Refresh your driving skills with the AARP Smart Driver online course! Use promo code THANKS to save 25 percent.

Reply
Regular Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
331
Views

Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action

331 Views
Message 161 of 1,444

It is under Ken Perrot Oct 30 the medical argument written criticism of paul connetts point 1.

I stand by what i said.

Richard Sauerheber, Ph.D.
Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
331
Views
Frequent Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
407
Views

Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action

407 Views
Message 162 of 1,444

Richard, you tell me "You might want to read the pdf again."

But a quick check on the Connett & Perrott (2014) document suggests to me that perhaps you need to read it yourself.

Nowhere in that article can I find the claim by me that there is"no such thing as naturally fluoride-free water."

So you appear to be arguing with a straw man.

In fact, checking through the document it is Paul Connett who refers mostly to natural fluoride in water or naturally fluoride-free water - not me.

Have a search for the word "naturally" to check that out.

Of course, if you can produce a quote of mine I am open to discussion - but as it stands there is nothing here to discuss.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
407
Views
Regular Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
420
Views

Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action

420 Views
Message 163 of 1,444

In an attempt to imply that fluoride ingestion is no big deal because fluoride is ubiquitous naturally, the claim was made in the pdf that there is no such thing as naturally fluoride free water. You might want to read the pdf again. The other claims against Connett are for the most part misinterpretations of Connett's words that are not his fault. But who wants to spend their life correcting others' junk? 

Furthermore, we have fought the San Diego city council for decades, both in a group setting, San Diegans for Clean water, and as many of us individually, and in public gropus at water district headquarters.  So to say we need to do something about the overruling of the cities' two votes against fluoridation and the city ordinance against it, as though we haven't, is laughable.

Richard Sauerheber, Ph.D.
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
420
Views
Frequent Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
372
Views

Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action

372 Views
Message 164 of 1,444

Richard - please be specific.

You say "contrary to the claim in the pdf." Could you please quote the claim and identify the pdf?

Who said what (exactly) where.

Otherwise, discussion is impossible.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
372
Views
Moderator
0
Kudos
356
Views

Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action

356 Views
Message 165 of 1,444

Hello everyone,

 

Whilst we welcome robust debate, we ask that everyone abides by the guidelines.

 

Please be respectful and refrain from making hateful and/or incendiary comments. You are free to express your opinions, but you must do so in a way that respects the opinions of others.

https://community.aarp.org/t5/custom/page/page-id/Guidelines

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
356
Views
Regular Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
365
Views

Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action

365 Views
Message 166 of 1,444

But fluorinated drugs most certainly are partially metaobolized, typically about 10% releasing free fluoride ion. There is nothing wrong with the chemical recogtnized by IUPAc, nomenclature system that incluedes naming C-F compouinds as fluorides, such as ethyl fluoride, methyl fluoirde,etc. If you want to take up your desires with IUPAC, be my guest.

 

And no the arguments protecting Connett from the false claims in the pdf were not dropped. The posts already made are simply being ignored in order to conveniently attempt to drop them.

What I said stands.. There are waters that are naturally frree of fluoride, contrary to the claim in the pdf. And just because ingesting fluoridated water does not immediately lead to clnically detectable symptoms and signs does not justlfy the claim that fluoride causes no harm. That is insane. Bone accumulation begins with the first sip of fluoridated water and likewise the earliest pathologic abnormality is elevated calcitonin and PTH together, along with formation of bone of poor quality and altered crystal sturicture.  At first for a chronic ttime periodr there are no associated symptoms or signs, either one.So what? That does not mean Connett is wrong, it means he is correct to criticize and denounce fluoridation of people even befroe there are clinically detectable abnormalities.  We have no equipment or  test that is noninvasive to assess the bone damage that occurs during the "subclinical' stage of bone fluorosis. Where do you get this stuff? It would be like claiming it is OK to eat pure cholesterol because for many years you will have no clinically detectable stroke symptoms or angina or other heart symptoms, all while one's carotids and heart artereis are becoming structurally abnormal due to atherosclerosis.  Just because there are no symptoms or signs does not mean it is healthy. Quite the contrary. Fluorosis in the temporary absence of symptoms is nevertheless pathologic.

Richard Sauerheber, Ph.D.
Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
365
Views
Frequent Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
365
Views

Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action

365 Views
Message 167 of 1,444

A new study reporting the ranges of values for kidney and liver parameters in a healthy population is being actively misrepresented by anti-fluoride campaigners. The Fluoride Action Network’s (FAN) latest bulletin claims the study shows “that fluoride at commonly experienced doses can damage the kidneys and livers of adolescents.”

The study shows nothing of the sort. How could it – individuals suffering liver or kidney disease were specifically excluded from the study population. The reported parameter values are all for healthy individuals.

https://openparachute.wordpress.com/2019/08/14/anti-fluoride-activists-misrepresent-a-kidney-liver-s...

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
365
Views
Frequent Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
378
Views

Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action

378 Views
Message 168 of 1,444

Richard, I prefer a more exact nomenclature - especially as some people get confused about how covalently bound F is released to form the fluoride anion.

Anyway, I take it that from your inability to provide quotes and citations you no longer wish to pursue the arguments you were making about "inaccuracies" in Connett & Perrott - The Fluoride Debate.

Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
378
Views
Frequent Social Butterfly
0
Kudos
373
Views

Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action

373 Views
Message 169 of 1,444

Yes, Bill, you had agreed to a scientific exchange with me and actually sent me a pdf for your first contribution. I got back to you wanting your help in providing the references and one of the images to make it suitable for publication.

At that stage, my hard drives packed up and I lost most of my material. It has been a slow process recovering what I could from backups.

I am still waiting for your final version of the contribution (I think you were traveling or also having computer problems at the time so couldn't respond at the time).

Anyway, I can start the exchange as soon as I get the final version of your contribution with the references and proper images.

I look forward to this exchange as you were concentrating on dental fluorosis and I had been preparing something on that.


Report Inappropriate Content
0
Kudos
373
Views
Frequent Social Butterfly
1
Kudos
355
Views

Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action

355 Views
Message 170 of 1,444

So Ken and Richard are at the fluoridation issue.  Amazing how you two get around.

 

Ken, you wanted a "discussion" "debate" on fluoride and I agreed, sending you information about excess exposure.   You were having email/computer problems and that is the last I heard.

 

Simple questions on exposure should be considered.

 

1.   How much ingested fluoride is recommended to prevent dental caries?

 

2.   At what age should the fluoride be ingested?

 

3.  At the recommended dosage, what are the risks for all ages?

 

4.  What label should be placed on the fluoride products?

 

5.  How much fluoride is each person receiving from other sources than artificial fluoridation?

 

Of course there are more questions, but those seem to be the most basic. 

 

Bill Osmunson DDS MPH

Report Inappropriate Content
1
Kudos
355
Views