<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Fluoride and Cancer in Brain Health</title>
    <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/2052038#M1130</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What did some reviewers say?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Thiessen’s Review of Kim et al. (2011),&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Referenced in PHS 2015 as evidence of safety).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“The paper by Kim et al. (2011) is part of the Harvard osteosarcoma study. The paper describes a comparison of bone fluoride levels in cases of osteosarcoma and a set of controls. The authors report no significant difference in bone fluoride levels between cases and controls and no significant association between bone fluoride levels and osteosarcoma risk.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“To give some context it is important to know that an earlier part of the Harvard osteosarcoma study, namely the work of Bassin et al. (2006; based on a 2001 dissertation by Bassin 2001), reported an association between age-specific fluoride exposure and risk of osteosarcoma, with the highest risks for childhood exposure for young males. Bassin's study involved 103 cases under the age of 20 (median age, 13.7) and 215 matched controls (median age, 14.5; matching based on age, gender, and distance from the hospital) from the orthopedics departments of the same hospitals. Cases were diagnosed between November 1989 and November 1992. Bassin estimated fluoride exposure from drinking water and fluoride supplements or rinses for each participant, for each year of life, based on residential histories. Bassin et al. describe the limitations of their study and point out that additional studies with larger numbers of osteosarcoma patients, with incidence under age 20, that examine age-specific and sex-specific associations are required to confirm or refute the findings of the current study.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“The NRC report (NRC 2006, pp. 329-330) was published shortly before the Bassin et al. paper appeared, but included an analysis of Bassin's dissertation (2001), which reported essentially the same findings. The NRC also reported a personal communication from C. Douglass of the Harvard School of Dental Medicine, describing a second study involving 189 cases and 289 controls. This study was said to include residence history, detailed interviews about water consumption, and fluoride assays of bone specimens and toenails of all subjects. The NRC committee was told that the preliminary results indicated no statistically significant association with fluoride intakes and that the results were expected to be reported in the summer of 2006. The NRC report describes some concerns about possible bias (in either direction) in the selection of controls and the expectation that the study could have limited statistical power to detect a small increase in osteosarcoma risk due to fluoride exposure.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“When Bassin's work was published (Bassin et al. 2006), the same issue of the journal contained a letter to the editor by Douglass and Joshipura (2006), both of whom were coauthors on an earlier paper describing Bassin's exposure analysis (Bassin et al. 2004). This letter mentioned that preliminary findings from the second set of cases did not appear to replicate the earlier work (Bassin's study) and indicated that their findings, which were “currently being prepared for publication,” did not suggest an overall association between fluoride and osteosarcoma. It also indicated that both a fluoride intake history and a bone specimen were being obtained for each participant, and that their preliminary analysis indicated that the fluoride content of the bone was not associated with excess risk of osteosarcoma. However, this letter provided no data and therefore constitutes no more than an opinion.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“The paper by Kim et al. (2011) was submitted to the Journal of Dental Research in January 2011 and published electronically in late July 2011. No mention is made of why it took 5 years from the time Douglass and Joshipura indicated that their findings were “currently being prepared for publication.” Nor is it obvious why the paper was published in a dental journal, when it does not deal directly with anything related to dentistry. Other recent papers that include some of the same coauthors (specifically, C. Douglass and R.N. Hoover) have been published in cancer research journals, (e.g., Savage et al. 2007; Mirabello et al. 2011a,b,c), as was Bassin's work (Bassin et al. 2006).&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“Kim et al. (2011) describe a study involving 137 cases (37 ages 0-14, 72 ages 15-29, 13 ages 30- 44, and 15 ages 45 and older) and 51 controls, with cases diagnosed between 1993 and 2000.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“Although there is mention of “orthopedic” controls (patients with benign tumors or non- neoplastic conditions), only “tumor” controls were in fact used. The selection of cases and controls was affected in part by the need to obtain bone specimens. The cases had a median age of 17.6 years, the controls, 41.3 years. Kim et al. report no significant difference in the median fluoride concentration in bone between matched osteosarcoma case and tumor control in 32 pairs where age matching was possible. In an unmatched analysis of all cases and controls, the median bone fluoride concentration was significantly higher in controls than in cases. The authors conclude that their study “did not demonstrate an association between fluoride levels in bone and osteosarcoma.”&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“The use of an individual measure of fluoride exposure (bone fluoride concentration) is important to note. However, as the authors themselves point out, “if risk is related to exposures at a specific time in life, rather than total accumulated dose, this metric would not be optimal” (Kim et al. 2011). Bone fluoride concentration is a measure of cumulative fluoride exposure to the time of diagnosis and surgery. Given a “lag time” of at least 5 years between initiation and diagnosis of most cancer types, the bone fluoride concentration at time of diagnosis can be affected by fluoride exposures that occurred after the cancer was initiated. Most importantly, a bone fluoride concentration at time of diagnosis says nothing about fluoride exposure at specific ages, so it does not address the key finding of Bassin et al. (2006).&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“The osteosarcoma cases analyzed by Kim et al. (2011) included 28 individuals aged 30 or older. The actual number of patients under 20 years old is not given, but was said to be too few to provide sufficient statistical power. Thus the cases analyzed by Kim et al. are not fully comparable to the cases analyzed by Bassin et al. While osteosarcoma obviously occurs in adults, the majority of cases occur in children and young adults (Sergi and Zwerschke 2008; Mirabello et al. 2011a,b,c; Savage et al. 2007); Kim et al. (2011) themselves indicate that osteosarcoma is more prevalent in individuals less than 20 years old. Kim et al. have not explained their justification for including older individuals, other than to have large enough numbers to do their statistical analyses. The possibility that different mechanisms are involved in pediatric and geriatric osteosarcoma has not been addressed.