<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Start again with one question based on your comments. in Brain Health</title>
    <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/2072814#M1418</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You have ignored most questions completely, and those you claim to have answered have been reinterpreted before “answering” – thus answering your questions and not mine, as demonstrated below.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Let’s start over with one very simple yes or no question:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Question)&lt;/STRONG&gt; Do you believe that &lt;STRONG&gt;ALL the science and health experts in the world&lt;/STRONG&gt; who accept the scientific consensus that community water fluoridation (CWF) is safe and effective (or who don’t publically accept the anti-F opinions), &lt;STRONG&gt;“&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;don't think for themselves … No conspiracy….&amp;nbsp; Simply blind obedience to tradition and a lack of scientific critical thinking.&lt;/EM&gt;”, “&lt;EM&gt;think fluoride is a magic element&lt;/EM&gt;”, &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;have&lt;STRONG&gt; “&lt;EM&gt;seriously tarnished&lt;/EM&gt;” credibility, “&lt;EM&gt;don’t protect the public&lt;/EM&gt;”, &lt;/STRONG&gt;are&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt; “&lt;EM&gt;lemmings, followers, part of a herd, not scientists&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;” &lt;/STRONG&gt;and&lt;STRONG&gt; “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;None reviewed the science.&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;EM&gt;All the so called ‘scientific’ organizations were all puppets of each other with fluoridation&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;”?&amp;nbsp; Depending on that answer, I will provide others.&amp;nbsp; Despite your protestations to the contrary, my questions have &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;everything&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; to do with science-based evidence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This question is in reply to your comments on, (&lt;A href="https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/2045233#M978" target="_blank"&gt;08-19-2018 02:18 AM&lt;/A&gt;), (&lt;A href="https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/2045476#M990" target="_blank"&gt;08-19-2018 07:15 PM&lt;/A&gt;) &amp;amp; (&lt;A href="https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/td-p/1528688/page/41" target="_blank"&gt;07-09-2018 09:09 PM&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Below are all your previous “un-answers” to my questions (&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.aarp.org/t5/forums/recentpostspage/post-type/message/user-id/19041723" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;you can read here&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;) that I have found&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;U-A12) &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;10-28-2018&lt;/SPAN&gt; 12:10 PM, You claim, “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;I rely on evidence based science.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;” And then go off on a rant against the EPA.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;That still does not answer one of the primary questions I started with – repeated above.&amp;nbsp; Answer that single question and then other specific questions can be answered one at a time until you answer questions I ask instead of your interpretation of my questions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;U-A11) &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;10-26-2018&lt;/SPAN&gt; 07:03 PM, You claimed, “&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;Instead of focusing on the research, fluoridationists focus on the people talking about the research&lt;/FONT&gt;.&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Actually, my concern is that a primary tactic of anti-science activists is to focus on the conclusions of people who are outliers talking about their interpretation of the research instead of the scientific consensus.&amp;nbsp; For example your interpretation of the 2017 IQ study by Bashash et al. in this comment presents only your personal, biased interpretation of a complex study presented in a public format that is not conducive to discussing and evaluating the conclusions.&amp;nbsp; You fail, for example, to quote the second paragraph of the conclusion which begins, “&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Community water and salt fluoridation, and fluoride toothpaste use, substantially reduces the prevalence and incidence of dental caries and is acknowledged as a public health success story&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;.&lt;/EM&gt;” And you don’t mention the five long paragraphs of limitations the authors discuss which include their inability to determine whether exposure to toxins, like arsenic, might be responsible for any observations.&amp;nbsp; In other words you present an excellent example of &lt;STRONG&gt;selective reporting of study conclusions, out of context in a manner deliberately designed to cause fear = Fear-Mongering.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; I will defer to several discussions which cover the same study limitations I was able to spot when I read it – and more.&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://openparachute.wordpress.com/2017/09/24/maternal-urinary-fluorideiq-study-an-update/" target="_blank"&gt;Ken Perrott&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="https://americanfluoridationsociety.org/home/statement-by-afs-president-dr-johnny-johnson-regarding-the-recently-released-study-of-prenatal-fluoride-exposure-and-cognitive-outcomes/" target="_blank"&gt;Johnny Johnson, Jr. DMD, MS&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="https://www.thelundreport.org/content/defense-fluoride" target="_blank"&gt;Steve Slott, DDS&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="https://www.ada.org/~/media/ADA/Public%20Programs/Files/2017_NFAC_Comments_on_Bashash_Study_11-27-2017.pdf?la=en" target="_blank"&gt;ADA&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="http://ga.dentalresearchblog.org/?p=2896" target="_blank"&gt;AADR&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/water-fluoridation-reduces-iq/" target="_blank"&gt;Snopes&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;U-A10)&lt;/STRONG&gt; 10-25-2018 02:27 PM “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Lets move on to the science.&amp;nbsp; But one more try at answering your questions. I have asked you to discuss science and you keep &lt;STRONG&gt;diverging onto people&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&amp;nbsp; … Your last post which is more mellow than most of your posts, has two example..&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;‘anti-science’&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt; &amp;nbsp;Really?&amp;nbsp; Any scientist who disagrees with the CDC, ADA (or you?) is anti-science?&amp;nbsp; … &lt;STRONG&gt;’fear-mongering’&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; Really?&amp;nbsp; Scared of science?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;”&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I carefully explained in my 10-26-2018 02:17 AM reply, you completely and deliberately misinterpreted my description of ‘anti-science’ as anyone who disagrees with science and ‘fear-mongering’ as moving away from science and “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;diverging onto people&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;”.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you actually read and understood my question and my reply, you would comprehend the fact that &lt;U&gt;my questions to you have EVERYTHING to do with science&lt;/U&gt; and the way people with extreme beliefs will ignore science and do anything to protect and promote those beliefs.