<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Scientific Consensus Supports Community Water Fluoridation (CWF) in Brain Health</title>
    <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/2049748#M1072</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dr. Osmunson – Regarding your (08-27-2018 01:40 AM) comment:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, the title (and my claim) is the “Scientific Consensus Continues to Support Community Water Fluoridation (CWF)”.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate the opportunity to ask you several questions about your comments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q1) &lt;/STRONG&gt;If you choose to arbitrarily fabricate a different name than Scientific Consensus, then please explain how the “&lt;EM&gt;Endorsement Consensus&lt;/EM&gt;” of a dozen or so alternate health, environmental, spiritual, consumer and cultural organizations you listed by you (07-09-2018 09:40 PM) and CarryAnne (06-28-2018 07:32 AM) is more credible than the “&lt;EM&gt;Endorsement Consensus&lt;/EM&gt;” of the 100+ nationally and internationally recognized science and health organizations that continue to recognize the benefits of fluoridation?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;~&amp;gt; &lt;A href="http://ada.org/en/public-programs/advocating-for-the-public/fluoride-and-fluoridation/fluoridation-facts/fluoridation-facts-compendium" target="_blank"&gt;http://ada.org/en/public-programs/advocating-for-the-public/fluoride-and-fluoridation/fluoridation-facts/fluoridation-facts-compendium&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;~&amp;gt; &lt;A href="http://ilikemyteeth.org/fluoridation/why-fluoride/" target="_blank"&gt;http://ilikemyteeth.org/fluoridation/why-fluoride/&lt;/A&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It does not matter whether the CWF Consensus is called a “Scientific Consensus” or an “Endorsement Consensus”.&amp;nbsp; It appears to be a diversionary tactic to avoid addressing the fact that only a small minority of health care professionals in the world are represented by the organizations you listed as objecting to CWF.&amp;nbsp; Exactly how many health professionals are represented by the AAEM, ICIM IABDM, IAOMT, HAD and ICA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q2) &amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;What group of experts do you and other fluoridation opponents (FOs) accept as a reliable majority of scientists and health professionals who (as a group) are educated and experienced enough to accurately evaluate the 70-year body of evidence and form a legitimate educated consensus about the benefits and risks of CWF?&amp;nbsp; Obviously (according to FOs), it is none of the mainstream science and health organizations or their members who have not joined the anti-F crusade despite what you believe to be conclusive and obvious evidence of harm.&amp;nbsp; According to you, these professionals are, “like a bunch of lemmings, they all have faith in each other, but not the facts to support fluoridation.” &amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Do you accept CarryAnne’s depiction of ADA and EPA and ATA members as "&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;greedy, ignorant, willfully blind, morally corrupt, cowards &amp;amp;/or sociopaths&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and do you extend it &amp;nbsp;to the hundreds of thousands of professionals who are members of all the other science and health care organizations that continue to recognize the benefits of CWF who have not publically denounced CWF?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q3)&lt;/STRONG&gt; If the representatives of those health organizations that publically recognize the benefits of fluoridation who have not publically denounced CWF have completely ignored &amp;amp;/or misinterpreted the body of evidence you believe proves CWF to be a dangerous practice and blindly followed each other, &lt;STRONG&gt;how can you possibly trust any of them to be competent in any other areas of their practices&lt;/STRONG&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These organizations include: The World Health Organization which represents 191 countries, the British Dental Association (around 22,000 members), the British Medical Association (over 156,000 members), the Irish Dental Association (over 1,800 members), the American&amp;nbsp; Dental Association (over 114,000 members), the American Medical Association (over 200,000 members), the American Academy of Pediatrics (around 64,000 members), the Canadian Dental Association (over 16,000 members), the Canadian Medical Association (80,000 members), The Australian Dental Association (over 11,000 members), the Australian Medical Association (over 28,000 members), the New Zealand Dental Association (2,026 members), and so on…&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Obviously the same question applies to all of the representatives of the scientific organizations that publically recognize the benefits of CWF and have not denounced the practice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with your statement, “Consensus is not scientific evidence”, however you seem to be missing the fact that the Scientific Consensus is based on an evaluation of the Scientific Evidence.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q4)&lt;/STRONG&gt; Do you accept the Wikipedia definition of &lt;STRONG&gt;Scientific Consensus&lt;/STRONG&gt; as “the collective judgment, position, and opinion of the community of scientists in a particular field of study. Consensus implies general agreement, though not necessarily unanimity.”?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q4A)&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;If NO –&lt;/STRONG&gt; Explain what you would call an agreement of conclusions based on an evaluation of the relevant body of evidence by relevant experts. Then explain whether you would accept that term as applying to the four conclusions outlined below and CWF.&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Q4B)&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;If YES –&lt;/STRONG&gt; Explain how you can claim that the anti-F position is in any way, “&lt;EM&gt;the collective judgment, position, and opinion of the community of scientists in a particular field of study&lt;/EM&gt;” when only about six health organizations and their practitioners endorse it?&lt;BR /&gt;-- Do you accept what I consider a fact that the majority of relevant science or health organizations and practitioners accept the three scientific /health related conclusions below?&lt;BR /&gt;-- Do you accept the term Scientific Consensus as applicable to the three scientific/ health related conclusions below that are accepted by the majority of relevant science or health organizations and practitioners?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;(a)&lt;/STRONG&gt; The benefits of brushing with fluoridated toothpaste (reducing the risk of tooth decay and improving dental health) outweigh any known risks;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;(b) &lt;/STRONG&gt;The benefits of adding disinfectants to treat drinking water outweigh risks of ingesting residual disinfectants and disinfection byproducts even though, according to anti-F “logic”, there is no “&lt;EM&gt;dose control&lt;/EM&gt;” (07-27-2018 12:55 PM) and “&lt;EM&gt;there is not now nor has ever been any consensus of safety&lt;/EM&gt;” (08-21-2018 01:14 PM) for ingesting sodium hypochlorite, chloroform and other disinfection byproducts, and, as far as I am aware, “&lt;EM&gt;There are no prospective randomized controlled trials, good science, supporting your theory for &lt;/EM&gt;[the safety of] &lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;dilute short contact topical or ‘ingested’&lt;/EM&gt; [chloroform and DBPs]” (08-19-2018 02:18 AM).