Make the best choices for your Medicare needs with AARP’s Medicare Made Easy. Try it today!

Reply
Valued Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
315
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

315 Views
Message 61 of 96

@Cirice

Amazing how soon some forget, or now try to cover up.

We all want to have our favorites picked. 

And please keep bringing up the Garland nomination. This was totally outside the norms and fairness of considering a candidate...and perhaps legality. 

mcconnell and trump have a directive for repubs in our current system...

cheat and lie if you need to in order to win! That is not who we are as a country. 

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
315
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
4
Kudos
305
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

305 Views
Message 62 of 96

@rk9152 wrote:

@Richva wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

Back to the basic issue:

 

2. The FBI sex crime experts ascertain who's lying and who's telling the truth.

 

How would that be possible with absolute certainty? 


It would not. If we cannot be certain, we should move on to another candidate for the court. 


Then another vague, unprovable claim could be made - and on and on until the Dems get a nominee they want. Is that really the process you'd like to see for our nation.


I really would like to see the process for our nation include the Cons being fair.   Unfortunately, that's very unlikely, as Cons only like to see the process go their way -- like when they flat-out refused to hold a vote for Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland, for a record 293 days. 

 

 

Report Inappropriate Content
4
Kudos
305
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
312
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

312 Views
Message 63 of 96

Investigating nominees for SCOTUS is most assurtidly an FBI function, as is investigating witness intimidation, so lil donny is stonewalling because...what? Kavanaugh admitted he did that rape thingie back in the day when it was okay, the day Republicans want to bring back for all American Women and cannot do that if the FBI confirms the good Professor's testimony.

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
312
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
310
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

310 Views
Message 64 of 96

@e661467w

Calling your bluff. Where are the missing papers concerning kavanaugh in the white house while serving W? And W is supporting kava. While a former W lawyer and associate of kava is overseeing those documents...fox in the chicken coop? And how could you possibly know if those papers are not important? Quality over quantity is the order of this hearing and of concern. 

What is being hidden?

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
310
Views
Highlighted
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
288
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

288 Views
Message 65 of 96

@rk9152 wrote:


As usual, rk is right on the mark. Events in a federal workplace is of concern to the FBI - HS parties, nope.
 


Rest easy, the guy will get confirmed. All the old gizzards in the Senate will see to it.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
288
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
280
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

280 Views
Message 66 of 96

@CriticalThinking wrote:

As usual, RK is completely wrong. This is not a criminal investigation, it's a background investigation. That is the purview of the FBI.


As usual, rk is right on the mark. Events in a federal workplace is of concern to the FBI - HS parties, nope.
 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
280
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
277
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

277 Views
Message 67 of 96

@jimc91 wrote:

How can any agency investigate anything that has no formal complaint?

 

They can’t!

 

As of now there is no complaint to work with.  Just a letter to Diane Finestein that she will not share with anyone.

 

 


That is a good point. The story changes from day to day and we still do not know what is in the letter that supposedly started all this.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
277
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
260
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

260 Views
Message 68 of 96

@Richva wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

Back to the basic issue:

 

2. The FBI sex crime experts ascertain who's lying and who's telling the truth.

 

How would that be possible with absolute certainty? 


It would not. If we cannot be certain, we should move on to another candidate for the court. 


Then another vague, unprovable claim could be made - and on and on until the Dems get a nominee they want. Is that really the process you'd like to see for our nation.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
260
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
6
Kudos
243
Views

A Question for Trump Lovers

243 Views
Message 69 of 96

As usual, RK is completely wrong. This is not a criminal investigation, it's a background investigation. That is the purview of the FBI.

Report Inappropriate Content
6
Kudos
243
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
247
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

247 Views
Message 70 of 96

@oceanedge2 wrote:

@e661467w wrote:

 LOL a loudmouth without a single shread of evidence...


How would you know she has no evidence?  You don't.  The FBI would certainly, if allowed to do so, examine her evidence.  They did for Anita Hill.  Something terrible is wrong with dt that he is so afraid of law enforcement.  He only has to make one phone call.  If Dr. Ford is not being truthful, you would think dt would want than known.


Hill claimed sexual harassment in a federal workplace - within the authority of the FBI. But a HS party????

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
247
Views