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“As mentioned, the controls were all patients with malignant bone tumors other than osteosarcoma, apparently because bone samples were more readily available for tumor controls than for other controls (Kim et al. 2011). Kim et al. point out that if “fluoride levels were related to bone cancer in general, the current study design would be unable to detect this. There is no published evidence of such an association.” There also is no published evidence clearly demonstrating a lack of such an association. The one small finding that has been published (as part of an appendix to a Public Health Service report) was an excess of Ewing's sarcoma in fluoridated counties as opposed to nonfluoridated counties (Hoover 1991). This was explained as an artifact of the analysis. However, given the distinct lack of adequate analyses of fluoride exposure and other types of bone cancer, the use by Kim et al. (2011) of tumor controls alone obviously has to be regarded with caution.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“Bassin et al. (2006) limited their analysis to 103 cases diagnosed before the age of 20 (median age 13.7) and used 215 orthopedic controls (median age 14.5). Kim et al. (2011) used a much broader range of ages among cases, together with a relatively small set of controls very different in age from the cases and who were themselves bone cancer patients. While there were apparently limitations in selecting controls who could provide bone samples, nevertheless, the result is that the analysis by Bassin et al. had a much better set of controls than did the analysis of Kim et al.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“Kim et al. (2011) report a higher median fluoride concentration of controls compared with cases, which they attribute to the older ages of the controls than the cases. Comparison of the distributions of bone fluoride concentrations between cases and controls (Figure, part D) indicates that the ranges are not greatly different. Given that the median age of the controls is more than twice the median age of the cases (41.3 vs. 17.6), the obvious conclusion is not a lack of association between fluoride exposure and osteosarcoma, but considerably higher average exposure (by a factor of 2) in cases and controls, in order to reach similar bone fluoride concentrations. Kim's 2007 dissertation, on which the 2011 paper is based, reports estimates of “median cumulative lifetime water fluoride” of 14.4 ppm year for the cases and 16.5 ppm year for the controls. These cumulative exposures together with the median ages of the two groups again indicate higher average fluoride exposure among cases than controls, by a factor of 2. Rather than refuting the work of Bassin et al., these findings by Kim et al. support an association between fluoride exposure and osteosarcoma.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“In order to obtain the estimates of median cumulative lifetime water fluoride, Kim had to develop the exposure histories for the individual cases and controls. In addition, her dissertation indicates that the exposure histories were available for the orthopedic (noncancer) controls. Douglass and Joshipura (2006) indicated that exposure histories were being obtained. Any meaningful comparison of Kim's findings with those of Bassin et al. (2011) will require use of the individual exposure histories to look at exposures at various ages, as opposed to just the comparison of bone fluoride concentrations.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“As an incidental note, the bone fluoride concentrations reported by Kim et al. (2011, Figure) for both osteosarcoma cases and tumor controls, extend into the range reported for skeletal fluorosis (NRC 2006). &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Also of note is that Kim et al. (2011) found that a history of broken bones was a significant predictor of osteosarcoma risk. An increased risk of bone fracture has been associated with fluoride exposure in a variety of studies (e.g., NRC 2006; Alarcón-Herrera et al. 2001; Danielson et al. 1992).”&lt;A href="#_ftn1" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;[1]&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A National Cancer Institute (NCI) report&lt;A href="#_ftn2" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[2]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt; on Kim (2011), failed to appreciate using a different cancer for controls is not “normal” bone fluoride concentration.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The NCI states “they [Kim] measured fluoride concentration in samples of normal bone adjacent to a person’s tumor. . . The analysis showed no difference in bone fluoride levels between people with osteosarcoma and people in a control group who had other malignant bone tumors.”&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Thiessen’s Review of Comber et al. (2011)&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Comber et al was cited by the PHS 2015 recommendation as evidence fluoride is not carcinogenic and safe.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“Comber et al. (2011) compare osteosarcoma rates in nonfluoridated Northern Ireland and in partially fluoridated Republic of Ireland, with the latter data divided between fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas. They report no significant differences in either age-specific or age- standardized incidence rates of osteosarcoma between fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“Comber et al. also describe several limitations of their study, including uncertainty about fluoridation status of particular areas (the possibility of misclassification), the possibility that the place of residence at the time of diagnosis may not be an accurate proxy for lifetime exposure to fluoridated water, and the lack of an accurate measure of total fluoride exposure. Perhaps the most important limitation pointed out by Comber et al. is the relative rarity of the cancer and the correspondingly wide confidence intervals of the relative risk estimates. They estimate that the risk for a fluoridated population would need to be at least 1.7 times that of the nonfluoridated population (a 70% increase) for a statistically significant effect to be detected. In other words, fluoride could cause a 50-60% increase in risk of osteosarcoma, and this study would not be able to detect it.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“With respect to using the place of residence at the time of diagnosis as a proxy for lifetime exposure to fluoridated water, Comber et al. point out that if fluoride exposure at a specific age is critical to osteosarcoma development (citing Bassin et al. 2006), use of the fluoride estimation at the time of diagnosis is less valuable. In other words, their analysis cannot evaluate the importance of age-specific exposure.