&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;Science does not exist without people&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and I have seen absolutely no rational explanation from you on why, if the “evidence” you wish to keep dumping onto the public is legitimate, only about 13 alternative health, environmental, spiritual and cultural organizations (along with groups like INFOWARS [Alex Jones] and Natural News [Mike Adams]) oppose CWF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;U-A9)&lt;/STRONG&gt; 10-24-2018 07:58 PM – You accuse me: “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Attack, name calling, attack, name calling, disparaging, and simply cruel, vulgar, barbaric unscientific attacks.&amp;nbsp; Your response clearly answers your own questions.&amp;nbsp; Not one reference to science, all opinion and attack.&amp;nbsp; Try being professional and see where that gets you.&amp;nbsp; What about scientific evidence based discussion scares you?&amp;nbsp; … In time, those opposed will say it was really their idea in the beginning.&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;Not long from now you will also be &lt;U&gt;opposed to ingesting excess fluoride&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;”&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I have pointed out repeatedly, my question &lt;STRONG&gt;are not directed against&lt;/STRONG&gt; any scientists or health professionals who hold conclusions that differ from the scientific consensus and work as scientists to resolve those differences.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;As I have pointed out over and over, questioning the scientific consensus is one of the fundamental and critical aspects of science&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;– it is the only way science progresses&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My questions are about the disingenuous tactics of small bands of anti-science activists who go far beyond legitimate disagreements and normal procedures of working to resolve them.&amp;nbsp; The tactics of anti-science activists consist of:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;a)&lt;/STRONG&gt; dismissing the scientific consensus of relevant experts and accepted by virtually all recognized science and health organizations,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;b)&lt;/STRONG&gt; demanding that their opinions be accepted based on their interpretations of carefully selected “evidence”,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;c)&lt;/STRONG&gt; instead of working with the scientific and health communities (which is the accepted scientific procedure if legitimate evidence exists) they take their arguments – and interpretations of the “evidence” – to the public (most of who don’t have the training and experience to accurately evaluate the evidence),&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;d)&lt;/STRONG&gt; they employ a variety of techniques including fear-mongering, adjusting/fabricating (evidence), and casting suspicion on the majority of science and health experts who accept the scientific consensus to influence public opinion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have always been “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;U&gt;opposed to ingesting excess fluoride&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;“.&amp;nbsp; That is the kind of irrational statement commonly employed by anti-science activists to misdirect the public.&amp;nbsp; Currently, the &lt;U&gt;consensus&lt;/U&gt; of organizations like the WHO, ADA, CDC, AAP. AMA, etc. does not define drinking optimally fluoridated water (0.7 ppm) along with other sources of exposure to fluoride ions as “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;ingesting excess fluoride&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;”.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Again, my question – if the “evidence” you present is legitimate, obvious and as damaging as fluoridation opponents claim&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;a)&lt;/STRONG&gt; why have a majority of professionals in all (or any) of these organizations (and the 100+ others) not recognized those alleged dangers?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;b)&lt;/STRONG&gt; why have anti-science activists &lt;U&gt;not&lt;/U&gt; worked within the science and health communities to alert them and change the consensus?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;c)&lt;/STRONG&gt; why have anti-science activists taken the battle to the public using the tactics listed above.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I first became aware of the anti-F arguments several decades ago I became concerned about the possible consequences that I read about, and I began examining the evidence and the conclusions drawn by both sides.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The alleged damage to health presented by fluoridation opponents were initially very troubling, but as I began tracking the anti-F claims back to their sources I began to recognize the same tactics (outlined above) I had seen employed by other anti-science activists.&amp;nbsp; When FOs demanded that Denver stop CWF in 2015, I decided not to remain silent and began exposing the tactics of fluoridation opponents whenever they attempted to hijack the processes of democracy by employing the disingenuous tactics of anti-science activists.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;U-A8)&lt;/STRONG&gt; 10-23-2018 05:24 PM “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;I'm EVIDENCE based, NOT organization or individual based.&amp;nbsp; I am persuaded by facts, not people.&amp;nbsp; (Money persuades people.&amp;nbsp; Facts are less biased.)&amp;nbsp; The questions you asked are not scientificly based and cannot be answered by empirical evidence. You questions are political, personality, and human based. … I answered your four questions.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Anti-science activists are not evidence based, they WEAPONIZE EVIDENCE.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/STRONG&gt;You have answered none of my questions.&amp;nbsp; Once you answer my questions about the tactics of anti-science activists, then the specific “&lt;EM&gt;empirical evidence&lt;/EM&gt;” and the way anti-science activists distort it can be discussed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;U-A7) &lt;/STRONG&gt;10-23-2018 03:00 PM – &lt;STRONG&gt;In answer&lt;/STRONG&gt; to my specific Q2) “I will ask you specifically, what makes you a better expert in fluoridation than the members of all the organizations that continue to support CWF?&amp;nbsp; It could be argued that you are a lemming, follower, part of a herd of FOs that allow their irrational fear of fluorine to bias their selection, evaluation and presentation of the scientific evidence."&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;You replied&lt;/STRONG&gt; “&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;Become "EVIDENCE BASED" rather than ‘human based, individual, organization based.&lt;/FONT&gt;’&lt;/EM&gt;”&amp;nbsp; and you followed that with a description of your experience, “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;When the evidence became clear that the cult was based on fraud, lies, and mistakes, I left the cult&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;” &lt;STRONG&gt;That seems to be a not-so-subtle attempt to suggest that all organizations that support CWF are part of a global cult based on fraud, lies and mistakes and all those who accept the scientific consensus that CWF is safe and effective are members of a cult?&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;nbsp;That fits well with your “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;lemmings/puppets&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;” descriptions that I have been trying to get you to clarify.