&amp;nbsp; If you accept the consensus of disinfection, it is difficult to understand how you can dismiss the consensus on CWF;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;(c)&lt;/STRONG&gt; The benefits of vaccination for members of a community far outweigh the known risks.&amp;nbsp; Consequences of discontinuing vaccination would be serious – probably catastrophic –&amp;nbsp; if a majority of individuals chose to skip vaccination for flu, polio, MMR, DTP, chicken pox, shingles (for elders), etc&lt;STRONG&gt;.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The IAOMT constitutes only one of the six alternative health organizations and 6-7 environmental, spiritual and cultural groups&amp;nbsp; you and CarryAnne listed as supporting the anti-F opinions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q5)&lt;/STRONG&gt; Have all of the other anti-F groups published “position papers on fluoridation” – if not, are they and their representatives all “&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;like a bunch of lemmings, they all have faith in each other, but not the facts to&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; [disprove the benefits and effectiveness of] &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;fluoridation&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;”?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;“&lt;EM&gt;Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyCCJ6B2WE" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyCCJ6B2WE&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your requests (08-27-2018 01:40 AM), “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Please provide the names and internet links to the top three organizations' position papers on fluoridation.&amp;nbsp; … Randy, relying on these organizations for endorsements is quite different than relying on them for quality position papers referenced with primary research&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;” remind me of the ‘wizard’ behind the curtain frantically trying to divert attention from reality.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First, take a look at the IAOMT &amp;nbsp;“&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;Position Paper against Fluoride Use…&lt;/FONT&gt;”. &lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;It is simply a blanket condemnation of exposure to fluoride ions from any source at any exposure level and included newspaper and magazine articles, blogs, etc. provided as “references”.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct me if I am wrong, but it does not appear that the IAOMT conducted any of the primary research. &amp;nbsp;They simply collected and listed all of the studies which had concluded (or could be adjusted to appear as though they concluded) exposure to fluoride ions was harmful and ineffective.&amp;nbsp; The “Position Paper” was not even a review that compared and evaluated studies with different designs, qualities, conclusions, etc. to present a considered, scientific evaluation. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;As David pointed out (08-27-2018 02:14 PM), “&lt;EM&gt;So, when I look at that "Position Statement, and see quotes about Bone Fractures and Weakened Bones which may occur under certain conditions, which have nothing to do with water fluoridation, I think a normal person &lt;/EM&gt;[particularly trained and experienced &lt;EM&gt;‘normal&lt;/EM&gt;’ health care professionals] &lt;EM&gt;would conclude that this statement was cherry-picked and taken out of context.&amp;nbsp; If you would like to explain what those certain conditions are, and provide primary evidence from the 2006 NRC Report explaining the statement, so that we can all see it in its full context, that would be fine.&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;But to provide a link to a deceptive opinion piece is hardly ‘primary evidence’ of anything&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The IAOMT “Position Paper” could be copied/pasted by any of the other anti-F groups, and they too would, according to your beliefs, have published a “Position Paper”.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Your insistence on an arbitrary fabrication of "&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Endorsement Consensus&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;” to replace “Scientific Consensus” in the specialized area of CWF, your definition of the majority of health practitioners as “&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;a bunch of lemming&lt;/FONT&gt;s”&lt;/EM&gt; who ignorantly or willingly ignore what you consider “facts”, and your belief that a comprehensive list of anti-F references in a “&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Position Paper&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;” somehow constitutes all the relevant “&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;facts, primary research, not estimates based on assumptions&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;” needed to understand all the complexities of CWF are simply diversionary tactics.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; You have created a curtain and loudspeaker with towering flames and general chaos designed to hide the fact that fluoridation opponents are a vocal minority of activists who have not been able to provide legitimate evidence sufficient to change the Scientific Consensus (or even the "Endorsement Consensus") that CWF is a safe and beneficial public health initiative.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is difficult to imagine you actually believe that because position papers with several thousand references to fluoridation-supporting research is not readily available to the public (most of whom will never read or understand them anyway) means that those thousands of professionals responsible for their patient’s care and wellbeing have not examined reviews and studies like those below and accepted their conclusions as more legitimate than the “Position Papers” of anti-F activists?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;References to peer reviewed reviews and studies which support the benefits &amp;amp;/or lack of harmful effects of CWF (with citations of primary research) that you apparently missed.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately, comment length limitations prevent the posting of most review conclusions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The 2018 Water Fluoridation: Health Monitoring Report for England&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~&amp;gt; &lt;A href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/water-fluoridation-health-monitoring-report-for-england-2018" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/water-fluoridation-health-monitoring-report-for-england-2018&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The 2018 Food Safety Authority of Ireland Fluoride Report&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~&amp;gt; &lt;A href="https://www.fsai.ie/news_centre/tds_fluoride_30042018.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.fsai.ie/news_centre/tds_fluoride_30042018.html&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="http://www.fsai.ie/publications/fluoride_study_2014-2016" target="_blank"&gt;www.fsai.ie/publications/fluoride_study_2014-2016&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The 2016 World Health Organization report: Fluoride and Oral Health&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~&amp;gt; &lt;A href="http://who.int/oral_health/publications/2016_fluoride_oral_health.