Refresh your driving skills and you could save on your auto insurance! Sign up for the AARP Smart Driver course.

 

Reply
Valued Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
294
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

294 Views
Message 61 of 96

@Cirice

Amazing how soon some forget, or now try to cover up.

We all want to have our favorites picked. 

And please keep bringing up the Garland nomination. This was totally outside the norms and fairness of considering a candidate...and perhaps legality. 

mcconnell and trump have a directive for repubs in our current system...

cheat and lie if you need to in order to win! That is not who we are as a country. 

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
294
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
4
Kudos
284
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

284 Views
Message 62 of 96

@rk9152 wrote:

@Richva wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

Back to the basic issue:

 

2. The FBI sex crime experts ascertain who's lying and who's telling the truth.

 

How would that be possible with absolute certainty? 


It would not. If we cannot be certain, we should move on to another candidate for the court. 


Then another vague, unprovable claim could be made - and on and on until the Dems get a nominee they want. Is that really the process you'd like to see for our nation.


I really would like to see the process for our nation include the Cons being fair.   Unfortunately, that's very unlikely, as Cons only like to see the process go their way -- like when they flat-out refused to hold a vote for Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland, for a record 293 days. 

 

 

Report Inappropriate Content
4
Kudos
284
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
291
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

291 Views
Message 63 of 96

Investigating nominees for SCOTUS is most assurtidly an FBI function, as is investigating witness intimidation, so lil donny is stonewalling because...what? Kavanaugh admitted he did that rape thingie back in the day when it was okay, the day Republicans want to bring back for all American Women and cannot do that if the FBI confirms the good Professor's testimony.

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
291
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
3
Kudos
289
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

289 Views
Message 64 of 96

@e661467w

Calling your bluff. Where are the missing papers concerning kavanaugh in the white house while serving W? And W is supporting kava. While a former W lawyer and associate of kava is overseeing those documents...fox in the chicken coop? And how could you possibly know if those papers are not important? Quality over quantity is the order of this hearing and of concern. 

What is being hidden?

Report Inappropriate Content
3
Kudos
289
Views
Treasured Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
267
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

267 Views
Message 65 of 96

@rk9152 wrote:


As usual, rk is right on the mark. Events in a federal workplace is of concern to the FBI - HS parties, nope.
 


Rest easy, the guy will get confirmed. All the old gizzards in the Senate will see to it.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
267
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
259
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

259 Views
Message 66 of 96

@CriticalThinking wrote:

As usual, RK is completely wrong. This is not a criminal investigation, it's a background investigation. That is the purview of the FBI.


As usual, rk is right on the mark. Events in a federal workplace is of concern to the FBI - HS parties, nope.
 

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
259
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
256
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

256 Views
Message 67 of 96

@jimc91 wrote:

How can any agency investigate anything that has no formal complaint?

 

They can’t!

 

As of now there is no complaint to work with.  Just a letter to Diane Finestein that she will not share with anyone.

 

 


That is a good point. The story changes from day to day and we still do not know what is in the letter that supposedly started all this.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
256
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
239
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

239 Views
Message 68 of 96

@Richva wrote:

@rk9152 wrote:

Back to the basic issue:

 

2. The FBI sex crime experts ascertain who's lying and who's telling the truth.

 

How would that be possible with absolute certainty? 


It would not. If we cannot be certain, we should move on to another candidate for the court. 


Then another vague, unprovable claim could be made - and on and on until the Dems get a nominee they want. Is that really the process you'd like to see for our nation.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
239
Views
Trusted Social Butterfly
6
Kudos
222
Views

A Question for Trump Lovers

222 Views
Message 69 of 96

As usual, RK is completely wrong. This is not a criminal investigation, it's a background investigation. That is the purview of the FBI.

Report Inappropriate Content
6
Kudos
222
Views
Valued Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
226
Views

Re: A Question for Trump Lovers

226 Views
Message 70 of 96

@oceanedge2 wrote:

@e661467w wrote:

 LOL a loudmouth without a single shread of evidence...


How would you know she has no evidence?  You don't.  The FBI would certainly, if allowed to do so, examine her evidence.  They did for Anita Hill.  Something terrible is wrong with dt that he is so afraid of law enforcement.  He only has to make one phone call.  If Dr. Ford is not being truthful, you would think dt would want than known.


Hill claimed sexual harassment in a federal workplace - within the authority of the FBI. But a HS party????

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
226
Views
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Users
Announcements

Have a question about AARP membership or benefits? Ask it in the AARP Help Membership forum, Benefits & Discounts forum, or General forum.


multiple white question marks with center red question mark

Top Authors