&lt;BR /&gt;People design and implement scientific observations and experiments; people evaluate the resulting evidence and draw conclusions; people develop the scientific consensus based on the best interpretation of the conclusions from all studies and observations.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to figure out how you can believe that the hundreds of thousands of people (trained science and health care professionals) who are members of the 100+ organizations that support CWF and who don’t publically accept the anti-F opinions have all completely missed or misinterpreted the “evidence” which you keep focusing on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;U-A6)&lt;/STRONG&gt; 10-23-2018 01:39 PM&amp;nbsp; “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;I have also answered most of your questions but you fail to read, or at least fail to respond to the answers&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;”&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;As noted above and below – your responses were not answers to my questions – they were answers to your rewriting of my questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;U-A5)&lt;/STRONG&gt; 10-23-2018 02:15 PM “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;provides partial answer to some of your questions&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;”&lt;BR /&gt;This is a copy of Limeback’s opinion piece and answers none of my specific questions to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;U-A4)&lt;/STRONG&gt; 10-21-2018 04:14 PM&amp;nbsp; “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Do not cherry pick science to prove a point.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Twisting and manipulating science and claiming it says something it does not, is not scientific&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;”&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;That is the only rational and accurate response to my questions I have read.&amp;nbsp; However, as I and others have demonstrated repeatedly, it is the anti-science activists who cherry pick any shred of “evidence” they believe can be used to support their opinions, and they are masters at twisting and manipulating science and claiming it proves something it does not. &amp;nbsp;That is why the major science and health communities follow an accurate and considered evaluation of the entire body of evidence and have concluded nearly unanimously that CWF is a safe and effective public health measure for reducing dental decay.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;U-A3)&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;A href="https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/2056519#M1223" target="_blank"&gt;09-15-2018 08:22 PM&lt;/A&gt; “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;I stand by my statements&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt; because you do not provide evidence to the contrary.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If you would spend more time checking the endorsements rather than simply regurgitating the mantra, you would be shocked.&amp;nbsp; Circular referencing is a huge problem&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;”&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This comment is an excellent example of how you divert the conversation away from providing specific answers to my specific questions by trying to play the “evidence game”.&amp;nbsp; You provide what you believe to be examples of organizations allegedly cherry picking evidence that only supports CWF and then engaging in the game of “circular referencing” and “endorsing” each other.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You apparently believe, no one in any of those organizations has ever considered and evaluated all the evidence – you seem to believe some individuals simply decided CWF was safe and effective based on their sloppy research, ignorance and a deluded belief that CWF could help reduce dental decay (perhaps an ouija board and tea-leaf readings were involved), and the other science and health professionals blindly followed that conclusion like lemmings or puppets – is that an accurate presentation of how you would describe all members of the 100+ organizations that support CWF who have not rebelled?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And, just for the record, how do you differentiate the listing of studies and reviews which support CWF in this comment with the list of references in the IAOMT&amp;nbsp; “Position Paper against Fluoride Use…” you continually reference.&amp;nbsp; That paper is simply a blanket condemnation of exposure to fluoride ions from any source at any exposure level and includes newspaper and magazine articles, blogs, etc. provided as “references”.&amp;nbsp; I discussed that further, &lt;A href="https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/2049748#M1072" target="_blank"&gt;08-29-2018 05:58 PM&lt;/A&gt;, Q5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;U-A2)&lt;/STRONG&gt; 09-04-2018 02:04 PM “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Lets talk science rather concensus. &lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;The next few posts will be just a touch on one aspect of fluoride, carcinogenicity.&amp;nbsp; Remember, the masses can be wrong.&amp;nbsp; Marketing can change public opinion&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;”&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That begins your Gish Gallop postings of 14 comments packed with “evidence” you seem to believe causes cancer – yet the organizations of experts responsible for understanding cancer have not concluded those studies proved CWF causes cancer.&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;Do you believe these experts on cancer are all “&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;lemmings, followers, not scientists&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;” who “&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;don't think for themselves or review the research&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;”?&amp;nbsp; Are they all uninformed puppets with fluoridation opponents the only “experts” on cancer? This is another example of you playing the “evidence game”&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Fact alert!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; The scientific consensus depends on the legitimate interpretation of scientific evidence by expert scientists – You can’t “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;talk science rather than consensus&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;” they are inseparable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;U-A1)&lt;/STRONG&gt; 08-27-2018 01:40 AM “The title here is "&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Scientific Consensus; however, your comments are about ‘Endorsement Consensus&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;’” and “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Yes, like a bunch of lemmings, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;they all&lt;/U&gt; have faith in each other, but not the facts to support fluoridation&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Irrelevant nonsense – Whatever you mean by “Endorsement Consensus” is based on the Scientific Consensus!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the public support of CWF by the 100+ science and health organizations does not demonstrate the scientific consensus (along with the lack of support of the anti-F opinions), then please explain your understanding of the Scientific Consensus as it relates to three public health measures – community water disinfection (and other water treatment processes), vaccination, and CWF.