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“With respect to the lack of an accurate measure of total fluoride exposure, the authors mention that at least one-third of fluoride intake is estimated to come from sources other than drinking water, citing tea, fish, and toothpaste as examples. The authors do not discuss the possibility that variability in total fluoride intake within the Irish populations could overwhelm differences between populations in fluoride intakes from drinking water alone.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“In summary, the paper by Comber et al. does not demonstrate an absence of a relationship between fluoride exposure and osteosarcoma, simply that any effect of fluoridated water (as opposed to total fluoride intake) is not large enough to detect by the methods employed.”&lt;A href="#_ftn3" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;[3]&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="#_ftnref1" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;[1]&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt; Thiessen IBID&amp;nbsp; Pages 12-14.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="#_ftnref2" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[2]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt; Kim FM, Hayes C, Williams PL, et al. An assessment of bone fluoride and osteosarcoma. &lt;EM&gt;Journal of Dental Research&lt;/EM&gt; 2011; 90(10):1171–1176. &amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/myths/fluoridated-water-fact-sheet#q4" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/myths/fluoridated-water-fact-sheet#q4&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; Accessed 2/14/2017&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="#_ftnref3" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;[3]&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt; Thiessen IBID p. 12.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 21:02:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BillO538145</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-04T21:02:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1528688#M182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;“The evidence that fluoride is more harmful than beneficial is now overwhelming… fluoride may be destroying our bones, our teeth, and our overall health.” &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;- &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;Dr. Hardy Limeback, &amp;nbsp;former President of Canadian ADA, Head of Preventive Dentistry at Univ of Toronto, 2006 National Research Council Scientist (2007)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 2006 National Research Council on Fluoride in Drinking Water commented to the EPA that fluoridation at 1 ppm can be anticipated to be harmful for those with reduced renal function and the elderly. The NRC confirmed that fluoride&amp;nbsp;not excreted by kidneys builds up in bones, resulting in arthritic pain and increased brittleness.&amp;nbsp;However, there were no EPA studies on the whole health impacts of fluoridated water on susceptible population such as kidney patients, children, those with prolonged disease or the elderly. There still aren’t.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, there is mounting science from other sources that “optimally fluoridated” water, which is known to cause varying degrees of dental fluorosis in 58% of Black American adolescents and 36% of White American adolescents, is causing subtle deficits in ability to remember or focus. That same “optimal level” has also been proved in a 2014 study as being nephrotoxic in rats with chronic kidney disease. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects approximately 15% of Americans, although CKD is quadruple the rate in Black Americans, and predictably worse in older Americans.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps the most horrifying part of the story of fluoridation is that not only is at least 50% of every drop of fluoride that has passed the lips of a Baby Boomer permanently stored in bones, fluoride&amp;nbsp;isn't the only poison in packages of fluoride that originate as&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;waste product of aluminum an phosphate industry. 100% of the fluoride sampled in a 2014 study was contaminated with aluminum; arsenic and lead were other common contaminants. In other words, fluoridated water serves as a delivery system for aluminum and lead into our bones and our brains. As we all know, aluminum is associated with Alzheimers in adults, and lead is associated with learning disabilities in children. Approximately 15% of the population who is sensitive to chemicals cite inability to think clearly and overwhelming fatigue as symptoms of exposure to fluoridated water.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our generation was part of a great human experiment. It may have had noble intentions based on the faulty hypothesis that &amp;nbsp;drinking fluoridated water prevented cavities. It is now known that any perceived benefits of fluoride are from tooth brushing. &amp;nbsp;Our grandchildren are the third generation in this travesty. I suggest we all DEMAND the AARP stand up for us and our grandchildren by issuing a strong position paper calling for the cessation of water fluoridation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;SCIENCE REFERENCES&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2014 in Toxicology. Effect of water fluoridation on the development of medial vascular calcification in uremic rats. (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“Optimal levels” worsen kidney function&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561004" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561004&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2015&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;in Neurotoxicology and Teratology. Association of lifetime exposure to fluoride and cognitive functions in Chinese children: A pilot study.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;(&lt;EM&gt;Children with visible dental fluorosis perform&amp;nbsp;less well on memory tasks, correlating with the degree of severity of their fluorosis. One of a series of human and animal studies with the same consistent findings.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25446012" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25446012&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://braindrain.dk/2014/12/mottled-fluoride-debate/" target="_blank"&gt;http://braindrain.dk/2014/12/mottled-fluoride-debate/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2014 in Physiology and Behavior. Fluoride exposure during development affects both cognition and emotion in mice. (&lt;EM&gt;Measurable behavioral changes&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24184405" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24184405&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2014 in International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. A new perspective on metals and other contaminants in fluoridation chemicals. (&lt;EM&gt;All samples of fluoride are&amp;nbsp;contaminated with aluminum, plus other contaminants like arsenic, lead and barium&lt;/EM&gt;);&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999851" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999851&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/sites/default/files/Mullenix%202014-2-2.