From ‘liquid biopsies’ to precision medicine, these five developments will change cancer care in the next decade. Learn more.

Reply
Valued Social Butterfly
2
Kudos
238
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

238 Views
Message 51 of 96

For the first time in history, a SCOTUS nominee is opposed by more Americans than support him. Looks like ramming him thru the confirmation process will cost more Republicans seats in November, but the prospect of having another nazi toadie on SCOTUS will drive the leadership to do it...unless a couple of those GOPers who will lose in November decide to save their own political hides and abstain from voting until the FBI investigates... Guess we'll see if losing power will cause a spine to grow in swamp scum.

Report Inappropriate Content
2
Kudos
238
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
4
Kudos
256
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

256 Views
Message 52 of 96

Republicans denied President Obamas nominee because they had the power to do so.

 

Now they will try and use that same power to seat a rapist who obeys the GOPerLords on the highest court.

 

They cannot USE power, only ABUSE it.

 

VOTE OUT THE NRAGOP IN NOVEMBER

 

Report Inappropriate Content
4
Kudos
256
Views
Bronze Conversationalist
0
Kudos
267
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

267 Views
Message 53 of 96

4th purported witness claims no knowledge of alleged Kavanaugh assault on Ford



Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
267
Views
Bronze Conversationalist
0
Kudos
289
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

289 Views
Message 54 of 96

I didnt run out of facts I just dont debate imaginations.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
289
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
326
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

326 Views
Message 55 of 96

I am now going to make this entire discussion as simple as humanly possible.  The question as originally stated is simply this:

 

Would Cavanaugh lying in front of the entire nation about a 36 year old incident disqualify him (IN YOUR OPINION) as a Supreme Court nominee?

 

Your only answer should either be "YES" or "NO."  That's it!  NOW, can those of you who claim to be republican, conservative, alt-right, patriot, or otherwise so inclined, just honestly answer the question as put forth above? 

 

"YES" or "NO!"

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
326
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
339
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

339 Views
Message 56 of 96

e66 - 12 years on the court already previously confirmed.

Didn't you know, his honesty on several topics of that confirmation process are in question, again.

Most documents hand over in history.

All from the GW Bush library are unavailable.   dt believes they need to be hidden from you.

Respone   Hissy fit.

No fit, just facts.  At the time of his nomination Judge Merrick Garland had more federal judicial experience than any other Supreme Court nominee in history.

 

IMO, money being expended for a particular Republican operative will soon be finding its way to a more promising stooge.

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
339
Views
Highlighted
Valued Social Butterfly
4
Kudos
334
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

334 Views
Message 57 of 96

@e661467w

Hardly. I don’t throw hissy fits. But I know avoidance and denial when I see it. When one runs out of facts for responding to thoughtful and rational questions, they fail to respond and provide any answer at all. Nice try!

Report Inappropriate Content
4
Kudos
334
Views
Bronze Conversationalist
0
Kudos
339
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

339 Views
Message 58 of 96

12 years on the court already previously confirmed.   Most documents handed over in history.. 

 

Respone   Hissy fit..

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
339
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
4
Kudos
354
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

354 Views
Message 59 of 96

@rk9152 wrote:

@Richva wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

Back to the basic issue:

 

2. The FBI sex crime experts ascertain who's lying and who's telling the truth.

 

How would that be possible with absolute certainty? 


It would not. If we cannot be certain, we should move on to another candidate for the court. 


Then another vague, unprovable claim could be made - and on and on until the Dems get a nominee they want. Is that really the process you'd like to see for our nation.


But it was OK for the Republicans to never hold a hearing or have a vote on Obama's nominee?


"The only thing man learns from history is man learns nothing from history"
Report Inappropriate Content
4
Kudos
354
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
4
Kudos
341
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

341 Views
Message 60 of 96

@NOTHAPPENING wrote:

@Richva wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

Back to the basic issue:

 

2. The FBI sex crime experts ascertain who's lying and who's telling the truth.

 

How would that be possible with absolute certainty? 


It would not. If we cannot be certain, we should move on to another candidate for the court. 


So the left assumes guilty with no evidence? Would you use the same criteria for Democrat nominees or are they presumed innocent until proved guilty?


So was Obama's nominee presumed guilty, so they held off and didn't hold a hearing or a vote for almost a year?


"The only thing man learns from history is man learns nothing from history"
Report Inappropriate Content
4
Kudos
341
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Are you new to the online community? Say Hi and tell us a bit about yourself, your interests, and how we can help make this community a great experience for you!


close-up group of seniors smiling at camera

Top Authors