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://who.int/oral_health/publications/2016_fluoride_oral_health.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The 2017 Swedish report, Effects of Fluoride in the Drinking Water&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~&amp;gt; &lt;A href="https://www.ifau.se/globalassets/pdf/se/2017/wp2017-20-the-effects-of-fluoride-in-the-drinking-water.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ifau.se/globalassets/pdf/se/2017/wp2017-20-the-effects-of-fluoride-in-the-drinking-water.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;T&lt;STRONG&gt;he 2016 Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council Fluoridation Report&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;BR /&gt;~&amp;gt; &lt;A href="https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/eh43-0" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/eh43-0&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The 2014 Royal Society of New Zealand, Health effects of water fluoridation&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp; A review of the scientific evidence:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~&amp;gt; &lt;A href="https://royalsociety.org.nz/assets/documents/Health-effects-of-water-fluoridation-Aug-2014-corrected-Jan-2015.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://royalsociety.org.nz/assets/documents/Health-effects-of-water-fluoridation-Aug-2014-corrected-Jan-2015.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;The 2011 European SCHER review&lt;/STRONG&gt;, Critical review of any new evidence on the hazard profile, health effects, and human exposure to fluoride and the fluoridating agents of drinking water&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Genotoxicity –&lt;/STRONG&gt; “&lt;EM&gt;Positive genotoxicity findings in vivo were only observed at doses that were highly toxic&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;to animals, while lower doses were generally negative for genotoxicity&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Carcinogenicity –&lt;/STRONG&gt; “&lt;EM&gt;On the basis of the results from the most adequate long-term carcinogenicity studies,&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;there is only equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity of fluoride in male rats and no consistent evidence of carcinogenicity in mice&lt;/EM&gt;”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Carcinogenicity, &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Epidemiological studies &lt;/STRONG&gt;–&amp;nbsp; “&lt;EM&gt;SCHER agrees that epidemiological studies do not indicate a clear link between fluoride in drinking water, and osteosarcoma and cancer in general. There is no evidence from animal studies to support the link, &lt;STRONG&gt;thus fluoride cannot be classified as carcinogenic&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;.”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Neurotoxicity –&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;nbsp;“&lt;EM&gt;SCHER concludes that fluoride at concentrations in drinking water permitted in the EU does not influence the reproductive capacity&lt;/EM&gt;.”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Mechanism of fluoride action in caries prevention –&lt;/STRONG&gt; “&lt;EM&gt;The predominant beneficial cariostatic effects of fluoride in erupted teeth occur locally at the tooth surface. This could be achieved by fluoridated toothpaste, &lt;STRONG&gt;fluoride- containing water&lt;/STRONG&gt;, fluoridated salt, etc. maintaining elevated intraoral fluoride levels of the teeth, dental biofilm and saliva throughout the day&lt;/EM&gt;.”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~&amp;gt; &lt;A href="https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/environmental_risks/docs/scher_o_139.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/environmental_risks/docs/scher_o_139.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;According to the 2006 NRC review&lt;/STRONG&gt;, “Fluoride in Drinking Water”, the “&lt;EM&gt;committee was asked to evaluate independently the scientific basis of EPA’s MCLG of 4 mg/L and SMCL of 2 mg/L in drinking water and the adequacy of those guidelines to protect children and others from adverse health effects&lt;/EM&gt;”&amp;nbsp; The review did not conclude there was ANY REASON (no adverse health effects) to lower the Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level of fluoride ions in drinking water of 2.0 ppm (nearly three times the optimal level).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not a review, but important recent evidence from a study promoted by fluoridation opponents.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The 2018 National Toxicity Program study&lt;/STRONG&gt;, An Evaluation of Neurotoxicity Following Fluoride Exposure from Gestational Through Adult Ages in Long-Evans Hooded Rats:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~&amp;gt; &lt;A href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12640-018-9870-x" target="_blank"&gt;https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12640-018-9870-x&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:58:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RandyJ913440</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-29T21:58:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1528688#M182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;“The evidence that fluoride is more harmful than beneficial is now overwhelming… fluoride may be destroying our bones, our teeth, and our overall health.” &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;- &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;Dr. Hardy Limeback, &amp;nbsp;former President of Canadian ADA, Head of Preventive Dentistry at Univ of Toronto, 2006 National Research Council Scientist (2007)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 2006 National Research Council on Fluoride in Drinking Water commented to the EPA that fluoridation at 1 ppm can be anticipated to be harmful for those with reduced renal function and the elderly. The NRC confirmed that fluoride&amp;nbsp;not excreted by kidneys builds up in bones, resulting in arthritic pain and increased brittleness.&amp;nbsp;However, there were no EPA studies on the whole health impacts of fluoridated water on susceptible population such as kidney patients, children, those with prolonged disease or the elderly. There still aren’t.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, there is mounting science from other sources that “optimally fluoridated” water, which is known to cause varying degrees of dental fluorosis in 58% of Black American adolescents and 36% of White American adolescents, is causing subtle deficits in ability to remember or focus. That same “optimal level” has also been proved in a 2014 study as being nephrotoxic in rats with chronic kidney disease. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects approximately 15% of Americans, although CKD is quadruple the rate in Black Americans, and predictably worse in older Americans.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps the most horrifying part of the story of fluoridation is that not only is at least 50% of every drop of fluoride that has passed the lips of a Baby Boomer permanently stored in bones, fluoride&amp;nbsp;isn't the only poison in packages of fluoride that originate as&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;waste product of aluminum an phosphate industry. 