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/sites/default/files/Mullenix%202014-2-2.pdf&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2014 in Scientific World Journal. Water Fluoridation: A Critical Review of the Physiological Effects of Ingested Fluoride as a Public Health Intervention. (&lt;EM&gt;Health risks and cost don't justify minimal&amp;nbsp;and questionable dental benefit&lt;/EM&gt;.): &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/293019/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/293019/&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;RACIAL INEQUITY (FOIA)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are three Oct 2014 news articles on the content of the Freedom of Information Act documents. Rev. Andrew Young, former UN ambassador has pursued them with the CDC, but to little effect. Civil Rights leaders have been calling for an end to community water fluoridation (CWF) since 2011.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. Black Americans disproportionately harmed:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/19317-feds-blacks-suffer-most-from-fluoride-fluoridate-anyway" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/19317-feds-blacks-suffer-most-from-fluoride-fluoridate-anyway#&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. CDC, ADA and Pew inappropriate relationships:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://benswann.com/do-newly-released-emails-reveal-conflict-of-interest-between-the-cdc-and-the-ada/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://benswann.com/do-newly-released-emails-reveal-conflict-of-interest-between-the-cdc-and-the-ada/&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;3. Kidneys, Civil Rights &amp;amp; Ralph Nader:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2014/10/428383.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2014/10/428383.shtml&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 LEGAL ARGUMENT (GROSS DISPROPORTIONALITY)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a legal initiative in Peel, Ontario (pop 1.3m) to remove fluoride from the water supply based on the principle of gross disproportionality, i.e. marginal benefit does not justify great risk of harm. There is also a political effort afoot in Canadian govt to mandate fluoridation and thereby make the legal argument moot. &lt;STRONG&gt;I suggest this document is well-worth printing. &lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/peel.june2014.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/peel.june2014.pdf&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a. The first 19 pages of this document is about the legal strategy. It includes summary of US legal cases that found water fluoridation harmful to the public, but legal under US "police power" mandate.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;b. Starting on page 20 is a devastating affidavit by Dr. Kathleen Thiessen, NAS/NRC scientist and international expert in risk assessment. Very readable summary of science indicating harm to populations in “optimally” fluoridated communities.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;POPULATION WITH LOW CHEMICAL THRESHOLD&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In excess of 25% of previously healthy Gulf War Veterans have Multiple Chemical Sensitivities, which includes sensitivity to fluoride. See:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/committee_documents/gwiandhealthofgwveterans_rac-gwvireport_2008.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/committee_documents/gwiandhealthofgwveterans_rac-gwvireport_2008.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;EXCERPT&lt;/STRONG&gt;: “It is&amp;nbsp;well established that&amp;nbsp;some people are more vulnerable&amp;nbsp;to adverse effects of certain&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;chemicals than others,&amp;nbsp;due to variability in biological processes that neutralize those chemicals, and clear them from&amp;nbsp;the body.”&amp;nbsp;-&amp;nbsp;Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses 2008&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Affidavit of Dr. Hans Moolenburgh:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/affidavit-moolenburgh.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/affidavit-moolenburgh.pdf&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Except&lt;/STRONG&gt;: “As a summary of our research, we are now convinced that fluoridation of the water supplies causes a low grade intoxication of the whole population, with only the approximately&amp;nbsp;5% most sensitive persons showing acute symptoms.The whole population being subjected to low grade poisoning means that their immune systems are constantly&amp;nbsp;overtaxed. With all the other poisonous influences in our environment, this can hasten health calamities.”&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;PubMed Listed Studies on immune system response:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;a. Fluoride makes allergies worse, rats (1990): &lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1707853" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1707853&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;b. Fluoride makes allergies worse, in vitro&amp;nbsp;(1999): &lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9892783?dopt=Abstract" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9892783&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;c. Immune system of the gut (2010):&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.hindawi.com/journals/iji/2010/823710/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.hindawi.com/journals/iji/2010/823710/&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;d.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ASIA Syndrome, adjuvant impact (2011): &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20708902" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20708902&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;e.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Gene predicts fluoride sensitivity (2015):&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25556215" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25556215&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;f. &amp;nbsp;Brain has an immune system (2015):&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26030524" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26030524&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AARP - STAND UP on our behalf!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2018 22:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1528688#M182</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-26T22:38:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530258#M184</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Fluoridation is an excellent issue for AARP to spearhead. This practice of adding toxic chemicals to raise the fluoride level to prevent tooth decay is NOT safe and is Not even effective!! And for seniors it jut adds more burden on our bodies especially our brains!! Fluoridation has become a political issue when&amp;nbsp; organizations like AARP need to look past the years of propaganda and endorsements and expose the harm out weieghs the supposed benefits! THANK you for opening up this topic ...AARP please take this on!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530258#M184</guid>