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2018 18:29:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RandyJ913440</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-28T18:29:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1528688#M182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;“The evidence that fluoride is more harmful than beneficial is now overwhelming… fluoride may be destroying our bones, our teeth, and our overall health.” &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;- &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;Dr. Hardy Limeback, &amp;nbsp;former President of Canadian ADA, Head of Preventive Dentistry at Univ of Toronto, 2006 National Research Council Scientist (2007)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 2006 National Research Council on Fluoride in Drinking Water commented to the EPA that fluoridation at 1 ppm can be anticipated to be harmful for those with reduced renal function and the elderly. The NRC confirmed that fluoride&amp;nbsp;not excreted by kidneys builds up in bones, resulting in arthritic pain and increased brittleness.&amp;nbsp;However, there were no EPA studies on the whole health impacts of fluoridated water on susceptible population such as kidney patients, children, those with prolonged disease or the elderly. There still aren’t.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, there is mounting science from other sources that “optimally fluoridated” water, which is known to cause varying degrees of dental fluorosis in 58% of Black American adolescents and 36% of White American adolescents, is causing subtle deficits in ability to remember or focus. That same “optimal level” has also been proved in a 2014 study as being nephrotoxic in rats with chronic kidney disease. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects approximately 15% of Americans, although CKD is quadruple the rate in Black Americans, and predictably worse in older Americans.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps the most horrifying part of the story of fluoridation is that not only is at least 50% of every drop of fluoride that has passed the lips of a Baby Boomer permanently stored in bones, fluoride&amp;nbsp;isn't the only poison in packages of fluoride that originate as&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;waste product of aluminum an phosphate industry. 100% of the fluoride sampled in a 2014 study was contaminated with aluminum; arsenic and lead were other common contaminants. In other words, fluoridated water serves as a delivery system for aluminum and lead into our bones and our brains. As we all know, aluminum is associated with Alzheimers in adults, and lead is associated with learning disabilities in children. Approximately 15% of the population who is sensitive to chemicals cite inability to think clearly and overwhelming fatigue as symptoms of exposure to fluoridated water.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our generation was part of a great human experiment. It may have had noble intentions based on the faulty hypothesis that &amp;nbsp;drinking fluoridated water prevented cavities. It is now known that any perceived benefits of fluoride are from tooth brushing. &amp;nbsp;Our grandchildren are the third generation in this travesty. I suggest we all DEMAND the AARP stand up for us and our grandchildren by issuing a strong position paper calling for the cessation of water fluoridation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;SCIENCE REFERENCES&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2014 in Toxicology. Effect of water fluoridation on the development of medial vascular calcification in uremic rats. (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“Optimal levels” worsen kidney function&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561004" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561004&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2015&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;in Neurotoxicology and Teratology. Association of lifetime exposure to fluoride and cognitive functions in Chinese children: A pilot study.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;(&lt;EM&gt;Children with visible dental fluorosis perform&amp;nbsp;less well on memory tasks, correlating with the degree of severity of their fluorosis. One of a series of human and animal studies with the same consistent findings.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25446012" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25446012&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://braindrain.dk/2014/12/mottled-fluoride-debate/" target="_blank"&gt;http://braindrain.dk/2014/12/mottled-fluoride-debate/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2014 in Physiology and Behavior. Fluoride exposure during development affects both cognition and emotion in mice. (&lt;EM&gt;Measurable behavioral changes&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24184405" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24184405&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2014 in International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. A new perspective on metals and other contaminants in fluoridation chemicals. (&lt;EM&gt;All samples of fluoride are&amp;nbsp;contaminated with aluminum, plus other contaminants like arsenic, lead and barium&lt;/EM&gt;);&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999851" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999851&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/sites/default/files/Mullenix%202014-2-2.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/sites/default/files/Mullenix%202014-2-2.pdf&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2014 in Scientific World Journal. Water Fluoridation: A Critical Review of the Physiological Effects of Ingested Fluoride as a Public Health Intervention. (&lt;EM&gt;Health risks and cost don't justify minimal&amp;nbsp;and questionable dental benefit&lt;/EM&gt;.): &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/293019/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/293019/&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;RACIAL INEQUITY (FOIA)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are three Oct 2014 news articles on the content of the Freedom of Information Act documents. Rev. Andrew Young, former UN ambassador has pursued them with the CDC, but to little effect. Civil Rights leaders have been calling for an end to community water fluoridation (CWF) since 2011.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. Black Americans disproportionately harmed:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/19317-feds-blacks-suffer-most-from-fluoride-fluoridate-anyway" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/19317-feds-blacks-suffer-most-from-fluoride-fluoridate-anyway#&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. CDC, ADA and Pew inappropriate relationships:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://benswann.com/do-newly-released-emails-reveal-conflict-of-interest-between-the-cdc-and-the-ada/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://benswann.com/do-newly-released-emails-reveal-conflict-of-interest-between-the-cdc-and-the-ada/&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;3. Kidneys, Civil Rights &amp;amp; Ralph Nader:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2014/10/428383.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2014/10/428383.shtml&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 LEGAL ARGUMENT (GROSS DISPROPORTIONALITY)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a legal initiative in Peel, Ontario (pop 1.3m) to remove fluoride from the water supply based on the principle of gross disproportionality, i.e. marginal benefit does not justify great risk of harm. There is also a political effort afoot in Canadian govt to mandate fluoridation and thereby make the legal argument moot. &lt;STRONG&gt;I suggest this document is well-worth printing. &lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/peel.june2014.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/peel.june2014.pdf&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a. The first 19 pages of this document is about the legal strategy. It includes summary of US legal cases that found water fluoridation harmful to the public, but legal under US "police power" mandate.