed, claims “a small amount of credit” for what he says is diminished ardor for radical epistemological relativism. But he says “the main credit” belongs to — wait for it — George W. Bush, who discredited “science bashing.” Sokal and kindred spirits — he seems to be safely back in the bubble — tell the Chronicle that the real problem is “anti-intellectualism” off campus: “academic expertise” is under attack, “epistemological skepticism” by “the right” is abetting climate change, etc.

 

 

Twenty years on, one lesson of Sokal’s hoax is that many educators are uneducable. Another is that although wonderful sendups have been written about academia (e.g., Randall Jarrell’s “Pictures from an Institution”), it now might be beyond satire.

 

http://www.chicoer.com/opinion/20170112/george-will-academia-may-now-be-beyond-satire

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

MY COMMENT:

 

Screen Shot 2017-01-15 at 6.24.38 AM.png

 

 

My dear friend sums this up perfectly...

 

Screen Shot 2017-01-15 at 6.27.05 AM.png

 

Relax everybody...  The adults are about to take charge.

 

 

VIMTSTL
Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
449
Views
6
Replies