      <dc:creator>ri1666</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-06T19:20:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530285#M185</link>
      <description>Yes!! FLUORIDE - I am 61 and my wife is 65. This is an extremely important topic! I am retired with a degree in Environmental Sciences including Biological Chemistry with added studies in Nutrition.&lt;BR /&gt;Seniors are more at risk for all kinds of health complications, because as we ingest Fluoride in the water, foods, and from other sources, it accumulates.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The CDC states that half of the Fluoride we ingest, accumulates in the body!!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since (FLUORIDE) F- is the MOST REACTIVE ION of any other element, it can EASILY REACT with many of the body’s minerals and chemicals.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See what the CDC says...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC - BONES and JOINTS&lt;BR /&gt;“…exposure to higher levels of fluoride may harm your health. Skeletal fluorosis can be caused by eating, drinking or breathing very large amounts of fluorides. This disease only occurs after long term exposures (because Fluoride accumulates with the ongoing daily bone formations of every age group) and can cause denser bones,&lt;BR /&gt;joint pain,&lt;BR /&gt;and a limited range of joint movement.&lt;BR /&gt;…severe cases, the spine completely rigid…”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC&lt;BR /&gt;“…fluoride can result in denser bones…&lt;BR /&gt;...these bones are often&lt;BR /&gt;more brittle&lt;BR /&gt;or fragile&lt;BR /&gt;than normal bone&lt;BR /&gt;and there is an increased risk of older men and women breaking a bone.&lt;BR /&gt;Some studies have also found a higher risk of bone fractures in older men and women at fluoride levels typically found in fluoridated water….”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC&lt;BR /&gt;40% of children suffer “dental fluorosis"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC - TOPICAL ONLY is effective&lt;BR /&gt;The CDC (Center for Disease Control) states that: “(Fluoride’s) actions primarily are topical for both adults and children”.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC - teeth breaking&lt;BR /&gt;“…in severe cases, the teeth are pitted and are fragile, and sometimes the teeth can break.”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC – The CDC’s ATSDR warns about consuming large amounts of fluoride in that “…it can cause stomach aches, vomiting, and diarrhea. Extremely large amounts can cause death by affecting your heart.”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I WANT MORE ARTICLES AND SUPPORT from AARP about exposing Fluoride's adverse health affects to the elderly (and young children or infants).</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530285#M185</guid>
      <dc:creator>tt59717964</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-06T19:38:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530832#M187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Extremely important topic from my community and for those of us over 50 as well. &amp;nbsp;If you've ever gone to an orthopedic sturgeon and been told, you have arthritis, bone spurs, thickening and brittleness of the bones, osteosclerosis, then you most likely have damage from too much fluoride. It's called skeletal fluorosis in just about every other county. &amp;nbsp;It is a chronic crippling problem that by that point you are aware of it there isn't much you can do about it but suffer and bear the expense. &amp;nbsp;The mayo clinic did one study associating it with too much black tea, but they've pretty much been told to back off fluoride if they want to advance their careers. &amp;nbsp; the original studies in 1946 by the ADA also clearly demonstrated this problem in the lab rats.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 19:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530832#M187</guid>
      <dc:creator>pablomck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-07T19:25:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531351#M188</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:07:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531351#M188</guid>
      <dc:creator>lp47633557</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-08T20:07:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531792#M189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If AARP has ever taken on a cuase that could have a great impact on the health of our community .... THIS IS IT!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:23:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531792#M189</guid>
      <dc:creator>rb98221521</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-09T18:23:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THYROID: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539756#M190</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;“The addition of fluorides to drinking water was, and is, a mistake.” &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;- Dr. Robert Isaacson, 2006 National Research Council Scientist (2007)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ON THYROID&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you see this week's Newsweek article on a nationwide English study?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;People living in fluoridated communities have significantly higher incidences of low thyroid. Over&amp;nbsp;50% more incidence in "optimally" fluoridated communities than in communities with &amp;lt;.3 ppm. &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.newsweek.com/water-fluoridation-may-increase-risk-underactive-thyroid-disorder-309173"&gt;http://www.newsweek.com/water-fluoridation-may-increase-risk-underactive-thyroid-disorder-309173&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's not surprising. There are studies from the early 20th century connecting various thyroid and parathyroid conditions with fluorides in the water and mottled teeth. The 2006 NRC also confirmed that fluoride even at low concentrations disrupts endocrine function, i.e. thyroid hormones. Sadly, gung-ho dentists urged on by business who stood to profit convinced government that&amp;nbsp;fluoride was some sort of magic bullet. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fluoridation is wrecking our health and the health of our grandkids!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Phone and write AARP... tell them to take a stand against water fluoridation, now!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2015 19:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539756#M190</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-08T19:13:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADHD: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539770#M191</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;"The evidence against the safety of this public health policy will keep mounting and never disappear again. My ignorance of fluoride in the beginning was a matter of chance. If you ignore this evidence today, it will be a matter of choice.”&lt;/STRONG&gt; - &lt;EM&gt;Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, Head Toxicologist at Forsyth Dental Center (1999)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ON&amp;nbsp;HYPERACTIVITY&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See TODAY's study published in Environmental Health that correlates ADHD (hyperactivity) in children with fluoridation. This is only the latest in 20 years of studies on animals and humans proving that fluoride in utero or youth not only permanently mottles the teeth of some children, but also permanently scrambles their brains:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2015 Ecologic study:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/14/1/17/abstract"&gt;http://www.ehjournal.net/content/14/1/17/abstract&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1995 Animal study: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/mullenix-1995.pdf"&gt;http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/mullenix-1995.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend&amp;nbsp;this 1996 talk by Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, the author of the 1995 study:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hci7BnWydAo"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hci7BnWydAo&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fluoridation is wrecking our health and the health of our grandkids!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Phone and write AARP... tell them to take a stand against water fluoridation, now!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:04:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539770#M191</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-27T19:04:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554257#M214</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sometimes, by the time you get to 50 or 60, people seem to think it is time to be in poor health, need a joint replacement, have thyroid dysfunction and diabetes. &amp;nbsp;With all the evidence of Fluoride being an endocrine dysrupter and known to Fluoride deposits in our bones, I imagine if AARP would take a long hard look at this topic, you would have numerous supporters from all walks of life. &amp;nbsp;The young people of the nation are beginning to see the illogical addition of Fluoride to our water supply and are shaking&amp;nbsp;their heads at us older adults wondering why we let this continue for so long.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 01:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554257#M214</guid>
      <dc:creator>kf4601639</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-13T01:55:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554966#M215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Adding additional contaminants to water is not required by law and should be&amp;nbsp;seen as a hindrance in the goal to provide the cleanest most natural water to customers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:30:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554966#M215</guid>
      <dc:creator>kf4601639</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-31T18:30:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1573728#M229</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your intelligent and educational posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you look on the Periodic Table of Elements, you will see&amp;nbsp;Fluorine, Chlorine and Bromine (a common baking additive) all displace Iodine ~ which is vital to healthy&amp;nbsp;thyroid function. No wonder thyroid malfunction has become&amp;nbsp;rampant! We once added iodine to our table salt to insure adequate levels. Now,&amp;nbsp;that effort has been&amp;nbsp;sabotaged.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And honestly, if fluoride worked in preventing cavities, wouldn't America be cavity-free by now?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2015 03:00:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1573728#M229</guid>
      <dc:creator>dd67136683</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-17T03:00:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1574706#M230</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;From:&lt;EM&gt; &lt;A href="http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/erin-brockovich-and-signers-put-health-agencies-notice-april-2015" target="_self"&gt;Moms Against Fluoridation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="row"&gt;&lt;DIV class="sixteen columns"&gt;&lt;DIV class="page_heading"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;Erin Brockovich and signers put the Health agencies on notice: April, 2015&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="row"&gt;&lt;DIV class="sixteen columns "&gt;&lt;DIV class="region region-content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="block block-system"&gt;&lt;DIV class="content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="node node-news-headline node-promoted node-news-headline node-promoted clearfix"&gt;&lt;DIV class="content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"&gt;&lt;DIV class="field-items"&gt;&lt;DIV class="field-item even"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Erin Brockovich has just put the government on big notice of their shortcomings in interpreting science and protecting the&amp;nbsp;health of American citizens.&amp;nbsp; Please take time to read this document about fluoridation.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;This is one of the very the best documents/ letters we have seen.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The references are great; the critical thinking is excellent, and the range and depth she covers are compelling. &amp;nbsp;&lt;U&gt;And, it has some 'teeth&lt;/U&gt;'.&amp;nbsp; Just read the first 2 pages if you are short on time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/sites/default/files/pdf-documents/Brockovich-Letter-to-US-Natl-Acad-Science-Inst-Medicine.