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;b. Starting on page 20 is a devastating affidavit by Dr. Kathleen Thiessen, NAS/NRC scientist and international expert in risk assessment. Very readable summary of science indicating harm to populations in “optimally” fluoridated communities.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;POPULATION WITH LOW CHEMICAL THRESHOLD&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In excess of 25% of previously healthy Gulf War Veterans have Multiple Chemical Sensitivities, which includes sensitivity to fluoride. See:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/committee_documents/gwiandhealthofgwveterans_rac-gwvireport_2008.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/committee_documents/gwiandhealthofgwveterans_rac-gwvireport_2008.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;EXCERPT&lt;/STRONG&gt;: “It is&amp;nbsp;well established that&amp;nbsp;some people are more vulnerable&amp;nbsp;to adverse effects of certain&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;chemicals than others,&amp;nbsp;due to variability in biological processes that neutralize those chemicals, and clear them from&amp;nbsp;the body.”&amp;nbsp;-&amp;nbsp;Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses 2008&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Affidavit of Dr. Hans Moolenburgh:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/affidavit-moolenburgh.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/affidavit-moolenburgh.pdf&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Except&lt;/STRONG&gt;: “As a summary of our research, we are now convinced that fluoridation of the water supplies causes a low grade intoxication of the whole population, with only the approximately&amp;nbsp;5% most sensitive persons showing acute symptoms.The whole population being subjected to low grade poisoning means that their immune systems are constantly&amp;nbsp;overtaxed. With all the other poisonous influences in our environment, this can hasten health calamities.”&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;PubMed Listed Studies on immune system response:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;a. Fluoride makes allergies worse, rats (1990): &lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1707853" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1707853&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;b. Fluoride makes allergies worse, in vitro&amp;nbsp;(1999): &lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9892783?dopt=Abstract" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9892783&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;c. Immune system of the gut (2010):&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.hindawi.com/journals/iji/2010/823710/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.hindawi.com/journals/iji/2010/823710/&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;d.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ASIA Syndrome, adjuvant impact (2011): &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20708902" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20708902&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;e.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Gene predicts fluoride sensitivity (2015):&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25556215" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25556215&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;f. &amp;nbsp;Brain has an immune system (2015):&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26030524" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26030524&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AARP - STAND UP on our behalf!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2018 22:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1528688#M182</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-26T22:38:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530258#M184</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Fluoridation is an excellent issue for AARP to spearhead. This practice of adding toxic chemicals to raise the fluoride level to prevent tooth decay is NOT safe and is Not even effective!! And for seniors it jut adds more burden on our bodies especially our brains!! Fluoridation has become a political issue when&amp;nbsp; organizations like AARP need to look past the years of propaganda and endorsements and expose the harm out weieghs the supposed benefits! THANK you for opening up this topic ...AARP please take this on!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530258#M184</guid>
      <dc:creator>ri1666</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-06T19:20:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530285#M185</link>
      <description>Yes!! FLUORIDE - I am 61 and my wife is 65. This is an extremely important topic! I am retired with a degree in Environmental Sciences including Biological Chemistry with added studies in Nutrition.&lt;BR /&gt;Seniors are more at risk for all kinds of health complications, because as we ingest Fluoride in the water, foods, and from other sources, it accumulates.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The CDC states that half of the Fluoride we ingest, accumulates in the body!!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since (FLUORIDE) F- is the MOST REACTIVE ION of any other element, it can EASILY REACT with many of the body’s minerals and chemicals.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See what the CDC says...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC - BONES and JOINTS&lt;BR /&gt;“…exposure to higher levels of fluoride may harm your health. Skeletal fluorosis can be caused by eating, drinking or breathing very large amounts of fluorides. This disease only occurs after long term exposures (because Fluoride accumulates with the ongoing daily bone formations of every age group) and can cause denser bones,&lt;BR /&gt;joint pain,&lt;BR /&gt;and a limited range of joint movement.&lt;BR /&gt;…severe cases, the spine completely rigid…”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC&lt;BR /&gt;“…fluoride can result in denser bones…&lt;BR /&gt;...these bones are often&lt;BR /&gt;more brittle&lt;BR /&gt;or fragile&lt;BR /&gt;than normal bone&lt;BR /&gt;and there is an increased risk of older men and women breaking a bone.&lt;BR /&gt;Some studies have also found a higher risk of bone fractures in older men and women at fluoride levels typically found in fluoridated water….”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC&lt;BR /&gt;40% of children suffer “dental fluorosis"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC - TOPICAL ONLY is effective&lt;BR /&gt;The CDC (Center for Disease Control) states that: “(Fluoride’s) actions primarily are topical for both adults and children”.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC - teeth breaking&lt;BR /&gt;“…in severe cases, the teeth are pitted and are fragile, and sometimes the teeth can break.”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC – The CDC’s ATSDR warns about consuming large amounts of fluoride in that “…it can cause stomach aches, vomiting, and diarrhea. Extremely large amounts can cause death by affecting your heart.”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I WANT MORE ARTICLES AND SUPPORT from AARP about exposing Fluoride's adverse health affects to the elderly (and young children or infants).</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530285#M185</guid>
