AARP Hearing Center
FROM THE ARTICLE.
โก๏ธ[*** Key takeaways!
[*] For this Medicare program, apply at your state Medicaid office.
[*] Application process is complex, but youโll save a bundle.
[*] New law puts plan to simplify applying on hold.
[*] Experts: More than 10% of people now in it could be dropped.
[*] Learn more about the 4 Medicare Savings Programs.
Perhaps the toughest part about needing help to pay your Medicare Part B premiums is knowing to ask your state for the aid.
Thatโs right: Medicare Savings Programs, which the federal government helps finance but state Medicaid agencies administer, assist Medicare beneficiaries with limited incomes and assets in paying for the Part B premiums, Part A premiums if you donโt qualify for premium-free Part A, deductibles, copayments and coinsurance associated with Medicare, a federal program.
You can apply any time, not just during Medicare open enrollment, Oct. 15 to Dec. 7.
USE LINK BELOW TO READ THE ARTICLE.
https://www.aarp.org/medicare/medicare-savings-program/
Solved! Go to Solution.
From the linked article:
Although the federal government establishes income and asset limits for each of the programs, those numbers are a floor, not a ceiling, and states have an option to increase maximums for their residents or waive guidelines altogether.
While that is true and it is the stateโs own Medicaid program that pays for this - I still wonder why. I also wonder why people donโt just move to places that very lucrative eligibility and asset limits -
A friend of mine in another higher income and asset eligibility state said it was because they did not want to seem prejudicial to assets since EXPANDED Medicaid has NO asset limits.
Look at this -
Compare these numbers for the 2025 QMB Medicare Savings Program - in these close together areas - WHY is DC so much more - DC isnโt even a state so who picks up the (Medicaid) cost of this QMB program in DC?
QMB = QUALIFIED MEDICARE BENEFICIARY
โโโโโโโ-MONTHLY INCOME LIMIT โโโโโโ- โ- ASSET LIMIT - - - -
| LOCATION | INDIVIDUAL | COUPLE | FPL | INDIVIDUAL | COUPLE |
| US | $ 1304 | $ 1763 | 100% | $ 9660 | $14, 470 |
| WASH DC | $ 3913 | $ 5288 | 300% | NONE | NONE |
| MARYLAND | $ 1304 | $ 1763 | 100% | $ 9660 | $14,470 |
| VIRGINIA | $ 1394 | $ 1763 | 100% | $ 9660 | $14, 470 |
So my question is WHY and then why not move to DC - for the Medicare cost savings, it could be really worth it.
There are other states as the article says that have higher income eligibility limits and NO asset limits. I just do not understand it - can anybody explain it?
Adding to my confusions of Medicaid specifically in the District of Columbia -
It works like states and the Federal Government - with DC taking the role of a state BUT it seems that DC takes up a lot of Federal Medicaid dollars -
Now WHO is the major employer in the District of Columbia - why the Federal government - so take a gander at this stat from KFF.org
Now would not the following be less IF the income and asset eligibility levels were lower ? This means that the Federal Government is paying 78% of the Medicaid funding in DC and DC is covering 22% of their Medicaid cost.
This too would be lower if their income and asset eligibility levels were closer to the that in the majority of states (the Federal income and asset eligibility levels)
All of the graphics in this post came from:
KFF.org files - Medicaid in the District of Columbia - May 2025
Just some added data to leave us all even more confused.
Adding to my confusions of Medicaid specifically in the District of Columbia -
It works like states and the Federal Government - with DC taking the role of a state BUT it seems that DC takes up a lot of Federal Medicaid dollars -
Now WHO is the major employer in the District of Columbia - why the Federal government - so take a gander at this stat from KFF.org
Now would not the following be less IF the income and asset eligibility levels were lower ? This means that the Federal Government is paying 78% of the Medicaid funding in DC and DC is covering 22% of their Medicaid cost.
This too would be lower if their income and asset eligibility levels were closer to the that in the majority of states (the Federal income and asset eligibility levels)
All of the graphics in this post came from:
KFF.org files - Medicaid in the District of Columbia - May 2025
Just some added data to leave us all even more confused.
From the linked article:
Although the federal government establishes income and asset limits for each of the programs, those numbers are a floor, not a ceiling, and states have an option to increase maximums for their residents or waive guidelines altogether.
While that is true and it is the stateโs own Medicaid program that pays for this - I still wonder why. I also wonder why people donโt just move to places that very lucrative eligibility and asset limits -
A friend of mine in another higher income and asset eligibility state said it was because they did not want to seem prejudicial to assets since EXPANDED Medicaid has NO asset limits.
Look at this -
Compare these numbers for the 2025 QMB Medicare Savings Program - in these close together areas - WHY is DC so much more - DC isnโt even a state so who picks up the (Medicaid) cost of this QMB program in DC?
QMB = QUALIFIED MEDICARE BENEFICIARY
โโโโโโโ-MONTHLY INCOME LIMIT โโโโโโ- โ- ASSET LIMIT - - - -
| LOCATION | INDIVIDUAL | COUPLE | FPL | INDIVIDUAL | COUPLE |
| US | $ 1304 | $ 1763 | 100% | $ 9660 | $14, 470 |
| WASH DC | $ 3913 | $ 5288 | 300% | NONE | NONE |
| MARYLAND | $ 1304 | $ 1763 | 100% | $ 9660 | $14,470 |
| VIRGINIA | $ 1394 | $ 1763 | 100% | $ 9660 | $14, 470 |
So my question is WHY and then why not move to DC - for the Medicare cost savings, it could be really worth it.
There are other states as the article says that have higher income eligibility limits and NO asset limits. I just do not understand it - can anybody explain it?
"I downloaded AARP Perks to assist in staying connected and never missing out on a discount!" -LeeshaD341679