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Read Letter&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I suggest the Signature page (p 16) and the Questions attachment&amp;nbsp;(last page) provide the best summary of this 24 page document, but go ahead, read the whole thing. It's worth your time! &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 22:26:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1574706#M230</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-19T22:26:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1580164#M235</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;“&lt;STRONG&gt;Industry has learned that debating the science is much easier and more effective than debating the policy. In field after field, year after year, conclusions that might support regulation are always disputed. Animal data are deemed not relevant, human data not representative, and exposure data not reliable.&lt;/STRONG&gt;” &lt;EM&gt;- David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, in “Doubt Is Their Product” (2008)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Prof. Rita Barnett-Rose of Chapman University includes a nice mix of science and law in her 2014 legal analysis of the U.S. fluoridation policy. She concludes, "&lt;EM&gt;The evidence continues to suggest that compulsory water fluoridation is no longer justifiable as a public health benefit.... &lt;STRONG&gt;the cessatio&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;n of all compulsory water fluoridation schemes should be the goal of all public health agencies, ethical lawmakers, and informed citizens.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See: &lt;A href="http://works.bepress.com/rita_barnett/3/" target="_blank"&gt;http://works.bepress.com/rita_barnett/3/&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phone, email or write the AARP directly. Tell them they need to step up and write a position statement opposing fluoridation, for the sake of the elderly, those in&amp;nbsp;fragile health, pregnant women and their fetuses, and the very young.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 15:27:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1580164#M235</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-01T15:27:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1588061#M236</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"When a statistical analysis of 1,000 children was conducted in London, and results were not as fluoridation proponents wanted, the study was quickly abandoned.&lt;/STRONG&gt;" &lt;EM&gt;- Dr. Malcolm Naylor, 1987 winner of Tomes Medal for imminence in dental research&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;Cochrane is the international gold standard panel for public health review. They found &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;bias rather than benefit&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; in their review of the dental studies. Moreover, like every large independent review of the dental science, the Cochrane panel finds that the evidence of dental benefit is poor quality, highly suspect, and does &lt;EM&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; support the rationale that fluoridation&amp;nbsp;benefits the poor. In the meantime, the scientific and legal arguments&amp;nbsp;against fluoridation as harmful to health mount.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 Cochrane review of dental studies&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cochrane.org/CD010856/ORAL_water-fluoridation-to-prevent-tooth-decay" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cochrane.org/CD010856/ORAL_water-fluoridation-to-prevent-tooth-decay&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 Newsweek article on Cochrane review&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.newsweek.com/fluoridation-may-not-prevent-cavities-huge-study-shows-348251" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.newsweek.com/fluoridation-may-not-prevent-cavities-huge-study-shows-348251&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 Opposition&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.earthclinic.com/news/why-the-us-should-ban-fluoride-in-drinking-water-by-jason-uttley.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.earthclinic.com/news/why-the-us-should-ban-fluoride-in-drinking-water-by-jason-uttley.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Write the AARP and your local newspaper!&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;Tell them that Cochrane confirms the dentists are lying and that you side with consumer adovcate Erin Brockovich, Civil Rights leaders, and &lt;SPAN&gt;21st century researchers like the&amp;nbsp;Harvard team of neuroscientists&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;in opposing fluoridation as a Human Rights violation!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1588061#M236</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-02T18:55:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596602#M238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;I&gt;"&lt;/I&gt;Fluoride is an enzyme poison, in the same class as cyanide, oxalate, or azide ... it is capable of a very wide variety of harmful effects, even at low doses. It is a scientific disgrace that a well organized lobby of the American Dental Association ever managed to stampede American legislators into ignoring the highly technical but very cogent objection to fluoridation."&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;I&gt;- James B. Patrick, Ph.D., antibiotics research scientist at National Institute of Health&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Latest study on fluoride concerns its capacity to cause &lt;STRONG&gt;INFLAMMATIONS&lt;/STRONG&gt; even at very small exposure level, such as that from water fluoridation. I especially like this key finding, "&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Long-term exposure to fluoride may affect activities of many enzymes&lt;/EM&gt;."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we really want a drug that interferes with the normal functioning of our enzymes, as well as causing or worsening inflammations to be an ubiquitous contaminant in our water and food? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2015 in Toxicology in Vitro. Fluoride as a factor initiating and potentiating inflammation in THP1 differentiated monocytes/macrophages&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233315001605" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233315001605&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Baby Boomers - this is your life and the lives of your children, grandchildren, and g-grandchildren at risk. &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DO SOMETHING&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Contact the AARP, your politicians, the White House.... &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;tell them to get the F* out of our water&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;.... Municipalities can use the financial savings to replace ineffective and dangerous chloramine which also kills enzymes and causes disease with a more effective and safe disinfectant alternative. And you can use the better quality of life and lower doctors bills to enjoy life.