      <dc:creator>tt59717964</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-06T19:38:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530832#M187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Extremely important topic from my community and for those of us over 50 as well. &amp;nbsp;If you've ever gone to an orthopedic sturgeon and been told, you have arthritis, bone spurs, thickening and brittleness of the bones, osteosclerosis, then you most likely have damage from too much fluoride. It's called skeletal fluorosis in just about every other county. &amp;nbsp;It is a chronic crippling problem that by that point you are aware of it there isn't much you can do about it but suffer and bear the expense. &amp;nbsp;The mayo clinic did one study associating it with too much black tea, but they've pretty much been told to back off fluoride if they want to advance their careers. &amp;nbsp; the original studies in 1946 by the ADA also clearly demonstrated this problem in the lab rats.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 19:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530832#M187</guid>
      <dc:creator>pablomck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-07T19:25:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531351#M188</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:07:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531351#M188</guid>
      <dc:creator>lp47633557</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-08T20:07:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531792#M189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If AARP has ever taken on a cuase that could have a great impact on the health of our community .... THIS IS IT!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:23:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531792#M189</guid>
      <dc:creator>rb98221521</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-09T18:23:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THYROID: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539756#M190</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;“The addition of fluorides to drinking water was, and is, a mistake.” &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;- Dr. Robert Isaacson, 2006 National Research Council Scientist (2007)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ON THYROID&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you see this week's Newsweek article on a nationwide English study?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;People living in fluoridated communities have significantly higher incidences of low thyroid. Over&amp;nbsp;50% more incidence in "optimally" fluoridated communities than in communities with &amp;lt;.3 ppm. &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.newsweek.com/water-fluoridation-may-increase-risk-underactive-thyroid-disorder-309173"&gt;http://www.newsweek.com/water-fluoridation-may-increase-risk-underactive-thyroid-disorder-309173&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's not surprising. There are studies from the early 20th century connecting various thyroid and parathyroid conditions with fluorides in the water and mottled teeth. The 2006 NRC also confirmed that fluoride even at low concentrations disrupts endocrine function, i.e. thyroid hormones. Sadly, gung-ho dentists urged on by business who stood to profit convinced government that&amp;nbsp;fluoride was some sort of magic bullet. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fluoridation is wrecking our health and the health of our grandkids!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Phone and write AARP... tell them to take a stand against water fluoridation, now!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2015 19:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539756#M190</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-08T19:13:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADHD: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539770#M191</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;"The evidence against the safety of this public health policy will keep mounting and never disappear again. My ignorance of fluoride in the beginning was a matter of chance. If you ignore this evidence today, it will be a matter of choice.”&lt;/STRONG&gt; - &lt;EM&gt;Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, Head Toxicologist at Forsyth Dental Center (1999)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ON&amp;nbsp;HYPERACTIVITY&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See TODAY's study published in Environmental Health that correlates ADHD (hyperactivity) in children with fluoridation. This is only the latest in 20 years of studies on animals and humans proving that fluoride in utero or youth not only permanently mottles the teeth of some children, but also permanently scrambles their brains:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2015 Ecologic study:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/14/1/17/abstract"&gt;http://www.ehjournal.net/content/14/1/17/abstract&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1995 Animal study: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/mullenix-1995.pdf"&gt;http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/mullenix-1995.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend&amp;nbsp;this 1996 talk by Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, the author of the 1995 study:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hci7BnWydAo"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hci7BnWydAo&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fluoridation is wrecking our health and the health of our grandkids!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Phone and write AARP... tell them to take a stand against water fluoridation, now!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:04:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539770#M191</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-27T19:04:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554257#M214</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sometimes, by the time you get to 50 or 60, people seem to think it is time to be in poor health, need a joint replacement, have thyroid dysfunction and diabetes. &amp;nbsp;With all the evidence of Fluoride being an endocrine dysrupter and known to Fluoride deposits in our bones, I imagine if AARP would take a long hard look at this topic, you would have numerous supporters from all walks of life. &amp;nbsp;The young people of the nation are beginning to see the illogical addition of Fluoride to our water supply and are shaking&amp;nbsp;their heads at us older adults wondering why we let this continue for so long.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 01:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554257#M214</guid>
      <dc:creator>kf4601639</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-13T01:55:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554966#M215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Adding additional contaminants to water is not required by law and should be&amp;nbsp;seen as a hindrance in the goal to provide the cleanest most natural water to customers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:30:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554966#M215</guid>
      <dc:creator>kf4601639</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-31T18:30:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1573728#M229</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your intelligent and educational posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you look on the Periodic Table of Elements, you will see&amp;nbsp;Fluorine, Chlorine and Bromine (a common baking additive) all displace Iodine ~ which is vital to healthy&amp;nbsp;thyroid function. No wonder thyroid malfunction has become&amp;nbsp;rampant! We once added iodine to our table salt to insure adequate levels. Now,&amp;nbsp;that effort has been&amp;nbsp;sabotaged.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And honestly, if fluoride worked in preventing cavities, wouldn't America be cavity-free by now?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2015 03:00:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1573728#M229</guid>