100% of the fluoride sampled in a 2014 study was contaminated with aluminum; arsenic and lead were other common contaminants. In other words, fluoridated water serves as a delivery system for aluminum and lead into our bones and our brains. As we all know, aluminum is associated with Alzheimers in adults, and lead is associated with learning disabilities in children. Approximately 15% of the population who is sensitive to chemicals cite inability to think clearly and overwhelming fatigue as symptoms of exposure to fluoridated water.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our generation was part of a great human experiment. It may have had noble intentions based on the faulty hypothesis that &amp;nbsp;drinking fluoridated water prevented cavities. It is now known that any perceived benefits of fluoride are from tooth brushing. &amp;nbsp;Our grandchildren are the third generation in this travesty. I suggest we all DEMAND the AARP stand up for us and our grandchildren by issuing a strong position paper calling for the cessation of water fluoridation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;SCIENCE REFERENCES&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2014 in Toxicology. Effect of water fluoridation on the development of medial vascular calcification in uremic rats. (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;“Optimal levels” worsen kidney function&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561004" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561004&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2015&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;in Neurotoxicology and Teratology. Association of lifetime exposure to fluoride and cognitive functions in Chinese children: A pilot study.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;(&lt;EM&gt;Children with visible dental fluorosis perform&amp;nbsp;less well on memory tasks, correlating with the degree of severity of their fluorosis. One of a series of human and animal studies with the same consistent findings.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25446012" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25446012&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://braindrain.dk/2014/12/mottled-fluoride-debate/" target="_blank"&gt;http://braindrain.dk/2014/12/mottled-fluoride-debate/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2014 in Physiology and Behavior. Fluoride exposure during development affects both cognition and emotion in mice. (&lt;EM&gt;Measurable behavioral changes&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24184405" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24184405&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2014 in International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. A new perspective on metals and other contaminants in fluoridation chemicals. (&lt;EM&gt;All samples of fluoride are&amp;nbsp;contaminated with aluminum, plus other contaminants like arsenic, lead and barium&lt;/EM&gt;);&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999851" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999851&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/sites/default/files/Mullenix%202014-2-2.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/sites/default/files/Mullenix%202014-2-2.pdf&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2014 in Scientific World Journal. Water Fluoridation: A Critical Review of the Physiological Effects of Ingested Fluoride as a Public Health Intervention. (&lt;EM&gt;Health risks and cost don't justify minimal&amp;nbsp;and questionable dental benefit&lt;/EM&gt;.): &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/293019/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/293019/&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;RACIAL INEQUITY (FOIA)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are three Oct 2014 news articles on the content of the Freedom of Information Act documents. Rev. Andrew Young, former UN ambassador has pursued them with the CDC, but to little effect. Civil Rights leaders have been calling for an end to community water fluoridation (CWF) since 2011.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. Black Americans disproportionately harmed:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/19317-feds-blacks-suffer-most-from-fluoride-fluoridate-anyway" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/19317-feds-blacks-suffer-most-from-fluoride-fluoridate-anyway#&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. CDC, ADA and Pew inappropriate relationships:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://benswann.com/do-newly-released-emails-reveal-conflict-of-interest-between-the-cdc-and-the-ada/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://benswann.com/do-newly-released-emails-reveal-conflict-of-interest-between-the-cdc-and-the-ada/&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;3. Kidneys, Civil Rights &amp;amp; Ralph Nader:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2014/10/428383.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2014/10/428383.shtml&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 LEGAL ARGUMENT (GROSS DISPROPORTIONALITY)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a legal initiative in Peel, Ontario (pop 1.3m) to remove fluoride from the water supply based on the principle of gross disproportionality, i.e. marginal benefit does not justify great risk of harm. There is also a political effort afoot in Canadian govt to mandate fluoridation and thereby make the legal argument moot. &lt;STRONG&gt;I suggest this document is well-worth printing. &lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/peel.june2014.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/peel.june2014.pdf&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a. The first 19 pages of this document is about the legal strategy. It includes summary of US legal cases that found water fluoridation harmful to the public, but legal under US "police power" mandate.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;b. Starting on page 20 is a devastating affidavit by Dr. Kathleen Thiessen, NAS/NRC scientist and international expert in risk assessment. Very readable summary of science indicating harm to populations in “optimally” fluoridated communities.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;POPULATION WITH LOW CHEMICAL THRESHOLD&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In excess of 25% of previously healthy Gulf War Veterans have Multiple Chemical Sensitivities, which includes sensitivity to fluoride. See:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/committee_documents/gwiandhealthofgwveterans_rac-gwvireport_2008.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/committee_documents/gwiandhealthofgwveterans_rac-gwvireport_2008.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;EXCERPT&lt;/STRONG&gt;: “It is&amp;nbsp;well established that&amp;nbsp;some people are more vulnerable&amp;nbsp;to adverse effects of certain&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;chemicals than others,&amp;nbsp;due to variability in biological processes that neutralize those chemicals, and clear them from&amp;nbsp;the body.”&amp;nbsp;-&amp;nbsp;Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses 2008&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Affidavit of Dr. Hans Moolenburgh:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/affidavit-moolenburgh.