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:44:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596602#M238</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T14:44:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596607#M239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For those who like visuals, this 1955 film shows what happens to &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;enzymes&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; in human blood with fluoride concentrations consistent with drinking a glass of "optimally" fluoridated water.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32op3srFDk8" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32op3srFDk8&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This enzyme death in the blood explains why some of us experience&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Chizzola maculae&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;, a distinctive bruise like hive that affects a minority of women and children in the early stages of fluoride poisoning. It's an abnormal blood coagulation and the destruction of blood vessels, an autoimmune reaction.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="page"&gt;&lt;DIV class="section"&gt;&lt;DIV class="layoutArea"&gt;&lt;DIV class="column"&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1978 Major Fluoride Symptoms:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/flier_waldbott_symptoms_ftgd.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/flier_waldbott_symptoms_ftgd.pdf&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1977 Blood Clotting in Patients with Chizzola Maculae. Fluoride. vol.10:1. p 29-33. http://&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.fluorideresearch.org/101/files/FJ1977_v10_n1_p001-044.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;www.fluorideresearch.org/101/files/FJ1977_v10_n1_p001-044.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:45:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596607#M239</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T14:45:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596637#M240</link>
      <description>First, eating and drinking fluoride ion has no effect whatsoever on dental caries, as published in detailed studies by Zigelbecker, and also by Sutton, and by Teotia and Teotia, and also by Yamouyiannis. The fluoride concentration in saliva that bathes teeth topically (at 0.016 ppm, NRC, 2006) is 75,000 times less than that in toothpaste. Second, systemic fluoride dissolves in the blood and throughout all tissues at 0.2 ppm from regular consumption of treated drinking water. The ion accumulates lifelong permanently into bone causing the formation of new bone of poor quality. We now have 1/3 million U.S. elderly who suffer from broken hips which usually is lethal due to pneumonia that ensues while waiting for fluoridated bone to heal. Cruel experiments in dogs indicate that broken bones heal far more slowly when animals are given fluoridated water. Finally, adding fluoride into drinking water is illegal. No EPA regulated water contaminant, including fluoride, can be discharged into public drinking water intentionally without an NPDES permit from the EPA, as stipulated by the Clean Water Act. And the Safe Drinking Water Act prohibits the requirement of any substance added into water other than to sanitize the water. The EPA Office of Water argues that, as a substance that is being used to treat humans, the FDA is responsible for regulating fluoridation. The FDA argues that, as a pollutant being added intentionally into water, the EPA is in charge of its regulation. The HHS recommended that fluoride levels not exceed 0l7 ppm but refuses to accept liability for its use, in particular to avoid litigation over the easily proven increase in unwanted unsightly abnormal dental enamel hypoplasia dental fluorosis that plagues 42% of U.S. teens as a result of water "fluoridation." Please get involved and halt this absurd experiment from being continued.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:48:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596637#M240</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs5526</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T16:48:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596648#M241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great idea!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm starting a coalition in NYC Against Artificial Fluoridation - Fluoride in not a nutrient, we shoudn't be exposing ourselves to neurotoxins by drinking the toxic waste product of the fertilizer industry. Please email nyc.caaf@gmail.com for more information.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596648#M241</guid>
      <dc:creator>sn4302</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T17:22:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596650#M242</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a really great article: please help get this neurotoxin out of our water, and our food.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am starting a coalition against artificial fluoridation in NYC - please email nyc.caaf@gmail.com if you are interested in helping getting the word out - this stuff is toxic, not a nutrient, not safe and we shouldn't be drinking it!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:26:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596650#M242</guid>
      <dc:creator>sn4302</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T17:26:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1598286#M245</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dr. Richard Sauerheber who added a post in this thread is a chemist, college professor and researcher who has published some excellent work on the toxicity of industrial fluoride in drinking water. As a result of his research, he has written letters opposing fluoridation to the FDA and other regulatory agencies, urging they take action, i.e. actually consider science to regulate the industries in order protect the health of the public:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2013 Publication:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3690253/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3690253/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2010-2011 Letters: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/ask-dr-sauerheber" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/ask-dr-sauerheber&lt;/A&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, doctor!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;“When industry and government agree, people suffer.”&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;EM&gt;- Proverb&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 13:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1598286#M245</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-18T13:11:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