      <dc:creator>dd67136683</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-17T03:00:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1574706#M230</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;From:&lt;EM&gt; &lt;A href="http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/erin-brockovich-and-signers-put-health-agencies-notice-april-2015" target="_self"&gt;Moms Against Fluoridation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="row"&gt;&lt;DIV class="sixteen columns"&gt;&lt;DIV class="page_heading"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;Erin Brockovich and signers put the Health agencies on notice: April, 2015&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="row"&gt;&lt;DIV class="sixteen columns "&gt;&lt;DIV class="region region-content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="block block-system"&gt;&lt;DIV class="content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="node node-news-headline node-promoted node-news-headline node-promoted clearfix"&gt;&lt;DIV class="content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"&gt;&lt;DIV class="field-items"&gt;&lt;DIV class="field-item even"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Erin Brockovich has just put the government on big notice of their shortcomings in interpreting science and protecting the&amp;nbsp;health of American citizens.&amp;nbsp; Please take time to read this document about fluoridation.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;This is one of the very the best documents/ letters we have seen.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The references are great; the critical thinking is excellent, and the range and depth she covers are compelling. &amp;nbsp;&lt;U&gt;And, it has some 'teeth&lt;/U&gt;'.&amp;nbsp; Just read the first 2 pages if you are short on time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/sites/default/files/pdf-documents/Brockovich-Letter-to-US-Natl-Acad-Science-Inst-Medicine.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Read Letter&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I suggest the Signature page (p 16) and the Questions attachment&amp;nbsp;(last page) provide the best summary of this 24 page document, but go ahead, read the whole thing. It's worth your time! &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 22:26:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1574706#M230</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-19T22:26:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1580164#M235</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;“&lt;STRONG&gt;Industry has learned that debating the science is much easier and more effective than debating the policy. In field after field, year after year, conclusions that might support regulation are always disputed. Animal data are deemed not relevant, human data not representative, and exposure data not reliable.&lt;/STRONG&gt;” &lt;EM&gt;- David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, in “Doubt Is Their Product” (2008)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Prof. Rita Barnett-Rose of Chapman University includes a nice mix of science and law in her 2014 legal analysis of the U.S. fluoridation policy. She concludes, "&lt;EM&gt;The evidence continues to suggest that compulsory water fluoridation is no longer justifiable as a public health benefit.... &lt;STRONG&gt;the cessatio&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;n of all compulsory water fluoridation schemes should be the goal of all public health agencies, ethical lawmakers, and informed citizens.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See: &lt;A href="http://works.bepress.com/rita_barnett/3/" target="_blank"&gt;http://works.bepress.com/rita_barnett/3/&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phone, email or write the AARP directly. Tell them they need to step up and write a position statement opposing fluoridation, for the sake of the elderly, those in&amp;nbsp;fragile health, pregnant women and their fetuses, and the very young.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 15:27:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1580164#M235</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-01T15:27:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1588061#M236</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"When a statistical analysis of 1,000 children was conducted in London, and results were not as fluoridation proponents wanted, the study was quickly abandoned.&lt;/STRONG&gt;" &lt;EM&gt;- Dr. Malcolm Naylor, 1987 winner of Tomes Medal for imminence in dental research&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;Cochrane is the international gold standard panel for public health review. They found &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;bias rather than benefit&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; in their review of the dental studies. Moreover, like every large independent review of the dental science, the Cochrane panel finds that the evidence of dental benefit is poor quality, highly suspect, and does &lt;EM&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; support the rationale that fluoridation&amp;nbsp;benefits the poor. In the meantime, the scientific and legal arguments&amp;nbsp;against fluoridation as harmful to health mount.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 Cochrane review of dental studies&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cochrane.org/CD010856/ORAL_water-fluoridation-to-prevent-tooth-decay" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cochrane.org/CD010856/ORAL_water-fluoridation-to-prevent-tooth-decay&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 Newsweek article on Cochrane review&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.newsweek.com/fluoridation-may-not-prevent-cavities-huge-study-shows-348251" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.newsweek.com/fluoridation-may-not-prevent-cavities-huge-study-shows-348251&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 Opposition&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.earthclinic.com/news/why-the-us-should-ban-fluoride-in-drinking-water-by-jason-uttley.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.earthclinic.com/news/why-the-us-should-ban-fluoride-in-drinking-water-by-jason-uttley.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Write the AARP and your local newspaper!&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;Tell them that Cochrane confirms the dentists are lying and that you side with consumer adovcate Erin Brockovich, Civil Rights leaders, and &lt;SPAN&gt;21st century researchers like the&amp;nbsp;Harvard team of neuroscientists&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;in opposing fluoridation as a Human Rights violation!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1588061#M236</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-02T18:55:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596602#M238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;I&gt;"&lt;/I&gt;Fluoride is an enzyme poison, in the same class as cyanide, oxalate, or azide ... it is capable of a very wide variety of harmful effects, even at low doses. It is a scientific disgrace that a well organized lobby of the American Dental Association ever managed to stampede American legislators into ignoring the highly technical but very cogent objection to fluoridation."&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;I&gt;- James B. Patrick, Ph.D., antibiotics research scientist at National Institute of Health&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Latest study on fluoride concerns its capacity to cause &lt;STRONG&gt;INFLAMMATIONS&lt;/STRONG&gt; even at very small exposure level, such as that from water fluoridation. I especially like this key finding, "&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Long-term exposure to fluoride may affect activities of many enzymes&lt;/EM&gt;."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we really want a drug that interferes with the normal functioning of our enzymes, as well as causing or worsening inflammations to be an ubiquitous contaminant in our water and food? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2015 in Toxicology in Vitro. Fluoride as a factor initiating and potentiating inflammation in THP1 differentiated monocytes/macrophages&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233315001605" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233315001605&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Baby Boomers - this is your life and the lives of your children, grandchildren, and g-grandchildren at risk. &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DO SOMETHING&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Contact the AARP, your politicians, the White House.... &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;tell them to get the F* out of our water&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;.... Municipalities can use the financial savings to replace ineffective and dangerous chloramine which also kills enzymes and causes disease with a more effective and safe disinfectant alternative. And you can use the better quality of life and lower doctors bills to enjoy life.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:44:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596602#M238</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T14:44:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596607#M239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For those who like visuals, this 1955 film shows what happens to &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;enzymes&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; in human blood with fluoride concentrations consistent with drinking a glass of "optimally" fluoridated water.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32op3srFDk8" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32op3srFDk8&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This enzyme death in the blood explains why some of us experience&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Chizzola maculae&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;, a distinctive bruise like hive that affects a minority of women and children in the early stages of fluoride poisoning. It's an abnormal blood coagulation and the destruction of blood vessels, an autoimmune reaction.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="page"&gt;&lt;DIV class="section"&gt;&lt;DIV class="layoutArea"&gt;&lt;DIV class="column"&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1978 Major Fluoride Symptoms:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/flier_waldbott_symptoms_ftgd.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/flier_waldbott_symptoms_ftgd.pdf&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1977 Blood Clotting in Patients with Chizzola Maculae. Fluoride. vol.10:1. p 29-33. http://&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.fluorideresearch.org/101/files/FJ1977_v10_n1_p001-044.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;www.fluorideresearch.org/101/files/FJ1977_v10_n1_p001-044.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:45:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596607#M239</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T14:45:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596637#M240</link>
      <description>First, eating and drinking fluoride ion has no effect whatsoever on dental caries, as published in detailed studies by Zigelbecker, and also by Sutton, and by Teotia and Teotia, and also by Yamouyiannis. The fluoride concentration in saliva that bathes teeth topically (at 0.016 ppm, NRC, 2006) is 75,000 times less than that in toothpaste. Second, systemic fluoride dissolves in the blood and throughout all tissues at 0.2 ppm from regular consumption of treated drinking water. The ion accumulates lifelong permanently into bone causing the formation of new bone of poor quality. We now have 1/3 million U.S. elderly who suffer from broken hips which usually is lethal due to pneumonia that ensues while waiting for fluoridated bone to heal. Cruel experiments in dogs indicate that broken bones heal far more slowly when animals are given fluoridated water. Finally, adding fluoride into drinking water is illegal. No EPA regulated water contaminant, including fluoride, can be discharged into public drinking water intentionally without an NPDES permit from the EPA, as stipulated by the Clean Water Act. And the Safe Drinking Water Act prohibits the requirement of any substance added into water other than to sanitize the water. The EPA Office of Water argues that, as a substance that is being used to treat humans, the FDA is responsible for regulating fluoridation. The FDA argues that, as a pollutant being added intentionally into water, the EPA is in charge of its regulation. The HHS recommended that fluoride levels not exceed 0l7 ppm but refuses to accept liability for its use, in particular to avoid litigation over the easily proven increase in unwanted unsightly abnormal dental enamel hypoplasia dental fluorosis that plagues 42% of U.S. teens as a result of water "fluoridation." Please get involved and halt this absurd experiment from being continued.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:48:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596637#M240</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs5526</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T16:48:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596648#M241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great idea!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm starting a coalition in NYC Against Artificial Fluoridation - Fluoride in not a nutrient, we shoudn't be exposing ourselves to neurotoxins by drinking the toxic waste product of the fertilizer industry. Please email nyc.caaf@gmail.com for more information.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596648#M241</guid>
      <dc:creator>sn4302</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T17:22:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596650#M242</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a really great article: please help get this neurotoxin out of our water, and our food.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am starting a coalition against artificial fluoridation in NYC - please email nyc.caaf@gmail.com if you are interested in helping getting the word out - this stuff is toxic, not a nutrient, not safe and we shouldn't be drinking it!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:26:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596650#M242</guid>
      <dc:creator>sn4302</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T17:26:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1598286#M245</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dr. Richard Sauerheber who added a post in this thread is a chemist, college professor and researcher who has published some excellent work on the toxicity of industrial fluoride in drinking water. As a result of his research, he has written letters opposing fluoridation to the FDA and other regulatory agencies, urging they take action, i.e. actually consider science to regulate the industries in order protect the health of the public:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2013 Publication:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3690253/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3690253/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2010-2011 Letters: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/ask-dr-sauerheber" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/ask-dr-sauerheber&lt;/A&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, doctor!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;“When industry and government agree, people suffer.”&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;EM&gt;- Proverb&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 13:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1598286#M245</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-18T13:11:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