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/affidavit-moolenburgh.pdf&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Except&lt;/STRONG&gt;: “As a summary of our research, we are now convinced that fluoridation of the water supplies causes a low grade intoxication of the whole population, with only the approximately&amp;nbsp;5% most sensitive persons showing acute symptoms.The whole population being subjected to low grade poisoning means that their immune systems are constantly&amp;nbsp;overtaxed. With all the other poisonous influences in our environment, this can hasten health calamities.”&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;PubMed Listed Studies on immune system response:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;a. Fluoride makes allergies worse, rats (1990): &lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1707853" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1707853&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;b. Fluoride makes allergies worse, in vitro&amp;nbsp;(1999): &lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9892783?dopt=Abstract" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9892783&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;c. Immune system of the gut (2010):&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.hindawi.com/journals/iji/2010/823710/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.hindawi.com/journals/iji/2010/823710/&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;d.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ASIA Syndrome, adjuvant impact (2011): &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20708902" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20708902&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;e.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Gene predicts fluoride sensitivity (2015):&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25556215" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25556215&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;f. &amp;nbsp;Brain has an immune system (2015):&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26030524" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26030524&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AARP - STAND UP on our behalf!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2018 22:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1528688#M182</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-26T22:38:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530258#M184</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Fluoridation is an excellent issue for AARP to spearhead. This practice of adding toxic chemicals to raise the fluoride level to prevent tooth decay is NOT safe and is Not even effective!! And for seniors it jut adds more burden on our bodies especially our brains!! Fluoridation has become a political issue when&amp;nbsp; organizations like AARP need to look past the years of propaganda and endorsements and expose the harm out weieghs the supposed benefits! THANK you for opening up this topic ...AARP please take this on!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530258#M184</guid>
      <dc:creator>ri1666</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-06T19:20:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530285#M185</link>
      <description>Yes!! FLUORIDE - I am 61 and my wife is 65. This is an extremely important topic! I am retired with a degree in Environmental Sciences including Biological Chemistry with added studies in Nutrition.&lt;BR /&gt;Seniors are more at risk for all kinds of health complications, because as we ingest Fluoride in the water, foods, and from other sources, it accumulates.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The CDC states that half of the Fluoride we ingest, accumulates in the body!!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since (FLUORIDE) F- is the MOST REACTIVE ION of any other element, it can EASILY REACT with many of the body’s minerals and chemicals.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See what the CDC says...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC - BONES and JOINTS&lt;BR /&gt;“…exposure to higher levels of fluoride may harm your health. Skeletal fluorosis can be caused by eating, drinking or breathing very large amounts of fluorides. This disease only occurs after long term exposures (because Fluoride accumulates with the ongoing daily bone formations of every age group) and can cause denser bones,&lt;BR /&gt;joint pain,&lt;BR /&gt;and a limited range of joint movement.&lt;BR /&gt;…severe cases, the spine completely rigid…”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC&lt;BR /&gt;“…fluoride can result in denser bones…&lt;BR /&gt;...these bones are often&lt;BR /&gt;more brittle&lt;BR /&gt;or fragile&lt;BR /&gt;than normal bone&lt;BR /&gt;and there is an increased risk of older men and women breaking a bone.&lt;BR /&gt;Some studies have also found a higher risk of bone fractures in older men and women at fluoride levels typically found in fluoridated water….”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC&lt;BR /&gt;40% of children suffer “dental fluorosis"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC - TOPICAL ONLY is effective&lt;BR /&gt;The CDC (Center for Disease Control) states that: “(Fluoride’s) actions primarily are topical for both adults and children”.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC - teeth breaking&lt;BR /&gt;“…in severe cases, the teeth are pitted and are fragile, and sometimes the teeth can break.”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CDC – The CDC’s ATSDR warns about consuming large amounts of fluoride in that “…it can cause stomach aches, vomiting, and diarrhea. Extremely large amounts can cause death by affecting your heart.”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I WANT MORE ARTICLES AND SUPPORT from AARP about exposing Fluoride's adverse health affects to the elderly (and young children or infants).</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530285#M185</guid>
      <dc:creator>tt59717964</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-06T19:38:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530832#M187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Extremely important topic from my community and for those of us over 50 as well. &amp;nbsp;If you've ever gone to an orthopedic sturgeon and been told, you have arthritis, bone spurs, thickening and brittleness of the bones, osteosclerosis, then you most likely have damage from too much fluoride. It's called skeletal fluorosis in just about every other county. &amp;nbsp;It is a chronic crippling problem that by that point you are aware of it there isn't much you can do about it but suffer and bear the expense. &amp;nbsp;The mayo clinic did one study associating it with too much black tea, but they've pretty much been told to back off fluoride if they want to advance their careers. &amp;nbsp; the original studies in 1946 by the ADA also clearly demonstrated this problem in the lab rats.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 19:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1530832#M187</guid>
      <dc:creator>pablomck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-07T19:25:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531351#M188</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:07:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531351#M188</guid>
      <dc:creator>lp47633557</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-08T20:07:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531792#M189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If AARP has ever taken on a cuase that could have a great impact on the health of our community .... THIS IS IT!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:23:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1531792#M189</guid>
      <dc:creator>rb98221521</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-09T18:23:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THYROID: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539756#M190</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;“The addition of fluorides to drinking water was, and is, a mistake.” &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;- Dr. Robert Isaacson, 2006 National Research Council Scientist (2007)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ON THYROID&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you see this week's Newsweek article on a nationwide English study?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;People living in fluoridated communities have significantly higher incidences of low thyroid. Over&amp;nbsp;50% more incidence in "optimally" fluoridated communities than in communities with &amp;lt;.3 ppm. &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.newsweek.com/water-fluoridation-may-increase-risk-underactive-thyroid-disorder-309173"&gt;http://www.newsweek.com/water-fluoridation-may-increase-risk-underactive-thyroid-disorder-309173&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's not surprising. There are studies from the early 20th century connecting various thyroid and parathyroid conditions with fluorides in the water and mottled teeth. The 2006 NRC also confirmed that fluoride even at low concentrations disrupts endocrine function, i.e. thyroid hormones. Sadly, gung-ho dentists urged on by business who stood to profit convinced government that&amp;nbsp;fluoride was some sort of magic bullet. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fluoridation is wrecking our health and the health of our grandkids!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Phone and write AARP... tell them to take a stand against water fluoridation, now!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2015 19:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539756#M190</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-08T19:13:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADHD: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539770#M191</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;"The evidence against the safety of this public health policy will keep mounting and never disappear again. My ignorance of fluoride in the beginning was a matter of chance. If you ignore this evidence today, it will be a matter of choice.”&lt;/STRONG&gt; - &lt;EM&gt;Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, Head Toxicologist at Forsyth Dental Center (1999)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ON&amp;nbsp;HYPERACTIVITY&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See TODAY's study published in Environmental Health that correlates ADHD (hyperactivity) in children with fluoridation. This is only the latest in 20 years of studies on animals and humans proving that fluoride in utero or youth not only permanently mottles the teeth of some children, but also permanently scrambles their brains:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2015 Ecologic study:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/14/1/17/abstract"&gt;http://www.ehjournal.net/content/14/1/17/abstract&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1995 Animal study: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/mullenix-1995.pdf"&gt;http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/mullenix-1995.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend&amp;nbsp;this 1996 talk by Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, the author of the 1995 study:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hci7BnWydAo"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hci7BnWydAo&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fluoridation is wrecking our health and the health of our grandkids!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Phone and write AARP... tell them to take a stand against water fluoridation, now!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:04:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1539770#M191</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-27T19:04:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554257#M214</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sometimes, by the time you get to 50 or 60, people seem to think it is time to be in poor health, need a joint replacement, have thyroid dysfunction and diabetes. &amp;nbsp;With all the evidence of Fluoride being an endocrine dysrupter and known to Fluoride deposits in our bones, I imagine if AARP would take a long hard look at this topic, you would have numerous supporters from all walks of life. &amp;nbsp;The young people of the nation are beginning to see the illogical addition of Fluoride to our water supply and are shaking&amp;nbsp;their heads at us older adults wondering why we let this continue for so long.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 01:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554257#M214</guid>
      <dc:creator>kf4601639</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-13T01:55:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554966#M215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Adding additional contaminants to water is not required by law and should be&amp;nbsp;seen as a hindrance in the goal to provide the cleanest most natural water to customers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:30:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1554966#M215</guid>
      <dc:creator>kf4601639</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-31T18:30:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1573728#M229</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your intelligent and educational posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you look on the Periodic Table of Elements, you will see&amp;nbsp;Fluorine, Chlorine and Bromine (a common baking additive) all displace Iodine ~ which is vital to healthy&amp;nbsp;thyroid function. No wonder thyroid malfunction has become&amp;nbsp;rampant! We once added iodine to our table salt to insure adequate levels. Now,&amp;nbsp;that effort has been&amp;nbsp;sabotaged.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And honestly, if fluoride worked in preventing cavities, wouldn't America be cavity-free by now?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2015 03:00:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1573728#M229</guid>
      <dc:creator>dd67136683</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-17T03:00:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1574706#M230</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;From:&lt;EM&gt; &lt;A href="http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/erin-brockovich-and-signers-put-health-agencies-notice-april-2015" target="_self"&gt;Moms Against Fluoridation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="row"&gt;&lt;DIV class="sixteen columns"&gt;&lt;DIV class="page_heading"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;Erin Brockovich and signers put the Health agencies on notice: April, 2015&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="row"&gt;&lt;DIV class="sixteen columns "&gt;&lt;DIV class="region region-content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="block block-system"&gt;&lt;DIV class="content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="node node-news-headline node-promoted node-news-headline node-promoted clearfix"&gt;&lt;DIV class="content"&gt;&lt;DIV class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"&gt;&lt;DIV class="field-items"&gt;&lt;DIV class="field-item even"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Erin Brockovich has just put the government on big notice of their shortcomings in interpreting science and protecting the&amp;nbsp;health of American citizens.&amp;nbsp; Please take time to read this document about fluoridation.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;This is one of the very the best documents/ letters we have seen.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The references are great; the critical thinking is excellent, and the range and depth she covers are compelling. &amp;nbsp;&lt;U&gt;And, it has some 'teeth&lt;/U&gt;'.&amp;nbsp; Just read the first 2 pages if you are short on time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://momsagainstfluoridation.org/sites/default/files/pdf-documents/Brockovich-Letter-to-US-Natl-Acad-Science-Inst-Medicine.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Read Letter&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I suggest the Signature page (p 16) and the Questions attachment&amp;nbsp;(last page) provide the best summary of this 24 page document, but go ahead, read the whole thing. It's worth your time! &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 22:26:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1574706#M230</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-19T22:26:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1580164#M235</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;“&lt;STRONG&gt;Industry has learned that debating the science is much easier and more effective than debating the policy. In field after field, year after year, conclusions that might support regulation are always disputed. Animal data are deemed not relevant, human data not representative, and exposure data not reliable.&lt;/STRONG&gt;” &lt;EM&gt;- David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, in “Doubt Is Their Product” (2008)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Prof. Rita Barnett-Rose of Chapman University includes a nice mix of science and law in her 2014 legal analysis of the U.S. fluoridation policy. She concludes, "&lt;EM&gt;The evidence continues to suggest that compulsory water fluoridation is no longer justifiable as a public health benefit.... &lt;STRONG&gt;the cessatio&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;n of all compulsory water fluoridation schemes should be the goal of all public health agencies, ethical lawmakers, and informed citizens.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See: &lt;A href="http://works.bepress.com/rita_barnett/3/" target="_blank"&gt;http://works.bepress.com/rita_barnett/3/&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phone, email or write the AARP directly. Tell them they need to step up and write a position statement opposing fluoridation, for the sake of the elderly, those in&amp;nbsp;fragile health, pregnant women and their fetuses, and the very young.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 15:27:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1580164#M235</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-01T15:27:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1588061#M236</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"When a statistical analysis of 1,000 children was conducted in London, and results were not as fluoridation proponents wanted, the study was quickly abandoned.&lt;/STRONG&gt;" &lt;EM&gt;- Dr. Malcolm Naylor, 1987 winner of Tomes Medal for imminence in dental research&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;Cochrane is the international gold standard panel for public health review. They found &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;bias rather than benefit&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; in their review of the dental studies. Moreover, like every large independent review of the dental science, the Cochrane panel finds that the evidence of dental benefit is poor quality, highly suspect, and does &lt;EM&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; support the rationale that fluoridation&amp;nbsp;benefits the poor. In the meantime, the scientific and legal arguments&amp;nbsp;against fluoridation as harmful to health mount.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 Cochrane review of dental studies&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cochrane.org/CD010856/ORAL_water-fluoridation-to-prevent-tooth-decay" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cochrane.org/CD010856/ORAL_water-fluoridation-to-prevent-tooth-decay&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 Newsweek article on Cochrane review&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.newsweek.com/fluoridation-may-not-prevent-cavities-huge-study-shows-348251" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.newsweek.com/fluoridation-may-not-prevent-cavities-huge-study-shows-348251&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2015 Opposition&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.earthclinic.com/news/why-the-us-should-ban-fluoride-in-drinking-water-by-jason-uttley.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.earthclinic.com/news/why-the-us-should-ban-fluoride-in-drinking-water-by-jason-uttley.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Write the AARP and your local newspaper!&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;Tell them that Cochrane confirms the dentists are lying and that you side with consumer adovcate Erin Brockovich, Civil Rights leaders, and &lt;SPAN&gt;21st century researchers like the&amp;nbsp;Harvard team of neuroscientists&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;in opposing fluoridation as a Human Rights violation!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1588061#M236</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-02T18:55:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596602#M238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;I&gt;"&lt;/I&gt;Fluoride is an enzyme poison, in the same class as cyanide, oxalate, or azide ... it is capable of a very wide variety of harmful effects, even at low doses. It is a scientific disgrace that a well organized lobby of the American Dental Association ever managed to stampede American legislators into ignoring the highly technical but very cogent objection to fluoridation."&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;I&gt;- James B. Patrick, Ph.D., antibiotics research scientist at National Institute of Health&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Latest study on fluoride concerns its capacity to cause &lt;STRONG&gt;INFLAMMATIONS&lt;/STRONG&gt; even at very small exposure level, such as that from water fluoridation. I especially like this key finding, "&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Long-term exposure to fluoride may affect activities of many enzymes&lt;/EM&gt;."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we really want a drug that interferes with the normal functioning of our enzymes, as well as causing or worsening inflammations to be an ubiquitous contaminant in our water and food? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2015 in Toxicology in Vitro. Fluoride as a factor initiating and potentiating inflammation in THP1 differentiated monocytes/macrophages&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233315001605" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233315001605&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Baby Boomers - this is your life and the lives of your children, grandchildren, and g-grandchildren at risk. &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DO SOMETHING&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Contact the AARP, your politicians, the White House.... &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;tell them to get the F* out of our water&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;.... Municipalities can use the financial savings to replace ineffective and dangerous chloramine which also kills enzymes and causes disease with a more effective and safe disinfectant alternative. And you can use the better quality of life and lower doctors bills to enjoy life.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:44:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596602#M238</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T14:44:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596607#M239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For those who like visuals, this 1955 film shows what happens to &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;enzymes&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; in human blood with fluoride concentrations consistent with drinking a glass of "optimally" fluoridated water.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32op3srFDk8" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32op3srFDk8&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This enzyme death in the blood explains why some of us experience&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Chizzola maculae&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;, a distinctive bruise like hive that affects a minority of women and children in the early stages of fluoride poisoning. It's an abnormal blood coagulation and the destruction of blood vessels, an autoimmune reaction.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="page"&gt;&lt;DIV class="section"&gt;&lt;DIV class="layoutArea"&gt;&lt;DIV class="column"&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1978 Major Fluoride Symptoms:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/flier_waldbott_symptoms_ftgd.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://fluorideinformationaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/flier_waldbott_symptoms_ftgd.pdf&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1977 Blood Clotting in Patients with Chizzola Maculae. Fluoride. vol.10:1. p 29-33. http://&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.fluorideresearch.org/101/files/FJ1977_v10_n1_p001-044.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;www.fluorideresearch.org/101/files/FJ1977_v10_n1_p001-044.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:45:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596607#M239</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T14:45:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596637#M240</link>
      <description>First, eating and drinking fluoride ion has no effect whatsoever on dental caries, as published in detailed studies by Zigelbecker, and also by Sutton, and by Teotia and Teotia, and also by Yamouyiannis. The fluoride concentration in saliva that bathes teeth topically (at 0.016 ppm, NRC, 2006) is 75,000 times less than that in toothpaste. Second, systemic fluoride dissolves in the blood and throughout all tissues at 0.2 ppm from regular consumption of treated drinking water. The ion accumulates lifelong permanently into bone causing the formation of new bone of poor quality. We now have 1/3 million U.S. elderly who suffer from broken hips which usually is lethal due to pneumonia that ensues while waiting for fluoridated bone to heal. Cruel experiments in dogs indicate that broken bones heal far more slowly when animals are given fluoridated water. Finally, adding fluoride into drinking water is illegal. No EPA regulated water contaminant, including fluoride, can be discharged into public drinking water intentionally without an NPDES permit from the EPA, as stipulated by the Clean Water Act. And the Safe Drinking Water Act prohibits the requirement of any substance added into water other than to sanitize the water. The EPA Office of Water argues that, as a substance that is being used to treat humans, the FDA is responsible for regulating fluoridation. The FDA argues that, as a pollutant being added intentionally into water, the EPA is in charge of its regulation. The HHS recommended that fluoride levels not exceed 0l7 ppm but refuses to accept liability for its use, in particular to avoid litigation over the easily proven increase in unwanted unsightly abnormal dental enamel hypoplasia dental fluorosis that plagues 42% of U.S. teens as a result of water "fluoridation." Please get involved and halt this absurd experiment from being continued.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:48:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596637#M240</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs5526</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T16:48:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596648#M241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great idea!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm starting a coalition in NYC Against Artificial Fluoridation - Fluoride in not a nutrient, we shoudn't be exposing ourselves to neurotoxins by drinking the toxic waste product of the fertilizer industry. Please email nyc.caaf@gmail.com for more information.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596648#M241</guid>
      <dc:creator>sn4302</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T17:22:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596650#M242</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a really great article: please help get this neurotoxin out of our water, and our food.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am starting a coalition against artificial fluoridation in NYC - please email nyc.caaf@gmail.com if you are interested in helping getting the word out - this stuff is toxic, not a nutrient, not safe and we shouldn't be drinking it!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:26:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1596650#M242</guid>
      <dc:creator>sn4302</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-13T17:26:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fluoride - Demand AARP Take Action</title>
      <link>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1598286#M245</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dr. Richard Sauerheber who added a post in this thread is a chemist, college professor and researcher who has published some excellent work on the toxicity of industrial fluoride in drinking water. As a result of his research, he has written letters opposing fluoridation to the FDA and other regulatory agencies, urging they take action, i.e. actually consider science to regulate the industries in order protect the health of the public:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2013 Publication:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3690253/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3690253/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2010-2011 Letters: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/ask-dr-sauerheber" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/ask-dr-sauerheber&lt;/A&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, doctor!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;“When industry and government agree, people suffer.”&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;EM&gt;- Proverb&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 13:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.aarp.org/t5/Brain-Health/Fluoride-Demand-AARP-Take-Action/m-p/1598286#M245</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarryAnne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-18T13:11:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

